2512002707
  • Open Access
  • Article

Transforming Sediment from Nutrient Source to Sink through Electrokinetic Geosynthetics-Driven Porewater Drainage

  • Xianqiang Tang 1, 2, 3, *,   
  • Rui Li 1, 2, 3,   
  • Yanping Hu 1, 2, 3,   
  • Danyang Wang 1, 2, 3,   
  • Junjun Gu 1, 2, 3,   
  • Zhenhua Wang 1, 2, 3

Received: 04 Aug 2025 | Revised: 22 Sep 2025 | Accepted: 31 Dec 2025 | Published: 12 Jan 2026

Abstract

Porewater, a key reservoir of nutrients, plays a critical role in sediment nutrient release. This study used electrokinetic geosynthetics (EKGs) as electrodes to drain sediment porewater in the presence of 20 cm-deep overlying water and conducted five sets of indoor experiments (one control group and four groups exposed to voltage gradients of 0, 0.5 (intermittent power IP), 0.5 (continuous power CP), 1.0 V/cm (IP)) to investigate the performance and mechanisms of porewater drainage regulating sediment nutrient release and the response of microbial communities. Total nitrogen (TN) release flux dramatically decreased to ≤10% of its maximum within 14 days, while total phosphorus (TP) release flux clearly decreased after fluctuating for nearly 28 days. 0.5 and 1.0 V/cm were more effective for restraining TN and TP release, respectively. For both nitrogen and phosphorus, the drainage of porewater changed the sediment’s role from nutrient source to sink, effectively restraining nutrient accumulation in the overlying water. Physical processes including porewater renewal by overlying water, gravity drainage, and sediment pore compression were the key mechanisms restricting sediment nutrient release, while electromigration and electrochemical oxidation promoted nutrient transformation and separation. The drainage caused a non-significant decline in community abundance indices but not changed the dominant species of the sediment microorganisms.

References 

  • 1.

    Smith, V.H.; Schindler, D.W. Eutrophication Science: Where Do We Go from Here? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2009, 24, 201–207.

  • 2.

    Zamparas, M.; Zacharias, I. Restoration of Eutrophic Freshwater by Managing Internal Nutrient Loads. A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 496, 551–562.

  • 3.

    Yang, C.; Li, J.; Yin, H. Phosphorus Internal Loading and Sediment Diagenesis in a Large Eutrophic Lake (Lake Chaohu, China). Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118471.

  • 4.

    Yin, H.; Zhang, M.; Yin, P.; et al. Characterization of Internal Phosphorus Loading in the Sediment of a Large Eutrophic Lake (Lake Taihu, China). Water Res. 2022, 225, 119125.

  • 5.

    Tang, X.; Li, Q.; Wang, Z.; et al. In Situ Electrokinetic Isolation of Cadmium from Paddy Soil through Porewater Drainage: Effects of Voltage Gradient and Soil Moisture. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 337, 210–219.

  • 6.

    Fan, X.; Gao, S.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Stimulation of High-Concentration Dissolved Nitrogen and Reactive Phosphorus in Lake Taihu Sediments on the Initiation and Maintenance of Cyanobacterial Blooms. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 851, 158088.

  • 7.

    Jiang, H.; Wang, C.; Bai, L.; et al. Advances and Prospects in Lake Environment Science and Engineering: A Review. J. Lake Sci. 2020, 32, 1278–1296.

  • 8.

    Yang, C.; Yang, P.; Yin, H. In Situ Control of Internal Nutrient Loading and Fluxes in the Confluence Area of an Eutrophic Lake with Combined P Inactivation Agents and Modified Zeolite. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145745.

  • 9.

    Yin, H.; Douglas, G.B.; Cai, Y.; et al. Remediation of Internal Phosphorus Loads with Modified Clays, Influence of Fluvial Suspended Particulate Matter and Response of the Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610, 101–110.

  • 10.

    Han, H.; Li, Z. Effects of Macrophyte-Associated Nitrogen Cycling Bacteria on ANAMMOX and Denitrification in River Sediments in the Taihu Lake Region of China. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 93, 82–90.

  • 11.

    Wen, D.; Fu, R.; Li, Q. Removal of Inorganic Contaminants in Soil by Electrokinetic Remediation Technologies: A Review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 401, 123345.

  • 12.

    Han, D.; Wu, X.; Li, R.; et al. Critical Review of Electro-Kinetic Remediation of Contaminated Soils and Sediments: Mechanisms, Performances and Technologies. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 335.

  • 13.

    Shin, S.-Y.; Park, S.-M.; Kitae, B. Soil Moisture Could Enhance Electrokinetic Remediation of Arsenic-Contaminated Soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 9820–9825.

  • 14.

    Choi, J.-H.; Maruthamuthu, S.; Lee, H.-G.; et al. Removal of Phosphate from Agricultural Soil by Electrokinetic Remediation with Iron Electrode. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2010, 40, 1101–1111.

  • 15.

    Weigand, H.; Marb, C.; Weiss, W.; et al. Electrokinetic Phosphorus Recovery from Packed Beds of Sewage Sludge Ash: Yield and Energy Demand. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2010, 40, 1069–1078.

  • 16.

    Ghaeminia, M.; Mokhtarani, N. Remediation of Nitrate-Contaminated Groundwater by PRB-Electrokinetic Integrated Process. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 222, 234–241.

  • 17.

    Liu, R.; Wang, H.; Liu, Z.; et al. Electrokinetic Remediation with Solar Powered for Electrolytic Manganese Residue and Researching on Migration of Ammonia Nitrogen and Manganese. J. Water Process Eng. 2020, 38, 101655.

  • 18.

    Li, S.; Zheng, C.; Yang, S.; et al. Reduction of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loading from Polluted Sediment by Electrolysis. Ecol. Eng. 2021, 159, 106088.

  • 19.

    Wang, D.; Tang, X.; Li, R.; et al. Electrokinetic Geosynthetics Restrained Nitrogen Release from Sediment to Overlying Water through Porewater Drainage. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135674.

  • 20.

    Tang, X.; Li, R.; Han, D.; et al. Impacts of Electrokinetic Isolation of Phosphorus through Porewater Drainage on Sediment Phosphorus Storage Dynamics. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 266, 115210.

  • 21.

    Wu, X.; Li, R.; Tang, X.; et al. Performance of Separating Sediment Endogenous Nitrogen via Electrokinetic Drainage of Porewater. China Environ. Sci. 2021, 41, 1208–1218.

  • 22.

    Pardo, P.; Rauret, G.; López-Sánchez, J.F. Shortened Screening Method for Phosphorus Fractionation in Sediments A Complementary Approach to the Standards, Measurements and Testing Harmonised Protocol. Anal. Chim. Acta 2004, 508, 201–206.

  • 23.

    Yin, H.; Yang, C.; Yang, P.; et al. Contrasting Effects and Mode of Dredging and In Situ Adsorbent Amendment for the Control of Sediment Internal Phosphorus Loading in Eutrophic Lakes. Water Res. 2021, 189, 116644.

  • 24.

    Wang, Z.; Wang, C.; Jiang, H.; et al. Higher Dissolved Oxygen Levels Promote Downward Migration of Phosphorus in the Sediment Profile: Implications for Lake Restoration. Chemosphere 2022, 301, 134705.

  • 25.

    Hopkinson, C.S.; Giblin, A.E.; Tucker, J.; et al. Benthic Metabolism and Nutrient Cycling along an Estuarine Salinity Gradient. Estuaries 1999, 22, 863–881.

  • 26.

    Beutel, M.W. Inhibition of Ammonia Release from Anoxic Profundal Sediments in Lakes Using Hypolimnetic Oxygenation. Ecol. Eng. 2006, 28, 271–279.

  • 27.

    Reyter, D.; Bélanger, D.; Roué, L. Nitrate Removal by a Paired Electrolysis on Copper and Ti/IrO2 Coupled Electrodes-Influence of the Anode/Cathode Surface Area Ratio. Water Res. 2010, 44, 1918–1926.

  • 28.

    Chauhan, R.; Srivastava, V.C. Superior Reduction of Nitrate with Simultaneous Oxidation of Intermediates and Enhanced Nitrogen Gas Selectivity via Novel Electrochemical Treatment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2021, 147, 245–258.

  • 29.

    Weber, K.A.; Achenbach, L.A.; Coates, J.D. Microorganisms Pumping Iron: Anaerobic Microbial Iron Oxidation and Reduction. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 752–764.

  • 30.

    Ma, S.; Wang, H.; Wang, H.; et al. High Ammonium Loading Can Increase Alkaline Phosphatase Activity and Promote Sediment Phosphorus Release: A Two-Month Mesocosm Experiment. Water Res. 2018, 145, 388–397.

  • 31.

    Zhao, X.; Tan, X.; Yang, L.; et al. Cultivation of Chlorella pyrenoidosa in Anaerobic Wastewater: The Coupled Effects of Ammonium, Temperature and pH Conditions on Lipids Compositions. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 284, 90–97.

  • 32.

    Yang, D.; Chen, Q.; Liu, R.; et al. Ammonia Recovery from Anaerobic Digestate: State of the Art, Challenges and Prospects. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 363, 127957.

  • 33.

    Kissel, D.E. Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 56–64.

  • 34.

    Kim, W.-S.; Jeon, E.-K.; Jung, J.-M.; et al. Field Application of Electrokinetic Remediation for Multi-Metal Contaminated Paddy Soil Using Two-Dimensional Electrode Configuration. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 4482–4491.

  • 35.

    Kim, K.-W.; Kim, Y.-J.; Kim, I.-T.; et al. Electrochemical Conversion Characteristics of Ammonia to Nitrogen. Water Res. 2006, 40, 1431–1441.

  • 36.

    Urban, N.R.; Dinkel, C.; Wehrli, B. Solute Transfer across the Sediment Surface of a Eutrophic Lake: I. Porewater Profiles from Dialysis Samplers. Aquat. Sci. 1997, 59, 1–25.

  • 37.

    Dong, M.; Nielsen, L.; Yang, S.; et al. Cable Bacteria: Widespread Filamentous Electroactive Microorganisms Protecting Environments. Trends Microbiol. 2024, 32, 697–706.

  • 38.

    Guedes, P.; Dionisio, J.; Couto, N.; et al. Electro-Bioremediation of a Mixture of Structurally Different Contaminants of Emerging Concern: Uncovering Electrokinetic Contribution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 406, 124304.

  • 39.

    Shi, Y.; Wei, Z.; Xu, Y.; et al. Effects of Electrochemical Intervention on the Remediation of Black-Odorous Water: Insights into Microbial Community Dynamics and Functional Shifts in Sediments. Water Sci. Technol. 2023, 87, 2776–2792.

  • 40.

    Mena, E.; Villaseñor, J.; Cañizares, P.; et al. Effect of a Direct Electric Current on the Activity of a Hydrocarbon-Degrading Microorganism Culture Used as the Flushing Liquid in Soil Remediation Processes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 124, 217–223.

  • 41.

    Li, F.; Guo, S.; Wang, S.; et al. Changes of Microbial Community and Activity under Different Electric Fields during Electro-Bioremediation of PAH-Contaminated Soil. Chemosphere 2020, 254, 126880.

  • 42.

    Xu, H.; Zhu, Y.; Du, M.; et al. Subcellular Mechanism of Microbial Inactivation during Water Disinfection by Cold Atmospheric-Pressure Plasma. Water Res. 2021, 188, 1165123.

  • 43.

    Tucci, M.; Viggi, C.; Nunez, A.; et al. Empowering Electroactive Microorganisms for Soil Remediation: Challenges in the Bioelectrochemical Removal of Petroleum Hydrocarbons. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 419, 130008.

  • 44.

    Duncan, S.; Louis, P.; Thomson, J.; et al. The Role of pH in Determining the Species Composition of the Human Colonic Microbiota. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 2112–2122.

  • 45.

    Hemkemeyer, M.; Schwalb, S.; Heinze, S.; et al. Functions of Elements in Soil Microorganisms. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 252, 126832.

  • 46.

    Luo, G. Review of Waste Phosphorus from Aquaculture: Source, Removal and Recovery. Rev. Aquac. 2022, 15, 1058–1082.

  • 47.

    Kar, S.; Singh, R.; Gurian, P.; et al. Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis of Nitrogen Recovery by Ammonia Air-Stripping from Wastewater Treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 857, 159499.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Tang, X.; Li, R.; Hu, Y.; Wang, D.; Gu, J.; Wang, Z. Transforming Sediment from Nutrient Source to Sink through Electrokinetic Geosynthetics-Driven Porewater Drainage. Remediation Ecology 2025, 1 (1), 2.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.