Pigs, Biomes, and the Pork Peril: A One Health and One Welfare Meta-Narrative

Niyaz Ahmed

doi:10.53941/dbgs.2026.100004

Abstract

Global pork production and consumption occupy a dominant yet insufficiently scrutinized position within modern food systems, with 1.5 billion pigs slaughtered each year, a staggering loss of animal life. This perspective synthesizes published evidence and opinion from microbiology, epidemiology, environmental science, and public health to examine risks associated with industrial pig production, including zoonotic pathogen emergence, antimicrobial resistance (AMR), environmental degradation, and chronic disease burdens. The classification of processed meat as carcinogenic by the World Health Organization reinforces the need for critical reassessment of pork-centric production and consumption systems. High-density pig farming amplifies microbial spillover, ecological pressure, and public health vulnerability through intensive resource use, antibiotic dependence, and waste externalities. The convergence of these risks within industrial swine systems warrants particular attention. Accordingly, transitioning both industrial pig production and processing toward less risk-intensive and more adaptable alternatives based on diversified, agroecological food systems entailing aquaculture, sustainable dairying, poultry, and plant-based food cultivation can provide pragmatic pathways to resilient, health-conscious, and sustainable food supplies that operate within planetary boundaries. This direction aligns with sustainable food policies and frameworks advanced by international governing bodies and directly operationalizes the integrated One Health and One Welfare frameworks.

References

1.
Bouvard, V.; Loomis, D.; Guyton, K.Z.; et al. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 1599–1600.
2.
Kim, S.W.; Gormley, A.; Jang, K.B.; et al. Invited Review: Current status of global pig production: An overview and research trends. Anim Biosci. 2024, 37, 719–729.
3.
Processed Meat Market Size & Share Analysis—Growth Trends and Forecast (2025–2030). Available online: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/global-processed-meat-market-industry (accessed on 1 July 2026).
4.
The Guardian. Scientists Demand Cancer Warnings for Bacon and Ham in the UK. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/oct/24/scientists-demand-cancer-warnings-bacon-ham-uk (accessed on 1 July 2026).
5.
Lin, C.-N.; Okabayashi, T.; Tummaruk, P.; et al. Editorial: Zoonotic diseases among pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023, 9, 1122679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1122679.
6.
Augustyniak, A.; Pomorska-Mól, M. An Update in Knowledge of Pigs as the Source of Zoonotic Pathogens. Animals 2023, 13, 3281. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203281.
7.
Baer, A.A.; Miller, M.J.; Dilger, A.C. Pathogens of Interest to the Pork Industry: A Review of Research on Interventions to Assure Food Safety. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 183–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12001.
8.
Abrego, A.; Wiseman, B.; Gragg, S.E. Summarizing the Current knowledge and Existing Knowledge Gaps for Preharvest and Postharvest Salmonella Contamination in Pork. J. Food Prot. 2025, 88, 100609.
9.
Martins, B.T.F.; Camargo, A.C.; Tavares, R.M.; et al. Relevant foodborne bacteria associated to pork production chain. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2025, 113, 181–218.
10.
Jaramillo-Bedoya, E.; Flórez-Elvira, L.J.; Ocampo-Ibáñez, I.D. High Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Ready-to-Eat Artisanal Pork Sausages Sold at Food Outlets in Quindío, Colombia. Pathogens 2025, 14, 31.
11.
Prasertsee, T.; Prachantasena, S.; Tantitaveewattana, P.; et al. Assessing antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica in the pork production system. J. Med. Microbiol. 2024, 73, 001894.
12.
Kennedy, J.; Alexander, P.; Taillie, L.S.; et al. Estimated effects of reductions in processed meat consumption and unprocessed red meat consumption on occurrences of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, colorectal cancer, and mortality in the USA: A microsimulation study. Lancet Planet Health 2024, 8, e441–e451.
13.
Monger, X.C.; Gilbert, A.A.; Saucier, L.; et al. Antibiotic Resistance: From Pig to Meat. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1209.
14.
Pham-Duc, P.; Nguyen-Viet, H.; Luu-Quoc, T.; et al. Understanding antibiotic residues and pathogens flow in livestock wastewater from Smallholder Pig Farms to Agriculture Field in Ha Nam Province, Vietnam. Environ. Health Insights 2020, 14, 117.
15.
Rasschaert, G.; Elst, D.V.; Colson, L.; et al. Antibiotic Residues and Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in Pig Slurry used to Fertilize Agricultural Fields. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 34.
16.
Krapac, I.G.; Dey, W.S.; Roy, W.R.; et al. Impacts of swine manure pits on groundwater quality. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 120, 475–492.
17.
Tiseo, K.; Huber, L.; Gilbert, M.; et al. Global Trends in Antimicrobial Use in Food Animals from 2017 to 2030. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 918.
18.
Van Boeckel, T.P.; Brower, C.; Gilbert, M.; et al. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5649–5654.
19.
Naghavi, M.; Vollset, S.E.; Ikuta, K.S.; et al. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance 1990–2021: A systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet 2024, 404, 1199–1226.
20.
Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655.
21.
Meng, X.J.; Thiel, V. Emerging and re-emerging porcine viruses. Virus Res. 2020, 290, 198198.
22.
Ma, W.; Kahn, R.E.; Richt, J.A. The pig as a mixing vessel for influenza viruses: Human and veterinary implications. J. Mol. Genet. Med. 2008, 3, 158–166.
23.
Ma, W.; Loving, C.L.; Driver, J.P. From Snoot to Tail: A Brief Review of Influenza Virus Infection and Immunity in Pigs. J. Immunol. 2023, 211, 1187–1194.
24.
Sooryanarain, H.; Meng, X.J. Swine hepatitis E virus: Cross-species infection, pork safety and chronic infection. Virus Res. 2020, 284, 197985.
25.
Stettler, N.; Murphy, M.M.; Barraj, L.M.; et al. Systematic review of clinical studies related to pork intake and metabolic syndrome or its components. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. Targets Ther. 2013, 6, 347–357.
26.
Thøgersen, R.; Rasmussen, M.K.; Sundekilde, U.K.; et al. Background Diet Influences TMAO Concentrations Associated with Red Meat Intake without Influencing Apparent Hepatic TMAO-Related Activity in a Porcine Model. Metabolites 2020, 10, 57.
27.
Li, H.; Xu, J. Multifaceted dietary exposures and atrial fibrillation: Bidirectional causal evidence from two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Medicine 2025, 104, e44722.
28.
Ivancovsky-Wajcman, D.; Fliss-Isakov, N.; Grinshpan, L.S.; et al. High Meat Consumption Is Prospectively Associated with the Risk of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Presumed Significant Fibrosis. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3533.
29.
Nanji, A.A.; French, S.W. Relationship between pork consumption and cirrhosis. Lancet 1985, 325, 681–683.
30.
Bastide, N.M.; Pierre, F.H.; Corpet, D.E. Heme iron from meat and risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis and a review of the mechanisms involved. Cancer Prev. Res. 2011, 4, 177–184.
31.
Turner, N.D.; Lloyd, S.K. Association between red meat consumption and colon cancer: A systematic review of experimental results. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 813–839.
32.
Wang, X.; Lin, X.; Ouyang, Y.Y.; et al. Red and processed meat consumption and mortality: Dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Public Health Nutr. 2016, 19, 893–905.
33.
Zhang, M.; Zou, X.; Zhao, D.; et al. Pork Meat Proteins Alter Gut Microbiota and Lipid Metabolism Genes in the Colon of Adaptive Immune-Deficient Mice. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2020, 64, e1901105.
34.
Sinha, R.; Cross, A.J.; Graubard, B.I.; et al. Meat intake and mortality: A prospective study of over half a million people. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 562–571.
35.
Gershteyn, I.M.; Ferreira, L.M.R. Immunodietica: A data-driven approach to investigate interactions between diet and autoimmune disorders. J. Transl. Autoimmun. 2019, 1, 100003.
36.
Holzbauer, S.M.; DeVries, A.S.; Sejvar, J.J.; et al. Epidemiologic investigation of immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy among abattoir workers exposed to porcine brain. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9782.
37.
Lachance, D.H.; Lennon, V.A.; Pittock, S.J.; et al. An outbreak of neurological autoimmunity with polyradiculoneuropathy in workers exposed to aerosolized porcine neural tissue: A descriptive study. Lancet Neurol. 2010, 9, 55–66.
38.
Poore, J.; Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 2018, 360, 987–992.
39.
MacLeod, M.; Gerber, P.; Mottet, A.; et al. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Pig and Chicken Supply Chains: A Global Life Cycle Assessment; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2013.
40.
Yang, P.; Yu, M.; Ma, X.; et al. Carbon Footprint of the Pork Product Chain and Recent Advancements in Mitigation Strategies. Foods 2023, 12, 4203.
41.
Faunalytics. Global Pig Slaughter Statistics and Charts. Available online: https://faunalytics.org/global-pig-slaughter-statistics-and-charts/ (accessed on 1 July 2026).
42.
OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2025–2034; OECD/FAO: Paris, France; Rome, Italy, 2025.
43.
Kool, A.; Blonk, H.; Ponsioen, T.; et al. Carbon Footprints of Conventional and Organic Pork: Assessments of Typical Production Systems in the Netherlands, Denmark, England and Germany; Blonk Milieu Advies: Gouda, Netherlands, 2009; p. 90.
44.
Zhang, D.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Z. Impacts of Small-Scale Industrialized Swine Farming on Local Soil, Water and Crop Qualities in a Hilly Red Soil Region of Subtropical China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1524.
45.
Essig, M. Lesser Beasts: A Snout-to-Tail History of the Humble Pig; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 2015.
46.
Ahmed, N. The Last Pig—Ending the Pork Peril; Notion Press: Chennai, India, 2025.
47.
European Commission. Farm to Fork Strategy. Available online: https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-05/f2f_action-plan_2020_strategy-info_en.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2026).
48.
Slow Food. What Do the New EU Farm to Fork and Biodiversity Strategies Mean for Slow Food? Available online: https://www.slowfood.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/F2F_Bio_Strat_Report_ENG.pdf (accessed on 1 July 2026).
49.
Humpenöder, F.; Popp, A.; Merfort, L.; et al. Food matters: Dietary shifts increase the feasibility of 1.5 °C pathways in line with the Paris Agreement. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadj3832.

Scilight Press

Author Information

Abstract

Keywords

References

About Scilight

Journals

Publishing Policies

Contact Us