2510001957
  • Open Access
  • Article

The Compensation Effect of Mortality: A Global Analysis of Human Populations

  • Natalia S. Gavrilova *,   
  • Leonid A. Gavrilov

Received: 15 Jul 2025 | Revised: 16 Sep 2025 | Accepted: 28 Oct 2025 | Published: 03 Nov 2025

Abstract

The compensation effect of mortality (CEM) refers to the convergence of mortality rates at advanced ages across different human populations. This phenomenon occurs when higher values of the Gompertz slope parameter α (actuarial aging rate) are offset (compensated) by lower values of the intercept parameter R (initial mortality rate). The age at which this convergence occurs is known as the species-specific lifespan (SSLS). The primary aim of this study is to estimate SSLS in contemporary human populations of different world regions using both parametric and nonparametric approaches. We analyzed United Nations period abridged life tables for 251 countries and regions, spanning the period from 1980 to 2020. Both parametric and nonparametric methods of SSLS estimation produced comparable results. For industrialized countries with high-quality vital statistics, SSLS estimates ranged from 95 to 100 years—consistent with estimates made more than three decades ago. This suggests that the convergence point of CEM has remained stable over time, despite substantial declines in mortality at younger ages. High SSLS estimates were also observed in regions of Eastern and South-Eastern Asia. In contrast, other world regions showed lower SSLS values, ranging from 75 to 90 years. Due to the CEM, efforts to extend lifespan are typically accompanied by a paradoxical increase in the actuarial aging rate (Gompertz slope), making significant extensions of life expectancy at older ages challenging. The CEM thus remains a key constraint to radical life extension in humans. Importantly, the compensation effect of mortality appears to be a general regularity, observed consistently across world populations examined.

References 

  • 1.
    Gavrilov, L.A.; Gavrilova, N.S. The Biology of Life Span: A Quantitative Approach; Harwood Academic Publisher: New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  • 2.
    Strehler, B.L.; Mildvan, A.S. General theory of mortality and aging. Science 1960, 132, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.132.3418.14.
  • 3.
    Dolejs, J. The Strehler-Mildvan correlation as a valuable tool for monitoring the long-term health status of a population. Front. Public Health 2025, 13, 1627111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.
  • 4.
    Yashin, A.I.; Begun, A.S.; Boiko, S.I.; et al. New age patterns of survival improvement in Sweden: Do they characterize changes in individual aging? Mech. Ageing Dev. 2002, 123, 637–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-6374(01)00410-9.
  • 5.
    Gavrilov, L.A.; Gavrilova, N.S.; Iaguzhinskii, L.S. Basic patterns of aging and death in animals from the standpoint of reliability theory. Zhurnal Obs. Biol. 1978, 39, 734–742.
  • 6.
    Gavrilov, L.A.; Gavrilova, N.S. Exploring Patterns of Human Mortality and Aging: A Reliability Theory Viewpoint. Biochemistry 2024, 89, 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0006297924020123.
  • 7.
    Golubev, A. A 2D analysis of correlations between the parameters of the Gompertz-Makeham model (or law?) of relationships between aging, mortality, and longevity. Biogerontology 2019, 20, 799–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-019-09828-z.
  • 8.
    Shen, J.; Landis, G.N.; Tower, J. Multiple Metazoan Life-span Interventions Exhibit a Sex-specific Strehler-Mildvan Inverse Relationship Between Initial Mortality Rate and Age-dependent Mortality Rate Acceleration. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biomed. Sci. Med. Sci. 2017, 72, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glw005.
  • 9.
    Gavrilova, N.S.; Gavrilov, L.A. Compensation effect of mortality is a challenge to substantial lifespan extension of humans. Biogerontology 2024, 25, 851–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-024-10111-z.
  • 10.
    Milevsky, M.A. Calibrating Gompertz in reverse: What is your longevity-risk-adjusted global age? Insur. Math. Econ. 2020, 92, 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.03.009.
  • 11.
    Burger, O.; Missov, T.I. Evolutionary theory of ageing and the problem of correlated Gompertz parameters. J. Theor. Biol. 2016, 408, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.08.002.
  • 12.
    Li, T.; Anderson, J.J. The Strehler-Mildvan correlation from the perspective of a two-process vitality model. Popul. Stud. 2015, 69, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2014.992358.
  • 13.
    Hawkes, K.; Smith, K.R.; Blevins, J.K. Human actuarial aging increases faster when background death rates are lower: A consequence of differential heterogeneity? Evolution 2012, 66, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01414.x.
  • 14.
    Golubev, A. Does Makeham make sense? Biogerontology 2004, 5, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOG.0000031153.63563.58.
  • 15.
    Hallen, A. Makeham’s addition to the Gompertz law re-evaluated. Biogerontology 2009, 10, 517–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-008-9184-0.
  • 16.
    Gavrilov, L.A.; Gavrilova, N.S. Trends in Human Species-Specific Lifespan and Actuarial Aging Rate. Biochemistry 2022, 87, 1998–2011. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297922120173.
  • 17.
    Polinesi, G.; Recchioni, M.C.; Sysoev, A.; et al. Longevity-Risk-Adjusted Global Age Indicators in Russia and Italy. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Control Systems, Mathematical Modeling, Automation and Energy Efficiency (SUMMA), Lipetsk, Russian Federation, 10–12 November 2021; pp. 434–439. https://doi.org/10.1109/SUMMA53307.2021.9632068.
  • 18.
    United Nations. World Population Prospects 2019, Online Edition. United Nations; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2019.
  • 19.
    Guillot, M.; Gavrilova, N.; Pudrovska, T. Understanding the “Russian mortality paradox” in Central Asia: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan. Demography 2011, 48, 1081–1104. https://doi.org/10.07/s13524-011-0036-1.
  • 20.
    Guillot, M.; Lim, S.; Torgasheva, L.; et al. Infant mortality in Kyrgyzstan before and after the break-up of the Soviet Union. Popul. Stud. 2013, 67, 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2013.835859.
  • 21.
    Bongaarts, J. Long-range trends in adult mortality: Models and projection methods. Demography 2005, 42, 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0003.
  • 22.
    Bongaarts, J.; Feeney, G. How long do we live? Popul. Dev. Rev. 2002, 28, 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00013.x.
  • 23.
    Gurven, M.; Kaplan, H. Longevity among hunter-gatherers: A cross-cultural examination. Popul. Dev. Rev. 2007, 33, 321–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00171.x.
  • 24.
    Gavrilova, N.S.; Gavrilov, L.A. Protective Effects of Familial Longevity Decrease with Age and Become Negligible for Centenarians. J. Gerontol. Ser. A 2022, 77, 736–743.. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab380.
  • 25.
    Chetty, R.; Stepner, M.; Abraham, S.; et al. The Association Between Income and Life Expectancy in the United States, 2001–2014. JAMA 2016, 315, 1750–1766. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.4226.
  • 26.
    Fenelon, A. An examination of black/white differences in the rate of age-related mortality increase. Demogr. Res. 2013, 29, 441–471. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.17.
  • 27.
    Thornton, R. The Navajo-US population mortality crossover since the mid-20th century. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 2004, 23, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:popu.0000034094.47041.52.
  • 28.
    Vogt, T.C.; Missov, T.I. Estimating the contribution of mortality selection to the East-West German mortality convergence. Popul. Health Metr. 2017, 15, 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-017-0151-3.
  • 29.
    Gavrilov, L.A.; Gavrilova, N.S. New trend in old-age mortality: Gompertzialization of mortality trajectory. Gerontology 2019, 65, 451–457. https://doi.org/10.1159/000500141.
  • 30.
    Tarkhov, A.E.; Menshikov, L.I.; Fedichev, P.O. Strehler-Mildvan correlation is a degenerate manifold of Gompertz fit. J. Theor. Biol. 2017, 416, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.017.
  • 31.
    Promislow, D.; Tatar, M.; Pletcher, S.; et al. Below-threshold mortality: Implications for studies in evolution, ecology and demography. J. Evol. Biol. 1999, 12, 314–328. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00037.x.
  • 32.
    Gavrilov, L.A.; Gavrilova, N.S. Reliability Theory of Aging and Longevity. In Handbook of the Biology of Aging, 6th ed.; Masoro, E.J., Austad, S.N., (Eds.); Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2006; pp. 3–42.
  • 33.
    Man, E.H.; Sandhouse, M.E.; Burg, J.; et al. Accumulation of D-aspartic acid with age in the human brain. Science 1983, 220, 1407–1408. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6857259.
  • 34.
    Gavrilov, L.A.; Gavrilova, N.S. The reliability theory of aging and longevity. J. Theor. Biol. 2001, 213, 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2001.2430.
  • 35.
    Buetow, D.E. Cellular Content and Cellular Proliferation Changes in the Tissues and Organs of the Aging Mammal. In Cellular and Molecular Renewal in the Mammalian Body; Cameron, I.L., Thrasher, J.D., (Eds.); Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1971; pp. 87–107.
  • 36.
    Holland, D.; Desikan, R.S.; Dale, A.M.; et al. Rates of decline in Alzheimer disease decrease with age. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42325. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042325.
  • 37.
    Whittemore, K.; Vera, E.; Martinez-Nevado, E.; et al. Telomere shortening rate predicts species life span. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 15122–15127. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1902452116.
  • 38.
    Golubev, A.; Panchenko, A.; Anisimov, V. Applying parametric models to survival data: Tradeoffs between statistical significance, biological plausibility, and common sense. Biogerontology 2018, 19, 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-018-9759-3.
Share this article:
How to Cite
Gavrilova, N. S.; Gavrilov, L. A. The Compensation Effect of Mortality: A Global Analysis of Human Populations. Ageing and Longevity Research 2025, 1 (1), 4.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.