Although the thermofield dynamics (TFD) was developed specifically for systems to which the ladder canonical operators are associated, in the paper we showed that this approach can also be formulated for systems of deformed bosons, associated with a pair of deformed operators. In this context we built sets of temperature dependent coherent states, both of the Barut-Girardello and of the Klauder-Perelomov type, these two types being dual to each other. In calculations involving ladder operators, both independent and temperature-dependent, we used the Diagonal Operator Ordering Technique (DOOT), which is a generalization of the Integration Within an Ordered Product technique (IWOP) applicable to canonical operators associated with the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. We also refer to the connection between TFD and thermodynamic quantities.
- Open Access
- Article
Generalized Coherent States in Thermal Field Dynamics in the Frame of Diagonal Ordering Operator Technique
Author Information
Received: 30 May 2026 | Revised: 08 Jul 2026 | Accepted: 10 Jul 2026 | Published: 31 Jul 2026
Abstract
Keywords
References
- 1.
Takahashi, Y.; Umezawa, H. Thermo Field Dynamics, Collect. Phenom. 1975, 2, 55–80; reprinted in Int. J. Mod. Phys. 1996, 10, 1755.
- 2.
Umezawa, H.; Matsumoto, H.; Tachiki, M. Thermofield Dynamics and Condensed States; North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1982; p. 607.
- 3.
Mann, A.; Revzen, M. Thermal coherent states. Phys. Lett. A 1989, 134, 273–275.
- 4.
Mogurampally, N.K.; Shiv Chaitanya, K.V.S.; Bambah, B.A. Quantum Entanglement in Coupled Lossy Waveguides Using SU(2) and SU(1, 1) Thermo-Algebras. J. Mod. Phys. 2015, 6, 1554.
- 5.
Fan, H.-Y. Thermal Wigner operator in coherent thermal state representation and its application. Commun. Theor. Phys. 2002, 37, 289.
- 6.
Xu, X.-F.; Zhu, S.-Q. From the Thermo Wigner Operator to the Thermo Husimi Operator in Thermo Field Dynamics. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2010, 27, 090305.
- 7.
Kim, S.P.; Khanna, F.C. Thermofield Dynamics of Time-Dependent Boson and Fermion Systems. arXiv 2003, arXiv:0308053v1.
- 8.
Azuma, H.; Ban, M. Thermal Effects in Jaynes–Cummings Model Derived with Low-Temperature Expansion. Int. J. Mod. Phys. 2011, 22, 1015–1062.
- 9.
Harsha, G.; Henderson, T.M.; Scuseria, G.E. Thermofield Dynamics for Finite-Temperature Electronic Structure. J. Chem. Phys. 2023, 127, 3063.
- 10.
Guo, M.; Fan, Z.-Y.; Jiang, J.; et al. Circuit complexity for generalized coherent states in thermal field dynamics. Phys. Rev. D 2020, 101, 126007.
- 11.
Schrödinger, E. Der stetige übergang von der Mikrozur Makromechanik. Die Naturwissenschaften 1926, 14, 664–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01507634.
- 12.
Glauber, R.J. Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field. Phys. Rev. 1963, 131, 2766.
- 13.
Klauder, J.R.; Skagerstam, B. Coherent States: Applications in Physics and Mathematical Physics; World Scientific: Singapore, 1985; pp. 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1142/0096.
- 14.
Perelomov, A. Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1986; pp. 40–44.
- 15.
Gazeau, J.-P. Coherent States in Quantum Physics; Wiley-VCH: Berlin, Germany, 2009; pp. 28–35.
- 16.
Dodonov, V.V. ‘Nonclassical’ states in quantum optics: A ‘squeezed’ review of the first 75 years. J. Opt. B Quant. Semiclass. Optics. 2002, 4, R1.
- 17.
Barut, A.O.; Girardello, L. New “Coherent” States Associated with Non-Compact Groups. Commun. Math. Phys. 1971, 21, 41.
- 18.
Popov, D. Generalized Klauder–Perelomov CSs in the frame of diagonal operators ordering technique. Rep. Math. Phys. 2021, 88, 361.
- 19.
Gazeau, J.P.; Klauder, J.R.; Coherent states for systems with discrete and continuous spectrum. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 1999, 32, 123.
- 20.
Man’ko, V.I.; Marmo, G.; Sudarshan, E.C.G.; et al. f-Oscillators and Nonlinear Coherent States. Phys. Scr. 1997, 55, 528.
- 21.
León-Montiel, R.d.J.; Vallés, A.; Moya-Cessa, H.M.; et al. Coherent delocalization: Views of entanglement in different scenarios. Laser Phys. Lett. 2015, 12, 085204. https://doi.org/10.1088/1612-2011/12/8/085204.
- 22.
Sivakumar, S. Studies on nonlinear coherent states. J. Opt. B Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 2000, 2, R61.
- 23.
Matos Filho, R.L.; Vogel, W. Nonlinear coherent states. Phys. Rev. A 1996, 54, 4560.
- 24.
Floquet, S.; Trindade, M.A.S.; Vianna, J.D.M. Lie algebras and generalized thermal coherent states. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2017, 32, 1750015.
- 25.
Bishop, R.F.; Vourdas, A. Coherent mixed states and a generalized P representation. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 1987, 20, 3743–3769.
- 26.
Kim, S.P.; Santana, A.E.; Khanna, F.C. Generalized Invariants and Quantum Evolution of Open Fermionic System. Phys. Lett. A 2000, 1–2, 46–52.
- 27.
Popov, D.; Popov, M. Some operatorial properties of the generalized hypergeometric coherent states. Phys. Scr. 2015, 90, 035101.
- 28.
Nielsen, M.A.; Chuang, I.L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information; Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010, pp. 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511976667.
- 29.
Hall, B.C. Quantum Theory for Mathematicians. In Graduate Texts in Mathematics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; p. 267. ISBN 978-1-4614-7115-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7116-5.
- 30.
Paz, J.P.; Roncaglia, A.J. Defining coherent states: Why must be eigenstates of the annihilation operator? arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.16483v1.
- 31.
Mojaveri, B.; Dehghani, A. Generalized su(1,1) coherent states for pseudo harmonic oscillator and their nonclassical properties. Eur. Phys. J. D. 2013, 67, 179.
- 32.
Popov, D. Considerations of the Duality in the Generalized Coherent States Formalism. Int. J. Sci. Res. Phys. Appl. Sci. 2025, 13, 34–35.
- 33.
Mathai, A.M.; Saxena, R.K. Generalized Hypergeometric Functions with Applications in Statistics and Physical Sciences. In Lecture Notes in Mathematics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1973; Volume 348, pp. 27–31.
- 34.
Husimi, K. Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan, 3rd ed.; Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan: Tokyo, Japan, 1940; Volume 22, p. 264.
- 35.
Umezawa, H. Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro and Thermal Physics; American Institute of Physics: New York, NY, USA, 1995; pp. 30–32.
- 36.
Chua, E.Y.S. The Time in Thermal Time. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.18948v1.
- 37.
Petronilo, G.X.A.; Araújo, M.R.; Cruz, C. Simulating thermal qubits through thermofield dynamics: An undergraduate approach using quantum computing. Rev. Bras. Ens. Fís. 2023, 45, e20230287.
- 38.
Diniz, C.M.; Damas, G.G.; de Almeida, N.G.; et al. Quantum Features of the Thermal Two-Qubit Quantum Rabi Model in Ultra- and Deep-Strong Regimes. Adv. Quantum Technol. 2025, 8, e2500250.
- 39.
Nandy, P.; Matsoukas-Roubeas, A.S.; Martınez-Azcona, P.; et al. Quantum dynamics in Krylov space: Methods and applications. Phys. Rept. 2025, 1125–1128, 1–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2025.05.001.
- 40.
Vancea, V. Bosonic D-branes at finite temperature Phys. Lett. B 2000, 487, 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00799-1.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Suite 4002 Level 4, 447 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
General Inquiries: info@sciltp.com