Copepods are a good live feed for aquaculture because they feed a variety of fish and crustacean larvae. Their roles in larviculture are explained by their ecological role in the transfer of energy from primary producers to higher trophic levels. Copepods exhibit higher levels of protein, amino acid profiles, digestive enzymes, and essential fatty acids, such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), which are critical for larval growth, neural development, stress resilience, and survival, when compared to conventional live feeds like rotifers and Artemia nauplii. Despite all of these advantages, copepod use is constrained by significant production constraints. Complex life cycles, sensitivity to environmental changes, changes in the nutritional makeup of algal diets, and difficulties achieving reliable high-density production are some of the difficulties that mass culture faces. The persistent obstacles continue to restrict their widespread commercial use. This review summarizes what is currently known about the ecological importance of copepods, assesses their nutritional value and production limitations, and suggests important lines of inquiry to improve their widespread use as sustainable live feed in aquaculture.
- Open Access
- Review
Ecological Basis and Aquaculture Use of Copepods as Live Feed with Emphasis on Nutritional Value, Production Constraints, and Future Directions
- Nadiah Wan Rasdi 1,*,
- Aisyah Ashaari 1,
- Nabilah Abdul Hadi 2,
- Hon Jung Liew 3,
- Siti Rohana Yatim 4,
- Heru Kurniawan Alamsyah 5,
- Einar Ringø 6
Author Information
Received: 15 Feb 2026 | Revised: 08 May 2026 | Accepted: 19 May 2026 | Published: 23 Jun 2026
Abstract
Keywords
copepods | aquaculture | growth | fisheries | ecology
References
- 1.
Yuslan, A.; Ghaffar, M.A.; Arshad, A.; et al. Enhancement of Protein, Lipid and Fatty Acids in Copepod, Oithona rigida for the Improvement of Growth, Development and Survival of Early-Stage Mud Crab Larvae (Scylla olivacea). Aquac. Res. 2022, 53, 6158–6171. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.16089.
- 2.
Hong, G.K.; Tew, K.S. The Advantages of Inorganic Fertilization for the Mass Production of Copepods as Food for Fish Larvae in Aquaculture. Life 2022, 12, 441. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12030441.
- 3.
Pan, Y.J.; Dahms, H.U.; Hwang, J.S.; et al. Recent Trends in Live Feeds for Marine Larviculture: A Mini Review. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 864165.
- 4.
Sun, Y.H.; Lin, Y.R.; Hsieh, H.Y.; et al. Early Feeding Strategies for the Larviculture of the Vermiculated Angelfish Chaetodontoplus mesoleucus: The Key Role of Copepods. Animals 2025, 15, 2437.
- 5.
Vidhya, G.; Pavithra, K. The Impact of Microalgae-Based Diet Enriched Mesocyclops aspericornis Copepod on the Growth Performance and Biochemical Assessment of Ornamental Fish (Brachydanio rerio). Uttar Pradesh J. Zool. 2024, 45, 275–282.
- 6.
Ma, M.; Hu, Q. Microalgae as Feed Sources and Feed Additives for Sustainable Aquaculture: Prospects and Challenges. Rev. Aquacult. 2024, 16, 818–835.
- 7.
Chen, M.; Kim, D.; Liu, H.; et al. Variability in Copepod Trophic Levels and Feeding Selectivity Based on Stable Isotope Analysis in Gwangyang Bay of the Southern Coast of the Korean Peninsula. Biogeosciences 2018, 15, 2055–2073. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-2055-2018.
- 8.
Morison, F.; Pierson, J.J.; Oikonomou, A.; et al. Mesozooplankton Grazing Minimally Impacts Phytoplankton Abundance during Spring in the Western North Atlantic. PeerJ 2020, 8, e9430. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9430.
- 9.
Wollrab, S.; Diehl, S. Bottom-Up Responses of the Lower Oceanic Food Web Are Sensitive to Copepod Mortality and Feeding Behavior. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2015, 60, 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10044.
- 10.
Shoemaker, K.M.; Duhamel, S.; Moisander, P.H. Copepods Promote Bacterial Community Changes in Surrounding Seawater through Farming and Nutrient Enrichment. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 21, 3737–3750. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14723.
- 11.
Valdés, V.P.; Fernandez, C.; Molina, V.; et al. Dissolved Compounds Excreted by Copepods Reshape the Active Marine Bacterioplankton Community Composition. Front. Mar. Sci. 2017, 4, 343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00343.
- 12.
Di Matteo, L.; Benedetti, F.; Ayata, S.D.; et al. Including Different Mesozooplankton Feeding Strategies in a Biogeochemical Ocean Model Impacts Global Ocean Biomass and Carbon Cycle. Biogeosciences 2025, 22, 7233–7268.
- 13.
Vijayaraj, R.; Jayaprakashvel, M.; Altaff, K. Asian Seabass (Lates calcarifer) Larval Rearing Using Cyclopoid Copepod (Apocyclops royi) Live Feed: A New Approach. J. Basic Appl. Zool. 2025, 86, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-025-00425-w.
- 14.
Azani, N.; Liew, H.J.; Redzuan, N.S.; et al. Reproduction Rate and Nutritional Composition (Proteins, Lipids) of Mesocyclops leuckarti (Copepoda, Cyclopoida) Enriched with Organic Diets for Aquacultural Purposes. Crustaceana 2023, 96, 823–851. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685403-bja10322.
- 15.
Khan, N.S.; Rahman, M.S. Zooplankton in Aquaculture: A Perspective on Nutrition and Cost-Effectiveness. Aquacult. Res. 2025, 2025, 5347147. https://doi.org/10.1155/are/5347147.
- 16.
Das, P.; Mukherjee, S.; Kar, S.; et al. Zooplankton as Dietary Component of Selected Freshwater Fish: Network Analysis Based on Gut Content. Aquacult. Aquarium Conserv. Legis. 2018, 11, 232–244.
- 17.
Suhaimi, H.; Yuslan, A.; Azani, N.; et al. Effect of Dietary Enhanced Moina macrocopa (Straus, 1820) on the Growth, Survival and Nutritional Profiles of Hybrid Nile Tilapia Fry. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2022, 48, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2021.08.004.
- 18.
Ajiboye, O.O.; Yakubu, A.F.; Adams, T.E.; et al. A Review of the Use of Copepods in Marine Fish Larviculture. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2011, 21, 225–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-010-9169-3.
- 19.
Lomartire, S.; Marques, J.C.; Gonçalves, A.M.M. The Key Role of Zooplankton in Ecosystem Services: A Perspective of Interaction Between Zooplankton and Fish Recruitment. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 129, 107867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107867.
- 20.
Piccinetti, C.C.; Tulli, F.; Tokle, N.E.; et al. The Use of Preserved Copepods in Sea Bream Small-Scale Culture: Biometric, Biochemical and Molecular Implications. Aquacult. Nutr. 2014, 20, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12055.
- 21.
Karlsen, Ø.; van der Meeren, T.; Rønnestad, I.; et al. Copepods Enhance Nutritional Status, Growth and Development in Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua L.) Larvae—Can We Identify the Underlying Factors? PeerJ 2015, 3, e902. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.902.
- 22.
Araújo-Silva, S.L.; da Rocha, V.M.; Skorupa, K.; et al. The Importance of Copepods for Growth and Pigmentation of the Brazilian Basslet Gramma brasiliensis Larvae. Aquacult. Int. 2025, 33, 323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-025-02017-5.
- 23.
Abate, T.G.; Nielsen, R.; Nielsen, M.; et al. Economic Feasibility of Copepod Production for Commercial Use: Results from a Prototype Production Facility. Aquaculture 2015, 436, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.10.012.
- 24.
Azani, N.; Rasdi, N.W. Effect of Enriched Copepods on the Growth, Survival and Colouration of Angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare). Univ. Malaysia Terengganu J. Undergrad. Res. 2021, 3, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.46754/umtjur.v3i2.202.
- 25.
Ramlee, A.; Chembaruthy, M.; Gunaseelan, H.; et al. Enhancement of Nutritional Value on Zooplankton by Alteration of Algal Media Composition: A Review. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 869, 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/869/1/012006.
- 26.
Ashaari, A.; Abdul Jalal, A.S.; Hadi, N.A.; et al. Effects of Herbs Enriched Copepod and Its Potential Use in Whiteleg Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) Post-Larvae Culture. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2024, 1432, 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1432/1/012008.
- 27.
Ritu, J.R.; Khan, S.; Uddin, M.H.; et al. Exploring the Nutritional Potential of Monoraphidium littorale and Enriched Copepods as First Feeds for Rearing Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) Larvae. Heliyon 2024, 10, e35877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35877.
- 28.
Baharuddin, N.D.; Muthukhrisnan, S.; de Cruz, C.R.; et al. Evaluation of Diatom Halamphora sp. and Harpacticoid Copepod Amphiascoides neglectus as Live Food for Black Tiger Shrimp (Penaeus monodon) Postlarvae. Aquaculture 2024, 586, 740773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.740773.
- 29.
Yuslan, A.; Suhaimi, H.; Taufek, H.M.; et al. Effect of Bio-Organic Fertilizer and Agro-Industrial Residue on the Growth and Reproduction of Cyclopoid Copepod, Oithona rigida (Giesbrecht, 1896). Int. J. Aquat. Biol. 2022, 10, 151–168.
- 30.
Yuslan, A.; Nasir, N.; Suhaimi, H.; et al. The Effect of Enriched Cyclopoid Copepods on the Coloration and Feeding Rate of Betta splendens. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 869, 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/869/1/012007.
- 31.
Azani, N.; Ghaffar, M.A.; Suhaimi, H.; et al. The Impacts of Climate Change on Plankton as Live Food: A Review. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 869, 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/869/1/012005.
- 32.
Rasdi, N.W.; Ikhwannuddin, M.; Azani, N.; et al. The Effect of Different Feeds on the Growth, Survival and Reproduction of Rotifer, Brachionus plicatilis. J. Environ. Biol. 2020, 41, 1275–1280. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/41/5(SI)/MS_20.
- 33.
Naman, N.; Kassim, Z.; Rasdi, N.W. The Effect of Copepod Enriched-Vegetable Based Diet on Giant Tiger Prawn (Penaeus monodon) Post-Larvae. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 674, 012081. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/674/1/012081.
- 34.
Rasdi, N.W.; Qin, J.G. Impact of Food Type on Growth, Survival and Reproduction of the Cyclopoid Copepod Cyclopina kasignete as a Potential Live Food in Aquaculture. Aquacult. Int. 2018, 26, 1281–1295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-018-0283-x.
- 35.
Ramlee, A.; Rasdi, W.N.N.W.; Wahid, M.E.A.; et al. Microalgae and the Factors Involved in Successful Propagation for Mass Production. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2021, 16, 21–42. https://doi.org/10.46754/jssm.2021.04.003.
- 36.
Samat, N.A.; Yusoff, F.M.; Rasdi, N.W.; et al. The Efficacy of Moina micrura Enriched with Probiotic Bacillus pocheonensis in Enhancing Survival and Disease Resistance of Red Hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) Larvae. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10080989.
- 37.
Ashaari, A.; Iehata, S.; Kim, H.J.; et al. Recent Advancement of Zooplankton Enriched with Nutrients and Probiotic Isolates from Aquaculture Systems: A Review. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2024, 52, 2417052.
- 38.
Kumar, V.; Roy, S.; Meena, D.K.; et al. Application of Probiotics in Shrimp Aquaculture: Importance, Mechanisms of Action, and Methods of Administration. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquacult. 2016, 24, 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2016.1193841.
- 39.
Hagiwara, A.; Gallardo, W.G.; Assavaaree, M.; et al. Live Food Production in Japan: Recent Progress and Future Aspects. Aquaculture 2001, 200, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486(01)00696-2.
- 40.
Jepsen, P.M.; Andersen, C.V.B.; Schjelde, J.; et al. Tolerance of Un-Ionized Ammonia in Live Feed Cultures of the Calanoid Copepod Acartia tonsa Dana. Aquacult. Res. 2015, 46, 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12190.
- 41.
McGinty, N.; Barton, A.D.; Record, N.R.; et al. Anthropogenic Climate Change Impacts on Copepod Trait Biogeography. Global Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 1431–1442. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15499.
- 42.
Marjuk, M.S.; Sridhar, P.; Gowthami, A.; et al. Systematic Optimization and Neural Network Modelling of Acartia steueri Copepod Reproduction for Enhanced Live Feed Solutions in Sustainable Aquaculture. Aquaculture 2025, 614, 743482.
- 43.
Karlsson, K.; Puiac, S.; Winder, M. Life-History Responses to Changing Temperature and Salinity of the Baltic Sea Copepod Eurytemora affinis. Mar. Biol. 2018, 165, 30.
- 44.
Dey, T.; Ghosh, P.K.; Nandi, S.K.; et al. A Review on n-3 HUFA and Live Food Organism for Marine Fish Larvae Nutrition. Am. J. Agric. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2022, 6, 88–102.
- 45.
Huanacuni, J.I.; Nieto-Rojas, M.J.; Pepe-Victoriano, R.; et al. Influence of Salinity, Temperature, Photoperiod, and Isochrysis galbana Microalgal Cell Density on the Growth of the Marine Copepod Oithona nana. Animals 2025, 15, 2635.
- 46.
Ballesteros-Redondo, L.; Palm, H.W.; Bährs, H.; et al. Growth and Fatty Acid Composition of Pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L., 1758) Larvae under Altered Feeding Protocol Including the Copepod Apocyclops panamensis (Marsh, 1913). Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 19574.
- 47.
Aguilera, V.M.; Vargas, C.A.; Dam, H.G. Antagonistic Interplay Between pH and Food Resources Affects Copepod Traits and Performance in a Year-Round Upwelling System. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 62.
- 48.
Drillet, G.; Rabarimanantsoa, T.; Frouël, S.; et al. Do Inactivated Microbial Preparations Improve Life History Traits of the Copepod Acartia tonsa? Mar. Biotechnol. 2011, 13, 831–836.
- 49.
Honda, I.A.; Medeiros, L.P.; Thompson, C.R.; et al. Seasonal Trophic Controls Drive Population Variability in a Foundational Marine Copepod. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 36018.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Suite 4002 Level 4, 447 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
General Inquiries: info@sciltp.com