JHRR/
Articles/
2607004763
  • Open Access
  • Review

Explaining Urban Recovery after Tropical Cyclones: A Bibliometric-Systematic Review of Research Trends, Drivers, and Future Directions

  • Shengping Ding 1,*,   
  • Lilai Xu 2,3,   
  • Alexander V. Prishchepov 1

Received: 08 Mar 2026 | Revised: 28 Jul 2026 | Accepted: 29 Jul 2026 | Published: 10 Aug 2026

Abstract

Tropical cyclones increasingly threaten coastal cities, yet why recovery outcomes diverge across places remain poorly synthesized. Here we examine the determinants of post-cyclone urban recovery through a bibliometric-systematic review of 117 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2005 and 2025. Combining bibliometric mapping with full-text qualitative synthesis, we assess research trends, recovery drivers, and remaining knowledge gaps. The corpus has grown in visibility and methodological diversity, with increasing use of high-resolution geospatial, mobility and computational approaches to trace recovery across space and time. The synthesis shows that recovery trajectories emerge from interactions between hazard-impact conditions and five capacity-side dimensions: social equity, economic resources, infrastructure vulnerability, institutional capacity and community adaptability. However, the evidence remains geographically concentrated and dominated by single-event designs, fragmented recovery measurement and limited causal inference. We therefore identify three priorities for future research: cross-event and cross-regional comparison, integrated multi-source monitoring, and causal and nonlinear analysis of recovery mechanisms. By linking research trends with a structured framework of recovery determinants, this review advances understanding of why post-cyclone urban recovery diverges across places, while informing more adaptive and equitable resilience planning in cyclone-prone cities.

Graphical Abstract

Image Viewer
Open in new tab
Download Image

References 

  • 1.

    Needham, H.F.; Keim, B.D.; Sathiaraj, D. A Review of Tropical Cyclone-Generated Storm Surges: Global Data Sources, Observations, and Impacts. Rev. Geophys. 2015, 53, 545–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000477.

  • 2.

    Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Tignor, M.; et al., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 2022; p. 3056. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.

  • 3.

    Knutson, T.; Camargo, S.J.; Chan, J.C.L.; et al. Tropical Cyclones and Climate Change Assessment: Part II: Projected Response to Anthropogenic Warming. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2020, 101, E303–E322. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0194.1.

  • 4.

    Finch, C.; Emrich, C.T.; Cutter, S.L. Disaster Disparities and Differential Recovery in New Orleans. Popul. Environ. 2010, 31, 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8.

  • 5.

    Arcaya, M.; Raker, E.J.; Waters, M.C. The Social Consequences of Disasters: Individual and Community Change. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2020, 46, 671–691. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054827.

  • 6.

    Rodríguez, H.; Quarantelli, E.L.; Dynes, R.R. (Eds.) Handbook of Disaster Research; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4.

  • 7.

    Cutter, S.L.; Barnes, L.; Berry, M.; et al. A Place-Based Model for Understanding Community Resilience to Natural Disasters. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18, 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.013.

  • 8.

    Berke, P.R.; Kartez, J.; Wenger, D. Recovery after Disaster: Achieving Sustainable Development, Mitigation and Equity. Disasters 1993, 17, 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1993.tb01137.x.

  • 9.

    Peacock, W.G.; Van Zandt, S.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Inequities in Long-Term Housing Recovery after Disasters. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2014, 80, 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.980440.

  • 10.

    Griego, A.L.; Flores, A.B.; Collins, T.W.; et al. Social Vulnerability, Disaster Assistance, and Recovery: A Population-Based Study of Hurricane Harvey in Greater Houston, Texas. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020, 51, 101766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101766.

  • 11.

    Watson, M.; Xiao, Y.; Helgeson, J.; et al. Importance of Households in Business Disaster Recovery. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2020, 21, 05020008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000393.

  • 12.

    Rosas, E.; Roberts, P.S.; Lauland, A.; et al. Assessing the Impact of Municipal Government Capacity on Recovery from Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021, 61, 102340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102340.

  • 13.

    Román, M.O.; Stokes, E.C.; Shrestha, R.; et al. Satellite-Based Assessment of Electricity Restoration Efforts in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218883.

  • 14.

    Yabe, T.; Rao, P.S.C.; Ukkusuri, S.V.; et al. Toward Data-Driven, Dynamical Complex Systems Approaches to Disaster Resilience. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2111997119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111997119.

  • 15.

    Xu, L.; Yang, X.; Chen, D.; et al. Global Coastal Human Settlement Retreat Driven by Vulnerability to Coastal Climate Hazards. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2025, 15, 1060–1070. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02435-6.

  • 16.

    Ding, S.; Xu, L.; Liu, S.; et al. Understanding the Spatial Disparity in Socio-Economic Recovery of Coastal Communities Following Typhoon Disasters. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 919, 170831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170831.

  • 17.

    Page-Tan, C. The Role of Social Media in Disaster Recovery Following Hurricane Harvey. J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag. 2021, 18, 93–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2018-0054.

  • 18.

    Nguyen, M.T.; Salvesen, D. Disaster Recovery among Multiethnic Immigrants: A Case Study of Southeast Asians in Bayou La Batre (AL) after Hurricane Katrina. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2014, 80, 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.986497.

  • 19.

    Mayer, B. A Review of the Literature on Community Resilience and Disaster Recovery. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2019, 6, 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-019-00239-3.

  • 20.

    Mohammadi, S.; De Angeli, S.; Boni, G.; et al. Review Article: Current Approaches and Critical Issues in Multi-Risk Recovery Planning of Urban Areas Exposed to Natural Hazards. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2024, 24, 79–107. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-79-2024.

  • 21.

    Zaman, M.O.; Raihan, M.M.H. Community Resilience to Natural Disasters: A Systemic Review of Contemporary Methods and Theories. Nat. Hazards Res. 2023, 3, 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nhres.2023.05.003.

  • 22.

    Ogie, R.I.; James, S.; Moore, A.; et al. Social Media Use in Disaster Recovery: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022, 70, 102783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.102783.

  • 23.

    Ferreira, R.; Davidson, T.; Buttell, F.; et al. Barriers to Equitable Disaster Recovery: A Scoping Literature Review. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2024, 110, 104628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104628.

  • 24.

    Ostadtaghizadeh, A.; Ardalan, A.; Paton, D.; et al. Community Disaster Resilience: A Systematic Review on Assessment Models and Tools. PLoS Curr. 2015, 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed.

  • 25.

    Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

  • 26.

    Marzi, G.; Balzano, M.; Caputo, A.; et al. Guidelines for Bibliometric-Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 Steps to Combine Analysis, Synthesis and Theory Development. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2025, 27, 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12381.

  • 27.

    van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

  • 28.

    Cutter, S.L.; Boruff, B.J.; Shirley, W.L. Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Soc. Sci. Q. 2003, 84, 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002.

  • 29.

    Chang, S.E. Urban Disaster Recovery: A Measurement Framework and Its Application to the 1995 Kobe Earthquake. Disasters 2010, 34, 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01130.x.

  • 30.

    Delforge, D.; Wathelet, V.; Below, R.; et al. EM-DAT: The Emergency Events Database. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2025, 124, 105509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105509.

  • 31.

    Knapp, K.R.; Kruk, M.C.; Levinson, D.H.; et al. The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS): Unifying Tropical Cyclone Best Track Data. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2010, 91, 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2755.1.

  • 32.

    Jovita, H.D.; Nashir, H.; Mutiarin, D.; et al. Social Capital and Disasters: How Does Social Capital Shape Post-Disaster Conditions in the Philippines? J. Hum. Behav. Soc. Environ. 2019, 29, 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2018.1556143.

  • 33.

    Mansour, S.; Alahmadi, M.; Darby, S.; et al. Geospatial Modelling of Post-Cyclone Shaheen Recovery Using Nighttime Light Data and MGWR. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023, 93, 103761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103761.

  • 34.

    Mohebbi, S.; Aslani, B.; Dsouza, M.H. A Graph-Empowered Agent-Based Simulation: Impacts of Coordination Schemes on Critical Infrastructures Resilience. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2025, 255, 110658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2024.110658.

  • 35.

    Mitsova, D.; Esnard, A.-M.; Sapat, A.; et al. Effects of Infrastructure Service Disruptions Following Hurricane Irma: Multilevel Analysis of Postdisaster Recovery Outcomes. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2021, 22, 04020055. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000421.

  • 36.

    Der Sarkissian, R.; Cariolet, J.-M.; Diab, Y.; et al. Investigating the Importance of Critical Infrastructures’ Interdependencies during Recovery: Lessons from Hurricane Irma in Saint-Martin’s Island. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022, 67, 102675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102675.

  • 37.

    Sadri, A.M.; Ukkusuri, S.V.; Lee, S.; et al. The Role of Social Capital, Personal Networks, and Emergency Responders in Post-Disaster Recovery and Resilience: A Study of Rural Communities in Indiana. Nat. Hazards 2018, 90, 1377–1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-3103-0.

  • 38.

    Patrascu, F.; Mostafavi, A. Spatial Model for Predictive Recovery Monitoring Based on Hazard, Built Environment, and Population Features and Their Spillover Effects. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2024, 51, 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231167433.

  • 39.

    Xian, S.; Yin, J.; Lin, N.; et al. Influence of Risk Factors and Past Events on Flood Resilience in Coastal Megacities: Comparative Analysis of NYC and Shanghai. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 610–611, 1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.229.

  • 40.

    Ye, C.; Hu, B.; Gao, Q. Two-Stage Defending Framework for Typhoon-Resilient Distribution Energy Systems: Integrating Wind–Rain–Terrain Cascading Failures in Urban Microclimates. Renew. Energy 2026, 258, 124975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.124975.

  • 41.

    Fothergill, A.; Maestas, E.G.M.; Darlington, J.D. Race, Ethnicity and Disasters in the United States: A Review of the Literature. Disasters 1999, 23, 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00111.

  • 42.

    Fothergill, A.; Peek, L.A. Poverty and Disasters in the United States: A Review of Recent Sociological Findings. Nat. Hazards 2004, 32, 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9.

  • 43.

    Gafford, F.D. Rebuilding the Park: The Impact of Hurricane Katrina on a Black Middle-Class Neighborhood. J. Black Stud. 2010, 41, 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934709355117.

  • 44.

    Hirsch, A.R.; Levert, A.L. The Katrina Conspiracies: The Problem of Trust in Rebuilding an American City. J. Urban Hist. 2009, 35, 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144208327908.

  • 45.

    Rodríguez-Díaz, C.; Lewellen-Williams, C. Race and Racism as Structural Determinants for Emergency and Recovery Response in the Aftermath of Hurricanes Irma and Maria in Puerto Rico. Health Equity 2020, 4, 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2019.0103.

  • 46.

    Van Zandt, S.; Peacock, W.G.; Henry, D.W.; et al. Mapping Social Vulnerability to Enhance Housing and Neighborhood Resilience. Hous. Policy Debate 2012, 22, 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2011.624528.

  • 47.

    Hamideh, S.; Rongerude, J. Social Vulnerability and Participation in Disaster Recovery Decisions: Public Housing in Galveston after Hurricane Ike. Nat. Hazards 2018, 93, 1629–1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3371-3.

  • 48.

    McKinzie, A.E. A Tale of Two Cities: Variations in Perceptions of Disaster Recovery and the Importance of Intersectionality. Sociol. Race Ethn. 2017, 3, 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649217702659.

  • 49.

    Shen, J.; Murray-Tuite, P.; Wernstedt, K.; et al. Resident Recovery Priorities for Activities and Services after a Hypothetical Hurricane: Insights from Metropolitan Survey Data. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2025, 128, 105741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105741.

  • 50.

    Kamel, N. Social Marginalisation, Federal Assistance and Repopulation Patterns in the New Orleans Metropolitan Area Following Hurricane Katrina. Urban Stud. 2012, 49, 3211–3231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011433490.

  • 51.

    Gotham, K.F. Reinforcing Inequalities: The Impact of the CDBG Program on Post-Katrina Rebuilding. Hous. Policy Debate 2014, 24, 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2013.840666.

  • 52.

    Chang, Y.; Wilkinson, S.; Brunsdon, D.; et al. An Integrated Approach: Managing Resources for Post-Disaster Reconstruction. Disasters 2011, 35, 739–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01240.x.

  • 53.

    Chandrasekhar, D.; Rothfeder, R.; Xiao, Y.; et al. What Drives Household Recovery after Disasters? A Case Study of New York City after 2012 Hurricane Sandy. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2019, 62, 1249–1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1492907.

  • 54.

    Hofmann, S. Build Back Better and Long-Term Housing Recovery: Assessing Community Housing Resilience and the Role of Insurance Post Disaster. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5623. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095623.

  • 55.

    Ma, J.; Blessing, R.; Brody, S.; et al. Non-Locality and Spillover Effects of Residential Flood Damage on Community Recovery: Insights from High-Resolution Flood Claim and Mobility Data. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 117, 105947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105947.

  • 56.

    Eyre, R.; De Luca, F.; Simini, F. Social Media Usage Reveals Recovery of Small Businesses after Natural Hazard Events. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15405-7.

  • 57.

    Green, T.F.; Olshansky, R.B. Rebuilding Housing in New Orleans: The Road Home Program after the Hurricane Katrina Disaster. Hous. Policy Debate 2012, 22, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2011.624530.

  • 58.

    Choi, J.; Deshmukh, A.; Hastak, M. Seven-Layer Classification of Infrastructure to Improve Community Resilience to Disasters. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2019, 25, 04019012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000486.

  • 59.

    Huang, T.; Zanocco, C.; Wang, Z.; et al. Built Environment Disparities Are Amplified during Extreme Weather Recovery. Nature 2025, 648, 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09804-3.

  • 60.

    Li, X.; Ma, J.; Mostafavi, A. Anatomy of a Historic Blackout: Decoding Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Power Outages and Disparities during Hurricane Beryl. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2025, 125, 105574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105574.

  • 61.

    Hsu, C.-W.; Liu, C.-F.; Stearns, L.; et al. Spillover Effects of Built-Environment Vulnerability on Resilience of Businesses in Urban Crises. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2025, 127, 106376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106376.

  • 62.

    Rahimi-Golkhandan, A.; Garvin, M.; Wang, Q. Assessing the Impact of Transportation Diversity on Postdisaster Intraurban Mobility. J. Manag. Eng. 2021, 37, 04020106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000872.

  • 63.

    Li, C.-N.; Hsieh, Y.-K.; Lo, C.-W. Transit-Oriented Development Urban Spatial Forms and Typhoon Resilience in Taipei: A Dynamic Analytic Network Process Evaluation. Atmosphere 2025, 16, 1178. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16101178.

  • 64.

    Ouyang, M. Review on Modeling and Simulation of Interdependent Critical Infrastructure Systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2014, 121, 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.06.040.

  • 65.

    Green, R.; Bates, L.K.; Smyth, A. Impediments to Recovery in New Orleans’ Upper and Lower Ninth Ward: One Year after Hurricane Katrina. Disasters 2007, 31, 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.01011.x.

  • 66.

    Comfort, L.K.; Birkland, T.A.; Cigler, B.A.; et al. Retrospectives and Prospectives on Hurricane Katrina: Five Years and Counting. Public Adm. Rev. 2010, 70, 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02194.x.

  • 67.

    Li, Q.; Hannibal, B.; Mostafavi, A.; et al. Examining of the Actor Collaboration Networks around Hazard Mitigation: A Hurricane Harvey Study. Nat. Hazards 2020, 103, 3541–3562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04142-1.

  • 68.

    Li, Q.; Mostafavi, A. Local Interactions and Homophily Effects in Actor Collaboration Networks for Urban Resilience Governance. Appl. Netw. Sci. 2021, 6, 89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-021-00433-z.

  • 69.

    Ganapati, N.E.; Mukherji, A. Out of Sync: World Bank Funding for Housing Recovery, Postdisaster Planning, and Participation. Nat. Hazards Rev. 2014, 15, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000120.

  • 70.

    Schubert, J. Maintaining a City against Nature: Climate Adaptation in Beira. Build. Cities 2024, 5, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.378.

  • 71.

    Ramsey, M.M.; Muñoz-Erickson, T.A.; Mélendez-Ackerman, E.; et al. Overcoming Barriers to Knowledge Integration for Urban Resilience: A Knowledge Systems Analysis of Two Flood-Prone Communities in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 99, 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.013.

  • 72.

    Aldrich, D.P.; Meyer, M.A. Social Capital and Community Resilience. Am. Behav. Sci. 2015, 59, 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550299.

  • 73.

    Graham, L.; Debucquoy, W.; Anguelovski, I. The Influence of Urban Development Dynamics on Community Resilience Practice in New York City after Superstorm Sandy: Experiences from the Lower East Side and the Rockaways. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2016, 40, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.07.001.

  • 74.

    Kim, J.; Oh, S.S. The Virtuous Circle in Disaster Recovery: Who Returns and Stays in Town after Disaster Evacuation? J. Risk Res. 2014, 17, 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2013.822917.

  • 75.

    Sobhaninia, S. A Resilient Disaster Recovery Model for Puerto Rico: A Qualitative Case Study. Environ. Hazards 2025, 24, 290–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2024.2390426.

  • 76.

    Wagner, M.; Chhetri, N.; Sturm, M. Adaptive Capacity in Light of Hurricane Sandy: The Need for Policy Engagement. Appl. Geogr. 2014, 50, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.009.

  • 77.

    Hong, B.; Bonczak, B.; Gupta, A.; et al. Measuring Inequality in Community Resilience to Natural Disasters Using Large-Scale Mobility Data. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1870. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22160-w.

  • 78.

    Zheng, Q.; Zeng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Nighttime Lights Reveal Substantial Spatial Heterogeneity and Inequality in Post-Hurricane Recovery. Remote Sens. Environ. 2025, 319, 114645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114645.

  • 79.

    Xu, J.; Qiang, Y. Spatial Assessment of Community Resilience from 2012 Hurricane Sandy Using Nighttime Light. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4128. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13204128.

  • 80.

    Park, S.; Yao, T.; Ukkusuri, S. Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity Reveals Urban-Rural Differences in Post-Disaster Recovery. npj Urban Sustain. 2024, 4, 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-023-00139-4.

  • 81.

    Liu, Y.; Fan, W.; Guo, Q.; et al. Fusion Sensing for Urban Resilience. Innovation (Camb.) 2026, 7, 101117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2025.101117.

  • 82.

    Yang, Z.; Martí, A.; Chen, Y.; et al. Optimal Resource Allocation to Enhance Power Grid Resilience against Hurricanes. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2023, 38, 2621–2629. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3193133.

  • 83.

    Wang, J.; Hu, Y. Unraveling Hurricane Ian’s Impact: A Multiscale Analysis of Mobility Networks in Florida. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2024, 136, 104482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104482.

  • 84.

    United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2022: Our World at Risk: Transforming Governance for a Resilient Future; United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210015059.

Share this article:
Download PDF
DOI
10.53941/jhrr.2026.100020
Issue
Volume 1, Issue 1
How to Cite
Ding, S.; Xu, L.; Prishchepov, A. V. Explaining Urban Recovery after Tropical Cyclones: A Bibliometric-Systematic Review of Research Trends, Drivers, and Future Directions. Journal of Hazards, Risk and Resilience 2026, 1 (1), 20. https://doi.org/10.53941/jhrr.2026.100020.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.