IJAMM/
Articles/
2504000076
  • Open Access
  • Article
Research and Analysis on Motion Planning Method of Intelligent Network Connected Vehicles
  • Heng Wang 1, 2,   
  • XianYi Yang 1, 2,   
  • Zhengbai Liu 3,   
  • Zhenfeng Wang 1, 2, *

Received: 23 Sep 2022 | Accepted: 21 Nov 2022 | Published: 18 Dec 2022

Abstract

Combined with the tire model, a two-degree-of-freedom model is proposed in this study. At the same time, a turning control model is analyzed, which lays the foundation for the subsequent local path planning, that is, the simulation control of lane changing and obstacle avoidance. The co-simulation of CarSim and Simulink is used to realize the tracking control of trajectories, and the given reference trajectory can be tracked with high precision in the serpentine rod penetration test, so as to verify the stability of the control algorithm control. A set of optimal trajectories of straight lane change and curved lane change are selected as the reference trajectories of the controller, and the target speed of the lane change is given in the CarSim speed control module. The simulation results show that the motion planning error is extremely small that completes the high-precision automatic control of steering, and this helps realize the tracking of a given trajectory, reflecting the good trackability of the planned lane-changing trajectory from the side. Aiming at the automatic lane changing process of the intelligent connected vehicle on different straight roads and curved roads, the V2V method is used to obtain the status information of the surrounding traffic vehicles where the multi-objective optimization method is used to determine the optimal trajectory. Driving with reference to the trajectory realizes the coordination and unity of planning and control.

References 

  • 1.
    Zyner A. ; Worrall S. ; Nebot E . A recurrent neural network solution for predicting driver intention at unsignalized intersections. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2018, 3(3): 1759-1764.
  • 2.
    Jing S.C. ; Hui F. ; Zhao X.M. ; et al . Cooperative game approach to optimal merging sequence and on-ramp merging control of connected and automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 20(11): 4234-4244.
  • 3.
    Ito Y. ; Kamal M .A.S.; Yoshimura T.; et al. Coordination of connected vehicles on merging roads using pseudo-perturbation-based broadcast control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 20(9): 3496-3512.
  • 4.
    van Nunen E. ; Reinders J. ; Semsar-Kazerooni E. ; et al . String stable model predictive cooperative adaptive cruise control for heterogeneous platoons. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2019, 4(2): 186-196.
  • 5.
    Noh S . Decision-making framework for autonomous driving at road intersections: safeguarding against collision, overly conservative behavior, and violation vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2019, 66(4): 3275-3286.
  • 6.
    Bichiou Y. ; Rakha H .A. Developing an optimal intersection control system for automated connected vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2019, 20(5): 1908-1916.
  • 7.
    Nilsson J. ; Brännström M. ; Fredriksson J. ; et al . Longitudinal and lateral control for automated yielding maneuvers. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, 17(5): 1404-1414.
  • 8.
    Ding J .S.Y.; Li L.; Peng H.; et al. A rule-based cooperative merging strategy for connected and automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 21(8): 3436-3446.
  • 9.
    Debada G.G. ; Gillet D . Virtual vehicle-based cooperative maneuver planning for connected automated vehicles at single-lane roundabouts. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2018, 10(4): 35-46.
  • 10.
    Hubmann C. ; Schulz J. ; Becker M. ; et al . Automated driving in uncertain environments: planning with interaction and uncertain maneuver prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2018, 3(1): 5-17.
  • 11.
    Amezquita-Semprun K. ; Pradeep Y.C. ; Chen P .C.Y.; et al. Experimental evaluation of the stimuli-induced equilibrium point concept for automatic ramp merging systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 21(2): 815-827.
  • 12.
    Xu H.L. ; Feng S. ; Zhang Y. ; et al . A grouping-based cooperative driving strategy for CAVs merging problems. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2019, 68(6): 6125-6136.
  • 13.
    de Campos G.R. ; Rossa F.D. ; Colombo A . Safety verification methods for human-driven vehicles at traffic intersections: optimal driver-adaptive supervisory control. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 2018, 48(1): 72-84.
  • 14.
    Pei H.X. ; Feng S. ; Zhang Y. ; et al . A cooperative driving strategy for merging at on-ramps based on dynamic programming. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2019, 68(12): 11646-11656.
  • 15.
    Mercy T. ; van Parys R. ; Pipeleers G . Spline-based motion planning for autonomous guided vehicles in a dynamic environment. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2018, 26(6): 2182-2189.
  • 16.
    Xu T. ; Wen C.L. ; Zhao L. ; et al . The hybrid model for lane-changing detection at freeway off-ramps using naturalistic driving trajectories. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 103716-103726.
Share this article:
Download PDF
DOI
10.53941/ijamm0101004
Issue
Volume 1, Issue 1
How to Cite
Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Z. Research and Analysis on Motion Planning Method of Intelligent Network Connected Vehicles. International Journal of Automotive Manufacturing and Materials 2022, 1 (1), 4. https://doi.org/10.53941/ijamm0101004.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2022 by the authors.