Low-Carbon Alternative Fuels Toward Sustainable Mobility: Biodiesel Production and Comparative Analysis of Its Blends with Diesel

Tamer M. M. Abdellatief; Khuloud Almesafri; Leen Al-Marzuqi

doi:10.53941/rset.2026.100006

Abstract

The current work seeks to explore the viability of generating biodiesel from waste cooking oil as an economically viable waste biomass through the transesterification process and studied different blends with petroleum diesel (B0 to B100). Key fuel characteristics, such as cetane number, acid value, density, calorific value, flash point, and viscosity, were measured. The findings reported that the cetane number slightly increases as biodiesel is mixed with the blend. Moreover, the heating value gradually drops as biodiesel is mixed with diesel: 44.01 MJ/kg for B5, 43.59 MJ/kg for B10, 42.81 MJ/kg for B20, 42.53 MJ/kg for B25, 42.61 MJ/kg for B30, 41.81 MJ/kg for B40, 41.52 MJ/kg for B50, and 39.49 MJ/kg for pure biodiesel (B100). When compared with neat diesel, neat biodiesel indicated a cumulative decrease of approximately 11.4%. The biodiesel’s good quality was confirmed by the gradual drop in sulfur content, which helped to reduce possible emissions, and the total glycerol, which stayed well below standard limits. It was discovered that low to medium blends (B5–B20) provide better combustion and environmental performance while being completely compatible with traditional diesel engines without the need for modification. Although higher blends (B40–B100) have better safety and pollution benefits, their increased viscosity and lower energy content may necessitate slight modifications to engine calibration or fuel injection. Finally, this study reported that biodiesel–diesel blends are a viable, sustainable, and eco-friendly way to lessen dependency on fossil fuels while preserving engine performance. It also offers important information for maximizing blend ratios for emissions compliance and performance.

References

1.
Mulk, W.U.; Ismael, M.A.; Aziz, A.R.A.; et al. Recent Progress in Biodiesel-Fueled ICEs and Role of Nano-Additives in Optimizing Combustion and Emissions with Cost Analysis- A Comprehensive Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026, 226, 116263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116263.
2.
IEA. World Energy Outlook; International Energy Agency: Paris, France, 2009.
3.
Mulk, W.U.; Abd Aziz, A.R.; Ismael, M.A.; et al. Diesel and Oxyhydrogen Dual-Fuel: Reducing Emissions of a Diesel Engine Using Diesel-Oxyhydrogen Dual Fuel Combustion. J. Adv. Res. Exp. Fluid Mech. Heat Transf. 2025, 18, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.37934/arefmht.18.1.6980.
4.
Razzak, S.A.; Zakir Hossain, S.M.; Ahmed, U.; et al. Cleaner Biodiesel Production from Waste Oils (Cooking/Vegetable/Frying): Advances in Catalytic Strategies. Fuel 2025, 393, 134901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.134901.
5.
Kumar, D.; Singh, B.; Bauddh, K.; et al. Bio-Oil and Biodiesel as Biofuels Derived from Microalgal Oil and Their Characterization by Using Instrumental Techniques. In Algae and Environmental Sustainability; Singh, B., Bauddh, K., Bux, F., Eds.; Springer India: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2641-3_7.
6.
Kumar, M.; Ansari, N.A.; Gautam, R. Algae Biodiesel as a Alternative Green Fuel: A Futuristic Scope. Clean Chem. Eng. 2025, 11, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clce.2025.100178.
7.
Damian, C.S.; Devarajan, Y.; Jayabal, R. A Comprehensive Review of the Resource Efficiency and Sustainability in Biofuel Production from Industrial and Agricultural Waste. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2024, 26, 1264–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-01918-6.
8.
Soudagar, M.E.M.; Shelare, S.; Marghade, D.; et al. Optimizing IC Engine Efficiency: A Comprehensive Review on Biodiesel, Nanofluid, and the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 307, 118337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118337.
9.
Yilmaz, N.; Atmanli, A. Experimental Assessment of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Diesel-Biodiesel-1-Pentanol Blends. Fuel 2017, 191, 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.065.
10.
Lima dos Santos, H.C.; Gonçalves, M.A.; da Cas Viegas, A.; et al. Tungsten Oxide Supported on Copper Ferrite: A Novel Magnetic Acid Heterogeneous Catalyst for Biodiesel Production from Low Quality Feedstock. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 34614–34626. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA06923G.
11.
Vellaiyan, S. Energetic Materials for Improved Performance and Ecological Metrics in Biodiesel–Diesel Blended Engines: A Comprehensive Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026, 226, 116487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116487.
12.
Zhang, Y.; Gao, S.; Zhang, Z.; et al. A Comprehensive Review on Combustion, Performance and Emission Aspects of Higher Alcohols and Its Additive Effect on the Diesel Engine. Fuel 2023, 335, 127011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127011.
13.
Zikri, J.M.; Sani, M.S.M.; Adam, A. Exploring the World of Diesel Engines: Analyzing Noise and Vibration Characteristics with Biodiesel Application. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026, 226, 116168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116168.
14.
Prajapati, A.K.; Mahajan, A.; Jadhav, S.M.; et al. Fourth-Generation (4G) Biodiesel: Paving the Way for a Greener and Sustainable Energy Future in Emerging Economies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026, 225, 116103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116103.
15.
Rani, A.; Nandan, D. Alternative Fuels for Agricultural Internal Combustion Engines: Perspectives on Sustainability, Engine Compatibility, and Technology Potential. Biomass Futur. 2026, 1, 100017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmf.2026.100017.
16.
Meher, L.C.; Vidya Sagar, D.; Naik, S.N. Technical Aspects of Biodiesel Production by Transesterification—A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2006, 10, 248–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2004.09.002.
17.
Premkumar, D.; Jayabal, R.; Padmavathi, K.R.; et al. Ammonia-Assisted Combustion of Alcohol-Enriched Chicken Fat Biodiesel: Experimental Investigation of a Multi-Fuel Strategy in Diesel Engines. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2026, 209, 108577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2026.108577.
18.
Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H.; Nizami, A.-S.; Kalogirou, S.A.; et al. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil: A Systematic Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112411.
19.
Khan, K.H.; Mashud, M. Performance and Emission Analysis of Flaxseed Biodiesel Blends in a Direct Injection Diesel Engine. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2026, 30, 101623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101623.
20.
Nayak, M.G. Review and Comparison of the Methodology Adopted for Biodiesel Production. Carbon Resour. Convers. 2026, 9, 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2025.100343.
21.
Chamkalani, A.; Zendehboudi, S.; Rezaei, N.; et al. A Critical Review on Life Cycle Analysis of Algae Biodiesel: Current Challenges and Future Prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 134, 110143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110143.
22.
Tibesigwa, T.; Olupot, P.W.; Kirabira, J.B. Scenario Analysis of the Long-Term Impact on Energy Demand and Emissions of B10 Use as a Clean Transport Fuel. Front. Energy Res. 2024, 12, 1403014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1403014.
23.
Gautam, R.; Kumar, S. Performance and Combustion Analysis of Diesel and Tallow Biodiesel in CI Engine. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 2785–2793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.039.
24.
Patil, S.S.; Hulwan, D.B.; Kumbhar, V.S.; et al. Influence of Waste Cooking Oil Characteristics on the Quality of Produced Biodiesel. Int. J. Thermofluids 2025, 30, 101469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2025.101469.
25.
Sankhyan, S.; Kumar, P.; Pandit, S.; et al. Valorization of Waste Cooking Oil: Emerging Strategies for Bio-Based Product Development. Biomass Bioenergy 2025, 202, 108244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108244.
26.
Rinaldi, N.; Alfarez, R.H.; Sari, N.L.; et al. Activity of NiMo and CoMo Catalysts Supported on Ti-Pillared Bentonite for Converting Waste Cooking Oil into Green Diesel. Results Chem. 2026, 25, 103231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103231.
27.
Chenni, H.; Outili, N.; Kerras, H.; et al. From Waste to Value: Optimized Epoxidation of Waste Cooking Oil and Synthesis of Bio-Based Polyols. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2026, 212, 108843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2026.108843.
28.
Xie, Y.; Zhao, J.; Wang, H.; et al. Research Progress on Biodiesel Production Utilizing Waste Oils and Biomass-Derived Catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 2026, 281, 108389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108389.
29.
Sikandar, M.; Ashiq, J.; Raza, A.; et al. Waste Cooking Oil Conversion into Multifunctional Additives to Develop Economic Bio-Lubricant. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2026, 51, 102353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2026.102353.
30.
Zhang, F.; Huang, B.; Cui, J.; et al. Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel Alters Combustion Pathways to Enhance Volatile Organic Compound Emissions and Reduce Intermediate/Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds in Agricultural Machinery. J. Hazard. Mater. 2026, 513, 142450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2026.142450.
31.
Alamsyah, R.; Sudarto, S.; Supriatna, N.K.; et al. Integrated Coconut Processing for Cost-Effective Sustainable Aviation Fuel and Biodiesel Production: Focus on Medium Chain Triglycerides By-Products. Results Eng. 2026, 29, 108446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108446.
32.
Chen, R.; Xue, B.; Zhu, F.; et al. The Application of Heterogeneous Catalysts in Esterification/Transesterification for Biodiesel Production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026, 226, 116262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116262.
33.
Stojković, I.J.; Stamenković, O.S.; Povrenović, D.S.; et al. Purification Technologies for Crude Biodiesel Obtained by Alkali-Catalyzed Transesterification. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.005.

Scilight Press

Author Information

Abstract

Keywords

References

About Scilight

Journals

Publishing Policies

Contact Us