Evaluating Road Infrastructure Safety in Bamenda, Cameroon: A Data-Driven Approach Using Reactive Safety Performance Indicators and iRAP Star Ratings

Dindze Olive Dubila; Jean Francois Wounba; Stephen Kome Fondzenyuy; Ndingwan Tevoh Lordswill; Nkeng George Elambo

doi:10.53941/ijtlr.2025.100003

Abstract

With over 1000 road traffic fatalities recorded annually in Cameroon, the absence of the implementation of effective road safety measures remains a pressing concern. This study assesses the safety of road infrastructure in Bamenda using a data-driven approach that combines reactive safety indicators with iRAP star ratings to identify high-risk crash locations. After analysis of crash data and site visits, four indicators, with three being reactive (crash frequency, crash rate and injury severity index) and one proactive (iRAP star ratings) were calculated. The correlation between these indicators were also evaluated. Out of 64 evaluated sites (40 road segments and 24 intersections) with varying risks, 4 locations were identified for priority interventions as they had the highest risk based on all indicators. These sites had a mix of vehicle types with vulnerable road users, poor road geometry and unsafe road sides and speeding risks. The correlation between indicators varied, indicating the complementary nature of reactive and proactive assessments. The study highlights the added value of integrating the two approaches, both historical crash data and forward-looking infrastructure assessments to comprehensively identify and prioritize hazardous locations. The findings offer practical guidance for policymakers and urban planners to implement targeted, cost-effective safety interventions where resources are scarce. This approach supports the principles of the Safe System framework and can significantly contribute to reducing road traffic injuries and fatalities in low- and middle-income countries.

References

1.
World Bank. Global Road Safety Facility; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2023.
2.
WHO. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
3.
World Bank. Road Traffic Injuries in Developing Countries; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
4.
WHO. Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
5.
Passmore, J. Global Plan of Action for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2021–2030; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
6.
Elvik, R.; Høye, A.; Vaa, T.; et al. The Handbook of Road Safety Measures; Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Leeds, UK, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781848552517.
7.
Garrick, N.W. Designing Roads That Guide Drivers to Choose Safer Speeds; The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Washington, DC, USA, 2009. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237110875 (accessed on 6 May 2025).
8.
Federal Highway Administration. Crash Data Analysis Guidebook for Highway Safety Improvement Program Projects; Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
9.
NCHRP. Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. In A Guide for Conducting Road Safety Audits; NCHRP: Washington, DC, USA, 2003; Volume 12.
10.
Elvik, R. The Predictive Validity of Empirical Bayes Estimates of Road Safety. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2008, 40, 1964–1969.
11.
Hauer, E. Observational before-after Studies in Road Safety; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997.
12.
Ma, J.; Kockelman, K.M.; Damien, P. Injury Severity Analysis of Accidents Involving Young Male Drivers in Great Britain. J. Safety Res. 2010, 41, 247–255.
13.
Bachani, A.M.; Koradia, P.; Herbert, H.K.; et al. Road Traffic Injuries in Kenya: The Health Burden and Risk Factors in Two Districts. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2017, 18, 496–501.
14.
Transport Research Board. Road Safety Inspection Guidelines; Transport Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
15.
Ciari, F.; Balac, M.; Axhausen, K.W. Modeling Carsharing with the Agent-Based Simulation MATSim: State of the Art, Applications, and Future Developments. Transp. Res. Rec. 2016, 2564, 14–20. https://doi.org/10.3141/2564-02.
16.
Dingus, T.A.; Guo, F.; Lee, S.; et al. Driver Crash Risk Factors and Prevalence Evaluation Using Naturalistic Driving Data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 2636–2641. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1513271113.
17.
Mohan, D.; Tiwari, G.; Bhalla, K. Road Safety in India: A Framework for Reform. Transp. Res. Procedia 2017, 25, 4640–4652.
18.
Sukhai, A.; Jones, A.; Love, D.; et al. IRAP in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. J. Transp. Health 2019, 12, 1–12.
19.
Azevedo, C.; Cardoso, J.; Santos, L. Integrating Crash Data and Road Assessment for Improved Safety Planning in Brazil. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020, 144, 105612.
20.
Feudjio, S.L.T.; Tchaheu, D.T.; Fondzenyuy, S.K.; et al. Investigating and Improving Pedestrian Safety in an Urban Environment of a Low- or Middle-Income Country: A Case Study of Yaoundé, Cameroon. Future Transp. 2024, 4, 548–578. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp4020026.
21.
Sobngwi-Tambekou, J.; Bhatti, J.; Kounga, G.; et al. Road Traffic Crashes on the Yaoundé–Douala Road Section, Cameroon. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2010, 42, 422–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.003.
22.
Wounba, J.F.; Nkeng, G.E.; Madom De Tamo, M. Infrastructure causes of road accidents on the yaounde-douala highway. Cameroon 2020. https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.18747.06.2020.
23.
FHWA. Roadway Departure Safety: A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners. Technical Report, FHWA-SA-11-09, Federal Highway Administration. In FHWA Highway Safety Programs; FHWA: Washington, DC, USA; 2011; pp. 19–20. Available online: https://highways.dot.gov/sites/fhwa.dot.gov/files/2022-06/fhwasa1109.pdf (accessed on 6 May 2025).
24.
Mesic, A.; Damsere-Derry, J.; Feldacker, C.; et al. Identifying Emerging Hot Spots of Road Traffic Injury Severity Using Spatiotemporal Methods: Longitudinal Analyses on Major Roads in Ghana from 2005 to 2020. BMC Public Health 2024, 24, 1609. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18915-x.
25.
WHO. Pedestrian Safety: A Road Safety Manual for Decision Makers and Practitioners; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023.
26.
Fondzenyuy, S.K.; Turner, B.M.; Burlacu, A.F.; et al. The Contribution of Excessive or Inappropriate Speeds to Road Traffic Crashes and Fatalities: A Review of Literature. Transp. Eng. 2024, 17, 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2024.100259.
27.
Gorsuch, R.L. Factor Analysis; Routledge: London, UK, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735740.
28.
Saaty, T.L. Fundamentals of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making; Schmoldt Daniel, L., Kangas, J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001; pp. 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2.
29.
Charnes, A.; Cooper, W.W.; Rhodes, E. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1978, 2, 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
30.
Nardo, M.; Saisana, M.; Saltelli, A.; et al. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide; OECD Statistics Working Papers, No. 2005/03; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1787/533411815016.
31.
Khan, M.N.; Das, S. Advancing Traffic Safety through the Safe System Approach: A Systematic Review. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2024, 199, 107518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107518.

Scilight Press

Author Information

Abstract

Keywords

References

About Scilight

Journals

Publishing Policies

Contact Us