GSSD/
Articles/
2605004009
  • Open Access
  • Review

Management of Municipal Solid Waste: A Comparative Analysis between Togo and Brazil

  • Omar Ouro-Salim 1,*,   
  • Heidy Rodriguez Ramos 2

Received: 03 Mar 2026 | Revised: 12 May 2026 | Accepted: 22 May 2026 | Published: 15 Jun 2026

Abstract

Given the increasing generation of municipal solid waste (MSW) in developing countries, this study compares MSW management systems in Brasília (Brazil) and Lomé (Togo), focusing on institutional structures, collection systems, regulations, and operational challenges. Although several studies discuss the environmental impacts of waste, there remains a significant research gap regarding the comparative role of municipal authorities and governance structures in waste management systems across developing countries. This study adopts a qualitative comparative case study approach, based on document analysis of 37 institutional, legal, and scientific sources published between 2010 and 2025. The findings reveal major disparities between the two cities. In Brazil, the municipal recycling rate reached 4.5% in 2025, while Brasília recorded operational improvements of 5.6% in waste collection, 4.3% in street-cleaning services, and 43.3% in reverse logistics. In contrast, in Lomé, annual waste generation exceeds 350,000 tons, while less than 35% is properly collected, and approximately 83.5% remains inadequately managed nationwide. Informal waste pickers account for nearly 55% of collection operators in Lomé, underscoring the reliance on informal systems. The study demonstrates that Brasília benefits from more advanced regulatory frameworks and institutional coordination. In contrast, Lomé faces severe limitations in infrastructure, financing, informality, and the lack of specific waste management legislation. The study concludes that strengthening governance mechanisms, integrating informal workers, investing in technological innovation, and promoting circular economy policies are essential for improving waste management systems in developing countries. Future studies should prioritize empirical investigations involving residents, waste pickers, and municipal authorities better to understand behavioral and institutional barriers to sustainable waste management.

References 

  • 1.

    United Nations Environment Programme. Global Waste Management Outlook 2024: Beyond an Age of Waste—Turning Rubbish into a Resource; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2024. Available online: https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/44939 (accessed on 1 March 2026).

  • 2.

    Ouro-Salim, O.; Guarnieri, P. Sustainable food waste management: Comparative study of NGO and restaurant practices in Brazil and Togo. Rev. Agric., Food Environ. Stud. 2025, 106, 99–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-025-00226-3.

  • 3.

    Galavote, T.; Chaves, G.D.L.D.; Yamane, L.H.; et al. Municipal solid waste management instruments that influence the use of the refuse as fuel in developing countries: A critical review. Waste Manag. Res. 2025, 43, 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241231402.

  • 4.

    Arya, A.S.; Shukla, R. Trash talk: A review of evolving waste management paradigms. Int. J. Comput. Exp. Sci. Eng. 2025, 11. https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.891.

  • 5.

    Rashid, S.; Sultan, H.; Rashid, W.; et al. A critical review of opportunities and challenges of solid waste management in an emerging economy: Evidence from Pakistan. Environ. Dev. 2025, 55, 101182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101182.

  • 6.

    Kondoh, E.; Bodjona, M.B.; Aziable, E.; et al. Etat des lieux de la gestion des déchets dans le Grand Lomé. Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci. 2019, 13, 2200–2209.

  • 7.

    Karungamye, P. Energy recovery from solid-waste valorization: Environmental and economic potential for developing countries. Sci. Afr. 2024, 26, e02402.

  • 8.

    Kühn, V.O.; Oliveira, B.F.F.; Chiarelotto, M.; et al. Review and future perspectives on soil and groundwater inorganic contamination by non-sanitary landfills in Latin America. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-06171-w.

  • 9.

    Guarnieri, P.; Bianchini, A.; Rossi, J. The institutionalization of the transition towards circular economy: A comparison between Italy and Brazil. In Proceedings of the SUM 2020—Fifth Symposium on Urban Mining and Circular Economy, Venice, Italy, 18–20 November 2020.

  • 10.

    Ouro-Salim, O.; Ramos, H.R.; Fanho, A.D. Upcycling as a circular strategy for food waste valorization in developing countries: A systematic review and the upgrade strategic framework. Urban Agric. Reg. Food Syst. 2026, 11, e70042.

  • 11.

    Ouro-Salim, O.; Guarnieri, P.; Fanho, A.D. Unlocking value: Circular economy in NGOs’ food waste reduction efforts in Brazil and Togo. Discov. Environ. 2024, 2, 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00042-4.

  • 12.

    Zou, Q.; Duan, H.; Yang, Z.; et al. Machine learning-assisted solid waste life-cycle management: Applications, constrains, and future opportunities. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2025, 219, 108320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108320.

  • 13.

    Sanjrani, M.A.; Gang, X.; Mirza, S.N.A. A review on textile solid waste management: Disposal and recycling. Waste Manag. Res. 2025, 43, 522–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241257093.

  • 14.

    Koledzi, K.E. Valorisation des déchets solides urbains dans les quartiers de Lomé (Togo): Approche méthodologique pour une production durable de compost. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France, 2011.

  • 15.

    Couth, R. and Trois, C. Cost Effective Waste Management through Composting in Africa. Waste Management, 2012, 32, 2518-2525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.042.

  • 16.

    Brasil. Lei nº 12.305, de 2 de agosto de 2010. Available online: https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/inspecao/produtos-vegetal/legislacao-1/biblioteca-de-normas-vinhos-e-bebidas/lei-no-12-305-de-2-de-agosto-de-2010.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2026).

  • 17.

    Elkington, J. The triple bottom line. Environ. Manag. Read. Cases 1997, 2, 49–66.

  • 18.

    Heidari-Maleni, A.; Taheri-Garavand, A.; Rezaei, M.; et al. Biogas production and electrical power potential, challenges, and barriers from municipal solid waste (MSW) for developing countries: A review study in Iran. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 13, 100668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100668.

  • 19.

    Rashed, A.H. Sustainable solid waste management in the context of environmental governance. Discov. Sustain. 2026, 7, 148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-02385-1.

  • 20.

    Przeworski, A.; Teune, H. The logic of comparative social inquiry (book review). Soc. Forces 1974, 52, 559.

  • 21.

    ABREMA. Como evolui o cenário de RSU no Brasil. Available online: https://www.abrema.org.br/2024/03/04/como-evolui-o-cenario-de-rsu-no-brasil/ (accessed on 1 March 2026).

  • 22.

    Agência Senado. Criação da Política Nacional de Economia Circular é aprovada na CAE. Available online: https://www12.senado.leg.br/noticias/materias/2024/08/13/criacao-da-politica-nacional-de-economia-circular-e-aprovada-na-cae (accessed on 1 March 2026).

  • 23.

    Arantes, M.V.C.; Pereira, R.D.S. Análise crítica dos 10 anos de criação e implementação da Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos (PNRS) no Brasil. Rev. Liceu On-Line 2021, 11, 48–66.

  • 24.

    Bardin, L. Análise de Conteúdo; Edições 70: Lisboa, Portugal, 2011.

  • 25.

    Besen, G.; Jacobi, P.; Silva, C. Anos da Política de Resíduos Sólidos: Caminhos e Agendas Para um Futuro Sustentável; IEE-USP: São Paulo, Brazil, 2021.

  • 26.

    Bigou-Lare, N.; Pigé, B. Chapitre 18. La gestion des ordures ménagères à Lomé. In Dynamique Normative: Arbitrer et Négocier la Place de la Norme dans l’organisation; EMS Editions: Caen, France, 2015; pp. 219–228. https://doi.org/10.3917/ems.cappe.2015.01.0219.

  • 27.

    Bodjona, B.M.; Bromblet, H.; Kolani, L.; et al. Prise en Compte des Travailleurs du Secteur Informel des Déchets en Afrique et dans les Caraïbes. Available online: https://www.plateforme-re-sources.org (accessed on 1 March 2026).

  • 28.

    Brasil. Plano Nacional de Economia Circular 2025–2034; Ministério do Meio Ambiente: Brasília, DF, Brazil, 2025.

  • 29.

    Confederação Nacional da Indústria. Economia circular: Oportunidades e desafios para a indústria brasileira. Available online: https://www.portaldaindustria.com.br/publicacoes/2018/4/economia-circular-oportunidades-e-desafios-para-industria-brasileira/ (accessed on 1 March 2026).

  • 30.

    Danciu, D.; Munteanu, F. Municipal solid waste management. In Catástrofes Antrópicas: Uma Aproximação Integral; Coimbra University Press: Coimbra, Portugal, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1867-8_7.

  • 31.

    Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S. Handbook of Qualitative Research; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2011.

  • 32.

    Distrito Federal. Lei Distrital nº 5.275, de 24 de dezembro de 2013. Available online: http://www.tc.df.gov.br/SINJ/Arquivo.ashx?id_norma_consolidado=76012 (accessed on 1 March 2026).

  • 33.

    dos Santos, A.S.; da Silva Avila, E.A.; de Freitas Rezende, S.E.; et al. Desafios juríDicos na Gestão de Resíduos Sólidos: Implementação do Plano Estadual de Resíduos Sólidos na Região Norte de Goiás. Rev. Ibero-Am. Humanid. Ciênc. Educ. 2025, 11, 6258–6273.

  • 34.

    Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF). Uma Economia Circular no Brasil: Uma Abordagem Exploratória Inicial; Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK, 2017.

  • 35.

    Gunsilius, E.; Spies, S.; García-Cortés, S.; et al. Recovering Resources, Creating Opportunities: Integrating the Informal Sector into Solid Waste Management; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ): Eschborn, Germany, 2011.

  • 36.

    ILOG. Reciclagem no Brasil em 2025: Panorama Atual, Desafios e Avanços. Available online: https://ilogpr.com.br/reciclagem-no-brasil-em-2025-panorama-atual-desafios-e-avancos/#:~:text=O%20%C3%ADndice%20de%20reciclagem%20no,de%20infraestrutura%20ou%20%C3%A0%20contamina%C3%A7%C3%A3o (accessed on 1 March 2026).

  • 37.

    IPEA. Resíduos sólidos urbanos no Brasil: Desafios tecnológicos, políticos e econômicos. Available online: https://www.ipea.gov.br/cts/pt/central-de-conteudo/artigos/artigos/217-residuos-solidos-urbanos-no-brasil-desafios-tecnologicos-politicos-e-economicos (accessed on 1 March 2026).

  • 38.

    Koledzi, K.E.; Baba, G.; Agbebavi, J.; et al. Gestion des déchets dans les villes en développement: Transfert, adaptation de schéma et sources de financement. Déchets Sci. Tech. 2014, 68, 31–40.

  • 39.

    Koledzi, K.E.; Hundjoe, K.S.; Krou, N.M. Potential for anaerobic digestion by incubation and anaerobic fermentation of landfill waste: A case of the city of Lom (Togo). J. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2021, 13, 23–33.

  • 40.

    Kundariya, N.; Mohanty, S.; Varjani, S.; et al. A review on integrated approaches for municipal solid waste for environmental and economic relevance: Monitoring tools, technologies, and strategic innovations. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 342, 125982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125982.

  • 41.

    Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications—MCTIC. Public Statement Sent to MCTIC: MCTIC Ordinance No. 1122 of 19 March 2020. JC News 2020, 6362; Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation and Communications: Brasília, Brazil, 2020.

  • 42.

    Mor, S.; Ravindra, K. Municipal solid waste landfills in lower- and middle-income countries: Environmental impacts, challenges and sustainable management practices. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.04.014.

  • 43.

    Paes, L.; Bezerra, B.; Deus, R.; et al. A Transition toward a Circular Economy: Insights from Brazilian National Policy on Solid Waste. In Handbook of Solid Waste Management; Baskar, C., Ramakrishna, S., Baskar, S., et al., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, Singapore, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7525-9_16-1.

  • 44.

    PDGIRS. Plano Distrital de Gestão Integrada de Resíduos Sólidos. Available online: https://www.so.df.gov.br/wp-conteudo/uploads/2018/03/PDGIRS.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2026).

  • 45.

    Relatório de Atividades do Serviço de Limpeza Urbana (SLU)—2024; Serviço de Limpeza Urbana (SLU): Brasília, DF, Brazil, 2024.

  • 46.

    Tcha-Thom, M. Recherche d’une Filière Durable Pour la Méthanisation des Déchets de Fruits et d’abattoirs du Togo: Evaluation du Potentiel Agronomique des Digestats Sur les Sols de la Région de la Kara; Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France, 2019.

  • 47.

    Vyas, S.; Prajapati, P.; Shah, A.; et al. Municipal solid waste management: Dynamics, risk assessment, ecological influence, advancements, constraints, and perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152802.

  • 48.

    SLU. Relatório trimestral. Available online: https://www.slu.df.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/RELATORIO-TRIMESTRAL-JAN-MAR-2023.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2026).

Share this article:
Download PDF
DOI
10.53941/gssd.2026.100018
Issue
Volume 1, Issue 1
How to Cite
Ouro-Salim, O.; Ramos, H. R. Management of Municipal Solid Waste: A Comparative Analysis between Togo and Brazil. Global South & Sustainable Development 2026, 1 (1), 18. https://doi.org/10.53941/gssd.2026.100018.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.