JCMDE/
Articles/
2601002957
  • Open Access
  • Mini Review

The Planetary Health Diet: A Review of the Highlights of the EAT-Lancet Commission 2019 and 2025 Reports

  • Evangelia Damigou

Received: 17 Dec 2025 | Revised: 26 Jan 2026 | Accepted: 29 Jan 2026 | Published: 09 Feb 2026

Abstract

The Planetary Health Diet (PHD) as defined by the EAT-Lancet Commission in 2019, has garnered the interest of health professionals, and especially dietitians. The purpose of this review was to compare the PHD as assessed in the 2025 compared to the 2019 report of the EAT-Lancet Commission. Contrary to the common misinterpretation that the PHD is solely an “environment-first” diet, the PHD was defined as the result of modeling a nutritionally adequate pattern that was constrained to stay within predefined planetary boundaries. This is particularly important in our current era, due to the food system being a major driver of environmental damage, while also being highly vulnerable to the climate effects it creates. Moreover, the PHD is associated with decreased all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease risk and type two diabetes risk. However, this diet has received criticism for being nutritionally inadequate, not affordable and not culturally inclusive. Based on the 2025 report, the PHD was (re)defined as a flexitarian diet that does not eliminate, but drastically reduces animal source foods to 2 servings/day (1 dairy and 1 non-dairy food product). Furthermore, emphasis was given to implementation and justice, highlighting that this pattern should be culturally adaptable, accessible, and affordable. However, some implementation barriers and policy gaps still exist. In conclusion, the PHD is a prime tool that can be used as a starting point to advocate for more sustainable choices for the general population, while for individualized guidance more research is warranted. 

References 

  • 1.

    Gussow, J.D.; Clancy, K.L. Dietary guidelines for sustainability. J. Nutr. Educ. 1986, 18, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3182(86)80255-2.

  • 2.

    Barilla Foundation 2019. Available online: https://www.barillagroup.com/en/who-we-are/barilla-foundation/ (accessed on 9 April 2024).

  • 3.

    EFAD Position Paper on Sustainable Dietary Patterns. Komp Nutr. Diet. 2021, 1, 118–119. https://doi.org/10.1159/000519851.

  • 4.

    World Health Organization. Sustainable Healthy Diets: Guiding Principles. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789241516648 (accessed on 17 April 2024).

  • 5.

    Willett, W.; Rockström, J.; Loken, B.; et al. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 2019, 393, 447–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4.

  • 6.

    Beal, T.; Ortenzi, F.; Fanzo, J. Estimated micronutrient shortfalls of the EAT–Lancet planetary health diet. Lancet Planet. Health 2023, 7, e233–e237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00006-2.

  • 7.

    Beal, T.; Gardner, C.D.; Herrero, M.; et al. Friend or Foe? The Role of Animal-Source Foods in Healthy and Environmentally Sustainable Diets. J. Nutr. 2023, 153, 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.10.016.

  • 8.

    Beal, T. Environmentally protective diets may come with trade-offs for micronutrient adequacy. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2024, 119, 872–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.01.028.

  • 9.

    Rockström, J.; Thilsted, S.H.; Willett, W.C.; et al. The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy, sustainable, and just food systems. Lancet 2025, 406, 1625–1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01201-2.

  • 10.

    Johnston, J.L.; Fanzo, J.C.; Cogill, B. Understanding sustainable diets: A descriptive analysis of the determinants and processes that influence diets and their impact on health, food security, and environmental sustainability. Adv. Nutr. 2014, 5, 418–429. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.113.005553.

  • 11.

    Steffen, W. Introducing the Anthropocene: The human epoch. Ambio 2021, 50, 1784–1787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01489-4.

  • 12.

    Crutzen, P.J.; Stoermer, E.F. The ‘Anthropocene’ (2000). In Paul, J. Crutzen and the Anthropocene: A New Epoch in Earth’s History; Benner, S., Lax, G., Crutzen, P.J., et al., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 19–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82202-6_2.

  • 13.

    Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockström, J.; et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 2015, 347, 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.

  • 14.

    Rockström, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461, 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.

  • 15.

    Mekonnen, M.M.; Hoekstra, A.Y. A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products. Ecosystems 2012, 15, 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8.

  • 16.

    Marvinney, E.; Ro, J.W.; Kendall, A. Trade-Offs in Net Life Cycle Energy Balance and Water Consumption in California Almond Orchards. Energies 2020, 13, 3195. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123195.

  • 17.

    Selvamani, Y.; Elgar, F. Food insecurity and its association with health and well-being in middle-aged and older adults in India. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2023, 77, 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219721.

  • 18.

    FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; et al. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023: Urbanization, Agrifood Systems Transformation and Healthy Diets Across the Rural–Urban Continuum; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3017en.

  • 19.

    Serra-Majem, L.; Tomaino, L.; Dernini, S.; et al. Updating the Mediterranean Diet Pyramid towards Sustainability: Focus on Environmental Concerns. Int. J. Env. Res. Public. Health 2020, 17, 8758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17238758.

  • 20.

    World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. WCRF/AICR—Third Expert Report—… Health Open Research 2018. Available online: https://healthopenresearch.org/documents/3-30 (accessed on 17 December 2025).

  • 21.

    Münzel, T.; Lüscher, T.; Kramer, C.M.; et al. Environmental Stressors and Cardiovascular Health: Acting Locally for Global Impact in a Changing World. JACC accepted 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2026.01.015.

  • 22.

    Stubbendorff, A.; Janzi, S.; Jukkola, J.; et al. Mini-review of the EAT-Lancet planetary health diet and its role in cardiometabolic disease prevention. Metabolism 2025, 172, 156373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2025.156373.

  • 23.

    Muszalska, A.; Wiecanowska, J.; Michałowska, J.; et al. The Role of the Planetary Diet in Managing Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2025, 17, 862. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17050862.

  • 24.

    Sawicki, C.M.; Ramesh, G.; Bui, L.; et al. Planetary health diet and cardiovascular disease: Results from three large prospective cohort studies in the USA. Lancet Planet. Health 2024, 8, e666–e674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00170-0.

  • 25.

    Liu, J.; Shen, Q.; Wang, X. Emerging EAT-Lancet planetary health diet is associated with major cardiovascular diseases and all-cause mortality: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Nutr. 2024, 43, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2024.10.021.

  • 26.

    Damigou, E.; Downs, S.M.; Chrysohoou, C.; et al. Sustainable, planetary healthy dietary patterns are associated with lower 20-year incidence of cardiovascular disease: The ATTICA study (2002–2022). Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2025, 79, 536–543. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-025-01586-1.

  • 27.

    Cacau, L.T.; Hanley-Cook, G.T.; Vandevijvere, S.; et al. Association between adherence to the EAT-Lancet sustainable reference diet and cardiovascular health among European adolescents: The HELENA study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2024, 78, 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-023-01379-4.

  • 28.

    Berthy, F.; Brunin, J.; Allès, B.; et al. Higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet reference diet is associated with higher nutrient adequacy in the NutriNet-Santé cohort: A cross-sectional study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2023, 117, 1174–1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.03.029.

  • 29.

    Ojo, O.; Jiang, Y.; Ojo, O.O.; et al. The Association of Planetary Health Diet with the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Related Complications: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11081120.

  • 30.

    Teixeira, B.; Afonso, C.; Severo, M.; et al. Are the EAT-Lancet dietary recommendations associated with future cardiometabolic health?—Insights from the Generation XXI cohort from childhood into early adolescence. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2024, 120, 1344–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.09.023.

  • 31.

    Shojaei, S.; Dehnavi, Z.; Irankhah, K.; et al. Adherence to the planetary health diet index and metabolic syndrome: Cross-sectional results from the PERSIAN cohort study. BMC Public. Health 2024, 24, 2988. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20484-y.

  • 32.

    Satija, A.; Hu, F.B. Plant-based diets and cardiovascular health. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2018, 28, 437–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2018.02.004.

  • 33.

    Petersen, K.S.; Flock, M.R.; Richter, C.K.; et al. Healthy Dietary Patterns for Preventing Cardiometabolic Disease: The Role of Plant-Based Foods and Animal Products. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2017, 1, cdn.117.001289. https://doi.org/10.3945/cdn.117.001289.

  • 34.

    Mozaffarian, D. Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review. Circulation 2016, 133, 187–225. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018585.

  • 35.

    Frank, S.M.; Jaacks, L.M.; Avery, C.L.; et al. Dietary quality and cardiometabolic indicators in the USA: A comparison of the Planetary Health Diet Index, Healthy Eating Index-2015, and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0296069. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296069.

  • 36.

    Young, H.A. Adherence to the EAT-Lancet Diet: Unintended Consequences for the Brain? Nutrients 2022, 14, 4254. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14204254.

  • 37.

    Rochefort, G.; Robitaille, J.; Lemieux, S.; et al. Are the 2019 Canada’s Food Guide Recommendations on Healthy Food Choices Consistent with the EAT-Lancet Reference Diet from Sustainable Food Systems? J. Nutr. 2024, 154, 1368–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.02.012.

  • 38.

    Frank, S.M.; Jaacks, L.M.; Adair, L.S.; et al. Adherence to the Planetary Health Diet Index and correlation with nutrients of public health concern: An analysis of NHANES 2003–2018. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2024, 119, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.10.018.

  • 39.

    Hirvonen, K.; Bai, Y.; Headey, D.; et al. Affordability of the EAT–Lancet reference diet: A global analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2020, 8, e59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30447-4.

  • 40.

    Damigou, E.; Kosti, R.I.; Anastasiou, C.; et al. Associations between meat type consumption pattern and incident cardiovascular disease: The ATTICA epidemiological cohort study (2002−2022). Meat Sci. 2023, 205, 109294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109294.

  • 41.

    Johnston, B.C.; Zeraatkar, D.; Han, M.A.; et al. Unprocessed Red Meat and Processed Meat Consumption: Dietary Guideline Recommendations from the Nutritional Recommendations (NutriRECS) Consortium. Ann. Intern. Med. 2019, 171, 756–764. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-1621.

  • 42.

    Zhang, K.; Chen, X.; Zhang, L.; et al. Fermented dairy foods intake and risk of cardiovascular diseases: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 1189–1194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1564019.

  • 43.

    Astrup, A.; Magkos, F.; Bier, D.M.; et al. Saturated Fats and Health: A Reassessment and Proposal for Food-Based Recommendations: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 76, 844–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.077.

  • 44.

    Astrup, A.; Geiker, N.RW.; Magkos, F. Effects of Full-Fat and Fermented Dairy Products on Cardiometabolic Disease: Food Is More Than the Sum of Its Parts. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 924S–930S. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmz069.

  • 45.

    Mozaffarian, D. Dairy Foods, Obesity, and Metabolic Health: The Role of the Food Matrix Compared with Single Nutrients. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 917S–923S. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmz053.

  • 46.

    Yamada, S.; Shirai, T.; Inaba, S.; et al. Saturated Fat Restriction for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JMA J. 2025, 8, 395–407. https://doi.org/10.31662/jmaj.2024-0324.

  • 47.

    Harcombe, Z.; Baker, J.S.; DiNicolantonio, J.J.; et al. Evidence from randomised controlled trials does not support current dietary fat guidelines: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart 2016, 3, e000409. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2016-000409.

  • 48.

    Damigou, E.; Kosti, R.I.; Downs, S.M.; et al. Comparing the Mediterranean and The Japanese Dietary Pattern in Relation to Longevity—A Narrative Review. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets 2024, 24, 1746–1755. https://doi.org/10.2174/0118715303270869240120040514.

  • 49.

    Downs, S.M.; Fox, E.L.; Mutuku, V.; et al. Food Environments and Their Influence on Food Choices: A Case Study in Informal Settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2571. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14132571.

  • 50.

    Clonan, A.; Roberts, K.E.; Holdsworth, M. Socioeconomic and demographic drivers of red and processed meat consumption: Implications for health and environmental sustainability. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016, 75, 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665116000100.

  • 51.

    Poore, J.; Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 2018, 360, 987–992. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0216.

  • 52.

    Damigou, E.; Kosti, R.I.; Panagiotakos, D.B. White Meat Consumption and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Review of Recent Prospective Cohort Studies. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5213. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245213.

  • 53.

    Downs, S.M.; Fanzo, J. Is a Cardio-Protective Diet Sustainable? A Review of the Synergies and Tensions Between Foods That Promote the Health of the Heart and the Planet. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2015, 4, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-015-0142-6.

  • 54.

    Cacau, L.T.; De Carli, E.; de Carvalho, A.M.; et al. Development and Validation of an Index Based on EAT-Lancet Recommendations: The Planetary Health Diet Index. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13051698.

  • 55.

    Stubbendorff, A.; Sonestedt, E.; Ramne, S.; et al. Development of an EAT-Lancet index and its relation to mortality in a Swedish population. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 115, 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqab369.

  • 56.

    Trijsburg, L.; Talsma, E.F.; Crispim, S.P.; et al. Method for the Development of WISH, a Globally Applicable Index for Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems. Nutrients 2020, 13, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13010093.

  • 57.

    Seconda, L.; Baudry, J.; Pointereau, P.; et al. Development and validation of an individual sustainable diet index in the NutriNet-Santé study cohort. Br. J. Nutr. 2019, 121, 1166–1177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114519000369.

  • 58.

    Jung, S.; Young, H.A.; Braffett, B.H.; et al. Development of a sustainable diet index in US adults. Nutr. J. 2024, 23, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-00943-3.

  • 59.

    Okekunle, A.P.; Nicolaou, M.; De Allegri, M.; et al. A multi-dimensional Sustainable Diet Index (SDI) for Ghanaian adults under transition: The RODAM Study. Nutr. J. 2024, 23, 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-024-01009-0.

  • 60.

    Jarvis, S.; Hadjikakou, M.; Wu, J.; et al. Integrating health, nutrition, and environmental impacts of foods: A life cycle impact assessment and modelling analysis of foods in Canada. Lancet Planet. Health 2024, 8, S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00083-4.

  • 61.

    Damigou, E.; Faka, A.; Kouvari, M.; et al. Adherence to a Mediterranean type of diet in the world: A geographical analysis based on a systematic review of 57 studies with 1,125,560 participants. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 74, 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2023.2262781.

  • 62.

    Policy Instruments for the Environment (PINE) Database. OECD. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/policy-instruments-for-the-environment-pine-database.html (accessed on 23 January 2026).

  • 63.

    Burkhart, S.; Verdonck, M.; Ashford, T.; et al. Sustainability in Nutrition: Potential Guiding Statements for Education and Practice. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2021, 53, 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2021.03.011.

  • 64.

    Fernández-Morilla, M.; Albareda-Tiana, S. Developing Sustainability Competencies Through Healthy and Sustainable Nutrition Workshops in Initial Teacher Training. Educ. Sci. 2025, 15, 321. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030321.

Share this article:
Download PDF
Issue
Volume 1, Issue 1
How to Cite
Damigou, E. The Planetary Health Diet: A Review of the Highlights of the EAT-Lancet Commission 2019 and 2025 Reports. Journal of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease Epidemiology 2026, 1 (1), 5.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.