AlgaeEnviron/
Articles/
2511002223
  • Open Access
  • Review

Bridging Science and Strategy: The Emerging R&D Portfolio of the Australian Seaweed Industry

  • Yan Li 1,2,*,   
  • Margie Rule 2,3,   
  • Steven Clarke 4,   
  • Jian Qin 1

Received: 29 Aug 2025 | Revised: 19 Sep 2025 | Accepted: 04 Nov 2025 | Published: 10 Nov 2025

Abstract

The Australian seaweed industry is poised for transformative growth, driven by its potential economic, environmental, and health benefits. Some native seaweeds have emerged as promising sources of novel feed and food additives, showing strong potential for the development of innovative bioproducts. To fully unlock this potential, it is crucial to establish a robust industrial and social ecosystem that positions seaweed as a cornerstone of Australia’s blue and circular economy development. At present, the industry is focusing on scaling up biomass production through initiatives that address societal challenges, such as climate change and environmental degradation, alongside the broader goal of promoting economic independence. This article outlines a comprehensive portfolio developed for the Australian seaweed sector, identifying strategic priorities and emerging needs within the industry. It outlines key research and development (R&D) challenges, opportunities and expected outcomes. This article also provides commentary on the issues and gaps within the current R&D landscape, along with targeted recommendations to support the industry’s future development. The information can be used to coordinate national R&D practices and help focus targeted investments to better support the growth and advancement of the seaweed industry.

References 

  • 1.
    World Bank. Global Seaweed: New and Emerging Markets Report, 2023; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023.
  • 2.

    Deloitte. Australian Seaweed Industry Sector Development & Economic Impact Report; Deloitte: New York, NY, USA, 2025; p. 14.

  • 3.
    Kelly, J. Australian Seaweed Industry Blueprint—A Blueprint for Growth; CABI: Oxfordshire, UK, 2020; p. 44.
  • 4.

    FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture-Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2018; p. 227.

  • 5.
    Ward, G.M.; Faisan, J.P., Jr.; Cottier-Cook, E.J.; et al. A review of reported seaweed diseases and pests in aquaculture in Asia. World Aquac. Soc. 2020, 51, 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12649.
  • 6.
    Barry, W.L.; Karing, M.J. The Australian Seaweed Industry—A Baseline Review of Research and Development; RIRDC Research Paper No 97/49: AgriFutures, Australia, 1997; p. 45.
  • 7.
    Hurd, C.L.; Wright, J.T.; Layton, C.; et al. From Tasmania to the world: Long and strong traditions in seaweed use, research, and development. Mar. 2023, 66, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2022-0061.
  • 8.
    Ridoutt, B.; Lehnert, S.A.; Denman, S.; et al. Potential GHG emission benefits of Asparagopsis taxiformis feed supplement in Australian beef cattle feedlots. Clean. Prod. 2022, 337, 130499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130499.
  • 9.

    DAWR. National Aquaculture Strategy; Department of Agriculture and Water Resources: Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2017; p. 40.

  • 10.

    NMSC. National Marine Science Plan 2015–2025; National Marine Science Committee: Parkes, NSW, Australia, 2015; p. 48.

  • 11.
    Spillias, S.; Cottrell, R.S.; Kelly, R.; et al. Expert perceptions of seaweed farming for sustainable development. Clean. Prod. 2022, 368, 133052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133052.
  • 12.

    Kinley, R.D.; Martinez-Fernandez, G.; Matthews, M.K.; et al. Mitigating the carbon footprint and improving productivity of ruminant livestock agriculture using a red seaweed. Clean. Prod. 2020, 259, 120836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120836.

  • 13.

    Alvarez-Hess, P.S.; Jacobs, J.L.; Kinley, R.D.; et al. Effects of a range of effective inclusion levels of Asparagopsis armata steeped in oil on enteric methane emissions of dairy cows. Feed Sci. Technol. 2024, 310, 115932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.115932.

  • 14.
    Roque, B.M.; Brooke, C.G.; Ladau, J.; et al. Effect of the macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis on methane production and rumen microbiome assemblage. Microbiome 2019, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-019-0004-4.
  • 15.
    Patwary, Z.P. Multi-omics investigation across the life-history stages of the red seaweed, Asparagopsis Ph.D. Thesis, University of the Sunshine Coast: Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia, 2023.
  • 16.
    Cowley, F.C.; Kinley, R.D.; Mackenzie, S.L.; et al. Bioactive metabolites of Asparagopsis stabilized in canola oil completely suppress methane emissions in beef cattle fed a feedlot diet. Anim. Sci. 2024, 102, skae109. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae109.
  • 17.

    Glasson, C.R.K.; Kinley, R.D.; de Nys, R.; et al. Benefits and risks of including the bromoform containing seaweed Asparagopsis in feed for the reduction of methane production from ruminants. Algal 2022, 64, 102673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2022.102673.

  • 18.
    Australia Joins Global Methane Pledge. Available online: https://minister.dcceew.gov.au/bowen/media-releases/australia-joins-global-methane-pledge (accessed on 12 December 2024).
  • 19.
    Mihaila, A.A.; Lawton, R.J.; Glasson, C.R.K.; et al. Early hatchery protocols for tetrasporogenesis of the antimethanogenic seaweed Asparagopsis J. Appl. Phycol. 2023, 35, 2323–2335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-023-03029-5.
  • 20.

    Reducing Methane from Livestock. Available online: https://www.dcceew.gov.au/climate-change/emissions-reduction/agricultural-land-sectors/livestock (accessed on 20 November 2024).

  • 21.

    Partnerships & Licensing. Available online: https://www.future-feed.com/how-to-get-involved-in-the-asparagopsis-industry (accessed on 2 Febuary 2025).

  • 22.
    Start-Up Fighting Cow-Burped Methane Raises US$29 M in Series B Funding, Bringing Total Investment to US$47M. Available online: https://ch4global.com/2023/08/29/series-b-funding-announcement/ (accessed on 2 Febuary 2025).
  • 23.
    Nissui Partnership Announcement. Available online: https://www.immersiongroup.com.au/news (accessed on 20 Febuary 2025).
  • 24.
    Sea Forest News. Available online: https://www.seaforest.com.au/news (accessed on 15 October 2024).
  • 25.

    SeaStock and Regis Resources Partner to Cultivate Asparagopsis in Mine Pit Water. Available online: https://www.seastock.com.au/seastock-and-regis-resources-partner-to-cultivate-asparagopsis-in-mine-pit-water/ (accessed on 12 July 2025).

  • 26.
    Fremantle Seaweed Aquaculture Lease Approved for 32 Hectares. Available online: https://fremantleseaweed.com/fremantle-seaweeds-first-commercial-harvest-and-plans-featured-in-the-west-australian-2/ (accessed on 20 January 2025).
  • 27.
    Research and Development. Available online: https://www.plentex.com.au/site/operations/research-and-development (accessed on 12 December 2024).
  • 28.
    Murphy, S. Scientists Call for Stricter Oversight as Asparagopsis Seaweed Gains Popularity in Livestock Sector. Available online: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-07-02/concerns-regarding-asparagopsis-seaweed-health-risk-livestock/102524810 (accessed on 20 Januaray 2025).
  • 29.

    Standards Australia. Research to Market: Sustainable Seaweed Feed a Step toward Net Zero. Available online: https://www.standards.org.au/news/research-to-market-sustainable-seaweed-feed-a-step-toward-net-zero (accessed on 12 December 2024).

  • 30.
    TNF Federation. Climate Change Authority: Issues Paper: Targets, Pathways, and Progress. The National Farmers’ Federation: Barton, Australia, 2024; p. 97.
  • 31.
    Goodwin, S. Beef’s Best Bet to Curb Methane Emissions Hangs under Cancer Storm Cloud. 2024. Available online: https://www.farmonline.com.au/story/8805966/asparagopsis-bromoform-cattle-the-science-and-the-concerns/ (accessed on 12 December 2024).
  • 32.
    Welcome to Natrakelp. Available online: https://www.natrakelp.com/ (accessed on 12 December 2024).
  • 33.
    Norwood, C. Seaweed the Hero in New Boost Juice Offerings.
  • 34.

    Steinhagen, S.; Stedt, K.; Trigo, J.P.; et al. A step towards closing the food-waste gap in novel protein sources: Post-harvest protein boost of the seaweed crop Ulva by herring production tub water. Future Foods 2024, 9, 100347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100347.

  • 35.

    PhycoHealth Offer Document. Available online: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fd343ovmvm
    cloudfront.net%2Fmedia%2Fcompany_document%2FPhycoHealth_Offer_Document_04102023.pdf&psig=
    AOvVaw2tpsd_ZII1t7JKhgp8Pf33&ust=1754534990803000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&
    amp;ved=0CAQQn5wMahcKEwiY156tlvWOAxUAAAAAHQAAAAAQBA (accessed on 20 January 2025).

  • 36.
    Shiraz Vines Turbocharged by Bluefin Tuna? Only in South Australia. Available online: https://mbcrc.com/portfolio-items/shiraz-vines-turbocharged-by-bluefin-tuna-only-in-south-australia/ (accessed on 12 December 2024).
  • 37.
    Oza, R.M. Culture studies on induction of tetraspores and their subsequent development in the red alga Falkenbergia rufolanosa (Harvey) Schmitz. Mar. 1977, 20, 29–32, https://doi.org/10.1515/botm.1977.20.1.29.
  • 38.
    Turrell, C. Ocean-grown bioplastics. Biotechnol. 2025, 43, 1027. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02746-1.
  • 39.
    Uluu Closes $8.6M Seed Round with Some Pretty Special Investors. Available online: https://www.uluu.com.au/press/uluu-closes-8-6m-seed-round-with-some-pretty-special-investors (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  • 40.

    Findlay, S. Researchers Discover Seaweed Molecules Can Help Heal Wounds. Available online: https://www.uow.edu.au/media/2021/researchers-discover-seaweed-molecules-can-help-heal-wounds-.php (accessed on 20 January 2025).

  • 41.

    PhycoLife. Available online: https://swarmer.com.au/en/company/phycolife/overview/ (accessed on 23 November 2024).

  • 42.
    Li, Y.; Wood, , W.; Kosa, G.; et al. A new insight of phycoremdiation study: Using filamentous algae for the treatment of tertiary municipal wastewater. In Progress in Microalgae Research; Leila Queiroz, Z., Eduardo, J.-L., Mariany Costa, D., Eds.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2022; p. 10.
  • 43.
    Seaweed Biofilter. Available online: https://www.australianseaweedinstitute.com.au/seaweed-biofilters (accessed on 20 January 2025).
  • 44.
    From Bromoform to Net-Zero Nutrient Loads. Available online: https://www.seaweedalliance.org.au/news/from-bromoform-to-net-zero-nutrient-loads (accessed on 20 November 2024).
  • 45.
    Smart, J.N.; Schmid, M.; Paine, E.R.; et al. Seasonal ammonium uptake kinetics of four brown macroalgae: Implications for use in integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 1693–1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-022-02743-w.
  • 46.
    Biancacci, C.; Sanderson, J.C.; Evans, B.; et al. Nutritional composition and heavy metal profiling of Australian kelps cultured in proximity to salmon and mussel farms. Algal 2022, 64, 102672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2022.102672.
  • 47.

    Layton, C.; Coleman, M.A.; Marzinelli, E.M.; et al. Kelp forest restoration in Australia. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00074.

  • 48.
    Carnell, P.E.; Keough, M.J. Reconstructing historical marine populations reveals major decline of a kelp forest ecosystem in Australia. Estuaries Coasts 2019, 42, 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00525-1.
  • 49.
    Filbee-Dexter, K.; Scheibling, R.E. Sea urchin barrens as alternative stable states of collapsed kelp ecosystems. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014, 495, 1–25.
  • 50.

    Kelly, J.; Macleod, C. Seaweed Aquaculture Governance in Australia—A Review of State and Northern Territory Seaweed Aquaculture Policy. AgriFutures Emerging p. 71. 2023. (Report). Available online: https://agrifutures.com.au/product/seaweed-aquaculture-governance-in-australia/ (accessed on 20 Novermber 2024).

  • 51.
    Sustainable Horizons: Coordinating the Future of Seaweed Industry Development in Australia. page: 2024. (Report). Available online: https://www.seaweedalliance.org.au/s/ASSA-Mini-Report-Sustainable-Horizons.pdf (accessed on 20 Novermber 2024).
  • 52.
    Bradly, N.; Syddall, V.; Ingram, C.; et al. Stocktake and characterisation of Aoteroa New Zealand’s Seaweed Sector: Market and Regulatory Focus. Auckland: Sustainable Seas National Science Challenge. 2021. (Report). Available online: https://www.sustainableseaschallenge.co.nz/tools-and-resources/nz-seaweed-sector-review-part-1/ (accessed on 20 Novermber 2024).
  • 53.

    NSW Seaweed Prospectus. 2024; p. 24. (Report). Available online: https://www.investregional.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/2024-11/Seaweed_Prospectus_0.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2025).

  • 54.
    Craig, R.K. Fostering adaptive marine aquaculture through procedural innovation in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy 2019, 110, 103555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103555.
  • 55.
    Losada-Lopez, C.; Dopico, D.C.; Faína-Medín, J.A. Neophobia and seaweed consumption: Effects on consumer attitude and willingness to consume seaweed. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2021, 24, 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100338.
  • 56.
    MarketsandMarkets Report. Seaweed Cultivation Market; MarketsandMarkets Research Private Ltd.: Pune, India, 2022; p. 210.
  • 57.

    Winkel, C. Development of a Seaweed Food Safety 2022; p. 46. (Report). Available online: https://www.frdc.com.au/sites/default/files/2023-02/23-011-FinalReport-Development-of-a-seaweed-food-safety-program.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2025).

  • 58.
    Ferdouse, F.; Smith, R.; Murúa, P.; et al. The Global Status of Seaweed Production, Trade and Utilization; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2018; p. 120.
  • 59.
    Nissar, S.; Bakhtiyar, Y.; Arafat, M.Y.; et al. The evolution of integrated multi-trophic aquaculture in context of its design and components paving way to valorization via optimization and diversification. Aquaculture 2023, 565, 739074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.739074.
  • 60.
    Larson, S.; Anderson, C.; Tiitii, U.; et al. Barriers and enablers for engagement in a new aquaculture activity: An example from seaweed initiatives in Samoa. Aquaculture 2023, 571, 739328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739328.
  • 61.
    Suybeng, B.; Charmley, E.; Gardiner, C.P.; et al. Methane emissions and the use of desmanthus in beef cattle production in northern Australia. Animals 2019, 9, 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080542.
  • 62.
    Krause-Jensen, D.; Duarte, C.M. Substantial role of macroalgae in marine carbon sequestration. Geosci. 2016, 9, 737–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2790.
  • 63.
    Ross, F.W.R.; Boyd, P.W.; Filbee-Dexter, K.; et al. Potential role of seaweeds in climate change mitigation. Total Environ. 2023, 885, 163699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163699.
  • 64.
    Seaweed Farming. Available online: https://drawdown.org/solutions/seaweed-farming (accessed on 20 January 2025).
  • 65.
    Green, P. The Significance of Japan’s Blue Carbon Calculations. Available online: https://thefishsite.com/articles/the-significance-of-japans-blue-carbon-calculations (accessed on 16 October 2024).
  • 66.

    Kaiser, A. New Markets Could Catalyze Seaweed’s Regenerative Potential on Land and Sea. Available online: https://www.nature.org/en-us/newsroom/new-markets-could-catalyze-seaweed-regenerative-potential-on-land-and-sear/ (accessed on 22 Febuary 2025).

  • 67.
    Strategies for Success-Asparagopsis Aquaculture in Australian Industry & Seaweed R&D Initiatives. 3. 2024. (Report). Available online: https://www.seaweedalliance.org.au/s/ASSA-Mini-Report-Strategies-For-Success.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2024).
  • 68.
    Duarte, C.M.; Wu, J.; Xiao, X.; et al. Can seaweed farming play a role in climate change mitigation and adaptation? Mar. Sci. 2017, 4, 100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00100.
  • 69.

    Dyrset, G. Blue growth in Norway–Three emerging narratives. Policy 2025, 178, 106718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2025.106718.

  • 70.
    Buschmann, A.H.; Camus, C.; Infante, J.; et al. Seaweed production: Overview of the global state of exploitation, farming and emerging research activity. J. Phycol. 2017, 52, 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2017.1365175.
  • 71.
    Chopin, T.; Troell, M.; Reid, G.K.; et al. Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. Policies Ensure A Aquac. Sect. 2010, 10, 195–217.
  • 72.
    Lal, J.; Singh, S.K.; Pawar, L.; et al. Chapter 15-Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture: A balanced ecosystem approach to blue revolution. In Organic Farming, 2nd ed.; Sarathchandran, M.R.U., Thomas, S.; Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2023; pp. 513–535.
  • 73.
    Zaat, L.M.; van den Burg, S.W.K.; Ketelaar, T.; et al. Prospective seaweed systems for North-West European waters. ICES Mar. Sci. 2025, 82, fsaf010. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaf010.
  • 74.
    Nishihara, G.N.; Sato, Y.; Eger, A.M.; et al. Expert opinions regarding the concept of blue carbon in seaweed systems. Res. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/pre.70009.
  • 75.

    UNEP. Seaweed Farming: Assessment on the Potential of Sustainable Upscaling for Climate, Communities and the Planet; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 2023.

  • 76.
    van den Burg, S.; Koch, S.; Raoult, J.; et al. Time to include blue carbon from seaweed in voluntary carbon removal certification. EuroChoices 2023, 22, 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12398.
  • 77.
    Parsons, M.; Taylor, L.; Crease, R. Indigenous environmental justice within marine ecosystems: A systematic review of the literature on Indigenous peoples’ involvement in marine governance and management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4217.
  • 78.
    Woodward, E.; Hill, R.; Harkness, P.; et al. Our Knowledge Our Way in Caring for Country: Indigenous-Led Approaches to Strengthening and Sharing Our Knowledge for Land and Sea Management; NAILSMA and CSIRO: Cairns, QLD, Australia, 2020; p. 127.
  • 79.

    Empowering Indigenous Rangers to Care for Sea Country on the Great Barrier Reef. Available online: https://www.aims.gov.au/information-centre/news-and-stories/empowering-indigenous-rangers-care-sea-country-great-barrier-reef (accessed on 2 October 2025).

  • 80.
    Holdt, S.L.; Kraan, S. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: Functional food applications and legislation. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 543–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9632-5.
Share this article:
Download PDF
DOI
10.53941/algaeenviron.2025.100006
Issue
Volume 1, Issue 1
How to Cite
Li, Y.; Rule, M.; Clarke, S.; Qin, J. Bridging Science and Strategy: The Emerging R&D Portfolio of the Australian Seaweed Industry. Algae and Environment 2025, 1 (1), 6. https://doi.org/10.53941/algaeenviron.2025.100006.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.