2604003665
  • Open Access
  • Article

Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Hoplolaimus seinhorsti Luc, 1958 with Its First Report on Turfgrass

  • Yongsan Zeng,   
  • Joseph A. Roberts *

Received: 17 Dec 2025 | Revised: 23 Mar 2026 | Accepted: 15 Apr 2026 | Published: 08 May 2026

Abstract

In the 2023 summer season, a Hoplolaimus population collected from the rhizosphere of bermudagrass collected in Shenzhen, China was morphologically and molecularly identified as H. seinhorsti. As far as we are aware, this is the first documentation of H. seinhorsti from turfgrass. The average body length of females in this population is 1465 µm. Lip region is set off from body by a deep constriction, with 4 annules, basal annule of lip region has 9–10 longitudinal striations. A single incisure is faint in lateral field. Excretory pore (EP) is located at level of esophageal glands. Hemizonid is situated 2 annules posterior to EP. Stylet is strong, with large, tulip-shaped basal knobs, 33 to 43 µm long. Esophageal glands dorsally overlap the intestine, with six gland nuclei. Intestine does not overlap rectum. Vulval opening is situated at 53–59% of total body length from the anterior end, posterior epiptygma is visible. Reproductive system didelphic with two equally developed outreached ovaries, no spermatheca observed. Tail shorter, 0.8–1.4 anal body diameter long, with rounded tip, with 10–16 annules. Phylogenetic analysis using partial sequences of 18S and the expansion fragment D2-D3 of 28S rDNA genes suggested that studied H. seinhorsti is clustered in a monophyletic clade with high support with the other populations of H. seinhorsti, revealed closer relationship of this species to H. columbus, H. indicus, H. dubius and H. pararobustus than to H. galeatus, H. stephanus, H. concaudajuvencus and H. magnistylus, and supported that the present H. seinhorsti is a separate species from H. columbus, H. galeatus, H. concaudajuvencus and H. stephanus found on turfgrasses.

 

References 

  • 1.

    Handoo, Z.A.; Golden, A.M. A key and diagnostic compendium to the species of the genus Hoplolaimus Daday, 1905 (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae). J. Nematol. 1992, 24, 45–53.

  • 2.

    Tiwari, A.K.; Misra, S.L.; Malhotra, S.K. Bioecology of nematodes in soil of a sub-humid region. I. Hoplolaimus johani sp. nov. and Hoplolaimus caudifurcatus sp. nov. around fruit crops. Bulg. Acad. Sci. Exp. Pathol. Parasitol. 2001, 4, 8–19.

  • 3.

    Ali, S.S.; Shaheen, A.; Pervez, R. A new species of Hoplolaimus (Basirolaimus) (Hoplolaiminae: Tylenchida) from pigeon pea ecosystem of Bumdelkhand region. Trends Biosci. 2009, 2, 36–38.

  • 4.

    Nguyen, T.H.; Bui, Q.D.; Trinh, P.Q. Description of Hoplolaimus bachlongviensis sp. n. (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) from banana soil in Vietnam. Biodivers. Data J. 2015, 3, e6523.

  • 5.

    Ma, X.; Robbins, R.T.; Bernard, E.C.; et al. Morphological and molucular characterisation of Hoplolaimus smokyensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae), a lance nematode from Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. Nematology 2019, 21, 923–935.

  • 6.

    Ghaderi, R.; Hosseinvand, M.; Eskandari, A. Systematics of the Genus Hoplolaimus (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae); Scholars’ Press: Chisinau, Moldova, 2020; p. 164.

  • 7.

    Olajide, E.; Singh, P.R.; Kolombia, Y.A.; et al. Characterization of Hoplolaimus seinhorsti and Hoplolaimus pararobustus (Tylenchina: Hoplolaimidae) from banana, with phylogeny and species delineation in the genus Hoplolaimus. J. Nematol. 2023, 55, 20230019.

  • 8.

    Hyman, B.C. Molecular diagnosis of Meloidogyne species. J. Nematol. 1990, 22, 24–30.

  • 9.

    Handoo, Z.A.; Palomares-Rius, J.E.; Cantalapiedra-Navarrete, C.; et al. Integrative taxonomy of the stunt nematodes of the genera Bitylenchus and Tylenchorhynchus (Nematoda, Telotylenchidae) with description of two new species and molecular phylogeny. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2014, 172, 231–264.

  • 10.

    Bae, C.H.; Szalanski, A.L.; Robbins, R.T. Genetic variation of Hoplolaimus columbus populations in the United States using PCR-RFLP analysis of nuclear rDNA ITS regions. J. Nematol. 2009, 41, 187–193.

  • 11.

    Cantalapiedra-Navarrete, C.; Navas-Cortés, J.A.; Liébanas, G.; et al. Comparative molecular and morphological characterisations in the nematode genus Rotylenchus: Rotylenchus paravitis n. sp., an example of cryptic speciation. Zool. Anz. 2013, 252, 246–268.

  • 12.

    Subbotin, S.A.; Sturhan, D.; Vovlas, N.; et al. Application of secondary structure model of rRNA for phylogeny: D2-D3 expansion segments of the LSU gene of plant-parasitic nematodes from the family Hoplolaimidae Filipjev, 1934. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2007, 43, 881–890.

  • 13.

    Subbotin, S.A.; Inserra, R.N.; Marais, M.; et al. Diversity and phylogenetic relationships within the spiral nematodes of Helicotylenchus Steiner, 1945 (Tylenchida: Hoplolaimidae) as inferred from analysis of the D2-D3 expansion segments of 28S rRNA gene sequences. Nematology 2011, 13, 333–345.

  • 14.

    Subbotin, S.A.; Vovlas, N.; Yeates, G.W.; et al. Morphological and molecular characterisation of Helicotylenchus pseudorobustus (Steiner, 1914) Golden, 1956 and related species (Tylenchida: Hoplolaimidae) with a phylogeny of the genus. Nematology 2015, 17, 27–52.

  • 15.

    Bae, C.; Szalanski, A.L.; Robbins, R.T. Molecular analysis of the lance nematode, Hoplolaimus spp., using the first Internal Transcribed Spacer and the D1-D3 expansion segments of 28S Ribosomal DNA. J. Nematol. 2008, 40, 201–209.

  • 16.

    Mueller, J.D.; Sullivan, M.J. Response of cotton to infection by Hoplolaimus columbus. Ann. Appl. Nematol. 1988, 2, 86–89.

  • 17.

    Sher, S.A. Revisions of the Hoplolaiminae (Nematoda) II. Hoplolaimus Daday, 1905 and Aorolaimus n. gen. Nematologica 1963, 9, 267–295.

  • 18.

    Lewis, S.A.; Smith, F.H. Host plants, distribution, and ecological association of Hoplolaimus columbus. J. Nematol. 1976, 8, 264–270.

  • 19.

    Robbins, R.T.; McNeely, V.M.; Lorenz, G.M., III. The lance nematode, Hoplolaimus magnistylus, on cotton in Arkansas. J. Nematol. 1998, 30, 590–591.

  • 20.

    Rhoades, H.L. Effects of Hoplolaimus galeatus on ten vegetable crops in Florida. Nematropica 1987, 17, 213–218.

  • 21.

    Sharma, S.B. Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Rice-Wheat Based Cropping Systems in South Asian. J. Crop Prod. 2001, 4, 227–247.

  • 22.

    Zeng, Y.; Ye, W.; Tredway, L.; et al. Taxonomy and morphology of plant-parasitic nematodes associated with turfgrasses in North and South Carolina, USA. Zootaxa 2012, 3452, 1–46.

  • 23.

    Supramana, S.; Lewis, S.A. Suitability of selected crop cultivars as hosts for Hoplolaimus columbus Sher in the greenhouse. J. Nematol. 1999, 31, 573–574.

  • 24.

    Golden, A.M.; Minton, N.A. Description and larval heteromorphism of Hoplolaimus concaudajuvencus, n. sp. (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae). J. Nematol. 1970, 2, 161–166.

  • 25.

    Jagdale, G.B.; Nugraha, G.T.; Martin, K.; et al. Occurrence of the lance nematode Hoplolaimus stephanus infecting bentgrass Agrostis stolonifera in Georgia, USA. Plant Health Prog. 2022, 23, 162–165.

  • 26.

    Luc, M. Les nematodes et le fletrissement des cotonniers dans le Sudouest de Madagascar. Cotton Fibres Trop. 1958, 13, 239–256.

  • 27.

    CABI. Hoplolaimus seinhorsti. [Distribution Map]. In Distribution Maps of Plant Diseases (April), 1st ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2008.

  • 28.

    Castillo, P.; Navas-Cortés, J.A.; Landa, B.B.; et al. Plant-parasitic nematodes attacking chickpea and their in planta interactions with Rhizobia and Phytopathogenic Fungi. Plant Dis. 2008, 92, 840–853.

  • 29.

    Goodey, J.B.; Franklin, M.T.; Hooper, D.J. T. Goodey’s: The Nematode Parasites of Plants Catalogued Under Their Hosts, 3rd ed.; Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux: Farnham Royal, UK, 1965.

  • 30.

    Lamberti, F.; Ekanayake, H.M.R.K.; Sasanelli, N. Effect of some plant parasitic nematodes on the growth of selected crops in Srilanka. Nematol. Mediterr. 1993, 21, 27–43.

  • 31.

    Queneherve, P.; Chabrier, C.; Auwerkerken, A.; et al. Status of weeds as reservoirs of plant parasitic nematodes in banana fields in Martinique. Crop Prot. 2006, 25, 860–867.

  • 32.

    Jenkins, W.R. A rapid centrifugal-flotation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Dis. Rep. 1964, 48, 692.

  • 33.

    Hooper, D.J. Handling, fixing, staining and mounting nematodes. In Laboratory Methods For Work with Plant and Soil Nematodes, 5th ed.; Her Majesty’s Stationery Office: London, UK, 1970; pp. 39–54.

  • 34.

    Ye, W. Applying Microsoft Works spreadsheet in statistics for morphometric data of nematode identification. Afro-Asian J. Nematol. 1996, 6, 203–211.

  • 35.

    Williams, B.D.; Schrank, B.; Huynh, C.; et al. A genetic mapping system in Caenorhabditis elegans based on polymorphic sequence-tagged sites. Genetics 1992, 131, 609–624.

  • 36.

    Mullin, P.G.; Harris, T.S.; Powers, T.O. Phylogenetic relationships of Nygolaimina and Dorylaimina (Nematoda: Dorylaimida) inferred from small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Nematology 2005, 7, 59–79.

  • 37.

    Nunn, G.B. Nematode Molecular Evolution. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, 1992.

  • 38.

    Ye, W.; Giblin-Davis, R.M.; Braasch, H.; et al. Phylogenetic relationships among Bursaphelenchus species (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae) inferred from nuclear ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2007, 43, 1185–1197.

  • 39.

    Tamura, K.; Peterson, D.; Peterson, N.; et al. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetic analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011, 28, 2731–2739.

  • 40.

    Posada, D.; Crandall, K.A. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14, 817–818.

  • 41.

    Zeng, Y.; Chen, X.; Ni, Y.; et al. Morphological and molecular characterization of prevalent plant-parasitic nematodes from turfgrasses in Guangdong, China. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 611. http://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070611.

  • 42.

    Huelsenbeck, J.P.; Ronquist, F. MR BAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 1754–1755.

  • 43.

    Larget, B.; Simon, D.L. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 750–759.

  • 44.

    Zeng, Y.; Ye, W.; Martin, S.; et al. Diversity and occurrence of nematodes associated with turfgrasses in North and South Carolina, USA. J. Nematol. 2012, 44, 345–355.

  • 45.

    Henn, R.A.; Dunn, R.A. Reproduction of Hoplolaimus galeatus and growth of seven St. Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum) cultivars. Nematropica 1989, 19, 81–87.

  • 46.

    Giblin-Davis, R.M.; Busey, P.; Center, B.J. Parasitism of Hoplolaimus galeatus on diploid and polyploidy St. Augustine grasses. J. Nematol. 1995, 27, 472–477.

  • 47.

    Sánchez-Arce, O.; Palacios-Espinosa, A.; Carillo-Fasio, J.; et al. Diversity and distribution of plant-parasitic nematodes on golf courses in localities of Baja California Sur, Mexico. Rev. Fac. Agron. La Univ. Del Zulia 2021, 38, 651–660.

  • 48.

    Vandenbossche, B.; Viaene, N.; De Sutter, N.; et al. Diversity and incidence of plant-parasitic nematodes in Belgian turf grass. Nematology 2011, 13, 245–256.

  • 49.

    Fortuner, R. The Hoplolaiminae. In Manual of Agricultural Nematology; Nickle, W.R., Ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1991; Chapter 15, pp. 669–719.

  • 50.

    Mansourabad, A.M.; Ghaderi, R.; Kashi, L.; et al. Observations on Hoplolaimus indicus Sher, 1963 and Hoplolaimus seinhorsti Luc, 1958 (Nematoda: Hoplolaimidae) from Southern Iran. J. Crop Prot. 2016, 5, 189–201.

  • 51.

    Orton Williams, K.J. Hoplolaimus galeatus. Commonwealth Institute of Helminthology Descriptions of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes; Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux: St. Albans, UK, 1973.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Zeng, Y.; Roberts, J. A. Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Hoplolaimus seinhorsti Luc, 1958 with Its First Report on Turfgrass. Parasitological Science 2026, 1 (1), 6.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.