2603003247
  • Open Access
  • Article

Discretized Infinite Potential Well and Their Associated Coherent States

  • Dušan Popov 1,2

Received: 25 Dec 2025 | Revised: 12 Feb 2026 | Accepted: 09 Mar 2026 | Published: 20 Mar 2026

Abstract

Since, unlike “traditional” physics, computational physics uses the discretization formalism, in this paper we have focused our attention on the discrete approach in order to solve the Schrödinger as well as the Bloch equations for a free particle and the “quantum gas” of free particles in an infinite quantum well with the finite length, respectively. By applying the so called continuous quantum mechanics limit we recover the corresponding results in continuous-variable quantum mechanics. For the infinite quantum well model we formulated the associated coherent states, which lead to the expression for the coherent qubits, in counterpart to the thermal qubits, obtained as a result of using the thermofield dynamics model. Thus, a “bridge” is created between the infinite quantum well model, coherent states and thermofield dynamics, which ultimately converge towards Quantum Computing.

References 

  • 1.

    Odake, S.; Sasaki, R. Discrete quantum mechanics. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2011, 44, 353001.

  • 2.

    Elaydi, S.N. An Introduction to Difference Equations; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 57–60.

  • 3.

    Peterson, A.C.; Kelley, W.G. Difference Equations: An Introduction with Applications; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1991; pp. 13–15.

  • 4.

    Tošić, B.; Sajfert, V.; Popov, D.; et al. Application of Difference Calculus in Analysis of Nanostructure; Vojvodina Academy of Sciences and Arts: Novi Sad, Serbia, 2005; pp. 11–12. (In Serbian)

  • 5.

    Tošić, B.; Sajfert, V.; Popov, D.; et al. Theoretical Analysis of Specific Properties of Nano-Structures; Editura Politehnica: Timisoara, Romania, 2007; pp. 14–20. (In Romanian)

  • 6.

    Jannussis, A.; Leodaris, A.; Papatheou, V.; et al. Some remarks on the discrete-time Schrödinger equation. Lett. Nuovo C. 1980, 29, 259–262.

  • 7.

    Boykin, T.B.; Klimeck, G. The discretized Schrödinger equation and simple models for semiconductor quantum wells. Eur. J. Phys. 2004, 25, 503–514.

  • 8.

    Wolf, C.; Testing discrete quantum mechanics using neutron interferometry and the superposition principle—A gedenken experiment, Found. Phys. 1990, 20, 1, 133-137. 

  • 9.

    Boykin, T.B.; Klimeck, G. The discretized Schrödinger equation for the finite square well and its relationship to solid-state physics. Eur. J. Phys. 2005, 26, 865–881.

  • 10.

    Dong, S.H. Factorization Method in Quantum Mechanics; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 58–62.

  • 11.

    Feynman, R.P. Statistical Mechanics—A Set of Lectures; Mir: Moscow, Russia, 1975; pp. 61–62. (Translated in Russian)

  • 12.

    Tošić, B.S.; Popov, D. A method for solving Bloch equation for Morse potential. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2000, 61, 1561–1566.

  • 13.

    DiracDelta. Available online: http://functions.wolfram.com/GeneralizedFunctions/DiracDelta/06/ShowAll.html (accessed on 10 March 2023).

  • 14.

    Gradshteyn, I.S.; Ryzhik, I.M. Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2007; p. 337.

  • 15.

    Munoz Villegas, C.A.; Chavez Chavez, A.; Chumakov, S.; et al. On Discrete Quasiprobability Distributions. arXiv 2003, arXiv:quant-ph/0307051.

  • 16.

    Fiset, M.-A.; Hussin, V. Supersymmetric infinite wells and coherent states. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2015, 624, 012016.

  • 17.

    Popov, D.; Sajfert, V.; Šetrajčić, J.P.; Pop, N. Coherent States Formalism Applied to the Quantum Well Model. Quantum Matter 2014, 3, 388–393.

  • 18.

    Barut, A.O.; Girardello, L. New “Coherent” States associated with non-compact groups. Commun. Math. Phys. 1971, 21, 41–55.

  • 19.

    Antoine, J.-P.; Gazeau, J.-P.; Monceau, P.; et al. Temporally stable coherent states for infinite well and Pöschl-Teller potentials. J. Math. Phys. 2001, 6, 2349–2387.

  • 20.

    Popov, D.; Zaharie, I.; Sajfert, V.; et al. Quantum Information in the Frame of Coherent States Representation. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2007, 47, 1441–1454.

  • 21.

    Torsti, T.; Eirola, T.; Enkovaara, J.; et al. Three real-space discretization techniques in electronic structure calculations. Phys. Status Solidi B 2006, 243, 1016–1053.

  • 22.

    Abdulrahman, D.T. Comparison between numerical analysis methods and methods for solving complex differential equations. Int. J. Stat. Appl. Math. 2025, 10, 41–51.

  • 23.

    Umezawa, H.; Matsumoto, H.; Tachiki, M. Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States; North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982; pp. 102–110.

  • 24.

    Petronilo, G.X.A.; Araújo, M.R.; Cruz, C. Simulating thermal qubits through thermofield dynamics: An undergraduate approach using quantum computing. RBEF Rev. Bras. Ens. Fís. 2023, 45, e20230287.

  • 25.

    Diniz, C.M.; Damas, G.G.; de Almeida Norton, G.; et al. Quantum Features of the Thermal Two-Qubit Quantum Rabi Model in Ultra- and Deep-Strong Regimes. Adv. Quantum Technol. 2025, 8, e2500250.

  • 26.

    Garcia de Leon, P.L.; Gazeau, J.P.; Quelva, J. Infinite quantum well: A coherent state approach. Phys. Lett. A 2008, 372, 3597–3607.

  • 27.

    EllipticTheta3. Available online: http://functions.wolfram.com/EllipticFunctions/EllipticTheta3/02/ (accessed on 10 March 2023).

Share this article:
How to Cite
Popov, D. Discretized Infinite Potential Well and Their Associated Coherent States. Applied Mathematics and Statistics 2026, 3 (1), 2. https://doi.org/10.53941/ams.2026.100002.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.