2504000013
  • Open Access
  • Article
A Novel Multi-Objective Optimization Approach with Flexible Operation Planning Strategy for Truck Scheduling
  • Yiming Wang,   
  • Weibo Liu *,   
  • Chuang Wang,   
  • Futra Fadzil,   
  • Stanislao Lauria,   
  • Xiaohui Liu

Received: 11 Mar 2023 | Accepted: 25 Apr 2023 | Published: 23 Jun 2023

Abstract

The transportation system plays an important role in the open-pit mine. As an effective solution, smart scheduling has been widely investigated to manage transportation operations and increase transportation capabilities. Some existing truck scheduling methods tend to treat the critical parameter (i.e., the moving speed of the truck) as a constant, which is impractical in real-world industrial scenarios. In this paper, a multi-objective optimization (MOO) algorithm is proposed for truck scheduling by considering three objectives, i.e., minimizing the queuing time, maximizing the productivity, and minimizing the financial cost. Specifically, the proposed algorithm is employed to search continuously in the solution space, where the truck moving speed and truck payload are chosen as the operational variables. Moreover, a smart scheduling application integrating the proposed MOO algorithm is developed to assist the user in selecting a suitable scheduling plan. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed MOO approach is effective in tackling the truck scheduling problem, which could satisfy a wide range of transportation conditions and provide managers with flexible scheduling options.

Graphical Abstract

References 

  • 1.
    Hodge, R.A.; Ericsson, M.; Löf, O.; et al. The global mining industry: Corporate profile, complexity, and change. Miner. Econ., 2022, 35: 587−606.
  • 2.
    Addison, T.; Roe, A. Extractives for development. Extr. Ind., 2018, 3.
  • 3.
    Carvalho, F.P. Mining industry and sustainable development: Time for change. Food Energy Secur., 2017, 6: 61−77.
  • 4.
    Humphreys, D. The mining industry after the boom. Miner. Econ., 2019, 32: 145−151.
  • 5.
    Domingues, M.S.Q.; Baptista, A.L.F.; Diogo, M.T. Engineering complex systems applied to risk management in the mining industry. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol., 2017, 27: 611−616.
  • 6.
    Wang, J.M.; Bi, L.; Wang, L.G.; et al. A mining technology collaboration platform theory and its product development and application to support China’s digital mine construction. Appl. Sci., 2019, 9: 5373.
  • 7.
    Wu, Q.; Xu, H. Three-dimensional geological modeling and its application in digital mine. Sci. China Earth Sci., 2014, 57: 491−502.
  • 8.
    Temkin, I.; Myaskov, A.; Deryabin, S.; et al. Design of a digital 3D model of transport-technological environment of open-pit mines based on the common use of telemetric and geospatial information. Sensors, 2021, 21: 6277.
  • 9.
    Cudjoe, M.N.M.; Cawood, F.T. The tracking of metal content on a surface mine: A digital mining technology approach. Res. Policy, 2022, 76: 102571.
  • 10.
    Zhang, L.J.; Xia, X.H. An integer programming approach for truck-shovel dispatching problem in open-pit mines. Energy Procedia, 2015, 75: 1779−1784.
  • 11.
    Chaowasakoo, P.; Seppälä, H.; Koivo, H.; et al. Improving fleet management in mines: The benefit of heterogeneous match factor. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2017, 261: 1052−1065.
  • 12.
    Zhang, Y.H.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Bi, L.; et al. Determination of truck-shovel configuration of open-pit mine: A simulation method based on mathematical model. Sustainability, 2022, 14: 12338.
  • 13.
    Zhang, S.; Lu, C.W.; Jiang, S.; et al. An unmanned intelligent transportation scheduling system for open-pit mine vehicles based on 5G and big data. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 135524−135539.
  • 14.
    Eskandari, H.; Darabi, H.; Hosseinzadeh, S.A. Simulation and optimization of haulage system of an open-pit mine. In Proceedings of 2013 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 7–10 July 2013; Society for Modeling & Simulation International: Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2013; p. 37.
  • 15.
    Manríquez, F.; González, H.; Morales, N. Short-term open-pit production scheduling optimizing multiple objectives accounting for shovel allocation in stockpiles. Optim. Eng., 2023, 24: 681−707.
  • 16.
    Subtil, R.F.; Silva, D.M.; Alves, J.C. A practical approach to truck dispatch for open pit mines. In Proceedings of 35th APCOM Symposium 2011, Wollongong, Australia; 2011; pp. 765–777.
  • 17.
    Alexandre, R.F.; Campelo, F.; Vasconcelos, J.A. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for the truck dispatch problem in open-pit mining operations. Learn. Nonlinear Models, 2019, 17: 53−66.
  • 18.
    Fioroni, M.M.; Franzese, L.A.G.; Bianchi, T.J.; et al. Concurrent simulation and optimization models for mining planning. In Proceedings of 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, Miami, FL, USA, 07–10 December 2008; IEEE: Miami, FL, USA, 2008; pp. 759–767. doi: 10.1109/WSC.2008.4736138.
  • 19.
    Alarie, S.; Gamache, M. Overview of solution strategies used in truck dispatching systems for open pit mines. Int. J. Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ., 2002, 16: 59−76.
  • 20.
    Patterson, S.R.; Kozan, E.; Hyland, P. Energy efficient scheduling of open-pit coal mine trucks. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 2017, 262: 759−770.
  • 21.
    Bastos, G.S.; Souza, L.E.; Ramos, F.T.; et al. A single-dependent agent approach for stochastic time-dependent truck dispatching in open-pit mining. In Proceedings of the 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Washington, DC, USA, 05–07 October 2011; IEEE: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; pp. 1057–1062. doi: 10.1109/ITSC.2011.6082902.
  • 22.
    Zitzler, E.; Laumanns, M.; Thiele, L. SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm. ETH Library: Zürich, 2001.
  • 23.
    Deb, K.; Pratap, A.; Agarwal, S.; et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 2002, 6: 182−197.
  • 24.
    Zhang, Q.F.; Li, H. MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., 2007, 11: 712−731.
  • 25.
    Mohtasham, M.; Mirzaei-Nasirabad, H.; Askari-Nasab, H.; et al. A multi-objective model for fleet allocation schedule in open-pit mines considering the impact of prioritising objectives on transportation system performance. Int. J. Min. Reclam. Environ., 2021, 35: 709−727.
  • 26.
    Greene, D.L. Estimated speed/fuel consumption relationships for a large sample of cars. Energy, 1981, 6: 441−446.
  • 27.
    Ghaffariyan, M.R.; Barrier, C.; Brown, M.; et al. A Short Review of Timber Truck Fuel Consumption Studies. University of the Sunshine Coast: Brisbane, 2018.
  • 28.
    Corne, D.W.; Jerram, N.R.; Knowles, J.D.; et al. PESA-II: Region-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, San Francisco, CA, USA, 7–10 July, 2001; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2007; pp. 283–290.
Share this article:
How to Cite
Wang, Y.; Liu, W.; Wang, C.; Fadzil, F.; Lauria, S.; Liu, X. A Novel Multi-Objective Optimization Approach with Flexible Operation Planning Strategy for Truck Scheduling. International Journal of Network Dynamics and Intelligence 2023, 2 (2), 100002. https://doi.org/10.53941/ijndi.2023.100002.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2023 by the authors.