Academic chemical research, especially in the laboratories that prepare very small quantities of novel chemical compounds, potentially exposes faculty, staff and students to several substances, in special conditions of manual work, for which the established methods of industrial hygiene monitoring and of medical health protection are not entirely adequate. Academic careers in chemistry develop over several decades, entailing workers’ mobility through research projects, institutions, and countries, especially in the early phase of researchers’ lives, when important life choices, such as pregnancy and childbearing, may be strongly influenced by occupational exposure to chemicals. This pilot study explores using the experimental section of published articles as proxy of activity recording in researcher’s laboratory logbook to record individual and group occupational exposure to research chemicals. Chemical researchers use substances with complete safety information, including occupational exposure limits, substances without occupational exposure limits but with safety assessment, including hazard classification, and produce completely new, original substances as the epistemological object of chemical research, the hazards of which may not be anticipated. A pilot example exemplifies data extraction from experimental descriptions and open-source safety information. Hazard indexes for the employed substances can be used to classify and rank individual experiments, such as chemical preparations, by hazard type and semi-quantitative hazard level, with more hazardous substances having higher Hazard index. However, hazards from original new substances cannot be anticipated. This approach can be shared by researchers to keep track of past occupational exposures throughout their professional lives.
- Open Access
- Article
Assessment of Potential Exposure to Research Chemicals in Academic Laboratories: Challenges and Opportunities for Scientists’ Health Protection
Author Information
Received: 08 Nov 2025 | Revised: 25 Nov 2025 | Accepted: 26 Dec 2025 | Published: 30 Dec 2025
Abstract
Keywords
chemical preparation | chemical reagent | chemical risk assessment | gravity index | hazard index | solvent
References
- 1.
Masters, EL. Trainor the Druggist. In: Spoon River’s Anthology; The Macmillan Company: New York, NY, USA, 1915.
- 2.
Gatterman, L. Laboratory Methods of Organic Chemistry; The Macmillan Company: New York, NY, USA, 1937; pp. 88–89.
- 3.
Kemsley, J.N. Learning from UCLA: Details of the Experiment that Led to a Researcher’s Death Prompt Evaluations of Academic Safety Practices. Available online: https://pubsapp.acs.org/cen/science/87/8731sci1.html? (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- 4.
Lessons of the Tragedy At UCLA. Available online: https://pubsapp.acs.org/cen/letters/87/8740letters.html? (accessed on accessed on 26 December 2025).
- 5.
Allen, K. A Young Lab Worker, a Professor, and a Deadly Accident. Available online: https://riskmanagement.nd.edu/assets/444869/ucla_lab_accident.pdf (accessed on 8 May 2025).
- 6.
National Research Council (US) Committee on Prudent Practices in the Laboratory. Prudent Practices in the Laboratory: Handling and Management of Chemical Hazards; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
- 7.
Wu, T.C.; Liu, C.W.; Lu, M.C. Safety climate in university and college laboratories: Impact of organizational and individual factors. J. Saf. Res. 2007, 38, 91–102.
- 8.
Leitão, S.; Greiner, B.A. Organisational safety climate and occupational accidents and injuries: An epidemiology-based systematic review. Work. Stress 2016, 30, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1102176.
- 9.
Wei, W. Reflections in Chemical Safety and Research: International Scholars’ Safety Conundrums. ACS Chem. Health Saf. 2024, 31, 426−428. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chas.4c00094.
- 10.
Science News Staff. Mercury Poisoning Kills Lab Chemist. Available online: https://www.science.org/content/article/mercury-poisoning-kills-lab-chemist (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- 11.
Lemonick, S. 25 Years After Karen Wetterhahn Died of Dimethylmercury Poisoning, Her Influence Persists. ACS Chem. Health Saf. 2022, 29, 327−332.
- 12.
Blayney, M.B.; Winn, J.S.; Nierenberg, D.W. Chemical safety: Handling dimethylmercury. Chem. Eng. News 1997, 75, 7.
- 13.
Viviano, F.; Ziniti, A. Deaths and Silence at the University: The Laboratory of Poisons; Aliberti Edizioni: Reggio nell’Emilia, Italy, 2010.
- 14.
Terranova, S. Apotheke, the Laboratory of Poisons; Duetredue Edizioni: Rittana, Italy, 2014.
- 15.
Lunelli, B. Hazard of C4O2XY compounds. La Chimica e l’Industria 2005, 86, 99.
- 16.
Furniss, B.S. Vogel's Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry. Pearson Education: Delhi, India, 2011.
- 17.
Cohen, B.S. Industrial Hygiene Measurement and Control. In: Environmental and Occupational Medicine; Rom, W.N., Ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkin: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007; pp. 1764–1777.
- 18.
Huising, R.; Silbey, S.S. Governing the gap: Forging safe science through relational regulation. Regul. Gov. 2011, 5, 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01100.x.
- 19.
Kemsley, J.N. Learning From UCLA: Details of the experiment that led to a researcher’s death prompt evaluations of academic safety practices. Chem. Eng. News 2009, 87, 29–31, 33–34.
- 20.
Nierenberg, D.W.; Nordgren, R.E.; Chang, M.B.; et al. Delayed cerebellar disease and death after accidental exposure to dimethylmercury. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 1672–1676. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199806043382305.
- 21.
Toribara, T.Y. Analysis of single hair by XRF discloses mercury intake. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2001, 20, 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1191/096032701678766813. PMID: 11393270.
- 22.
Citarella, A.; Belluti, S.; Bonanni, D.; et al. Structure-Based Discovery of Hsp90/HDAC6 Dual Inhibitors Targeting Aggressive Prostate Cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2025, 68, 15738–15765. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c00717.
- 23.
Fan, V.; Qian, Y.; Wang, A.; et al. OpenChemIE: An Information Extraction Toolkit for Chemistry Literature. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2024, 64, 5521–5534.
- 24.
Swain, M.C.; Cole, J.M. ChemDataExtractor: A Toolkit for Automated Extraction of Chemical Information from the Scientific Literature. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 56, 1894–1904. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00207.
- 25.
Rihm, S.D.; Saluz, F.; Kondinski, A.; et al. Extraction of chemical synthesis information using the World Avatar. Digit. Discov. 2025, 4, 2893–2909. https://doi.org/10.1039/D5DD00183H.
- 26.
Vaucher, A.C.; Zipoli, F.; Geluykens, J. et al. Automated extraction of chemical synthesis actions from experimental procedures. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3601. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17266-6.
- 27.
Inforisk Regione Piemonte. Modello Applicativo Proposto Dalla Regione Piemonte per la Valutazione del Rischio da Agenti Chimici Al.Pi.Ris.Ch. (Algoritmo Piemontese Rischio Chimico). Available online: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&
url=https://www.regione.piemonte.it/web/media/1093/download&ved=2ahUKEwjgsrSzv9iQAxWUhP0HHfQSO64QFnoECBcQAQ
&usg=AOvVaw157Gg3h9RJ_G9Okue4cud7 (accessed on 26 December 2025). - 28.
Regione Emilia-Romagna. Modello di Valutazione del Rischio Chimico (MoVaRisCh). Available online: https://www.ausl.mo.it/azienda/dipartimenti-territoriali/dipartimento-sanita-pubblica/servizio-prevenzione-sicurezza-ambienti-lavoro/sicurezza-e-assistenza/movarisch/ (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- 29.
Aggiornato il Modello di Valutazione del Rischio da Agenti Chimici (MoVaRisCh). Available online: https://www.normachem.com/it/normachem-informa/aggiornato-il-modello-di-valutazione-del-rischio-da-agenti-chimici-movarisch (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- 30.
EUR-Lex. Regolamento (CE) n. 1272/2008 Relativo Alla Classificazione, All’etichettatura e All’imballaggio Delle Sostanze e Delle Miscele. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:ev0013 (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- 31.
International Labour Organization (ILO). Diagnostic and Exposure Criteria for Occupational Diseases—Guidance Notes for Diagnosis and Prevention of the Diseases in the ILO List of Occupational Diseases (Revised 2010). Available online: https://www.ilo.org/publications/diagnostic-and-exposure-criteria-occupational-diseases-guidance-notes-0 (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- 32.
Bacciola, F. Chemical Risk Assessment in a University Research Laboratory: Comparison of Two Estimation Algorithms. Master’s Thesis, Post-graduate School of Occupational Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 2012.
- 33.
INAIL. Chemical Risk: Handbook for Health Protection of Research Laboratory Workers; Papaleo, B., Caporossi, L., De Rosa, M., Eds.; INAIL: Monte Porzio Catone, Italy, 2015.
- 34.
ISPRA. Linee Guida Per la Valutazione del Rischio da Esposizione: ad Agenti Chimici Pericolosi e ad Agenti Cancerogeni e Mutageni. Available online: https://www.arpa.sicilia.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Linee_guida_rischio_chimico2.pdf (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- 35.
Frigo, N. Health Risk Assessment from Chemical: A Comparison of Outcomes from Different Algorithms. Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy, 2024.
- 36.
La Valutazione del Rischio Chimico nei Laboratori Chimici di Ricerca Pura e Applicate. Available online: https://www.inail.it/portale/it/inail-comunica/pubblicazioni/catalogo-generale/catalogo-generale-dettaglio.2016.02.la-valutazione-del-rischio-chimico-nei-laboratori-chimici-di-ricerca-pura-e-applicata.html?all=true (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- 37.
Tamiazzo, A. Critical Issues in the Application of the Decree 81/2008 Concerning Protection of Safety and Health in the Universities. Bachelor’s Thesis, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy, 2018.
- 38.
Vecchi, L.; Bellettini, E.; Tamiazzo, A. Chemical risk assessment in academic research laboratories: Between norms and common practice. Dirit. Della Sicur. Sul Lav. 2024, 2, 1–17.
- 39.
Bird, C.L.; Willoughby, C.; Frey, J.G. Laboratory notebooks in the digital era: The role of ELNs in record keeping for chemistry and other sciences. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 8157–8175. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60122F.
- 40.
Wilkinson, M.; Dumontier, M.; Aalbersberg, I.; et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 2016, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
- 41.
Turning FAIR into Reality—Final Report and Action Plan from the European Commission Expert Group on FAIR Data. Available online: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/1524 (accessed on 26 December 2025).
- 42.
Rubino, F.M.; Floridia, L.; Pietropaolo, A.M.; et al. Measurement of surface contamination by certain antineoplastic drugs using high-performance liquid chromatography: Applications in occupational hygiene investigations in hospital environments. La Med. Del Lav. 1999, 90, 572–583.
- 43.
Ursini, C.L.; Salè, E.O.; Fresegna, A.M.; et al. Antineoplastic drug occupational exposure: A new integrated approach to evaluate exposure and early genotoxic and cytotoxic effects by no-invasive Buccal Micronucleus Cytome Assay biomarker. Toxicol. Lett. 2019, 316, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2019.08.022.
- 44.
Rubino, F.M.; Puri, D.; Fargnoli, M.; et al. Sicurpest: A Prototype of a User-Friendly Tool for Preventive Risk Assessment of Pesticide Use in Agriculture. Toxics 2025, 13, 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13020089.
- 45.
Nickla, J.T.; Boehm, M.B. Proper Laboratory Notebook Practices: Protecting Your Intellectual Property. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2011, 6, 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-010-9237-4.
- 46.
Eisenberg, A. Keeping a Laboratory Notebook. J. Chem. Educ. 1982, 59, 1045.
- 47.
Scarselli, A.; Porzio, A.; Marinaccio, A. Evaluation of occupational exposure risk experienced by a cohort of workers exposed to acrylonitrile using a register-based information system. Ann. Work. Expo. Health 2025, 69, 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaf021.
- 48.
Tsai, S.P.; Wendt, J.K.; Donnelly, R.P.; et al. Age at retirement and long term survival of an industrial population: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2005, 331, 995. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38586.448704.E0.
- 49.
Ajayi, M.A.; Shangodoyin, D.K.; Mokgathle, L.; et al. Mortality Experience of a Cohort of Academic Staff Retirees of University: A Case Study of University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2014, 3, 66–71.
- 50.
Urbina, F.; Lentzos, F.; Invernizzi, C.; et al. Dual Use of Artificial Intelligence-powered Drug Discovery. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2022, 4, 189–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-022-00465-9.
- 51.
Bradbury, S.P. Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: An overview. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1994, 2, 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10629369408028842.
- 52.
Luechtefeld, T.; Hartung, T. Navigating the AI Frontier in Toxicology: Trends, Trust, and Transformation. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2025, 12, 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-025-00514-6.
- 53.
Tang, B.L. Laboratory Safety Regulations and Training must Emphasize the Underpinning Research Ethics Perspectives. J. Acad. Ethics 2025, 23, 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09531-w.
- 54.
Gerardo Ribeiro, M.; Alvarez-Chavez, C.R. A Call for Papers “Chemical Safety in Universities: Legally Enforced vs Culturally Embraced”. ACS Chem. Health Saf. 2025, 32, 1–2.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Suite 4002 Level 4, 447 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
General Inquiries: info@sciltp.com