2605003859
  • Open Access
  • Article

Cross-Commodity Futures Portfolios as Tools for Environmental Risk Management: Evidence from Tail Risk and Regime Dependence

  • Jun Xie

Received: 25 Mar 2026 | Revised: 07 May 2026 | Accepted: 08 May 2026 | Published: 27 Jul 2026

Abstract

Environmental risks, including climate variability, resource scarcity, and policy changes, have increased uncertainty and price volatility across global commodity markets. Although a growing body of literature has examined commodity price dynamics, spillovers, and cross-market dependence, relatively fewer studies integrate cross-commodity dependence, downside tail risk, and regime-sensitive portfolio construction within a unified environmental risk management framework. This study evaluates whether cross-commodity futures portfolios can serve as tools for resource-price risk management under environmental and market uncertainty. Using a comprehensive dataset covering energy, agricultural, metal, and livestock futures, the analysis combines conditional value-at-risk (CVaR), rolling correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and regime-based portfolio evaluation. Hierarchical risk parity (HRP) and CVaR-minimizing portfolios are evaluated under both low-risk and high-risk market regimes. The results show that risk-oriented portfolio strategies substantially reduce volatility, downside tail risk, and maximum drawdown relative to an equal-weighted benchmark. The dependence analysis further indicates that energy markets constitute the dominant common factor driving cross-commodity risk transmission. Regime analysis and state-space estimation reveal that systemic commodity risk evolves dynamically and becomes more pronounced during periods of elevated market stress. Overall, the findings suggest that commodity-based financial indicators can complement traditional environmental monitoring by providing market-based information on evolving systemic risk under environmental and market uncertainty.

References 

  • 1.

    Albanese, M.; Caporale, G.M.; Colella, I.; et al. Climate Policies, Energy Shocks and Spillovers between Green and Brown Stock Price Indices. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2026, 106, 104883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104883.

  • 2.

    Baffes, J.; Haniotis, T. Placing the 2006/08 Commodity Price Boom into Perspective. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5371. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1646794 (accessed on 30 April 2026).

  • 3.

    Pindyck, R.S. Volatility and Commodity Price Dynamics. J. Futures Mark. 2004, 24, 1029–1047. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20120.

  • 4.

    Batten, J.A.; Kinateder, H.; Szilagyi, P.G.; et al. Time-Varying Energy and Stock Market Integration in Asia. Energy Econ. 2019, 80, 777–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.01.008.

  • 5.

    Tang, K.; Xiong, W. Index Investment and the Financialization of Commodities. Financ. Anal. J. 2012, 68, 54–74. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v68.n6.5.

  • 6.

    Pindyck, R.S.; Rotemberg, J.J. The Excess Co-Movement of Commodity Prices. Econ. J. 1990, 100, 1173–1189. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233966.

  • 7.

    Diebold, F.X.; Yilmaz, K. On the Network Topology of Variance Decompositions: Measuring the Connectedness of Financial Firms. J. Econom. 2014, 182, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.04.012.

  • 8.

    Kamal, M.M.; Roca, E.; Li, B.; et al. Price Contagion and Risk Spillover in the Global Commodities Market: COVID-19 Pandemic vs. Global Financial Crisis. Resour. Policy 2025, 103, 105553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105553.

  • 9.

    Liu, Z.; Zou, R.; Zhang, S.; et al. Risk Spillovers among Energy, Metals, and Agriculture Commodity Markets: A Network Perspective. Financ. Res. Lett. 2025, 83, 107502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107502.

  • 10.

    Silvennoinen, A.; Thorp, S. Financialization, Crisis and Commodity Correlation Dynamics. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 2013, 24, 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2012.11.007.

  • 11.

    Ang, A.; Bekaert, G. International Asset Allocation with Regime Shifts. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2002, 15, 1137–1187.

  • 12.

    Rockafellar, R.T.; Uryasev, S. Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. J. Risk 2000, 2, 21–41. https://doi.org/10.21314/jor.2000.038.

  • 13.

    Gorton, G.; Hayashi, F.; Rouwenhorst, K.G. The Fundamentals of Commodity Futures Returns. Rev. Financ. 2013, 17, 35–105.

  • 14.

    Chunhachinda, P.; de Boyrie, M.E.; Pavlova, I. Measuring the Hedging Effectiveness of Commodities. Financ. Res. Lett. 2019, 30, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.09.012.

  • 15.

    Longin, F.; Solnik, B. Extreme Correlation of International Equity Markets. J. Financ. 2001, 56, 649–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00340.

  • 16.

    Bouri, E.; Nekhili, R.; Todorova, N. Dynamic Co-Movement in Major Commodity Markets during Crisis Periods: A Wavelet Local Multiple Correlation Analysis. Financ. Res. Lett. 2023, 55, 103996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103996.

  • 17.

    Cho, Y.; Song, J.W. Hierarchical Risk Parity Using Security Selection Based on Peripheral Assets of Correlation-Based Minimum Spanning Trees. Financ. Res. Lett. 2023, 53, 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103608.

  • 18.

    Deng, W., Zhang, Z., Wang, H.; et al. Climate Risk Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Spatial Network Structure and Consequence Analysis in China. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 22, 11491–11522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-025-06470-w.

  • 19.

    Hamilton, J.D. Causes and Consequences of the Oil Shock of 2007-08. Available online: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15002 (accessed on 30 April 2026).

  • 20.

    Ma, Y.; Zhou, M.; Li, S. Weathering Market Swings: Does Climate Risk Matter for Agricultural Commodity Price Predictability? J. Commod. Mark. 2024, 36, 100423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100423.

  • 21.

    Ouyang, H.; Huang, X.; Yu, B. Risk Spillover Effects of Climate Uncertainty on Commodity Markets: From the Dual Perspective of Physical Risk and Transition Risk. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2025, 105, 104390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2025.104390.

  • 22.

    Bellemare, M.F. Rising Food Prices, Food Price Volatility, and Social Unrest. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2015, 97, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aau038.

  • 23.

    Bolton, P.; Kacperczyk, M. Do Investors Care about Carbon Risk? J. Financ. Econ. 2021, 142, 517–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008.

  • 24.

    Chen, Y.; Wei, Y.; Zhou, C. Climate Risk Transmissions to Commodity Markets: Evidence from a Mixed-Frequency Spillover Approach. Eval. Rev. 2026, 50, 346–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X251391891.

  • 25.

    Guo, Y.; Peng, P.; Zhou, L.; et al. Forecasting Volatility in Commodity Markets with Climate Risk. Financ. Res. Lett. 2025, 78, 107094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107094.

  • 26.

    Pham, L.; Kamal, J.B. Blessings or Curse: How Do Media Climate Change Concerns Affect Commodity Tail Risk Spillovers? J. Commod. Mark. 2024, 34, 100407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2024.100407.

  • 27.

    Sadorsky, P. Modeling Volatility and Correlations between Emerging Market Stock Prices and the Prices of Copper, Oil and Wheat. Energy Econ. 2014, 43, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.02.014.

  • 28.

    Working, H. New Concepts Concerning Futures Markets and Prices. Am. Econ. Rev. 1962, 52, 431–459. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1810553.

  • 29.

    Jia, S.; Chen, X.; Han, L.; Jin, J. Global Climate Change and Commodity Markets: A Hedging Perspective. J. Futures Mark. 2023, 43, 1393–1422. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22416.

  • 30.

    Basak, S.; Shapiro, A. Value-at-Risk-Based Risk Management: Optimal Policies and Asset Prices. Rev. Financ. Stud. 2001, 14, 371–405. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.2.371.

  • 31.

    Huang, X.; Liu, L.; Jiang, H.; et al. Tail Risk Spillovers between International Agricultural Commodity and China’s Financial Markets: Based on Quantile Time-Frequency Perspective. Financ. Res. Lett. 2025, 78, 107219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.107219.

  • 32.

    Lohre, H.; Rother, C.; Schäfer, K.A. Hierarchical Risk Parity: Accounting for Tail Dependencies in Multi-Asset Multi-Factor Allocations. In Machine Learning for Asset Management: New Developments and Financial Applications; Jurczenko, E., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 329–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119751182.ch9.

  • 33.

    Hamilton, J.D. A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle. Econometrica 1989, 57, 357–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912559.

  • 34.

    Kroner, K.F.; Ng, V.K. Modeling Asymmetric Co-Movements of Asset Returns. Rev. Financ. Stud. 1998, 11, 817–844. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/11.4.817.

  • 35.

    Jolliffe, I.T. Principal Component Analysis, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002.

  • 36.

    Bali, T.G.; Brown, S.J.; Caglayan, M.O. Do Hedge Funds’ Exposures to Risk Factors Predict Their Future Returns? J. Financ. Econ. 2011, 101, 36–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.02.008.

  • 37.

    Durbin, J.; Koopman, S.J. Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Xie, J. Cross-Commodity Futures Portfolios as Tools for Environmental Risk Management: Evidence from Tail Risk and Regime Dependence. Ecological Economics and Management 2026, 2 (3), 12. https://doi.org/10.53941/eem.2026.100012.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.