2512002595
  • Open Access
  • Article

Analysis and Control of a Boiling Water Reactor Model

  • Lakshmi N. Sridhar

Received: 25 Sep 2025 | Revised: 19 Dec 2025 | Accepted: 22 Dec 2025 | Published: 30 Dec 2025

Abstract

The Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) problem is a highly nonlinear physical system, and one must understand the dynamics in order to effectively control it. In this research, bifurcation analysis and multiobjective nonlinear model predictive control are performed on a boiling water reactor model. Bifurcation analysis is a powerful mathematical tool used to deal with the nonlinear dynamics of any process. Several factors must be considered, and multiple objectives must be met simultaneously. The MATLAB program MATCONT was used to perform the bifurcation analysis. The MNLMPC calculations were performed using the optimization language PYOMO in conjunction with the state-of-the-art global optimization solvers IPOPT and BARON. The bifurcation analysis revealed the existence of Hopf bifurcations. The Hopf bifurcations, which cause unwanted limit cycles, are eliminated with the use of the tanh functions. The MNLMPC calculations converge to the best possible solution, which is referred to as the Utopia point.

References 

  • 1.

    March-Leuba, J.; Cacuci, D.G.; Perez, R.B. Nonlinear dynamics and stability of boiling water reactors: Part 1—Qualitative analysis. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 1986, 93, 111–123.

  • 2.

    March-Leuba, J.; Cacuci, D.G.; Perez, R.B. Nonlinear dynamics and stability of boiling water reactors: Part 2—Qualitative analysis. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 1986, 93, 124–136.

  • 3.

    Munoz-Cobo, J.L.; Verdu, G. Application of Hopf bifurcation theory and variational methods to the study of limit cycles in boiling water reactors. Ann. Nucl. Energy 1991, 18, 269–302.

  • 4.

    Wang, H.; Kondo, S. Analysis on the mathematical structure of nonlinear BWR model. Nucl. Eng. Des. 1992, 137, 267–274.

  • 5.

    Tsuji, M.; Nishio, K.; Narita, M. Stability analysis of BWRs using bifurcation theory. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 1993, 30, 1107–1119.

  • 6.

    Rizwan-Uddin. Turning points and sub- and supercritical bifurcations in a simple BWR model. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2006, 236, 267–283.

  • 7.

    Lange, C.; Hennig, D.; Hurtado, A. An advanced reduced order model for BWR stability analysis. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2011, 53, 139–160.

  • 8.

    Wahi, P.; Kumawat, V. Nonlinear stability analysis of reduced order model of nuclear reactors- A parametric study relevant to the AHWR. Nucl. Eng. Des. 2011, 241, 134–143.

  • 9.

    Bindra, H. Effects of modelling assumptions on the stability domains of BWRs. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2014, 67, 13–20.

  • 10.

    Pandey, V.; Singh, S. Detailed bifurcation analysis with a simplified model for advanced heavy water reactor system. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2015, 20, 186–198.

  • 11.

    Pandey, V.; Singh, S. A bifurcation analysis of boiling water reactor on large domain of parametric spaces. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2016, 38, 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.01.018.

  • 12.

    Dhooge, A.; Govearts, W.; Kuznetsov, A.Y. MATCONT: A Matlab package for numerical bifurcation analysis of ODEs. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 2003, 29, 141–164.

  • 13.

    Dhooge, A.; Govaerts, W.; Mestrom, W.; et al. Cl_Matcont: A Continuation Toolbox in Matlab. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Melbourne, FL, USA, 9–12 March 2003; pp. 161–166.

  • 14.

    Kuznetsov, Y.A. Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998.

  • 15.

    Kuznetsov, Y.A. Five Lectures on Numerical Bifurcation Analysis; Utrecht University: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2009.

  • 16.

    Govaerts, W.J. Numerical Methods for Bifurcations of Dynamical Equilibria; SIAM: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000.

  • 17.

    Dubey, S.R.; Singh, S.K.; Chaudhuri, B.B. Activation functions in deep learning: A comprehensive survey and benchmark. Neurocomputing 2022, 503, 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.111.

  • 18.

    Kamalov, F.; Nazir, A.; Safaraliev, M.; et al. Comparative Analysis of Activation Functions in Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 2021 28th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems (ICECS), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 28 November–1 December 2021; pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECS53924.2021.9665646.

  • 19.

    Szandała, T. Review and comparison of commonly used activation functions for deep neural networks. In Bio-Inspired Neurocomputing; Springer: Singapore, 2020.

  • 20.

    Sridhar. L.N. Bifurcation Analysis and Optimal Control of the Tumor Macrophage Interactions. Biomed. J. Sci. Tech. Res. 2023, 53, 45218–45225. https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2023.53.008470.

  • 21.

    Sridhar, L.N. Elimination of oscillation causing Hopf bifurcations in engineering problems. J. Appl. Math. 2024, 2, 1826.

  • 22.

    Flores-Tlacuahuac, A.; Morales, P.; Rivera-Toledo, M. Multiobjective Nonlinear model predictive control of a class of chemical reactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 5891–5899.

  • 23.

    Hart, W.E.; Laird, C.D.; Watson, J.P.; et al. Pyomo—Optimization Modeling in Python, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Volume 67.

  • 24.

    Wächter, A.; Biegler, L. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math. Program. 2006, 106, 25–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y.

  • 25.

    Tawarmalani, M.; Sahinidis, N.V. A polyhedral branch-and-cut approach to global optimization. Math. Program. 2005, 103, 225–249.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Sridhar, L. N. Analysis and Control of a Boiling Water Reactor Model. Thermal Science and Applications 2025, 1 (1), 21–32.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.