2512002631
  • Open Access
  • Mini Review

Environmental-Economic Accounting-Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) in Tourism

  • Eglė Baltranaitė *,   
  • Miguel Inacio,   
  • Paulo Pereira

Received: 01 Sep 2025 | Revised: 23 Nov 2025 | Accepted: 24 Dec 2025 | Published: 14 Jan 2026

Abstract

Tourism is one of the fastest-growing industries in the global economy. It influences policies and strategies of many destinations at different spatial scales. It also has a significant impact on the environment and ecosystem services (ES). This effect further impacts the sustainability of tourism and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), contributing to biodiversity loss and habitat destruction. The System of Environmental-Economic Accounting—Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) was adopted as a global statistical standard in 2021, providing a comprehensive framework for integrating physical and monetary ecosystem accounts to support sustainable management and informed policy and development. This mini-review aimed to summarise and synthesise existing research and emphasise new developments in the use of SEEA-EA for the governance and planning of the tourism industry. We highlighted the key components of SEEA-EA (ecosystem extent, condition, services and asset valuation) relevant to tourism. The limited scope of existing tourism studies was evident in their primary focus on ES valuation and a restricted geographical scale. We further emphasise the potential for interoperability between SEEA-EA, tourism statistics, and the SDGs. The review underscores the current lack of data harmonisation across frameworks and the scarcity of data at the destination level. Despite its limitations, the SEEA-EA integration offers an opportunity to quantify the costs and benefits of tourism and to support monitoring of the SDGs. Prospective applications include utilising SEEA-EA at destination scale for management, enhancing the valuation of the travel & tourism sector’s environmental costs and economic benefits, and addressing gaps in tourism statistics. To advance sustainable tourism through effective adoption of the SEEA-EA, it requires enhanced data quality, increased institutional capacity, and global collaboration.

References 

  • 1.

    UNWTO. World Tourism Barometer; UNWTO: Madrid, Spain. https://doi.org/10.18111/wtobarometereng.

  • 2.

    Fredman, P.; Margaryan, L. 20 Years of Nordic Nature-Based Tourism Research: A Review and Future Research Agenda. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 2021, 21, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2020.1823247.

  • 3.

    Balmford, A.; Green, J.M.H.; Anderson, M.; et al. Walk on the Wild Side: Estimating the Global Magnitude of Visits to Protected Areas. PLoS Biol 2015, 13, e1002074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002074.

  • 4.

    Reid, W.V.; Mooney, H.A.; Cropper, A.; et al. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being—Synthesis: A Report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessments; Island Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.

  • 5.

    O’Leary, B.C.; Fonseca, C.; Cornet, C.C.; et al. Embracing Nature-Based Solutions to Promote Resilient Marine and Coastal Ecosystems. Nat.-Based Solut. 2023, 3, 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100044.

  • 6.

    García, D.H.; Rezapouraghdam, H.; Hall, C.M.; et al. Spatio-Temporal Variability of the Earth’s Surface Temperature and the Changes in Land User/Land Cover: Implications for Sustainable Tourism Development. J. Policy Res. Tour. Leis. Events 2025, 17, 557–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2023.2242362.

  • 7.

    Chowdhury, T.S.; Mawa, M.J.; Islam, R.U.; et al. Nature and Cause of CO2 Emission in Eastern Africa: Role of Tourism and Afforestation towards Reduce CO2 Emission. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open 2024, 10, 101051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101051.

  • 8.

    Adewumi, I.B.; Usui, R.; Funck, C. Perceptions of Multiple Stakeholders about Environmental Issues at a Nature-Based Tourism Destination: The Case of Yakushima Island, Japan. Environments 2019, 6, 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments6080093.

  • 9.

    Hayes, S.; Lovelock, B.; Carr, A. ‘They Sure Do Have a Pretty Colour Palette!’: The Problematic Promotion of Invasive Species as Tourism Icons. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2025, 50, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2023.2199613.

  • 10.

    Pásková, M.; Štekerová, K.; Zanker, M.; et al. Water Pollution Generated by Tourism: Review of System Dynamics Models. Heliyon 2024, 10, e23824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23824.

  • 11.

    Gabor, M.R.; Panait, M.; Bacoş, I.B.; et al. Circular Tourism Economy in European Union between Competitiveness, Risk and Sustainability. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2023, 32, 103407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103407.

  • 12.

    Chen, T.; Liu, G. Global Perspectives on Environmental Policy Innovations: Driving Green Tourism and Consumer Behavior in Circular Economy. J. Environ. Manage. 2025, 374, 124138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124138.

  • 13.

    Valença Pinto, L.; Inácio, M.; Bogdzevič, K.; et al. Factors Affecting the Use of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Lithuanian Coastal Area. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2024, 251, 107095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107095.

  • 14.

    Haines-Young, R.; Potschin-Young, M. Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services (CICES V5.1): A Policy Brief. One Ecosyst. 2018, 3, e27108. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e27108.

  • 15.

    Røpke, I. The Early History of Modern Ecological Economics. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 50, 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.012.

  • 16.

    Gómez-Baggethun, E.; De Groot, R.; Lomas, P.L.; et al. The History of Ecosystem Services in Economic Theory and Practice: From Early Notions to Markets and Payment Schemes. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007.

  • 17.

    Clawson, M. Methods of Measuring the Demand for and Value of Outdoor Recreation. Marion Clawson. Resources for the Future, Inc., 1145 Nineteenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 1959. 36p. 50c. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Methods-of-Measuring-the-Demand-for-and-Value-of-Clawson/f60807dcd5d3c250f3d974e64503b3928791a7c8 (accessed on 10 August 2025).

  • 18.

    European Commission. EU-Wide Methodology to Map and Assess Ecosystem Condition: Towards a Common Approach Consistent with a Global Statistical Standard; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2022.

  • 19.

    Lange, S.; Campagne, C.S.; Comte, A.; et al. Progress on Ecosystem Accounting in Europe. Ecosyst. Serv. 2022, 57, 101473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101473.

  • 20.

    Inácio, M.; Baltranaitė, E.; Pinto, L.V.; et al. A Systematic Literature Review on the Implementation of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting-Ecosystem Accounting in Forests, Cities and Marine Areas. Ecosyst. Serv. 2025, 74, 101752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101752.

  • 21.

    Ji, J.; Zhu, T.; Jia, C.; et al. Testing Ecosystem Accounting in Northern China—A Case Study of SEEA EA in Liaoning Province. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 2023, 68, 751–772. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2269473.

  • 22.

    Sylla, M. The Application of Ecosystem Accounting Principles at the Local Scale for a Protected Landscape: A Case Study of the Sleza Landscape Park in Poland. Ecosyst. Serv. 2024, 66, 101604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101604.

  • 23.

    Bartolini, A.; Di Gennaro, V.; Reas, V.; et al. Ecosystem Accounting for Marine-Based Tourism Provided by Posidonia oceanica in Italy. One Ecosyst. 2024, 9, e129751. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.9.e129751.

  • 24.

    Manero, A.; Yusoff, A.; Lane, M.; et al. A National Assessment of the Economic and Wellbeing Impacts of Recreational Surfing in Australia. Mar. Policy 2024, 167,106267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106267.

  • 25.

    Edens, B.; Maes, J.; Hein, L.; et al. Establishing the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting as a Global Standard. Ecosyst. Serv. 2022, 54, 101413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101413.

  • 26.

    Vardon, M.; Castaneda, J.-P.; Nagy, M.; et al. How the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting Can Improve Environmental Information Systems and Data Quality for Decision Making. Environ. Sci. Policy 2018, 89, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.007.

  • 27.

    Gkarane, S.; Vassiliadis, C. Breaking the Seasonality Barrier in Tourism. A Literature Review of Policies and Strategies. In Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism; Kavoura, A., Borges-Tiago, T., Tiago, F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 211–218. ISBN 978-3-031-51037-3.

  • 28.

    Smith, S.L.J.; Massieu, A. Tourism Statistics. In Encyclopedia of Social Measurement; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 863–868. ISBN 978-0-12-369398-3.

  • 29.

    Pham, T.; Meng, X.; Becken, S. Measuring Tourism Emissions at Destination Level: Australia Case. Ann. Tour. Res. Empir. Insights 2022, 3, 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2022.100062.

  • 30.

    European Commission; Statistical Office of the European Union. Tourism Satellite Accounts in Europe: 2019 Edition; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2019.

  • 31.

    UN Statistical Commission. Statistical Framework for Measuring the Sustainability of Tourism (SF-MST); Final Draft Prepared for UN Statistical Commission; UN Statistical Commission: New York, NY, USA, 2024.

  • 32.

    Dwyer, L. Measuring the Sustainability of Tourism (SF-MST): New Wine in an Old Bottle? Sustainability 2024, 16, 5867. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145867.

  • 33.

    Hernández-Martín, R.; Padrón-Fumero, N.; Padrón-Ávila, H. The Local Turn in Tourism Statistics within the Statistical Framework for Measuring the Sustainability of Tourism 2024. Sustainability 2025, 17, 1430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041430.

  • 34.

    Usubiaga-Liaño, A.; Selomane, O.; Comte, A. Strong Sustainability in the SEEA and the Wider Indicator Landscape. OE 2025, 10, e141086. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.10.e141086.

  • 35.

    Baltranaitė, E.; Inácio, M.; Valença Pinto, L.V; et al. Tourism Impacts on Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review. Geogr. Sustain. 2025, 6, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2025.100277.

  • 36.

    Di Gennaro, V.; Ferrini, S.; Turner, R.K. Extending the Genuine Savings Estimates with Natural Capital and Poverty at the Regional and National Level in Italy. Ecol. Econ. 2025, 228, 108433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108433.

  • 37.

    Qin, F.; Liu, J.; Li, G. Accounting for Tourism Carbon Emissions: A Consumption Stripping Perspective Based on the Tourism Satellite Account. Tour. Econ. 2024, 30, 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166231175378.

  • 38.

    Miller, G.; Torres-Delgado, A. Measuring Sustainable Tourism: A State of the Art Review of Sustainable Tourism Indicators. J. Sustain. Tour. 2023, 31, 1483–1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2213859.

  • 39.

    Bošković, N.; Vujičić, M.; Ristić, L. Sustainable Tourism Development Indicators for Mountain Destinations in the Republic of Serbia. Curr. Issues Tour. 2020, 23, 2766–2778. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2019.1666807.

  • 40.

    Hein, L.; Bagstad, K.J.; Obst, C.; et al. Progress in Natural Capital Accounting for Ecosystems. Science 2020, 367, 514–515. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8901.

  • 41.

    Bowen, J.; Whalen, E. Trends That Are Changing Travel and Tourism. WHATT 2017, 9, 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-09-2017-0045.

  • 42.

    Inácio, M.; Barceló, D.; Zhao, W.; et al. Mapping Lake Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 847, 157561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157561.

  • 43.

    Pereira, P.; Inácio, M.; Pinto, L.; et al. Mapping Ecosystem Services in Urban and Peri urban Areas. A Systematic Review. Geogr. Sustain. 2024, 5, 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2024.06.002.

  • 44.

    Thompson, J.L.; Kaiser, A.; Sparks, E.L.; et al. Ecosystem—What? Public Understanding and Trust in Conservation Science and Ecosystem Services. Front. Commun. 2016, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2016.00003.

  • 45.

    DeLorme, D.E.; Stephens, S.H.; Collini, R.C.; et al. Communicating and Understanding Ecosystem Services Assessment with Coastal Stakeholders: Obstacles and Opportunities. Front. Commun. 2021, 6, 656884. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.656884.

  • 46.

    Lewan, L.; Söderqvist, T. Knowledge and Recognition of Ecosystem Services among the General Public in a Drainage Basin in Scania, Southern Sweden. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 42, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00127-1.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Baltranaitė, E.; Inacio, M.; Pereira, P. Environmental-Economic Accounting-Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA-EA) in Tourism. Earth: Environmental Sustainability 2026, 2 (1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.53941/eesus.2026.100003.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.