2603003203
  • Open Access
  • Article

Performance-Oriented Metaheuristic PID Tuning for Parametrically Excited Mathieu Systems

  • Robert Vrabel

Received: 13 Jan 2026 | Revised: 15 Feb 2026 | Accepted: 04 Mar 2026 | Published: 16 Mar 2026

Abstract

This paper investigates metaheuristic-based tuning of classical PID controllers for the performance-oriented regulation of parametrically excited dynamical systems, with a particular focus on the Mathieu equation as a canonical model of time-periodic instability. Unlike many existing studies that emphasize nonlinear or autonomous dynamics, the work explicitly addresses PID tuning under time-periodic parametric excitation with an emphasis on closed-loop performance and bounded response behavior. Three population-based optimization algorithms–Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), and a hybrid PSO–GWO scheme–are employed to determine PID gain parameters under identical computational budgets. The tuning objective combines the Integral of Time-weighted Absolute Error (ITAE) with the Integral of Squared Overshoot (ISO), enabling a unified assessment of transient performance and overshoot suppression. The controlled Mathieu system is examined across multiple excitation regimes, ranging from stable periodic operation to near-resonant and strongly excited conditions. In addition to the metaheuristic approaches, a deterministic baseline PID controller derived from a nominal LTI approximation is included as a practical reference. All controllers are evaluated on the full time-varying Mathieu dynamics using the same performance index, and control-input saturation tests are conducted to assess behavior under practical actuator constraints. Numerical results demonstrate that all considered metaheuristic methods achieve reliable closed-loop stabilization and maintain bounded oscillatory responses despite strong parametric excitation. In contrast, the deterministic baseline exhibits a pronounced initial overshoot and higher steady-state oscillation amplitudes, resulting in significantly higher performance-index values. While the hybrid PSO–GWO approach occasionally yields smoother transients, it does not provide a consistent performance advantage over standalone PSO or GWO when normalized by computational effort. Overall, the findings indicate that, for low-dimensional PID tuning problems in parametrically excited systems, solution quality is governed primarily by adequate search-space coverage and population diversity rather than algorithmic hybridization. Well-configured single-population metaheuristics therefore offer an effective and practically relevant framework for stability-oriented PID control of time-varying systems subject to parametric excitation.

References 

  • 1.

    Astrom, K.J.; Hagglund, T. Advanced PID Control; ISA—The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 2006.

  • 2.

    Ogata, K. Modern Control Engineering, 5th Ed.; Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2010.

  • 3.

    Verhulst, F. Perturbation Analysis of Parametric Resonance; Mathematisch Instituut, University of Utrecht: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2008.

  • 4.

    Kennedy, J.; Eberhart, R.C. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, 27 November–1 December 1995; pp. 1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968.

  • 5.

    Kennedy, J.; Eberhart, R.C. A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Orlando, FL, USA, 12–15 October 1997; pp. 4104–4108. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.1997.637339.

  • 6.

    Shi, Y.; Eberhart, R.C. A modified particle swarm optimizer. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Anchorage, AK, USA, 04–09 May 1998; pp. 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEC.1998.699146.

  • 7.

    Clerc, M.; Kennedy, J. The particle swarm—Explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2002, 6, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.985692.

  • 8.

    Mirjalili, S.; Mirjalili, S.M.; Lewis, A. Grey wolf optimizer. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2014, 69, 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007.

  • 9.

    Prity, F.S. Nature-inspired optimization algorithms for enhanced load balancing in cloud computing: A comprehensive review with taxonomy, comparative analysis, and future trends. Swarm Evol. Comput. 2025, 97, 102053.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2025.102053.

  • 10.

    Francis, B.A.; Wonham, W.M. The internal model principle of control theory. Automatica 1976, 12, 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(76)90006-6.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Vrabel, R. Performance-Oriented Metaheuristic PID Tuning for Parametrically Excited Mathieu Systems. Complex Systems Stability & Control 2026, 2 (1), 2. https://doi.org/10.53941/cssc.2026.100002.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.