With the rapid advancement of additive manufacturing, Material Extrusion (MEX) has become widely adopted due to its low cost and high process flexibility. However, optimizing MEX processing parameters to balance multiple performance objectives in engineered polymers such as PETG remains a critical challenge. To collaboratively enhance tensile strength, printing efficiency, and material usage efficiency (MUE) of MEX-printed PETG parts, this study employed a multi-objective optimization using the desirability function method. Using single-factor and Taguchi orthogonal experiments, along with ANOVA and multiple linear regression, the coupling mechanisms among infill density, layer height, infill pattern, perimeter shells, and printing temperature for tensile strength, printing time, and MUE were rigorously characterized to elucidate their underlying interdependencies. Based on the established empirical prediction models for tensile strength, printing time, and MUE, the optimal parameter combination was identified as 52% infill density, 0.25 mm layer height, a grid infill pattern, 5 perimeter shells, and 250 °C printing temperature. Experimental validation yielded a measured tensile strength of 38.81 MPa, with a deviation of less than 1% from the predicted value. Furthermore, the printing time and MUE met the design objectives with excellent stability. The proposed MUE evaluation and multi-objective optimization framework provides essential theoretical and technical support for the efficient and economical manufacturing of MEX-printed PETG functional components.
- Open Access
- Article
Effects of Key Processing Parameters on Multi-Objective Performance of MEX Fabricated PETG Parts
- Tenglong Liu,
- Hui Wang *,
- Yunfu Luo,
- Ye Wang,
- Hao Li,
- Baochuan Tan,
- Yue Pan,
- Lizi Liu
Author Information
Received: 26 Mar 2026 | Revised: 28 Apr 2026 | Accepted: 12 May 2026 | Published: 14 May 2026
Abstract
Keywords
MEX | PETG | Taguchi method | mechanical properties | tensile strength
References
- 1.
Jandyal, A.; Chaturvedi, I.; Wazir, I.; et al. 3D Printing—A Review of Processes, Materials and Applications in Industry 4.0. Sustain. Oper. Comput. 2022, 3, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2021.09.004.
- 2.
Bogue, R. 3D Printing: The Dawn of a New Era in Manufacturing? Assem. Autom. 2013, 33, 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/AA-06-2013-055.
- 3.
Seyedzavvar, M.; Boğa, C. Investigation on the Effects of Printing Pattern on the Load Carrying Capacity of 3D Printed U-Notched Samples. Meccanica 2022, 57, 1575–1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-022-01514-8.
- 4.
Kechagias, J.; Zaoutsos, S. Effects of 3D-Printing Processing Parameters on FFF Parts’ Porosity: Outlook and Trends. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2024, 39, 804–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2024.2304843.
- 5.
Graziosi, S.; Faludi, J.; Stanković, T.; et al. A Vision for Sustainable Additive Manufacturing. Nat. Sustain. 2024, 7, 698–705. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01313-x.
- 6.
Rani, S.; Jining, D.; Shoukat, K.; et al. A Human–Machine Interaction Mechanism: Additive Manufacturing for Industry 5.0—Design and Management. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4158. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104158.
- 7.
Ma, T.; Zhang, Y.; Ruan, K.; et al. Advances in 3D Printing for Polymer Composites: A Review. InfoMat 2024, 6, e12568. https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12568.
- 8.
Chekkaramkodi, D.; Jacob, L.; C, M.S.; et al. Review of Vat Photopolymerization 3D Printing of Photonic Devices. Addit. Manuf. 2024, 86, 104189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2024.104189.
- 9.
Ng, W.L.; Goh, G.L.; Goh, G.D.; et al. Progress and Opportunities for Machine Learning in Materials and Processes of Additive Manufacturing. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2310006. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202310006.
- 10.
Lee, J.-Y.; An, J.; Chua, C.K. Fundamentals and Applications of 3D Printing for Novel Materials. Appl. Mater. Today 2017, 7, 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004.
- 11.
Shahrubudin, N.; Lee, T.C.; Ramlan, R. An Overview on 3D Printing Technology: Technological, Materials, and Applications. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 35, 1286–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089.
- 12.
Ngo, T.D.; Kashani, A.; Imbalzano, G.; et al. Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges. Composites Part B Eng. 2018, 143, 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.
- 13.
Liu, Z.; Zhang, M.; Bhandari, B.; et al. 3D Printing: Printing Precision and Application in Food Sector. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 69, 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.018.
- 14.
Wang, X.; Huang, L.; Li, Y.; et al. Research Progress in Polylactic Acid Processing for 3D Printing. J. Manuf. Process. 2024, 112, 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.01.038.
- 15.
Mudau, M.; Adebo, O.A. Three Dimensional (3D)-Printed Foods: A Review of Recent Advances in Their Ingredients, Printing Techniques, Food Printers, Post-Processing Methods, Consumer Acceptance and Safety. J. Food Process Eng. 2024, 47, e14621. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.14621.
- 16.
Sharma, R.; Chandra Nath, P.; Kumar Hazarika, T.; et al. Recent Advances in 3D Printing Properties of Natural Food Gels: Application of Innovative Food Additives. Food Chem. 2024, 432, 137196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137196.
- 17.
Daminabo, S.C.; Goel, S.; Grammatikos, S.A.; et al. Fused Deposition Modeling‑Based Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): Techniques for Polymer Material Systems. Mater. Today Chem. 2020, 16, 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100248.
- 18.
MacDonald, E.; Wicker, R. Multiprocess 3D Printing for Increasing Component Functionality. Science 2016, 353, aaf2093. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2093.
- 19.
Roschli, A.; Post, B.K.; Wang, P.; et al. The Cost of Scaling Up in Large-Format Additive Manufacturing. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2025, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2023.0112.
- 20.
Kristiawan, R.B.; Imaduddin, F.; Ariawan, D.; et al. A Review on the Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D Printing: Filament Processing, Materials, and Printing Parameters. Open Eng. 2021, 11, 639–649. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2021-0063.
- 21.
Equbal, A.; Murmu, R.; Kumar, V.; et al. A Recent Review on Advancements in Dimensional Accuracy in Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D Printing. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2024, 11, 950–990. https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2024046.
- 22.
Wickramasinghe, S.; Do, T.; Tran, P. FDM-Based 3D Printing of Polymer and Associated Composite: A Review on Mechanical Properties, Defects and Treatments. Polymers 2020, 12, 1529. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12071529.
- 23.
Popović, M.; Pjević, M.; Milovanović, A.; et al. Printing Parameter Optimization of PLA Material Concerning Geometrical Accuracy and Tensile Properties Relative to FDM Process Productivity. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2023, 37, 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-023-0113-6.
- 24.
Özen, A.; Auhl, D.; Völlmecke, C.; et al. Optimization of Manufacturing Parameters and Tensile Specimen Geometry for Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D-Printed PETG. Materials 2021, 14, 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14102556.
- 25.
Lakshman Sri, S.V.; Karthick, A.; Dinesh, C. Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed PETG and Polyamide (6) Polymers. Chem. Phys. Impact 2024, 8, 100491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphi.2024.100491.
- 26.
Vidakis, N.; Petousis, M.; Velidakis, E.; et al. On the Strain Rate Sensitivity of Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) Processed PLA, ABS, PETG, PA6, and PP Thermoplastic Polymers. Polymers 2020, 12, 2924. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12122924.
- 27.
Nugroho, A.; Ardiansyah, R.; Rusita, L.; et al. Effect of Layer Thickness on Flexural Properties of PLA (PolyLactid Acid) by 3D Printing. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1130, 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1130/1/012017.
- 28.
Loskot, J.; Jezbera, D.; Loskot, R.; et al. Influence of Print Speed on the Microstructure, Morphology, and Mechanical Properties of 3D‑Printed PETG Products. Polym. Test. 2023, 123, 108055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2023.108055.
- 29.
Valvez, S.; Silva, A.P.; Reis, P.N.B. Optimization of Printing Parameters to Maximize the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PETG-Based Parts. Polymers 2022, 14, 2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14132564.
- 30.
Bembenek, M.; Kowalski, Ł.; Kosoń-Schab, A. Research on the Influence of Processing Parameters on the Specific Tensile Strength of FDM Additive Manufactured PET-G and PLA Materials. Polymers 2022, 14, 2446. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122446.
- 31.
Luo, H.; Tan, Y.; Zhang, F.; et al. Selectively Enhanced 3D Printing Process and Performance Analysis of Continuous Carbon Fiber Composite Material. Materials 2019, 12, 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12213529.
- 32.
Kechagias, J.; Zaoutsos, S. Optimization Window of Printing Parameters for Specific Strength and Energy Consumption in PEEK Additive Manufacturing. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2026, 41, 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2026.2613641.
- 33.
Kantaros, A.; Katsantoni, M.; Ganetsos, T.; et al. The Evolution of Thermoplastic Raw Materials in High-Speed FFF/FDM 3D Printing Era: Challenges and Opportunities. Materials 2025, 18, 1220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061220.
- 34.
Napolitano, F.; Cozzolino, E.; Papa, I.; et al. Experimental Integrated Approach for Mechanical Characteristic Optimization of FDM-Printed PLA in an Energy-Saving Perspective. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2022, 121, 3551–3565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-09535-z.
- 35.
Marșavina, L.; Vălean, C.; Mărghitaș, M.; et al. Effect of the Manufacturing Parameters on the Tensile and Fracture Properties of FDM 3D-Printed PLA Specimens. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2022, 274, 108766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108766.
- 36.
Saeimi Sadigh, M.A.; Safi Valilu, H.; Mohammadi, A.; et al. Auxetic Metamaterials Application: 3D Printing and Systematic Optimization of a Sandwich Panel Core for Maximum Energy Dissipation. Iran J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Mech. Eng. 2026, 50, 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40997-025-00950-7.
- 37.
Warnung, L.; Estermann, S.-J.; Reisinger, A. Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D Printing Materials. RTe J. 2018, 15, 1–10.
- 38.
Somireddy, M.; Czekanski, A. Mechanical Characterization of Additively Manufactured Parts by FE Modeling of Mesostructure. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2017, 1, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp1020018.
- 39.
Collins, L.M.; Dziak, J.J.; Li, R. Design of Experiments with Multiple Independent Variables: A Resource Management Perspective on Complete and Reduced Factorial Designs. Psychol. Methods 2009, 14, 202–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015826.
- 40.
Tosi, G.; Mucchi, E.; dʼIppolito, R.; et al. Dynamic Behavior of Pumps: An Efficient Approach for Fast Robust Design Optimization. Meccanica 2015, 50, 2179–2199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-015-0142-z.
- 41.
Lanzotti, A.; Grasso, M.; Staiano, G.; et al. The Impact of Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated in PLA with an Open-Source 3-D Printer. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2015, 21, 604–617. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135.
- 42.
Rayegani, F.; Onwubolu, G.C. Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Process Parameter Prediction and Optimization Using Group Method for Data Handling (GMDH) and Differential Evolution (DE). Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2014, 73, 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Suite 4002 Level 4, 447 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
General Inquiries: info@sciltp.com