Ride comfort is crucial to passenger vehicle design because it affects occupant comfort, stability, and suspension performance. We developed a 7-DOF (seven-degree-of-freedom) spatial full-vehicle dynamic model in MATLAB/Simulink to investigate a passenger car’s vibration response to ISO 8608:2016-classified random road profiles. The spatial model represents coupling effects among the four suspension corners by accounting for vehicle-body bounce, pitch, and roll motions, as well as the vertical motion of the unsprung masses, unlike quarter-car and half-car models. The model is compared with simplified vehicle vibration models, and its capabilities are discussed in relation to recent full-vehicle models reported in the literature. The vehicle response is evaluated for road classes B–E, vehicle speeds ranging from 20 to 80 km/h, and suspension stiffness values ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 times the nominal stiffness. Ride comfort is evaluated using Root mean square (RMS), body displacement and vertical acceleration based on ISO 2631-1. Results reveal that road roughness affects vibration response more than vehicle speed. Raising suspension stiffness from 0.5 K to 1.5 K at 80 km/h on a class E road decreases RMS body displacement by 32.8%, while increasing RMS vertical acceleration by 43.8% (from 0.680 to 0.978 m/s2). These results show the inevitable trade-off between vibration isolation and body-motion inhibition. Because it captures coupled bounce, pitch, and roll responses, the 7-DOF spatial model represents vehicle-body vibration more accurately than vertical-only models, making it better suited for suspension parameter assessment under different road and speed conditions.
- Open Access
- Article
Influence of Suspension Stiffness and Vehicle Speed on Passenger Vehicle Ride Comfort over Random Road Profiles
Author Information
Received: 16 July 2026 | Revised: 17 September 2026 | Accepted: 23 October 2026 | Published: 03 November 2026
Abstract
Keywords
passenger vehicle | ride comfort | suspension stiffness | vehicle vibration | ISO 8608:2016
References
- 1.
ISO 8608; Mechanical Vibration—Road Surface Profiles—Reporting of Measured Data. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
- 2.
Foo, M.; Tan, A.H. Benchmark vehicle suspension data based on ISO 8608 road profiles. Control. Eng. Pract. 2026, 169, 106755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106755.
- 3.
Mieteń, M.; Seńko, J.; Caban, J.; Szcześniak, K.; Walkiewicz, M. Research on Dynamic Loads Acting on a Vehicle Caused by the Road Profile with Different Surfaces. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 13106. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152413106.
- 4.
Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Huang, W.; Ma, T.; Zhou, Z. Dynamic response analysis of vehicle–pavement-coupled system based on RIOHTrack full-size accelerated loading test. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 402, 132744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132744.
- 5.
Xie, J.; Yan, S.; Feng, C. Dynamic Load Analysis of Vertical, Pitching, and Lateral Tilt Vibrations of Multi-Axle Vehicles. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 9906. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189906.
- 6.
Zhao, T.; He, J.; Lv, J.; Min, D.; Wei, Y. A Comprehensive Implementation of Road Surface Classification for Vehicle Driving Assistance: Dataset, Models, and Deployment. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2023, 24, 8361–8370. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2023.3264588.
- 7.
Douier, K.; Renno, J.; Hussein, M.F.M. Reconstructing Road Roughness Profiles Using ANNs and Dynamic Vehicle Accelerations. Infrastructures 2024, 9, 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9110198.
- 8.
Xing, J.; Cheng, Z.; Ye, S.; Liu, S.; Lin, J. Road Roughness Recognition: Feature Extraction and Speed-Adaptive Classification Based on Simulation and Real-Vehicle Tests. Machines 2025, 13, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13050391.
- 9.
Tan, A.H.; Foo, M.F.L.; Ong, D.S. Road classification using built-in self-scaling method of Bayesian regression. J. Sound Vib. 2022, 516, 116523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116523.
- 10.
Stan, C.; Oprea, R.A. Vibration Comfort Assessment Methods in Heavy Vehicles: Models, Standards and Numerical Approaches—A State-of-the-Art Review. Technologies 2026, 14, 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies14020098.
- 11.
ISO 2631-1; Mechanical Vibration and Shock—Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration—Part 1: General Requirements. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1997.
- 12.
Guastadisegni, G.; De Pinto, S.; Cancelli, D.; Labianca, S.; Gonzalez, A.; Gruber, P.; Sorniotti, A. Ride Analysis Tools for Passenger Cars: Objective and Subjective Evaluation Techniques and Correlation Processes—A Review. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2024, 62, 1876–1902. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2023.2259024.
- 13.
Fossati, G.G.; Miguel, L.F.F.; Casas, W.J.P. Multi-objective optimization of the suspension system parameters of a full vehicle model. Optim. Eng. 2018, 20, 151–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11081-018-9403-8.
- 14.
Srikanth, K.; Chowdary, V. Influence of roughness and cross slope induced dynamic loads on flexible pavement responses. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2023, 24, 2241101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2023.2241101.
- 15.
Xu, G.; Zhang, N.; Roser, H.M. Roll and pitch independently tuned interconnected suspension: Modelling and dynamic analysis. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2015, 53, 1830–1849. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2015.1103375.
- 16.
Damavandi, A.D.; Masih-Tehrani, M.; Mashadi, B. Configuration development and optimization of hydraulically interconnected suspension for handling and ride enhancement. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 2022, 236, 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070211018040.
- 17.
Emami, A.; Masih-Tehrani, M.; Amirkhani, A.; Najafi, A. Robust Fuzzy Sliding Mode Controller for the Full Vehicle Semi-Active Suspension System Considering the Impact of Uncertainties. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2025, 19, e70125. https://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.70125.
- 18.
Sun, Q.; Yin, C.; Wang, B. Experimental Validation of Truck Cab Suspension Model and Ride Comfort Improvement under Various Semi-Active Control Strategies. Processes 2024, 12, 1880. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr12091880.
- 19.
Kim, D.; Jeong, Y. Road-Adaptive Static Output Feedback Control of a Semi-Active Suspension System for Ride Comfort. Actuators 2024, 13, 394. https://doi.org/10.3390/act13100394.
- 20.
Van Luong, V.; Nguyen, T.Q.; Le, H.Q.; Le, V.A.; Tran, P.H.; Nguyen, X.; Van, T.T. Determination of dynamic loads from the road surface acting on the chassis by experimental methods. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 886, 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/886/1/012008.
- 21.
Mahmood, A.; Kat, C.J.; Els, P.S. Ride comfort optimization with handling constraints over rough terrain. J. Terramechanics 2026, 122, 101105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2025.101105.
- 22.
Tehrani, M.M.; Mollajafari, M.; Nazemi, S. GA tuned H∞ roll acceleration controller based on series active variable geometry suspension on rough roads. Int. J. Veh. Perform. 2022, 8, 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijvp.2022.10045653.
- 23.
Kimball, J.B.; DeBoer, B.; Bubbar, K. Adaptive control and reinforcement learning for vehicle suspension control: A review. Annu. Rev. Control. 2024, 58, 100974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2024.100974.
- 24.
Wang, G.; Deng, J.; Duan, D. Data-driven H2/H∞ control for full-car active suspension systems via stochastic reinforcement learning algorithm. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2025, 240, 1303–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544062251406280.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
