Plastic Mulch as a Sustainable Yield-Boosting Strategy for Fresh Corn Production in the Andean Region of Ecuador

Ana Pincay-Verdezoto; José Luis Zambrano-Mendoza; Cristian Subía-Garcia; Carlos Sangoquiza-Caiza; Robinson Guanotoa-Chasipanta; Rafael Muñoz-Tenelema; César Asaquibay-Inca; María Nieto-Beltrán; Victoria López-Guerrero; José Camacho-Viteri; Jovanny Suquillo-Simbaña; Chang Hwan Park

doi:10.53941/pmsc.2025.100004

Abstract

The use of plastic mulch is a promising agronomic technique for enhancing crop performance under challenging environmental conditions. Mulching is commonly employed in horticultural crops, providing benefits such as increased yields, effective weed control, soil moisture conservation, and elevated soil temperature. However, its advantages for Andean crops have been insufficiently studied. This research evaluated the impact of plastic mulch on fresh corn yield across 19 locations in the Sierra (highlands) of Ecuador over two production cycles (2022–2023 and 2023–2024). Results indicated that plastic mulching significantly increased yields compared to conventional planting methods, with mean increases of 55.06% in the first cycle and 66.27% in the second cycle. A meta-analysis of 28 field trials confirmed a strong and statistically significant overall yield effect of the mulch (Standardized mean difference = 1.62; p < 0.0001). Further analysis revealed that combining plastic mulch with improved maize varieties resulted in significantly higher yields (14.78 ± 0.56 t·ha⁻¹) compared to local varieties (10.00 ± 0.74 t·ha⁻¹), indicating a synergistic effect. Notably, reutilized plastic mulch performed comparably to new mulch, showing no statistically significant difference in yield, suggesting agronomic viability beyond one cycle. The profitability analysis demonstrated that reutilized plastic mulch provided the highest economic return (benefit/cost ratio of 1.76) and posed less economic risk compared to conventional planting. These findings indicate that plastic mulching can be both a profitable and environmentally responsible practice. In contrast, conventional management was associated with greater risk and occasional financial loss.

References

1.
Guzzon, F.; Walquer, L.; Rios, A.; et al. Conservation and Use of Latin American Maize Diversity : Pillar of Nutrition Security and Cultural Heritage of Humanity. Agron. 2021, 11, 172
2.
Zambrano, J.; Velásquez, J.; Peñaherrera, D.; et al. Guía para la producción sustentable de maíz en la Sierra ecuatoriana. INIAP, Manual No. 122. Quito, Ecuador. Available online: https://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/57962021 (accessed on 17 January 2025).
3.
Caviedes, M.; Carvajal-larenas, F.E.; Zambrano, J.L. Generation of Technologies for the Cultivation of Corn (Zea mays L.) in Ecuador. Av. En Cienc. EIng. 2022, 14, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.18272/aci.v14i1.2588.
4.
SIPA. Superficie, Producción y Rendimiento-MAG. Available online: https://sipa.agricultura.gob.ec/index.php/sipa-estadisticas/estadisticas-productivas (accessed on 15 March 2025).
5.
FAO. Statistics Database. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL (accessed on 20 January 2025).
6.
FAO. La Contribución del Crecimiento Agrícola a la Reducción de la Pobreza, el Hambre y la Malnutrición. In El Estado de La Inseguridad Alimenaria En El Mundo; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2012; pp. 30–39.
7.
Bing-chao, Z.; Han, H.U.; Zheng-yu, G.U.O.; et al. Plastic-Film-Side Seeding, as an Alternative to Traditional Film Mulching, Improves Yield Stability and Income in Maize Production in Semi-Arid Regions. J. Integr. Agric. 2023, 22, 1021–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.017.
8.
Montemayor-Trejo, J.A.; Suárez-González, E.; Munguía-López, J.P.; et al. Acolchados Plásticos Para la Producción de Maíz (Zea mays L.) forrajero en la Comarca Lagunera. Rev. Mex. De Cienc. AgrÍColas 2018, 9, 4107–4115.
9.
Wu, L.; Quan, H.; Wu, L.; et al. Plastic Mulching Enhances Maize Yield and Water Productivity by Improving Root Characteristics, Green Leaf Area , and Photosynthesis for Different Cultivars in Dryland Regions. Agric. Water Manag. 2024, 305, 109105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109105.
10.
Zhang, P.; Wei, T.; Cai, T.; et al. Plastic-Film Mulching for Enhanced Water-Use Efficiency and Economic Returns from Maize Fields in Semiarid China. Front. PlantSci. 2017, 8, 512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00512.
11.
Xu, J.; Li, C.; Liu, H.; et al. The Effects of Plastic Film Mulching on Maize Growth and Water Use in Dry and Rainy Years in Northeast China. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0125781. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125781.
12.
Zambrano, J.; Cartagena, Y.; Sangoquiza, C.; et al. Evaluation of Plastic Mulching for Floury Corn Production (Zea mays L. var. Amylacea St.) in the Highlands of Ecuador. Available online: https://repositorio.iniap.gob.ec/handle/41000/5887?mode=full (accessed on 17 January 2025).
13.
Zambrano, J.; Cartagena, Y.; Sangoquiza, C.; et al. Exploring Plastic Mulching as a Strategy for Mitigating Drought Stress and Boosting Maize Yield in the Ecuadorian Andes. Water 2024, 16, 1033; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16071033.
14.
Sangoquiza, C.; Zambrano, J.; Subía, C.; et al. Effect of the Plastic Mulch Planting System on the Agronomic Behavior and Profitability of Four Varieties of Corn in the Sierra del Ecuador. ACI Av. En Cienc. EIng. 2024, 16, 3
15.
Liu, C.; Jin, S.; Zhou, L.; et al. Effects of Plastic Film Mulch and Tillage on Maize Productivity and Soil Parameters. Eur. J. Agron. 2009, 31, 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2009.08.004.
16.
NASA POWER. Data Portal. Available online: https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-access-viewer/ (accessed on 1 April 2025).
17.
RDC Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Found. Stat. Comput. 2016, 1, 409.
18.
Glass, G.V. Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research. Educ. Res. 1976, 5, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003.
19.
Ministerio de Agrucultura y Ganadería (MAG). Boletín de Precios Mayoristas. Available online: https://sipa.agricultura.gob.ec/index.php/boletin-nacional-precios-mayoristas/2023-mayoristas (accessed on 15 March 2025).
20.
Ministerio de Agrucultura y Ganadería (MAG). Boletín de Precios Mayoristas. Available online: https://sipa.agricultura.gob.ec/index.php/boletin-nacional-precios-mayoristas/2024-mayoristas (accessed on 15 March 2025).
21.
Cai, W.; Gu, X.; Du, Y.; et al. Effects of Mulching on Water Saving, Yield Increase and Emission Reduction for Maize in China. Agric. Water Manag. 2022, 274, 107954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107954.
22.
Lee, J.; Chae, H.; Hwang, H.; et al. Effect of Plastic Film Mulching on Maize Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency under Organic Farming in South Korea. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 787, 147503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147503.
23.
Wang, Z.; Li, M.; Flury, M.; et al. Science of the Total Environment Agronomic Performance of Polyethylene and Biodegradable Plastic Film Mulches in a Maize Cropping System in a Humid Continental Climate. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 786, 147460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147460.
24.
Liu, J.; Bu, L.; Zhu, L.; et al. Optimizing Plant Density and Plastic Film Mulch to Increase Maize Productivity and Water‐Use Efficiency in Semiarid Areas. Agron. J. 2014, 106, 1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj13.0582.
25.
Lamont, W.J. Plastics: Modifying the Microclimate for the Production of Vegetable Crops. Horttechnology 2005, 15, 477.
26.
Kasirajan, S.; Ngouajio, M. Polyethylene and Biodegradable Mulches for Agricultural Applications: A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 501–529.
27.
Zambrano, J.L.; Yánez, C.F.; Sangoquiza, C.A. Maize Breeding in the Highlands of Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia: A Review. Agronomy. 2021; 11(2):212. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020212
28.
Dey, J.K.; Saren, B.K.; Debnath, A.; et al. Productivity and Nutrient Dynamic of Legume in a Maize-Legume Cropping System are Influenced by Biomulches under No-Tillage System. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2022, 16, 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-022-00204-5.
29.
Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Yu, X.; et al. Maize–Fababean Rotation under Double Ridge and Furrows with Plastic Mulching Alleviates Soil Water Depletion. Agric. Water Manag. 2018, 207, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.04.033.
30.
Zhang, W.; Wei, Y.; Khan, A.; et al. Intercropped Soybean Boosts Nitrogen Benefits and Amends Nitrogen use Pattern under Plastic Film Mulching in the Semiarid Maize Field. Field Crops Res. 2023, 295, 108881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108881.
31.
Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.; et al. Re-Used Mulching of Plastic Film is More Profitable and Environmentally Friendly than New Mulching. Soil Tillage Res. 2022, 216, 105256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105256.
32.
Iacuzzi, N.; Tortorici, N.; Ida, D.M.; et al. Biodegradable Mulching Films Affect Soil Temperature and Agronomic Performance of Open Field Eggplant in Hot-Arid Environments. Ital. J. Agron. 2024, 19, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJAGRO.2024.100025.
33.
Sarpong, K.A.; Adesina, F.A.; DeVetter, L.W.; et al. Recycling Agricultural Plastic Mulch Limitations and Opportunities in the United States. Circ. Agric. Syst. 2024, 4, e005. https://doi.org/10.48130/CAS-0024-0003.

Scilight Press

Author Information

Abstract

Keywords

References

About Scilight

Journals

Publishing Policies

Contact Us