It has often been suggested that similar quantum particles may be a counterexample to the principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles. In this article, I discuss the status of indiscernibility in a perspectival approach to quantum mechanics. I argue that adopting an internal physical perspective can have the effect of making entities discernible even if they are not discernible relative to external reference frames, and thus perspectivalism offers a new way to understand the physical meaning of weak discernibility. I discuss whether this approach is circular, and I consider whether the reference frames involved are physically meaningful. I conclude that the Identify of Indiscernibles can probably be maintained in this context, though there are outstanding questions pertaining to the meaning of the quantum state and the way in which a system should be represented in its own reference frame.
- Open Access
- Article
Quantum Indiscernibility and Perspectivalism
- Emily Adlam
Author Information
Received: 05 Feb 2026 | Revised: 11 Mar 2026 | Accepted: 26 Mar 2026 | Published: 31 Mar 2026
Abstract
References
- 1.
Van Fraassen, B.C. Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1991.
- 2.
Brukner, C. On the Quantum Measurement Problem; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 95–117.
- 3.
Dieks, D. Quantum Mechanics and Perspectivalism. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1801.09307.
- 4.
Healey, R. Quantum Relativity Without Relativism. Available online: https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/20397/ (accessed on 30 March 2026).
- 5.
Rovelli, C. Relational quantum mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1996, 35, 1637–1678. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02302261.
- 6.
Adlam, E. Moderate physical perspectivalism. Philos. Sci. 2025, 92, 624–645.
- 7.
Howard, D. Who Invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A Study in Mythology. Philos. Sci. 2004, 71, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1086/425941.
- 8.
Everett, H. “Relative State” Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1957, 29, 454.
- 9.
Fuchs, C.A.; Stacey, B.C. QBism: Quantum Theory as a Hero’s Handbook. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1612.07308.
- 10.
Vidotto, F. The relational ontology of contemporary physics. In Quantum Mechanics and Fundamentality: Naturalizing Quantum Theory between Scientific Realism and Ontological Indeterminacy; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 163–173.
- 11.
Castro-Ruiz, E.; Giacomini, F.; Belenchia, A.; et al. Quantum clocks and the temporal localisability of events in the presence of gravitating quantum systems. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2672. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16013-1.
- 12.
de la Hamette, A.C.; Galley, T.D.; Hoehn, P.A.; et al. Perspective-neutral approach to quantum frame covariance for general symmetry groups. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2110.13824.
- 13.
Giacomini, F.; Brukner, Cˇ . Quantum superposition of spacetimes obeys einstein's equivalence principle. AVS Quantum Sci. 2022, 4, 015601. https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0070018.
- 14.
Giacomini, F.; Castro-Ruiz, E.; Brukner, C. Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 494. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08155-0.
- 15.
Hohn, P.A.; Vanrietvelde, A. How to switch between relational quantum clocks. New J. Phys. 2020, 22, 123048. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/abd1ac.
- 16.
Vanrietvelde, A.; Hoehn, P.A.; Giacomini, F.; et al. A change of perspective: switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework. Quantum 2020, 4, 225. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-01-27-225.
- 17.
Hoehn, P.A.; Lock, M.P.E.; Ahmad, S.A.; et al. Quantum relativity of subsystems. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2103.01232.
- 18.
Caulton, A. Qualitative individuation in permutation-invariant quantum mechanics. arXiv 2014, arXiv:1409.0247.
- 19.
Forrest, P. The Identity of Indiscernibles. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; Zalta, E.N., Ed.; Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2020.
- 20.
Loemker, L.E. (Ed.). Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Philosophical Papers and Letters; Reidel: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1969.
- 21.
Schmid, D.; Selby, J.H.; Spekkens, R.W. Unscrambling the omelette of causation and inference: The framework of causal-inferential theories. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2009.03297.
- 22.
Ladyman, J.; Bigaj, T. The principle of the identity of indiscernibles and quantum mechanics. Philos. Sci. 2010, 77, 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1086/650211.
- 23.
Dieks, D.; Versteegh, M.A.M. Identical quantum particles and weak discernibility. Found. Phys. 2008, 38, 923–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-008-9243-z.
- 24.
Black, M. The identity of indiscernibles. Mind 1952, 61, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/lxi.242.153.
- 25.
Messiah, A.M.L.; Greenberg, O.W. Symmetrization postulate and its experimental foundation. Phys. Rev. 1964, 136, B248–B267. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B248.
- 26.
Dieks, D. Weak discernibility and the identity of spacetime points. In Space and Time: A Priori and a Posteriori Studies; Fano, V., Orilia, F., Macchia, G., Eds.; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 43–62.
- 27.
Saunders, S.; Muller, F.A. Discerning fermions. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 2008, 59, 499–548. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axn027.
- 28.
Bigaj, T. On discernibility and symmetries. Erkenntnis 2015, 80, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9616-y.
- 29.
Quine, W.V. Grades of discriminability. J. Philos. 1976, 73, 113–116.
- 30.
Quine, W.V.O. Word and object. Les Etudes Philos. 1960, 17, 278–279.
- 31.
Saunders, S. Physics and Leibniz’s Principles. In Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002; pp. 289–307.
- 32.
Saunders, S. Are quantum particles objects? Analysis 2006, 66, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/66.1.52.
- 33.
Caulton, A. Discerning ‘indistinguishable’ quantum systems. Philos. Sci. 2013, 80, 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/668874.
- 34.
Muller, F.A.; Seevinck, M.P. Discerning elementary particles. Philos. Sci. 2009, 76, 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1086/647486.
- 35.
French, S.; Krause, D. Remarks on the theory of quasi-sets. Stud. Log. 2010, 95, 101–124, . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-
010-9249-3. - 36.
Krause, D.; Jorge, J.P.; Lombardi, O. A quasi-set theory without atoms and its application to a quantum ontology of properties. Synthese 2025, 207, 6.
- 37.
Krumm, M.; Hohn, P.A.; M¨uller, M.P. Quantum reference frame transformations as symmetries and the paradox of the third particle. Quantum 2021, 5, 530. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-08-27-530.
- 38.
de la Hamette, A.C.; Galley, T.D. Quantum reference frames for general symmetry groups. Quantum 2020, 4, 367. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-11-30-367.
- 39.
Brautigam, M. Heterodox underdetermination: Metaphysical options for discernibility and (non-)entanglement. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part A 2024, 103, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.09.005.
- 40.
Bigaj, T. Identity and Indiscernibility in Quantum Mechanics; Springer Nature (Palgrave-Macmillan): Cham, Switzerland, 2022.
- 41.
Mikusch, M.; Barbado, L.C.; Brukner, Cˇ . Transformation of spin in quantum reference frames. Phys. Rev. Res. 2021, 3, 043138. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.3.043138.
- 42.
Giacomini, F., Castro-Ruiz, E. and Brukner, Cˇ . Relativistic quantum reference frames: The operational meaning of spin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 123, 090404. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.090404.
- 43.
Marcus, R.B. Possibilia and possible worlds. Grazer Philosophische Studien. 1985, 25, 107–133. https://doi.org/10.5840/gps1985/8625/265.
- 44.
French, S.; Krause, D. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
- 45.
Poulin, D. Toy model for a relational formulation of quantum theory. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2006, 45, 1189—1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-006-9052-0.
- 46.
Aharonov, Y.; Kaufherr, T.Quantumframes of reference. Phys. Rev.D1984, 30, 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.30.368.
- 47.
Mazzucchi, S. On the observables describing a quantum reference frame. J. Math. Phys. 2001, 42, 2477–2489. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1370395.
- 48.
Rovelli, C. Quantum reference systems. Class. Quantum Gravity 1991, 8, 317. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/8/2/012.
- 49.
Toller, M. Quantum Reference Frames and Quantum Transformations. arXiv 1996, arXiv:9605052.
- 50.
Muller, F.A.; Leegwater, G. The Case Against Factorism: On the Labels of ⊗-Factor Hilbert-Spaces of Similar Particles in Quantum Mechanics. J. Gen. Philos. Sci. 2022, 53, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09514-6.
- 51.
Saunders, S. On the explanation for quantum statistics. arXiv 2005, arXiv:0511136.
- 52.
Ismael, J. The open universe: Totality, self-reference and time. Australas. Philos. Rev. 2024, 8, 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2022.2155200.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Suite 4002 Level 4, 447 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
General Inquiries: info@sciltp.com