A Comparative Evaluation of Simultaneous Nutrient Removal and Biomass Production for Treatment Vinasse Biogas Slurry by Microalgae

Shupeng Lin; Zhihao Chen; Hongqin Wang; Renjie Dong; Shan Liu

doi:10.53941/algaeenviron.2025.100003

Abstract

The substantial discharge of vinasse biogas slurry (VBS) from anaerobic digestion poses significant environmental risks, while microalgae could recover nutrient for biomass production from VBS treatment. This study comprehensively investigated the bio-remediation potential of microalgae via rotating biofilm reactor, focusing on microalgae species and inoculation ratios, as well as VBS dilution ratios. The results revealed that Desmodesmus sp. had a better performance in biomass productivity (0.62 g/L), and total phosphorus (TP) removal efficiency (77.03%) than the other two microalgae (p < 0.05). The low VBS proportion (≤30%) obtained a higher biomass accumulation of 0.87–0.89 g/L than groups of high VBS proportion of 50%. These growth inhibition in high VBS proportion groups were attributed to high ammonium nitrogen (NH₄⁺-N) toxicity and elevated turbidity of biogas slurry. Both the total nitrogen (TN) removal of 34.11–36.48% and NH₄⁺-N removal of 83.63–97.38% revealed ammonium assimilation during the treatment of VBS via microalgae. Inoculum optimization demonstrated that reduced initial inoculation ratio (10% v/v) obtained highest TN removal efficiency of 46.52% and biomass growth rate of 0.04 g/(L·d), likely through alleviated light limitation. In the rotating biofilm reactor, treatment with 50-time diluted VBS achieved the highest biomass growth rate of 1.60 g/(m²·d), and the removal of TN, NH₄⁺-N, and TP was 74.93%, 93.94% and 98.01%, respectively. Moreover, coarse ribbed fiber fabric (CRFF) exhibited higher attached biomass (48.76 g/m²) and NH₄⁺-N removal efficiency (76.30%) than other attached materials. The research offered insights into trade-offs between the nutrient recovery and accumulating microalgae biomass during biogas slurry treatment.

References

1.
Li, M.; Liu, N.; Wang, C.K.; et al. Large-scale use of spent grains and waste water in distilleries. Brew. Sci. Technol. 2018, 2, 113–116. https://doi.org/10.13746/j.njkj.2017294. (In Chinese)
2.
Utami, I.; Kautsar, D.; Akbar, R. Vinasse treatment with aerobic microbial method using activated sludge. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1569, 042059.
3.
Sillero, L.; Solera, R.; Perez, M. Improvement of the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge by co-digestion with wine vinasse and poultry manure: Effect of different hydraulic retention times. Fuel 2022, 321, 124104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124104.
4.
Almomani, F.; Bhosale, R.R.; Khraisheh, M.A.M.; et al. Enhancement of biogas production from agricultural wastes via pre-treatment with advanced oxidation processes. Fuel 2019, 253, 964–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.057.
5.
Chen, C.; Dai, Z.; Li, Y.; et al. Fouling-free membrane stripping for ammonia recovery from real biogas slurry. Water Res. 2023, 229, 119453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.119453.
6.
Lin, S.; Lyu, T.; Pan, M.; et al. Exploration of ammonia stripping coupled adsorption-membrane filtration process for treating kitchen waste biogas slurry. Environ. Res. 2025, 274, 121318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.121318.
7.
Yellezuome, D.; Zhu, X.; Wang, Z.; et al. Mitigation of ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-rich substrates for biogas production by ammonia stripping: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 157, 112043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.112043.
8.
Chisti, Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-101023-5.00010-8.
9.
Morales-Amaral, M.d.M.; Gómez-Serrano, C.; Acién, F.G.; et al. Production of microalgae using centrate from anaerobic digestion as the nutrient source. Algal Res. 2015, 9, 297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.03.018.
10.
Uggetti, E.; Sialve, B.; Latrille, E.; et al. Anaerobic digestate as substrate for microalgae culture: The role of ammonium concentration on the microalgae productivity. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 152, 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.036.
11.
Vasseur, C.; Bougaran, G.; Garnier, M.; et al. Carbon conversion efficiency and population dynamics of a marine algae–bacteria consortium growing on simplified synthetic digestate: First step in a bioprocess coupling algal production and anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 119, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.128.
12.
Zou, G.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris in a light-receiving-plate (LRP)-enhanced raceway pond for ammonium and phosphorus removal from pretreated pig urine. Energies 2020, 13, 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071644.
13.
Srimongkol, P.; Sangtanoo, P.; Songserm, P.; et al. Microalgae-based wastewater treatment for developing economic and environmental sustainability: Current status and future prospects. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 904046. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.904046.
14.
de Carvalho, J.C.; Sydney, E.B.; Tessari, L.F.A.; et al. Culture media for mass production of microalgae. In Biofuels from Algae; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-64192-2.00002-0.
15.
Tan, X.B.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Gong, H.; et al. Growth of Scenedesmus obliquus in anaerobically digested swine wastewater from different cleaning processes for pollutants removal and biomass production. Chemosphere 2024, 352, 141515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141515.
16.
Min, K.H.; Kim, D.H.; Ki, M.R.; et al. Recent progress in flocculation, dewatering, and drying technologies for microalgae utilization: Scalable and low-cost harvesting process development. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 344, 126404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126404.
17.
Christenson, L.B.; Sims, R.C. Rotating algal biofilm reactor and spool harvester for wastewater treatment with biofuels by-products. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012, 109, 1674–1684. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24451.
18.
Gross, M.; Henry, W.; Michael, C.; et al. Development of a rotating algal biofilm growth system for attached microalgae growth with in situ biomass harvest. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 150, 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.016.
19.
Zhao, X.; Kumar, K.; Gross, M.A.; et al. Evaluation of revolving algae biofilm reactors for nutrients and metals removal from sludge thickening supernatant in a municipal wastewater treatment facility. Water Res. 2018, 143, 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.001.
20.
Abinandan, S.; Shanthakumar, S. Challenges and opportunities in application of microalgae (Chlorophyta) for wastewater treatment: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 52, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.086.
21.
Nguyen, T.T.; Binh, Q.A.; Bui, X.T.; et al. Co-culture of microalgae-activated sludge for wastewater treatment and biomass production: Exploring their role under different inoculation ratios. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 314, 123754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123754.
22.
Rice, E.W.; Bridgewater, L.; Association, A.P.H. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-6910.
23.
Tesson, S.V.M.; Sildever, S. The pH tolerance range of the airborne species Tetracystis vinatzeri (Chlorophyceae, Chlamydomonadales). Eur. J. Phycol. 2024, 59, 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2023.2260444.
24.
Liu, W.; Huang, W.; Cao, Z.; et al. Microalgae simultaneously promote antibiotic removal and antibiotic resistance genes/bacteria attenuation in algal-bacterial granular sludge system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 438, 129286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129286.
25.
Jin, Y.; Zhan, W.; Wu, R.; et al. Insight into the roles of microalgae on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in microalgal-bacterial sequencing batch reactors: Nitrogen removal, extracellular polymeric substances, and microbial communities. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 379, 129038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129038.
26.
Guo, H.; Zhangsun, X.; Li, N.; et al. Enhanced nitrogen removal of micropolluted source waterbodies using an iron activated carbon system with siliceous materials: Insights into metabolic activity, biodiversity, interactions of core genus and co-existence. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 387, 129656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129656.
27.
Shi, X.M.; Zhang, X.W.; Chen, F. Heterotrophic production of biomass and lutein by Chlorella protothecoides on various nitrogen sources. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000, 27, 312–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0229(00)00208-8.
28.
Tang, C.C.; Tian, Y.; Liang, H.; et al. Enhanced nitrogen and phosphorus removal from domestic wastewater via algae-assisted sequencing batch biofilm reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 250, 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.028.
29.
Bhattacharya, R.; Mazumder, D. Kinetic study on nitrification of ammonium nitrogen-enriched synthetic wastewater using activated sludge. Water Sci. Technol. 2020, 81, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.080.
30.
Ferreira, G.F.; Ríos Pinto, L.F.; Maciel Filho, R.; et al. Effects of cultivation conditions on Chlorella vulgaris and Desmodesmus sp. grown in sugarcane agro-industry residues. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 342, 125949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125949.
31.
Zheng, M.; Li, H.; Guo, X.; et al. A semi-continuous efficient strategy for removing phosphorus and nitrogen from eel aquaculture wastewater using the self-flocculating microalga Desmodesmus sp. PW1. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 346, 118970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118970.
32.
Yu, D.; Yan, L.; Shi, J.; et al. Phosphorus Removal and Recovery During Microalgae-Based Wastewater Treatment: A Mini-review. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2024, 18, 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-024-00590-w.
33.
Liu, T.; Chen, Z.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Biochemical and morphological changes triggered by nitrogen stress in the oleaginous microalga Chlorella vulgaris. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 566. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030566.
34.
Ji, M.K.; Kim, H.C.; Sapireddy, V.R.; et al. Simultaneous nutrient removal and lipid production from pretreated piggery wastewater by Chlorella vulgaris YSW-04. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 2701–2710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4097-x.
35.
Sirohi, R.; Joun, J.; Lee, J.Y.; et al. Waste mitigation and resource recovery from food industry wastewater employing microalgae-bacterial consortium. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 352, 127129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127129.
36.
Baroni, É.; Cao, B.; Webley, P.A.; et al. Nitrogen Availability and the Nature of Extracellular Organic Matter of Microalgae. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 6795–6805. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05426.
37.
Harman-Ware, A.E.; Morgan, T.; Wilson, M.; et al. Microalgae as a renewable fuel source: Fast pyrolysis of Scenedesmus sp. Renew. Energy 2013, 60, 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.06.016.
38.
Li, G. High Biomass Accumulation and Pyrolysis Products of Desmodesmus sp. Cultivation in Anaerobic Digested Wastewater; China Agricultural University: Beijing, China, 2014. (In Chinese)
39.
Han, T.; Han, X.; Ye, X.; et al. Applying mixotrophy strategy to enhance biomass production and nutrient recovery of Chlorella pyrenoidosa from biogas slurry: An assessment of the mixotrophic synergistic effect. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 366, 128185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128185.
40.
Han, H. Decontamination of Fermented Biogas Liquid in Piggery Coupling with Lipid Production Based on Chlorella Cultivation; Guangdong University of Technology: Guangzhou, China, 2018. (In Chinese)
41.
Salbitani, G.; Carfagna, S. Ammonium Utilization in Microalgae: A Sustainable Method for Wastewater Treatment. Sustainability 2021, 13, 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020956.

Scilight Press

Author Information

Abstract

Keywords

References

About Scilight

Journals

Publishing Policies

Contact Us