MatSus/
Articles/
2601002897
  • Open Access
  • Review

A Review on Piezoelectric Transducer-Based Structural Health Monitoring for Wind Turbine Blades

  • Shahryar Altaf 1,   
  • Saqlain Abbas 1,2,*,   
  • Sania Kunwal 1,   
  • Hussnain Raza 1,   
  • Zulkarnain Abbas 3,   
  • Muhammad Islam 1

Received: 09 Dec 2025 | Revised: 20 Jan 2026 | Accepted: 22 Jan 2026 | Published: 09 Mar 2026

Abstract

Piezoelectric transducers have emerged as highly effective tools for structural health monitoring (SHM) in the renewable energy sector, particularly for wind turbine blades subjected to complex operational and environmental stresses. These sensors convert mechanical stimuli such as strain, vibration, and pressure into measurable electrical signals, enabling real-time and non-destructive evaluation of blade integrity. This review presents a comprehensive overview of the working principles, sensing mechanisms, and deployment strategies of piezoelectric transducers for condition monitoring of wind turbine blades. The advantages of this technology, including high sensitivity, early damage detection, and potential for integration into intelligent predictive maintenance frameworks, are highlighted. In addition, environmental influences, material coupling challenges, and signal processing complexities affecting sensor performance are discussed. Finally, emerging trends in piezoelectric-based SHM systems and their role in extending blade lifespan and improving overall energy efficiency are outlined.

References 

  • 1.

    Adedipe, O.; Brennan, F.; Kolios, A. Review of corrosion fatigue in offshore structures: Present status and challenges in the offshore wind sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 61, 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.017.

  • 2.

    Ahmadi, J.; Feirahi, M.H.; Farahmand-Tabar, S.; et al. A novel approach for non-destructive EMI-based corrosion monitoring of concrete-embedded reinforcements using multi-orientation piezoelectric sensors. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 273, 121689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121689.

  • 3.

    Aihara, A.; Kawaguchi, T.; Miki, N.; et al. A vibration estimation method for wind turbine blades. Exp. Mech. 2017, 57, 1213–1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-017-0295-x.

  • 4.

    Annamdas, V.G.M.; Soh, C.K. Three-dimensional electromechanical impedance model. I: Formulation of directional sum impedance. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2007, 20, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:1(53).

  • 5.

    Annamdas, V.G.M.; Soh, C.K. Three-dimensional electromechanical impedance model. II: Damage analysis and PZT characterization. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2007, 20, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:1(63).

  • 6.

    Antoniadou, I.; Dervilis, N.; Papatheou, E.; et al. Aspects of structural health and condition monitoring of offshore wind turbines. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math.  Phys. Eng. Sci. 2015, 373, 20140075. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0075.

  • 7.

    Antunes, R.A.; Cortez, N.E.; Gianesini, B.M.; et al. Modeling, simulation, experimentation, and compensation of temperature effect in impedance-based SHM systems applied to steel pipes. Sensors 2019, 19, 2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19122802.

  • 8.

    Budoya, D.E.; Baptista, F.G. A comparative study of impedance measurement techniques for structural health monitoring applications. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2018, 67, 912–924. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2018.2792854.

  • 9.

    Caselitz, P.; Giebhardt, J. Rotor condition monitoring for improved operational safety of offshore wind energy converters. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2005, 127, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1850485.

  • 10.

    Chou, J.S.; Tu, W.T. Failure analysis and risk management of a collapsed large wind turbine tower. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2011, 18, 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.09.008.

  • 11.

    Ciang, C.C.; Lee, J.R.; Bang, H.J. Structural health monitoring for a wind turbine system: A review of damage detection methods. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 122001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/19/12/122001.

  • 12.

    Civera, M.; Surace, C. Non-destructive techniques for the condition and structural health monitoring of wind turbines: A literature review of the last 20 years. Sensors 2022, 22, 1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041627.

  • 13.

    Crespo, B.H. Damage sensing in blades. In: MARE-WINT: New Materials and Reliability in Offshore Wind Turbine Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39095-6_3.

  • 14.

    de Castro, B.A.; Baptista, F.G.; Ciampa, F. 2016. Comparative analysis of signal processing techniques for impedance-based SHM applications in noisy environments. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019, 126, 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.02.034.

  • 15.

    de Oliveira, M.A.; Monteiro, A.V.; Filho, J.V. A new structural health monitoring strategy based on PZT sensors and convolutional neural network. Sensors 2018, 18, 2955. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092955.

  • 16.

    Djemana, M.; Hrairi, M. Impedance-based detection of delamination in composite structures. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; Volume 184. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/184/1/012058.

  • 17.

    Du, G.; Huo, L.; Kong, Q.; et al. Damage detection of pipeline multiple cracks using piezoceramic transducers. J. Vibroeng. 2016, 18, 2828–2838. https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.17040.

  • 18.

    Fan, W.; Qiao, P. Vibration-based damage identification methods: A review and comparative study. Struct. Health Monit. 2010, 10, 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921710365419.

  • 19.

    Fan, X.; Li, J.; Hao, H. Review of piezoelectric impedance-based structural health monitoring: Physics-based and data-driven methods. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2021, 24, 3609–3626. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332211038444.

  • 20.

    García Márquez, F.P.; Tobias, A.M.; Pinar Pérez, J.M.; et al. Condition monitoring of wind turbines: Techniques and methods. Renew. Energy 2012, 46, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.03.003.

  • 21.

    Grasse, F.; Trappe, V.; Thoens, S.; et al. Structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades by strain measurement and vibration analysis. unpublished/online report.

  • 22.

    Hameed, Z.; Hong, Y.S.; Cho, Y.M.; et al. Condition monitoring and fault detection of wind turbines and related algorithms: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.008.

  • 23.

    Hoshyarmanesh, H.; Ghodsi, M.; Kim, M.; et al. Temperature effects on electromechanical response of deposited piezoelectric sensors used in structural health monitoring of aerospace structures. Sensors 2019, 19, 2805. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19122805.

  • 24.

    Huo, L.; Chen, D.; Liang, Y.; et al. Impedance-based bolt pre-load monitoring using piezoceramic smart washer. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 057004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/aa6a8e.

  • 25.

    Huynh, T.C.; Dang, N.L.; Kim, J.T. Preload monitoring in bolted connection using piezoelectric-based smart interface. Sensors 2018, 18, 2766. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092766.

  • 26.

    Huynh, T.C.; Ho, D.D.; Dang, N.L.; et al. Sensitivity of piezoelectric-based smart interfaces to structural damage in bolted connections. Sensors 2019, 19, 3670. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173670.

  • 27.

    Huynh, T.C.; Kim, J.T. RBFN-based temperature compensation method for impedance monitoring in prestressed tendon anchorage. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2018, 25, e2173. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2173.

  • 28.

    Huynh, T.-C. Structural parameter identification of a bolted connection embedded with a piezoelectric interface. Vietnam J. Mech. 2020, 42, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.15625/0866-7136/14806.

  • 29.

    Kalkanis, K.; Kaminaris, S.D.; Psomopoulos, C.S.; et al. Structural health monitoring for the advanced maintenance of wind turbines. Int. J. Energy Environ. 2018, 12, 69–79.

  • 30.

    Katsaprakakis, D.; Papadakis, N.; Ntintakis, I. A comprehensive analysis of wind turbine blade damage. Energies 2021, 14, 5974. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185974.

  • 31.

    Park, G.; Taylor, S.G.; Farinholt, K.M.; et al. SHM of Wind Turbine Blades Using Piezoelectric Active-Sensors; Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL): Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2009.

  • 32.

    Kim, H.; Liu, X.; Ahn, E.; et al. Performance assessment method for crack repair in concrete using PZT-based electromechanical impedance technique. NDT E Int. 2019, 104, 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.04.004.

  • 33.

    Kralovec, C.; Schagerl, M. Review of structural health monitoring methods regarding a multi-sensor approach for damage assessment of metal and composite structures. Sensors 2020, 20, 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030826.

  • 34.

    Li, W.; Liu, T.; Zou, D.; et al. PZT-based smart corrosion coupon using electromechanical impedance. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2019, 129, 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.049.

  • 35.

    Liang, C.; Sun, F.P.; Rogers, C.A. An impedance method for dynamic analysis of active material systems. J. Vib. Acoust. 1994, 116, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2930387.

  • 36.

    Lim, Y.Y.; Smith, S.T.; Padilla, R.V.; et al. Monitoring of concrete curing using the electromechanical impedance technique: Review and path forward. Struct. Health Monit. 2019, 20, 604–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719893069.

  • 37.

    Liu, P.; Wang, W.; Chen, Y.; et al. Concrete damage diagnosis using electromechanical impedance technique. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 136, 450–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.173.

  • 38.

    Lopes, V.; Park, G.; Cudney, H.H.; et al. Impedance-based structural health monitoring with artificial neural networks. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2000, 11, 206–214. https://doi.org/10.1106/h0ev-7pwm-qyhw-e7vf.

  • 39.

    Luderer, G.; Pietzcker, R.C.; Carrara, S.; et al. Assessment of wind and solar power in global low-carbon energy scenarios: An introduction. Energy Econ. 2017, 64, 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.027.

  • 40.

    Madi, E.; Pope, K.; Huang, W.; et al. A review of integrating ice detection and mitigation for wind turbine blades. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 103, 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.019.

  • 41.

    McGugan, M.; Pereira, G.; Sørensen, B.F.; et al. Damage tolerance and structural monitoring for wind turbine blades. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2015, 373, 20140077. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0077.

  • 42.

    HITEC Sensors. Strain Gauge Sensors for Wind Turbines. Humanetics Group. Available online: https://hitec.humaneticsgroup.com/insights/perspectives/strain-gauge-sensors-wind-turbines (accessed on 20 January 2026).

  • 43.

    Nguyen, T.T.; Phan, T.T.V.; Ho, D.D.; Damage tolerance and structural monitoring for wind turbine blades. Deep learning-based autonomous damage-sensitive feature extraction for impedance-based prestress monitoring. Eng. Struct. 2022, 259, 114172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114172.

  • 44.

    Park, G.; Sohn, H.; Farrar, C.R.; et al. Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward. Shock Vib. Dig. 2003, 35, 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/05831024030356001.

  • 45.

    Optics11. Acoustic Emission Sensing for Wind Blade Monitoring. Available online: https://optics11.com/energy/acoustic-emission-sensing-for-wind-blade-monitoring (accessed on 20 January 2026).

  • 46.

    Chandrasekhar, K.; Bartoli, I.; Hester, D. Damage detection in operational wind turbine blades using vibration‐based structural health monitoring. Renew. Energy 2021, 179, 1820–1834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.119

  • 47.

    Pham, Q.Q.; Dang, N.L.; Ta, Q.B.; et al. Optimal localization of smart aggregate sensor for concrete damage monitoring in PSC anchorage zone. Sensors 2021, 21, 6337. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21196337.

  • 48.

    Yeter, B.; Garbatov, Y.; Guedes Soares, C. System Reliability of Jacket Offshore Wind Turbine Subjected to Fatigue. In Developments in Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Sea Resources; CRC Press/Balkema: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315157368-122.

  • 49.

    Pitchford, C.; Grisso, B.L.; Inman, D.J. Impedance-Based Structural Health Monitoring of Wind Turbine Blades. In Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, CA, USA, 18–22 March 2007. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.715800.

  • 50.

    Rumsey, M.A.; Musial, W. Application of infrared thermography nondestructive testing during wind turbine blade tests. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2001, 123, 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1409560.

  • 51.

    Rumsey, M.A.; Paquette, J.A. Structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades. In Proceedings of the SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, San Diego, CA, USA, 9–13 March 2008. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.778324.

  • 52.

    Sabet Divsholi, B.; Yang, Y. Combined embedded and surface-bonded piezoelectric transducers for monitoring of concrete structures. NDT E Int. 2014, 65, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.03.009.

  • 53.

    Sepehry, N.; Bakhtiari-Nejad, F.; Shamshirsaz, M. Discrete singular convolution and spectral finite element method for predicting electromechanical impedance applied on rectangular plates. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2017, 28, 2473–2488. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x17689931.

  • 54.

    Shafiee, M.; Brennan, F.; Espinosa, I.A. A parametric whole life cost model for offshore wind farms. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2016, 21, 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1075-z.

  • 55.

    Shafiee, M.; Zhou, Z.; Mei, L.; Dinmohammadi, F.; Karama, J.; Flynn, D. Unmanned aerial drones for inspection of offshore wind turbines: A mission-critical failure analysis. Robotics 2021, 10, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10010026.

  • 56.

    Smith, R.C.; Anderson, I.; Hartl, D.; et al. Adaptive and active materials: Selected papers from SMASIS 2015. Smart Mater. Struct. 2016, 25, 100201. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/25/10/100201.

  • 57.

    Guan, B.; Su, Z.; Yu, Q.; et al. Monitoring the blades of a wind turbine by using videogrammetry. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2022, 152, 106901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2021.106901. 

  • 58.

    Ta, Q.B.; Kim, J.T. Monitoring of corroded and loosened bolts in steel structures via deep learning and Hough transforms. Sensors 2020, 20, 6888. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236888.

  • 59.

    Talakokula, V.; Bhalla, S.; Gupta, A. Corrosion assessment of reinforced concrete structures based on equivalent structural parameters using electro-mechanical impedance technique. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2013, 25, 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x13498317.

  • 60.

    Tang, H.Y.; Winkelmann, C.; Lestari, W.; et al. Composite structural health monitoring through use of embedded PZT sensors. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2011, 22, 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x11406303.

  • 61.

    Tao, J.X.; Viet, N.V.; Carpinteri, A.; et al. Energy harvesting from wind by a piezoelectric harvester. Eng. Struct. 2017, 133, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.021.

  • 62.

    Wandowski, T.; Malinowski, P.H.; Ostachowicz, W.M. Delamination detection in CFRP panels using EMI method with temperature compensation. Compos. Struct. 2016, 151, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.056.

  • 63.

    Wang, Y.; Qiu, L.; Luo, Y.; et al. A stretchable and large-scale guided wave sensor network for aircraft smart skin of structural health monitoring. Struct. Health Monit. 2019, 20, 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719850641.

  • 64.

    Wiser, R.; Rand, J.; Seel, J.; et al. Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050. Nature Energy 2021, 6, 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00810-z.

  • 65.

    Xu, Y.G.; Liu, G.R. A modified electro-mechanical impedance model of piezoelectric actuator-sensors for debonding detection of composite patches. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2002, 13, 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/104538902761696733.

  • 66.

    Zhang, C.; Panda, G.P.; Yan, Q.; et al. Monitoring early-age hydration and setting of Portland cement paste by piezoelectric transducers via electromechanical impedance method. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 258, 120348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120348.

  • 67.

    Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, J.; et al. A PZT-based electromechanical impedance method for monitoring the soil freeze–thaw process. Sensors 2019, 19, 1107. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19051107.

  • 68.

    Zhang, X.; Zhou, W.; Li, H. Electromechanical impedance-based ice detection of stay cables with temperature compensation. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2019, 26, e2384. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2384.

  • 69.

    Zheng, Y.; Liu, K.; Wu, Z.; et al. Lamb waves and electro-mechanical impedance based damage detection using a mobile PZT transducer set. Ultrasonics 2019, 92, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2018.06.008.

  • 70.

    Zhou, L.; Chen, S.X.; Ni, Y.Q.; et al. EMI-GCN: A hybrid model for real-time monitoring of multiple bolt looseness using electromechanical impedance and graph convolutional networks. Smart Mater. Struct. 2021, 30, 035032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/abe292.

  • 71.

    Zhu, H.; Luo, H.; Ai, D.; et al. Mechanical impedance-based technique for steel structural corrosion damage detection. Measurement 2016, 88, 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.01.041.

  • 72.

    Zhu, J.; Wang, Y.; Qing, X. A real-time electromechanical impedance-based active monitoring for composite patch bonded repair structure. Compos. Struct. 2019, 212, 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.035.

Share this article:
Download PDF
DOI
10.53941/matsus.2026.100002
Issue
Volume 2, Issue 1
How to Cite
Altaf, S.; Abbas, S.; Kunwal, S.; Raza, H.; Abbas, Z.; Islam, M. A Review on Piezoelectric Transducer-Based Structural Health Monitoring for Wind Turbine Blades. Materials and Sustainability 2026, 2 (1), 2. https://doi.org/10.53941/matsus.2026.100002.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.