Freight forwarders are crucial to the global supply chain and their efficiency and capacity can improve a country’s logistics performance. This study aims to explore factors influencing the selection of freight forwarders by exporters and importers. An analogy between ocean and air freight forwarders is investigated based on perceived operational efficiency and capacity-related factors. The study also explores choosing international ocean freight forwarders to maintain a competitive advantage over air services. By applying the Best Worst Method (BWM) and Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) I and II methods, this study provides the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis framework to determine the significance of decision criteria for freight forwarder selection. Results suggest that faster services, commitment and responsiveness are significant operational efficiency-related decision criteria for freight forwarder selection, while competitive rates, financial strength, and tracking and tracing are significant capacity-related decision criteria.
- Open Access
- Article
Towards Freight Forwarder Selection Criteria: Exploration of BWM and PROMETHEE Method
- Mohammed Mojahid Hossain Chowdhury 1,2,
- Humayun Rashid Askari 1,*,
- Mohammed H. Alshareef 3,
- Md. Zaber Hossen 1
Author Information
Received: 02 Dec 2025 | Revised: 22 Jan 2026 | Accepted: 26 Jan 2026 | Published: 06 Mar 2026
Abstract
Keywords
shipper | freight forwarder | PROMETHEE | best worst method | multi-criteria decision analysis
References
- 1.
Tongzon, J.L. Port Choice and Freight Forwarders. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2009, 45, 186–195.
- 2.
Lu, Y.; Dinwoodie, J. Comparative Perspectives of International Freight Forwarder Services in China. Transp. J. 2002, 41, 17–27.
- 3.
Schramm, H.-J. Freight Forwarder’s Intermediary Role in Multimodal Transport Chains: A Social Network Approach; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012.
- 4.
Yoganandan, G.; Balaji, K. Service Quality in International Freight Forwarding Industries in India. ZENITH Int. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. Res. 2018, 8, 281–286.
- 5.
Murphy, P.R.; Daley, J.M. Investigating Selection Criteria for International Freight Forwarders. Transp. J. 1997, 37, 29–36.
- 6.
Perlman, Y.; Raz, T.; Moshka, L. Key Factors in Selecting an International Freight Forwarding Company. Open Transp. J. 2009, 3, 29–34.
- 7.
Dappe, M.H.; Kunaka, C.; Lebrand, M.; et al. Moving Forward: Connectivity and Logistics to Sustain Bangladesh’s Success; World Bank Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
- 8.
Banomyong, R.; Supatn, N. Selecting Logistics Providers in Thailand: A Shippers’ Perspective. Eur. J. Mark. 2011, 45, 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111107258.
- 9.
Chowdhury, M.M.H.; Haque Munim, Z. Dry Port Location Selection Using a Fuzzy AHP-BWM-PROMETHEE Approach. Marit. Econ. Logist. 2022, 24, 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-021-00200-y.
- 10.
Ho, T.-C.; Chiu, R.-H.; Chung, C.-C.; et al. Key Influence Factors for Ocean Freight Forwarders Selecting Container Shipping Lines Using the Revised DEMATEL Approach. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2017, 25, 6.
- 11.
Saha, R.C. Innovation in Maritime Logistics Industry of Bangladesh for Doing Port Transport Business. J. Shipp. Ocean Eng. 2017, 7, 78–92.
- 12.
Huang, S.T.; Bulut, E.; Duru, O. Service Quality Evaluation of International Freight Forwarders: An Empirical Research in East Asia. J. Shipp. Trade 2019, 4, 14.
- 13.
Kilibarda, M.; Nikolicic, S.; Andrejic, M. Measurement of Logistics Service Quality in Freight Forwarding Companies: A Case Study of the Serbian Market. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2016, 27, 770–794.
- 14.
Subhashini, S.; Preetha, S. An Empirical Analysis of Service Quality Factors Pertaining to Ocean Freight Forwarding Services. Marit. Bus. Rev. 2018, 3, 276–289.
- 15.
Matear, S.; Gray, R. Factors Influencing Freight Service Choice for Shippers and Freight Suppliers. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 1993, 23, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039310038198.
- 16.
Gil-Saura, I.; Berenguer-Contri, G.; Ruiz-Molina, E. Satisfaction and Loyalty in B2B Relationships in the Freight Forwarding Industry: Adding Perceived Value and Service Quality into Equation. Transport 2018, 33, 1184–1195. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2018.6648.
- 17.
Bakshi, T.; Sinharay, A.; Sarkar, B. Exploratory Analysis of Project Selection through MCDM. In Proceedings of the ICOQM-10, Kolkata, India, 28–30 December 2011; pp.128–131.
- 18.
Kakon, K.; Askari, H.R.; Shaheen, M.M.A.; et al. Factors Influencing Seafarers’ Human Rights Preservation Onboard. Marit. Technol. Res. 2025, 7. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2025.276889.
- 19.
Uzun, B.; Ozsahin, I.; Agbor, V.O.; et al. Theoretical Aspects of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods. In Applications of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Theories in Healthcare and Biomedical Engineering; Ozsahin, D.U., Uzun, B., Sanlidag, T., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2021; pp. 3–40.
- 20.
Marine Insight. Who is a Shipper? Available online: https://www.marineinsight.com/careers-2/who-is-a-shipper/ (accessed on 22 October 2025).
- 21.
Murray, D.E. History and Development of the Bill of Lading. Univ. Miami Law Rev. 1982, 37, 689–730.
- 22.
Lun, Y.V.; Lai, K.; Cheng, T.E. Shipping and Logistics Management; Springer: London, UK, 2010.
- 23.
Maheshika, M.I.; Abeysekara, B. Evaluation of Main Factors Affecting the Choice of a Freight Forwarder: A Sri Lankan Exporter’s Perspective. J. Supply Chain Manag. Syst. 2015, 4, 45–52.
- 24.
Liang, G.-S.; Chou, T.-Y.; Kan, S.-F. Applying Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment to Identify Service Management Requirements for an Ocean Freight Forwarder. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2006, 17, 539–554.
- 25.
Wenyong, Z.; Jing, Z.; Hongxiang, C. Service Quality Evaluation for International Freight Forwarder. In Proceedings of the 2010 7th International Conference on Logistics Systems and Intelligent Management, Tokyo, Japan, 28–30 June 2010.
- 26.
Song, S.-Y. A Study on the Factors of Choosing the Liner Shipping Companies Using AHP Method by International Freight Forwarder. Int. Commer. Inf. Rev. 2011, 13, 95–117.
- 27.
Fanam, P.D.; Nguyen, H.-O.; Cahoon, S. An Empirical Analysis of the Critical Selection Criteria of Liner Operators: The Perspective of Freight Forwarders. Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. 2018, 10, 567–586.
- 28.
Song, K.-J.; Yeo, G.-T. A Study on Extraction of International Freight Forwarders’ Service Quality Factors: The Case of South Korea. J. Digit. Converg. 2017, 15, 45–58.
- 29.
Rezaei, J. Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method. Omega 2015, 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009.
- 30.
Hossain Chowdhury, M.M.; Askari, H.R.; Bushra, R.T.; et al. Revisiting Seafarers’ Skills in the Twenty-First Century: A Modified Delphi-BWM Approach. Aust. J. Marit. Ocean Aff. 2023, 16, 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2023.2214429.
- 31.
Liang, F.; Brunelli, M.; Rezaei, J. Consistency Issues in the Best Worst Method: Measurements and Thresholds. Omega 2020, 96, 102175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102175.
- 32.
Brans, J.-P.; Smet, Y.D. PROMETHEE Methods. In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys; Greco, S., Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J.R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 187–218.
- 33.
Agrawal, N. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making toward Supplier Selection: Exploration of PROMETHEE II Method. Benchmarking Int. J. 2021, 29, 2122–2146.
- 34.
Sarker, S. Freight Forwarding Industry: Function, Economic Role and Future Market in Bangladesh. BMJ 2017, 1, 93–98.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Suite 4002 Level 4, 447 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
General Inquiries: info@sciltp.com