Removal of Typical Organic Pollutants in Biologically Treated Coking Wastewater by Ionizing Irradiation

Shizong Wang; Jianlong Wang; Hai Chen

doi:10.53941/emt.2026.100012

Abstract

Coking wastewater contains a variety of refractory organic pollutants, and among which phenolic compounds often persist in the effluent even after biological treatment, posing potential environmental risks. In this study, ionizing irradiation was used as an advanced treatment technology for the removal of phenolic pollutants from biologically treated coking wastewater. Based on GC-MS analysis of distilled ammonia wastewater and biologically treated effluent, 2,4-dimethylphenol (2,4-DP) was selected as a representative target compound to evaluate the degradation performance and mechanism. The results confirmed that phenolic compounds remained in the biologically treated effluent, while the abundance of alkanes increased compared to that in distilled ammonia wastewater. Ionizing irradiation effectively removed 2,4-DP, and its mineralization increased with increasing absorbed dose. Quenching experiments revealed that hydroxyl radicals (•OH) played the dominant role in degradation, whereas hydrated electrons and hydrogen radicals contributed less. The addition of H₂O₂ enhanced mineralization by increasing the •OH concentration, and the highest removal efficiency was observed at pH 6. The effects of inorganic anions were concentration-dependent. Chloride ions promoted degradation at low concentrations but inhibited removal at high concentrations, while sulfate ions had little influence on pollutant removal but suppressed mineralization at 10 g/L. Application to actual biologically treated coking wastewater demonstrated efficient removal of phenolic pollutants (phenol and 2,4-DP). Under optimal conditions (5 kGy with 0.5 mM H₂O₂), the effluent COD decreased to 78 ± 4 mg/L, meeting the Chinese discharge standard for the coking chemical industry (GB16171-2012). These results demonstrate the potential of ionizing irradiation as an effective advanced treatment technology for coking wastewater.

References

1.
Shen, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, H. Outlook of energy storage via large-scale entrained-flow coal gasification. Engineering 2023, 29, 50–54.
2.
Shi, J.; Xu, C.; Han, Y.; et al. Case study on wastewater treatment technology of coal chemical industry in China. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 51, 1003–1044.
3.
Ma, W.; Zhang, X.; Han, H.; et al. Overview of enhancing biological treatment of coal chemical wastewater: New strategies and future directions. J. Environ. Sci. 2024, 135, 506–520.
4.
Na, C.; Zhang, Y.; Quan, X.; et al. Evaluation of the detoxification efficiencies of coking wastewater treated by combined anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A²O) and advanced oxidation process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 338, 186–193.
5.
Ren, Z.; Ma, J.; Ding, P.; et al. Autotrophic denitrification in coking wastewater treatment systems: Comprehensive comparative study of full-scale systems in China. Bioresour. Technol. 2025, 427, 132442.
6.
Shi, J.; Huang, W.; Han, H.; et al. Review on treatment technology of salt wastewater in coal chemical industry of China. Desalination 2020, 493, 114640.
7.
Nidheesh, P.V.; Couras, C.; Karim, A.V.; et al. A review of integrated advanced oxidation processes and biological processes for organic pollutant removal. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2022, 209, 390–432.
8.
Shu, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, J.; et al. Treatment of high salinity wastewater by Chryseobacterium sp. coupled to ionizing irradiation technology. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2025, 112321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112321.
9.
Shamshad, J.; Rehman, R.U. Innovative approaches to sustainable wastewater treatment: A comprehensive exploration of conventional and emerging technologies. Environ. Sci. Adv. 2025, 4, 189–222.
10.
Zhang, Q.; Zheng, D.; Bai, B.; et al. Insight into antibiotic removal by advanced oxidation processes (AOPs): Performance, mechanism, degradation pathways, and ecotoxicity assessment. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 500, 157134.
11.
Wang, S.; Wang, J. Generation, Detection and Regulation Strategies of Reactive Species in Persulfate Activation Systems. Environ. Microb. Technol. 2026, 1, 8.
12.
Vatanpour, V.; Rezania, H.; Al-Shaeli, M.; et al. Advances in self-cleaning membranes for effective water and wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 373, 133539.
13.
Zhang, F.; Sui, M. Progress of persulfate-based advanced oxidation process (PS-AOPs) coupled with ultrafiltration membrane to alleviate membrane fouling: A review. Environ. Eng. Res. 2025, 30, 240244.
14.
Wang, S.; Wang, J. Electron beam technology coupled to Fenton oxidation for advanced treatment of dyeing wastewater: From laboratory to full application. ACS EST Water 2022, 2, 852–862.
15.
Mahmood, Z.; Garg, S.; Yuan, Y.; et al. Performance evaluation and optimization of a suspension-type reactor for use in heterogeneous catalytic ozonation. Water Res. 2024, 254, 121410.
16.
Chu, L.; Wang, J. Degradation of antibiotics in activated sludge by ionizing radiation: Effect of adsorption affinity of antibiotics. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 468, 143821.
17.
Chmielewski, A.G.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; et al. Emerging electron beam technology targeting hazardous micropollutants as quaternary treatment in wastewater treatment plants. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5963.
18.
Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Chen, C.; et al. Treatment of hospital wastewater by electron beam technology: Removal of COD, pathogenic bacteria and viruses. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136265.
19.
Zhang, W.; Wei, C.; Yan, B.; et al. Identification and removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in wastewater treatment processes from coke production plants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 6418–6432.
20.
Ahmaruzzaman, M.; Mishra, S.R.; Gadore, V.; et al. Phenolic compounds in water: From toxicity and source to sustainable solutions–An integrated review of removal methods, advanced technologies, cost analysis, and future prospects. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112964.
21.
Cheng, L.; Chen, X.; Gu, J.; et al. Ru-Loaded Nanosheet ZSM-5 for Bisphenol A Hydrodeoxygenation to Bicyclic Alkanes with Coke Resistance and Insights into the Ru-RuO₂ Hydrogenation Mechanism. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 36, e17448.
22.
Shu, R.; Li, R.; Lin, B.; et al. A review on the catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived phenolic compounds and the conversion of raw lignin to hydrocarbon liquid fuels. Biomass Bioenergy 2020, 132, 105432.
23.
Wang, S.; Hu, J.; He, S.; et al. Removal of ammonia and phenol from saline chemical wastewater by ionizing radiation: Performance, mechanism and toxicity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 433, 128727.
24.
Cheng, F.; Wang, J. Regulating hydroxyl radicals (•OH) and hydrated electron (eaq) for enhanced radiolytic degradation of 4-nitrophenol by addition of H2O2. ACS EST Water 2024, 4, 5077–5088.
25.
Buxton, G.V.; Greenstock, C.L.; Phillips Helman, W.; et al. Critical review of rate constants for reacitons of hydrated electrons. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1988, 17. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555805.
26.
Robinson-Duggon, J.; Mariño-Ocampo, N.; Barrias, P.; et al. Mechanism of visible-light photooxidative demethylation of toluidine blue O. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 4863–4872.
27.
Qin, W.; Guo, K.; Chen, C.; et al. Differences in the reaction mechanisms of chlorine atom and hydroxyl radical with organic compounds: From thermodynamics to kinetics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 17886–17897.
28.
Wang, J.; Wang, S. Effect of inorganic anions on the performance of advanced oxidation processes for degradation of organic contaminants. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 411, 128392.
29.
Li, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; et al. New advances in fluorescence excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for the characterization of dissolved organic matter in drinking water treatment: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122676.

Scilight Press

Author Information

Abstract

Keywords

References

About Scilight

Journals

Publishing Policies

Contact Us