PMSC/
Articles/
2609005164
  • Open Access
  • Review

Engineering Plant Enzymes for Enhanced Agricultural Productivity and Stress Tolerance

  • Sumit Kumar 1,   
  • Akshita Kapoor 2,   
  • Mukesh Kumar 2,   
  • Rohini Verma 3,   
  • Shiwali Dhiman 4,   
  • Utpal Dey 5,   
  • Tulasi Korra 6,   
  • Rameshkumar Arutselvan 7,   
  • Ali Chenari Bouket 8,   
  • Udai Bhan Singh  9,   
  • Mukesh Meena 10,*,   
  • Prashant Swapnil 11

Received: 05 Jul 2026 | Revised: 25 Aug 2026 | Accepted: 14 Sep 2026 | Published: 22 Sep 2026

Abstract

Biocatalysts or enzymes are natural, eco-friendly proteins that are essential for biochemical changes in all living beings. However, native enzymes are not reusable, unstable at extreme pH and temperature and are also costly for use in agriculture and industries. Engineering of enzymes to address these limitations involves exploiting structure–function relationships to create robust biocatalytic variants that are catalytically more efficient, have altered substrate specificity and will operate for longer. Some of these novel techniques including rational design, directed evolution, random mutagenesis, DNA shuffling, homology modeling and high throughput screening based on cell surface display allow the modification of existing enzymes to create valuable and cost-effective agricultural products. The engineering of plant enzymes to make them more tolerant to heat or acid, or to extract from biomass, has been less studied, but plant enzymes are known to be engineered to have enhanced properties for use in crops, disease resistance and yield. The design of plant biocatalytic systems, with higher abiotic stress resistance and productivity, has significant potential. The chapter presents a detailed description of the sophisticated techniques of protein engineering that have been developed to obtain catalytically superior and more thermostable and environmentally tough proteins. We explore some of the enzymes of plants–ascorbate peroxidase, papain, carbonic anhydrase and some glycoside hydrolases–that show how molecular optimization directly impacts crop stress adaptation and yields. Lastly, we highlight new, unconventional plant-derived enzymes that could be a valuable resource for scientific research in sustainable biotechnology.

References 

  • 1.

    Gu, D.; Andreev, K.; Dupre, M.E. Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC Wkly. 2021, 3, 604–613. https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2021.160.

  • 2.

    Sadigov, R. Rapid growth of the world population and its socioeconomic results. Sci. World J. 2022, 2022, 8110229. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8110229.

  • 3.

    Shiferaw, B.; Smale, M.; Braun, H.J.; et al. Crops that feed the world 10. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by wheat in global food security. Food Secur. 2013, 5, 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-013-0263-y.

  • 4.

    Giller, K.E.; Delaune, T.; Silva, J.V.; et al. The future of farming: Who will produce our food? Food Secur. 2021, 13, 1073–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01184-6.

  • 5.

    Saleem, A.; Anwar, S.; Nawaz, T.; et al. Securing a sustainable future: The climate change threat to agriculture, food security, and sustainable development goals. J. Umm Al-Qura Univ. Appl. Sci. 2025, 11, 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00177-3.

  • 6.

    Kumar, P.; Sonowal, B.S.; Thakur, A.; et al. Fungal endophytes as biostimulants to facilitate viable bioprospecting of high-value secondary metabolites. In Metabolic Sustainability of Endophytes: Current Status, Challenges and Potential; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2025; pp. 305–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4004-1_14.

  • 7.

    Vitolo, M. Miscellaneous use of enzymes. World J. Pharm. Res. 2020, 9, 199–224.

  • 8.

    Buller, R.; Lutz, S.; Kazlauskas, R.J.; et al. From nature to industry: Harnessing enzymes for biocatalysis. Science 2023, 382, eadh8615. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh8615.

  • 9.

    Gao, J.; Ma, S.; Major, D.T.; et al. Mechanisms and free energies of enzymatic reactions. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 3188–3209. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr050293k.

  • 10.

    Sousa, S.F.; Ribeiro, A.J.M.; Neves, R.P.P.; et al. Application of quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics methods in the study of enzymatic reaction mechanisms. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2017, 7, e1281. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1281.

  • 11.

    Niazian, M.; Sadat-Noori, S.A.; Tohidfar, M.; et al. Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) vs. Flavodoxin (Fld): Two important genes for enhancing plants stress tolerance and productivity. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 650215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.650215.

  • 12.

    Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; et al. Advances in the biosynthetic regulation and functional mechanisms of glycine betaine for enhancing plant stress resilience. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 7971. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26167971.

  • 13.

    Mishra, N.; Jiang, C.; Chen, L.; et al. Achieving abiotic stress tolerance in plants through antioxidative defense mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1110622. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1110622.

  • 14.

    Mahamed Ashiq, I.; Rakhesh, S.; Hurali, S.; et al. Integrative approaches for enhancing abiotic stress tolerance in crops through molecular and biotechnological interventions. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2024, 39, 177–198. https://doi.org/10.9734/arrb/2024/v39i122181.

  • 15.

    Kumar, S.; Sindhu, S.S. Drought stress mitigation through bioengineering of microbes and crop varieties for sustainable agriculture and food security. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2024, 7, 100285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100285.

  • 16.

    Lau, S.E.; Teo, W.F.A.; Teoh, E.Y.; et al. Microbiome engineering and plant biostimulants for sustainable crop improvement and mitigation of biotic and abiotic stresses. Discov. Food 2022, 2, 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-022-00009-5.

  • 17.

    Shahid, M.; Singh, U.B.; Khan, M.S.; et al. Bacterial ACC deaminase: Insights into enzymology, biochemistry, genetics, and potential role in amelioration of environmental stress in crop plants. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1132770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1132770.

  • 18.

    Nianiou-Obeidat, I.; Madesis, P.; Kissoudis, C.; et al. Plant glutathione transferase-mediated stress tolerance: Functions and biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Rep. 2017, 36, 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2139-7.

  • 19.

    Ugalde, J.M.; Nath, M.; Wagner, S.; et al. Diversification of glutathione transferases in plants and their role in oxidative stress defense. Biol. Chem. 2025, 406, 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2025-0111.

  • 20.

    Arora, K.; Sen, S. Cytokinin oxygenase/dehydrogenase inhibitors: An emerging tool in stress biotechnology employed for crop improvement. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 877510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.877510.

  • 21.

    Nisler, J. Beyond expectations: The development and biological activity of cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase inhibitors. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2024, 52, 2297–2306. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst20231561.

  • 22.

    Elsharawy, H.; Refat, M. SAL1 gene: A promising target for improving abiotic stress tolerance in plants: A mini review. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2025, 31, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-025-01549-7.

  • 23.

    Khin, N.C.; Carmody, M.; Schwartz, B.D.; et al. High-throughput screening and structure-guided design of small molecules enable modulation of SAL–PAP stress signaling. J. Exp. Bot. 2026, erag376. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erag376.

  • 24.

    Rao, M.A.; Scelza, R.; Acevedo, F.; et al. Enzymes as useful tools for environmental purposes. Chemosphere 2014, 107, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.059.

  • 25.

    Chapman, J.; Ismail, A.E.; Dinu, C.Z. Industrial applications of enzymes: Recent advances, techniques, and outlooks. Catalysts 2018, 8, 238. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal8060238.

  • 26.

    Razzaque, M.S.; Wimalawansa, S.J. Minerals and human health: From deficiency to toxicity. Nutrients 2025, 17, 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17030454.

  • 27.

    Food Enzyme Market Size, Share, Trends | Growth Report [2034]. Available online: https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/food-enzymes-market-102835 (accessed on 18 September 2026).

  • 28.

    Saxena, S. Microbial enzymes and their industrial applications. In Applied Microbiology; Saxena, S., Ed.; Springer India: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2259-0_9.

  • 29.

    Mukherjee, P.; Mondal, I.; Dey, D.; et al. An overview on microbial enzymes and their industrial applications. J. Surv. Fish. Sci. 2023, 10, 6154–6160. https://doi.org/10.53555/sfs.v10i1s.2120.

  • 30.

    Xiao, H.; Feng, Y.; Goundry, W.R.F.; et al. Organic solvent nanofiltration in pharmaceutical applications. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2024, 28, 891–923. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00470.

  • 31.

    Della Gala, V.; Dato, L.; Wiesenberger, G.; et al. Plant-derived UDP-glycosyltransferases for glycosylation-mediated detoxification of deoxynivalenol: Enzyme discovery, characterization, and in vivo resistance assessment. Toxins 2025, 17, 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17040153.

  • 32.

    Turan, M.; Nikerel, E.; Kaya, K.; et al. Enzyme dynamic in plant nutrition uptake and plant nutrition. In Enzyme Inhibitors and Activators; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5772/66938.

  • 33.

    Sheldon, R.A.; Woodley, J.M. Role of biocatalysis in sustainable chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 801–838. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00203.

  • 34.

    Bilal, M.; Zhao, Y.; Noreen, S.; et al. Modifying bio-catalytic properties of enzymes for efficient biocatalysis: A review from immobilization strategies viewpoint. Biocatal. Biotransform. 2019, 37, 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242422.2018.1564744.

  • 35.

    Liu, Q.; Xun, G.; Feng, Y. The state-of-the-art strategies of protein engineering for enzyme stabilization. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 530–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.10.011.

  • 36.

    Sharma, A.; Gupta, G.; Ahmad, T.; et al. Enzyme engineering: Current trends and future perspectives. Food Rev. Int. 2021, 37, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2019.1695835.

  • 37.

    Eş, I.; Vieira, J.D.G.; Amaral, A.C. Principles, techniques, and applications of biocatalyst immobilization for industrial application. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 2065–2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6390-y.

  • 38.

    Mesbah, N.M. Industrial biotechnology based on enzymes from extreme environments. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 870083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.870083.

  • 39.

    Wally, O.; Punja, Z.K. Genetic engineering for increasing fungal and bacterial disease resistance in crop plants. GM Crops 2010, 1, 199–206. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.1.4.13225.

  • 40.

    Anjali; Kumar, S.; Korra, T.; et al. Role of plant secondary metabolites in defence and transcriptional regulation in response to biotic stress. Plant Stress 2023, 8, 100154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100154.

  • 41.

    Mushtaq, M.; Sakina, A.; Wani, S.H.; et al. Harnessing genome editing techniques to engineer disease resistance in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 550. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00550.

  • 42.

    Farhan, M.; Hasani, I.W.; Khafaga, D.S.R.; et al. Enzymes as catalysts in industrial biocatalysis: Advances in engineering, applications, and sustainable integration. Catalysts 2025, 15, 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal15090891.

  • 43.

    Yadav, G.; Meena, M. Seasonal dynamics and enzyme profiles of diverse endophytic fungi in Sterculia urens Roxb.: Insights into host-associated trends. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2025, 41, 128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-025-04339-1.

  • 44.

    Kuo, C.H.; Huang, C.Y.; Shieh, C.J.; et al. Enzymes and biocatalysis. Catalysts 2022, 12, 993. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12090993.

  • 45.

    Hayes, D.J. An examination of biorefining processes, catalysts and challenges. Catal. Today 2009, 145, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.04.017.

  • 46.

    Formenti, L.R.; Nørregaard, A.; Bolic, A.; et al. Challenges in industrial fermentation technology research. Biotechnol. J. 2014, 9, 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201300236.

  • 47.

    Kumar, A.; Dhar, K.; Kanwar, S.S.; et al. Lipase catalysis in organic solvents: Advantages and applications. Biol. Proced. Online 2016, 18, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-016-0033-2.

  • 48.

    Gutierrez-Rus, L.I.; Vos, E.; Pantoja-Uceda, D.; et al. Enzyme enhancement through computational stability design targeting NMR-determined catalytic hotspots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 14978–14996. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c09428.

  • 49.

    Meena, M.; Zehra, A.; Dubey, M.K.; et al. Penicillium enzymes for the food industries. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Gupta, V.K., Rodriguez-Couto, S., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63501-3.00009-0.

  • 50.

    Ali, M.; Ishqi, H.M.; Husain, Q. Enzyme engineering: Reshaping the biocatalytic functions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020, 117, 1877–1894. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27329.

  • 51.

    Vanella, R.; Boult, S.; Küng, C.; et al. Decoding the substrate specificity landscape of a promiscuous enzyme through multi-substrate mutational scanning. Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 3245. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69913-z.

  • 52.

    Agarwal, P.K. A Biophysical perspective on enzyme catalysis. Biochemistry 2019, 58, 438–449. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01004.

  • 53.

    Holliday, G.L.; Mitchell, J.B.O.; Thornton, J.M. Understanding the functional roles of amino acid residues in enzyme catalysis. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 390, 560–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.05.015.

  • 54.

    Selvaraj, C.; Rudhra, O.; Alothaim, A.S.; et al. Chapter Three—Structure and chemistry of enzymatic active sites that play a role in the switch and conformation mechanism. In Protein Design and Structure: Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology; Donev, R., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; Vol. 130, pp. 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2022.02.002.

  • 55.

    Lv, F.; Zhang, J.; You, S.; et al. From traditional to AI-driven: The evolution of intelligent enzyme engineering for biocatalysis. Biotechnol. Adv. 2026, 87, 108788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2025.108788.

  • 56.

    He, H.; Liu, J.; Wang, Y.; et al. Site-directed mutagenesis of family GH10 Aspergillus fumigatus xylanase A and the interaction with Oryza sativa xylanase inhibitor protein. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 54, 102920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102920.

  • 57.

    Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Chen, J.; et al. Enhanced activity toward PET by site-directed mutagenesis of Thermobifida fusca cutinase–CBM fusion protein. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 97, 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.042.

  • 58.

    Xing, H.; Wang, P.; Yan, X.; et al. Thermostability enhancement of Escherichia coli phytase by error-prone polymerase chain reaction (epPCR) and site-directed mutagenesis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2023, 11, 1167530. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1167530.

  • 59.

    Labrou, N.E.; Rigden, D.J.; Clonis, Y.D. Engineering the pH-dependence of kinetic parameters of maize glutathione S-transferase I by site-directed mutagenesis. Biomol. Eng. 2004, 21, 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioeng.2003.10.002.

  • 60.

    Seo, D.H.; Jung, J.H.; Park, C.S. Improved polymerization activity of Deinococcus geothermalis amylosucrase by semi-rational design: Effect of loop flexibility on the polymerization reaction. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 130, 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.02.139.

  • 61.

    Zhang, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, C.; et al. Significant improvement in catalytic activity and enantioselectivity of a Phaseolus vulgaris epoxide hydrolase, PvEH3, towards ortho-cresyl glycidyl ether based on the semi-rational design. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1680. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58693-1.

  • 62.

    Yin, X.; Li, J.F.; Wang, C.J.; et al. Improvement in the thermostability of a type A feruloyl esterase, AuFaeA, from Aspergillus usamii by iterative saturation mutagenesis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 10047–10056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6889-2.

  • 63.

    Huang, J.; Dai, S.; Chen, X.; et al. Alteration of chain-length selectivity and thermostability of Rhizopus oryzae lipase via virtual saturation mutagenesis coupled with disulfide bond design. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 89, e01878-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01878-22.

  • 64.

    You, S.; Chen, C.C.; Tu, T.; et al. Insight into the functional roles of Glu175 in the hyperthermostable xylanase XYL10C-ΔN through structural analysis and site-saturation mutagenesis. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1150-8.

  • 65.

    Brissos, V.; Eggert, T.; Cabral, J.M.S.; et al. Improving activity and stability of cutinase towards the anionic detergent AOT by complete saturation mutagenesis. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2008, 21, 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzn014.

  • 66.

    Bei, J.; Chen, Z.; Fu, J.; et al. Structure-based fragment shuffling of two fungal phytases for combination of desirable properties. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 139, 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.08.011.

  • 67.

    Suen, W.; Zhang, N.; Xiao, L.; et al. Improved activity and thermostability of Candida antarctica lipase B by DNA family shuffling. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2004, 17, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzh017.

  • 68.

    Wang, Y.; Yuan, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Truncation of the cellulose binding domain improved thermal stability of endo-β-1,4-glucanase from Bacillus subtilis JA18. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 345–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.001.

  • 69.

    Zhao, H. Staggered extension process in vitro DNA recombination. In Protein Engineering; Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004; Vol. 388, pp. 42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0076-6879(04)88005-4.

  • 70.

    Melzer, S.; Sonnendecker, C.; Föllner, C.; et al. Stepwise error-prone PCR and DNA shuffling changed the pH activity range and product specificity of the cyclodextrin glucanotransferase from an alkaliphilic Bacillus sp. FEBS Open Bio 2015, 5, 528–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fob.2015.06.002.

  • 71.

    Parra, L.P.; Reyes, F.; Acevedo, J.P.; et al. Cloning and fusion expression of a cold-active lipase from marine Antarctic origin. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2008, 42, 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.11.003.

  • 72.

    Lu, X.; Liu, S.; Zhang, D.; et al. Enhanced thermal stability and specific activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipoxygenase by fusing with self-assembling amphipathic peptides. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 9419–9427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-4751-y.

  • 73.

    Yang, H.; Lu, X.; Liu, L.; et al. Fusion of an oligopeptide to the N terminus of an alkaline α-amylase from Alkalimonas amylolytica simultaneously improves the enzyme’s catalytic efficiency, thermal stability, and resistance to oxidation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 3049–3058. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03785-12.

  • 74.

    Yang, Z.; Wang, R.S.; Cheng, B.Y.; et al. Key residues identified by random mutagenesis enhanced indole hydroxylation efficiency of the flavin-containing monooxygenase from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biochem. Eng. J. 2023, 199, 109064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2023.109064.

  • 75.

    Marx, C.K.; Hertel, T.C.; Pietzsch, M. Random mutagenesis of a recombinant microbial transglutaminase for the generation of thermostable and heat-sensitive variants. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 136, 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.06.005.

  • 76.

    Arnold, F.H. Design by Directed Evolution. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar960017f.

  • 77.

    Patsch, D.; Schwander, T.; Voss, M.; et al. Enriching productive mutational paths accelerates enzyme evolution. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2024, 20, 1662–1669. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01712-3.

  • 78.

    Sellés Vidal, L.; Isalan, M.; Heap, J.T.; et al. A primer to directed evolution: Current methodologies and future directions. RSC Chem. Biol. 2023, 4, 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cb00231k.

  • 79.

    Bloom, J.D.; Arnold, F.H. In the light of directed evolution: Pathways of adaptive protein evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106 (Suppl. 1), 9995–10000. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901522106.

  • 80.

    Stemmer, W.P. DNA Shuffling by random fragmentation and reassembly: In Vitro recombination for molecular evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 10747–10751. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.22.10747.

  • 81.

    Cirino, P.C.; Mayer, K.M.; Umeno, D. Generating mutant libraries using error-prone PCR. In Directed Evolution Library Creation: Methods and Protocols; Arnold, F.H., Georgiou, G., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2003; pp. 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-395-x:3.

  • 82.

    Turner, N.J. Directed evolution drives the next generation of biocatalysts. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 567–573. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.203.

  • 83.

    Esvelt, K.M.; Carlson, J.C.; Liu, D.R. A System for the continuous directed evolution of biomolecules. Nature 2011, 472, 499–503. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09929.

  • 84.

    Kamalinia, G.; Grindel, B.J.; Takahashi, T.T.; et al. Directing evolution of novel ligands by mRNA display. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 9055–9103. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cs00160d.

  • 85.

    Lagoutte, P. La présentation sur ribosome—Évolution et sélection acellulaire de banques moléculaires. Med. Sci. 2020, 36, 717–724. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2020126.

  • 86.

    Lutz, S.; Bornscheuer, U.T. Protein Engineering Handbook | Wiley. Available online: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/protein-engineering-handbook-p-9783527667017 (accessed on 19 September 2026).

  • 87.

    Bornscheuer, U.T.; Pohl, M. Improved biocatalysts by directed evolution and rational protein design. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1367-5931(00)00182-4.

  • 88.

    Ariaeenejad, S.; Gharechahi, J.; Foroozandeh Shahraki, M.; et al. Precision enzyme discovery through targeted mining of metagenomic data. Nat. Prod. Bioprospecting 2024, 14, 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13659-023-00426-8.

  • 89.

    Branden, C.I.; Tooze, J. Introduction to Protein Structure; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA, 2012.

  • 90.

    Wang, H.; Lin, Q.; Liu, M.; et al. Molecular docking and site-directed mutagenesis of GH49 family dextranase for the preparation of high-degree polymerization isomaltooligosaccharide. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom13020300.

  • 91.

    Yin, T.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Protein structure prediction powered by artificial intelligence: From biochemical foundations to practical applications. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2026, 13, 1767821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2026.1767821.

  • 92.

    Sanz-Aparicio, J.; Hermoso, J.A.; Martínez-Ripoll, M.; et al. Crystal structure of β-glucosidase a from Bacillus polymyxa: Insights into the catalytic activity in family 1 glycosyl hydrolases. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 275, 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1467.

  • 93.

    Lutz, S. Beyond directed evolution—Semi-rational protein engineering and design. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21, 734–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2010.08.011.

  • 94.

    Chica, R.A.; Doucet, N.; Pelletier, J.N. Semi-rational approaches to engineering enzyme activity: Combining the benefits of directed evolution and rational design. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2005, 16, 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2005.06.004.

  • 95.

    Jäckel, C.; Kast, P.; Hilvert, D. Protein design by directed evolution. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2008, 37, 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125832.

  • 96.

    Telek, A.; Gaják, V.Z.; Dargó, G.; et al. Accessible biocatalyst development by rapid in vitro semi-rational engineering (RISE) of enzymes. iScience 2026, 29, 114257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.114257.

  • 97.

    Pavelka, A.; Chovancova, E.; Damborsky, J. HotSpot Wizard: A web server for identification of hot spots in protein engineering. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (Suppl. 2), W376–W383. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp410.

  • 98.

    Bozkurt, E.U.; Ørsted, E.C.; Volke, D.C.; et al. Accelerating enzyme discovery and engineering with high-throughput screening. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2026, 43, 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4np00031e.

  • 99.

    Lee, H.; Cho, Y.; Yun, J.; et al. Protein folding stability estimation with explicit consideration of unfolded states. Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 1883. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68637-4.

  • 100.

    Mazorra-Manzano, M.A.; Ramírez-Suarez, J.C.; Yada, R.Y. Plant proteases for bioactive peptides release: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2147–2163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2017.1308312.

  • 101.

    Meshram, A.; Singhal, G.; Bhagyawant, S.S.; et al. Chapter 28—Plant-derived enzymes: A treasure for food biotechnology. In Enzymes in Food Biotechnology; Kuddus, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813280-7.00028-1.

  • 102.

    Gupta, A.; Khare, S.K. Enhanced production and characterization of a solvent stable protease from solvent tolerant Pseudomonas aeruginosa PseA. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2007, 42, 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.07.019.

  • 103.

    Devi, M.K. Purification, characterization of alkaline protease enzyme from native isolate Aspergillus niger and its compatibility with commercial detergents. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2008, 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2008/v1i7.8.

  • 104.

    Gupta, R.; Beg, Q.; Khan, S.; et al. An Overview on fermentation, downstream processing and properties of microbial alkaline proteases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 60, 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-002-1142-1.

  • 105.

    Abidi, F.; Limam, F.; Nejib, M.M. Production of alkaline proteases by Botrytis cinerea using economic raw materials: Assay as biodetergent. Process Biochem. 2008, 43, 1202–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2008.06.018.

  • 106.

    Prasad, V.; Singh, V.K.; Meena, M.; et al. Production and technological applications of enzymes from microbial sources. In Applications of Microbial Genes in Enzyme Technology; Gupta, V.K., Tuohy, M.G., Sharma, G.D., et al., Eds.; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 175–204.

  • 107.

    Shankar, S.; More, S.; Laxman, R.S. Recovery of silver from waste X-ray film by alkaline protease from Conidiobolus coronatus. Kathmandu Univ. J. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2010, 6, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.3126/kuset.v6i1.3311.

  • 108.

    Choi, C.; Chun, S.S.; Kim, Y. Production and Properties of an alkaline protease from Pseudomonas sp. SJ-320. Korean Biochem. J. 1993, 26, 479–484.

  • 109.

    Shrivastav, P.; Prasad, M.; Singh, T.B.; et al. Role of Nutrients in plant growth and development. In Contaminants in Agriculture: Sources, Impacts and Management; Naeem, M., Ansari, A.A., Gill, S.S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41552-5_2.

  • 110.

    Bhatla, S.C.; Kathpalia, R. Essential and functional mineral elements. In Plant Physiology, Development and Metabolism; Bhatla, S.C., Lal, M.A., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5736-1_2.

  • 111.

    Tyagi, J.; Ahmad, S.; Malik, M. Nitrogenous fertilizers: Impact on environment sustainability, mitigation strategies, and challenges. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 11649–11672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04027-9.

  • 112.

    Balotf, S.; Kavoosi, G.; Kholdebarin, B. Nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase, glutamine synthetase, and glutamate synthase expression and activity in response to different nitrogen sources in nitrogen-starved wheat seedlings. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2016, 63, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.1362.

  • 113.

    Nahvi, S.L.; Khurshid, A. Nitrogen metabolism enzymes: Structure, role, and regulation. In Advances in Plant Nitrogen Metabolism; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022.

  • 114.

    Navarro, B.B.; Machado, M.J.; Figueira, A. Nitrogen use efficiency in agriculture: Integrating biotechnology, microbiology, and novel delivery systems for sustainable agriculture. Plants 2025, 14, 2974. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants14192974.

  • 115.

    Nawaz, T.; Fahad, S.; Gu, L.; et al. Harnessing nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria for sustainable agriculture: Opportunities, challenges, and implications for food security. Nitrogen 2025, 6, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen6010016.

  • 116.

    Rawat, P.; Das, S.; Shankhdhar, D.; et al. Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms: Mechanism and their role in phosphate solubilization and uptake. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2021, 21, 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-020-00342-7.

  • 117.

    Hoefgen, R.; Hesse, H. Sulfur and Cysteine Metabolism. In Sulfur: A Missing Link between Soils, Crops, and Nutrition; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 83–104. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr50.c6.

  • 118.

    Blancquaert, D.; De Steur, H.; Gellynck, X.; et al. Metabolic engineering of micronutrients in crop plants. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2017, 1390, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13274.

  • 119.

    Tiozon, R.J.N.; Fernie, A.R.; Sreenivasulu, N. Reconfiguring biofortification strategies to transform food systems and address micronutrient deficiency of the 21st century. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2026, 68, 2511–2547. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.70305.

  • 120.

    Gao, J.; Wang, F.; Hu, H.; et al. Improved leaf nitrogen reutilisation and Rubisco activation under short-term nitrogen-deficient conditions promotes photosynthesis in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at the seedling stage. Funct. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 840–853. https://doi.org/10.1071/fp17232.

  • 121.

    Nawaz, M.; Sun, J.; Shabbir, S.; et al. A review of plants strategies to resist biotic and abiotic environmental stressors. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 900, 165832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165832.

  • 122.

    Raza, A.; Ashraf, F.; Zou, X.; et al. Plant adaptation and tolerance to environmental stresses: Mechanisms and perspectives. In Plant Ecophysiology and Adaptation under Climate Change: Mechanisms and Perspectives I: General Consequences and Plant Responses; Hasanuzzaman, M., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 117–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2156-0_5.

  • 123.

    Parmar, N.; Singh, K.H.; Sharma, D.; et al. Genetic engineering strategies for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and quality enhancement in horticultural crops: A comprehensive review. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0870-y.

  • 124.

    Jagadeesh Chandra Bose, K.; Kaur, S.; Sharma, S.; et al. Methods from the field of synthetic biology that aim to improve plant growth and resistance to stress through the use of genetic engineering. In Metabolomics, Proteomics and Gene Editing Approaches in Biofertilizer Industry: Volume II; Kaur, S., Dwibedi, V., Sahu, P.K., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2910-4_6.

  • 125.

    Chamani, M.; Dadpour, M.; Dehghanian, Z.; et al. From digestion to detoxification: Exploring plant metabolite impacts on insect enzyme systems for enhanced pest control. Insects 2025, 16, 392. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16040392.

  • 126.

    Rajput, V.D.; Harish; Singh, R.K.; et al. Recent developments in enzymatic antioxidant defence mechanism in plants with special reference to abiotic stress. Biology 2021, 10, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10040267.

  • 127.

    Grover, A. Plant chitinases: Genetic diversity and physiological roles. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2012, 31, 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2011.616043.

  • 128.

    Sandhu, J.S.; Sidhu, M.K.; Yadav, I.S. Control of fungal diseases in agricultural crops by chitinase and glucanase transgenes. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; Lichtfouse, E., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 163–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48006-0_6.

  • 129.

    Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9.

  • 130.

    Passardi, F.; Cosio, C.; Penel, C.; et al. Peroxidases have more functions than a Swiss army knife. Plant Cell Rep. 2005, 24, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0972-6.

  • 131.

    Dixon, D.P.; Edwards, R. Glutathione transferases. Arab. Book 2010, 8, e0131. https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0131.

  • 132.

    Dixon, R.; Paiva, N. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.7.7.1085.

  • 133.

    Jeandet, P.; Vannozzi, A.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E.; et al. Phytostilbenes as agrochemicals: Biosynthesis, bioactivity, metabolic engineering and biotechnology. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2021, 38, 1282–1329. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0np00030b.

  • 134.

    Wasternack, C.; Hause, B. Jasmonates: Biosynthesis, perception, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. An update to the 2007 review in Annals of Botany. Ann. Bot. 2013, 111, 1021–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct067.

  • 135.

    Vlot, A.C.; Dempsey, D.A.; Klessig, D.F. Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2009, 47, 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202.

  • 136.

    Choudhary, R.; Ahmad, F.; Kaya, C.; et al. Decrypting proteomics, transcriptomics, genomics, and integrated omics for augmenting the abiotic, biotic, and climate change stress resilience in plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2025, 305, 154430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2025.154430.

  • 137.

    Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016.

  • 138.

    Queitsch, C.; Hong, S.W.; Vierling, E.; et al. Heat shock protein 101 plays a crucial role in thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 479–492. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.4.479.

  • 139.

    Chen, T.H.H.; Murata, N. Glycinebetaine protects plants against abiotic stress: Mechanisms and biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02232.x.

  • 140.

    Xu, J.; Xing, X.J.; Tian, Y.S.; et al. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing tomato glutathione S-transferase showed enhanced resistance to salt and drought stress. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136960. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136960.

  • 141.

    Zhang, S.; Klessig, D.F. MAPK cascades in plant defense signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 520–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(01)02103-3.

  • 142.

    Gandhi, A.; Oelmüller, R. Emerging roles of receptor-like protein kinases in plant response to abiotic stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14762. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241914762.

  • 143.

    Noctor, G.; Foyer, C.H. Ascorbate and glutathione: Keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 1998, 49, 249–279. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249.

  • 144.

    Khan, Z.; Shahwar, D. Role of heat shock proteins (HSPs) and heat stress tolerance in crop plants. In Sustainable Agriculture in the Era of Climate Change; Roychowdhury, R., Choudhury, S., Hasanuzzaman, M., et al., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45669-6_9.

  • 145.

    Ozougwu, J. The role of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in oxidative stress. Int. J. Pharm. Biosci. 2016, 3, 1–8.

  • 146.

    Mishra, A.; Bhardwaj, A.; Bhatt, U.; et al. Reactive oxygen species as integrators of stress signalling and developmental regulation in plants. Discov. Plants 2026, 3, 320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00800-z.

  • 147.

    Zandi, P.; Schnug, E. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant responses and implications from a microbial modulation perspective. Biology 2022, 11, 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11020155.

  • 148.

    Zhu, C.; Sanahuja, G.; Yuan, D.; et al. Biofortification of plants with altered antioxidant content and composition: Genetic engineering strategies. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2013, 11, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00740.x.

  • 149.

    Sunkar, R.; Bartels, D.; Kirch, H.H. Overexpression of a stress-inducible aldehyde dehydrogenase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana in transgenic plants improves stress tolerance. Plant J. 2003, 35, 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01819.x.

  • 150.

    Yang, G.; Wang, Y.; Xia, D.; et al. Overexpression of a GST gene (ThGSTZ1) from Tamarix hispida improves drought and salinity tolerance by enhancing the ability to scavenge reactive oxygen species. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, 117, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-014-0424-5.

  • 151.

    Nahar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Roles of osmolytes in plant adaptation to drought and salinity. In Osmolytes and Plants Acclimation to Changing Environment: Emerging Omics Technologies; Iqbal, N., Nazar, R., Khan, A.N., Eds.; Springer India: New Delhi, India, 2016; pp. 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2616-1_4.

  • 152.

    Khan, S.; Siraj, S.; Shahid, M.; et al. Osmolytes: Wonder molecules to combat protein misfolding against stress conditions. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 234, 123662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123662.

  • 153.

    Singh, M.; Kumar, J.; Singh, S.; et al. Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: A review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2015, 14, 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-015-9372-8.

  • 154.

    Liu, Y.; Li, B.; Chen, T.; et al. The synthesis, degradation and biological function of trehalose-6-phosphate. Stress Biol. 2025, 5, 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-025-00235-8.

  • 155.

    Wang, W.; Vinocur, B.; Altman, A. Plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: Towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 2003, 218, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5.

  • 156.

    Trono, D.; Pecchioni, N. Candidate genes associated with abiotic stress response in plants as tools to engineer tolerance to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures in wheat: An overview. Plants 2022, 11, 3358. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233358.

  • 157.

    Gao, S.; Zhang, H.; Tian, Y.; et al. Expression of TERF1 in rice regulates expression of stress-responsive genes and enhances tolerance to drought and high-salinity. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 1787–1795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-008-0602-1.

  • 158.

    Kaur, N.; Gupta, A.K. Signal transduction pathways under abiotic stresses in plants. Curr. Sci. 2005, 88, 1771–1780.

  • 159.

    Atif, R.M.; Shahid, L.; Waqas, M.; et al. Insights on calcium-dependent protein kinases (CPKs) signaling for abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20215298.

  • 160.

    Goher, F.; Shafique Khan, F.; Sun, S.; et al. Calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPK/CPK)-mediated salicylic acid cascade: The key arsenal of plants under pathogens attack. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2025, 45, 1576–1592. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2025.2498463.

  • 161.

    Villas-Boas, F.; Yamauti, Y.; Moretti, M.M.S.; et al. Influence of molecular structure on the susceptibility of starch to α-amylase. Carbohydr. Res. 2019, 479, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2019.05.001.

  • 162.

    Pen, J.; Molendijk, L.; Quax, W.J.; et al. Production of active Bacillus licheniformis alpha-amylase in tobacco and its application in starch liquefaction. Bio/Technology 1992, 10, 292–296. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0392-292.

  • 163.

    Azevedo, R.A.; Lea, P.J. Lysine metabolism in higher plants. Amino Acids 2001, 20, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007260170043.

  • 164.

    Azevedo, R.A.; Arruda, P.; Turner, W.L.; et al. The biosynthesis and metabolism of the aspartate derived amino acids in higher plants. Phytochemistry 1997, 46, 395–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(97)00319-1.

  • 165.

    Azevedo, R.A.; Blackwell, R.D.; Smith, R.J.; et al. Three aspartate kinase isoenzymes from maize. Phytochemistry 1992, 31, 3725–3730. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9422(00)97516-2.

  • 166.

    Teixeira, C.M.G.; Gaziola, S.A.; Lugli, J.; et al. Isolation, partial purification and characterization of isoenzymes of aspartate kinase from rice seeds. J. Plant Physiol. 1998, 153, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0176-1617(98)80153-3.

  • 167.

    Vauterin, M.; Frankard, V.; Jacobs, M. The Arabidopsis thaliana dhdps gene encoding dihydrodipicolinate synthase, key enzyme of lysine biosynthesis, is expressed in a cell-specific manner. Plant Mol. Biol. 1999, 39, 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006132428623.

  • 168.

    Ferreira, R.R.; Meinhardt, L.W.; Azevedo, R.A. Lysine and threonine biosynthesis in sorghum seeds: Characterisation of aspartate kinase and homoserine dehydrogenase isoenzymes. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2006, 149, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2006.00074.x.

  • 169.

    Azarkan, M.; El Moussaoui, A.; van Wuytswinkel, D.; et al. Fractionation and purification of the enzymes stored in the latex of Carica papaya. J. Chromatogr. B 2003, 790, 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1570-0232(03)00084-9.

  • 170.

    Mamboya, F.; Amri, E. Papain, a plant enzyme of biological importance: A review. Am. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2012, 8, 99–104. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajbbsp.2012.99.104.

  • 171.

    O’Quinn, T.G.; Legako, J.F.; Brooks, J.C.; et al. Evaluation of the contribution of tenderness, juiciness, and flavor to the overall consumer beef eating experience. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2018, 2, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txx008.

  • 172.

    Drey, L.N.; O’Quinn, T.G. Tenderness, juiciness, and flavor contribute to the overall consumer beef eating experience. Kans. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. 2017, 3, 27. https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.1361.

  • 173.

    Feijoo-Siota, L.; Villa, T.G. Native and biotechnologically engineered plant proteases with industrial applications. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011, 4, 1066–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0431-4.

  • 174.

    Sullivan, G.A.; Calkins, C.R. Application of exogenous enzymes to beef muscle of high and low-connective tissue. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 730–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.03.033.

  • 175.

    Scannell, A.G.M.; Kenneally, P.M.; Arendt, E.K. Contribution of starter cultures to the proteolytic process of a fermented non-dried whole muscle ham product. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 93, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.11.007.

  • 176.

    Yu, W.; Quek, W.P.; Li, C.; et al. Effects of the starch molecular structures in barley malts and rice adjuncts on brewing performance. Fermentation 2018, 4, 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation4040103.

  • 177.

    Wallerstein, J.S. Art of Producing Fermented Malt Beverages. US2223753A, 3 December 1940. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US2223753A/en (accessed on 19 September 2026).

  • 178.

    Kennedy, J.F.; Pike, V.W. Papain, chymotrypsin and related proteins—A comparative study of their beer chill-proofing abilities and characteristics. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1981, 3, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(81)90037-5.

  • 179.

    Jin, F.; Toda, K. Preparation of immobilized papain covalently bound on natural cellulose for treatment of beer. Biotechnol. Lett. 1988, 10, 221–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01134834.

  • 180.

    Jones, B.L. Endoproteases of barley and malt. J. Cereal Sci. 2005, 42, 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2005.03.007.

  • 181.

    Yahia, D.F.; Bourekoua, H.; Fetouhi, A.; et al. Impact of sourdoughs, enzymes, and their combinations on gluten-based bread quality. Processes 2025, 13, 2796. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13092796.

  • 182.

    Dahiya, S.; Bajaj, B.K.; Kumar, A.; et al. A review on biotechnological potential of multifarious enzymes in bread making. Process Biochem. 2020, 99, 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2020.09.002.

  • 183.

    Collar, C.; Martinez, J.C.; Andreu, P.; et al. Effects of enzyme associations on bread dough performance: A response surface analysis. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2000, 6, 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/108201320000600304.

  • 184.

    Polaina, J.; MacCabe, A.P. (Eds.) Industrial Enzymes: Structure, Function and Applications; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5377-0.

  • 185.

    Wang, J.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Characterization of hydrolysates derived from enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat gluten. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, C103–C107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00247.x.

  • 186.

    Wang, J.; Zhao, M.; Zhao, Q.; et al. Antioxidant properties of papain hydrolysates of wheat gluten in different oxidation systems. Food Chem. 2007, 101, 1658–1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.04.024.

  • 187.

    Jegannathan, K.R.; Nielsen, P.H. Environmental assessment of enzyme use in industrial production—A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 42, 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.005.

  • 188.

    Bigelis, R. Flavor metabolites and enzymes from filamentous fungi: Use of biotechnology to enhance food flavor. Food Technol. 1992, 46, 151–161.

  • 189.

    Sahoo, A.; Bhagat, S.; Stuti; et al. Phytochemistry and functional applications of ginger (Zingiber officinale): A comprehensive review of therapeutic and nutraceutical insights. Food Humanit. 2026, 6, 101201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2026.101201.

  • 190.

    Singh, L.A.; Kumari, P.; Kumar, P.; et al. Microalgae-derived antioxidants and antimicrobials: A sustainable approach for natural food preservatives. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2025, 9, 1669731. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1669731.

  • 191.

    De Corato, U. Improving the shelf-life and quality of fresh and minimally-processed fruits and vegetables for a modern food industry: A comprehensive critical review from the traditional technologies into the most promising advancements. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 940–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1553025.

Share this article:
Download PDF
DOI
10.53941/pmsc.2026.100004
Issue
Volume 2, Issue 1
How to Cite
Kumar, S.; Kapoor, A.; Kumar, M.; Verma, R.; Dhiman, S.; Dey, U.; Korra, T.; Arutselvan, R.; Bouket, A. C.; Singh , U. B.; Meena, M.; Swapnil, P. Engineering Plant Enzymes for Enhanced Agricultural Productivity and Stress Tolerance. Physiology and Management of Sustainable Crops 2026, 2 (1), 4. https://doi.org/10.53941/pmsc.2026.100004.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
Article Metrics
29
Article Views
0
Citations