Methanol from Catalytic Conversion of Biogas-Based Syngas (CO, H2)

Yitong Jiang; Jin Zhang; Huili Zhang; Jan Baeyens

doi:10.53941/see.2026.100006

Abstract

Hydrogen (H₂) will foster the decarbonization roadmap. H₂ faces challenges that hamper its application, storage and transport being the major issues needing reliable and affordable solutions. Its transformation into H₂-based green methanol offers a potential alternative. The present research applied a multi-step inter-cooled fixed-bed reactor using a Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst and fed with biogas-derived syngas of different CO/H₂ concentration ratios. The reaction is mainly carried out at 503 K and 5 MPa. Conversions and yields were measured after each of the 4 steps and revealed a total conversion of 97.8%. The catalyst was fully characterized and showed a nano-size structural cell with ultrafine crystallinity. Aspen simulation predictions using the Graaf et al. kinetic expressions accurately fitted the experimental results. The methanol purity exceeded 99.5%. The concept can be readily scaled up by using 3 successive catalytic beds with intercooling. Pilot-plant experiments will be further used to enhance the Technology Readiness Level.

References

1.
Zhang, H.; Fang, Y.; Wang, M.; et al. Prospects and perspectives foster enhanced research on bio-aviation fuels. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 274, 111214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111214.
2.
Deng, Y.; Dewil, R.; Appels, L.; et al. Hydrogen-enriched natural gas in a decarbonization perspective. Fuel 2022, 318, 123680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123680.
3.
Zhang, H.; Kou, Y.; Yang, M.; et al. Producing “green” methanol from syngas, derived from anaerobic digestion biogas. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2025, 19, 92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-025-2549-y.
4.
Deng, Y.; Baeyens, J.; Margot, V.E.; et al. Renewable electricity and “green” feedstock-based chemicals will foster industrial sustainability. Innov. Energy 2024, 1, 100016. https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-energy.2024.100016.
5.
Chu, F.; Jiang, Y.; Li, Z.; et al. Sustainable Biogas-to-Syngas Catalytic Dry Reforming of Methane (DRM) Using a Novel Fleece Reactor. Sustainability 2026, 18, 3151. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18063151.
6.
Kiran, E.U.; Stamatelatou, K.; Antonopoulou, G.; et al. 10—Production of biogas via anaerobic digestion, In Handbook of Biofuels Production, 2nd ed.; Luque, R., Lin, C.S.K., Wilson, K., et al., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 259–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100455-5.00010-2.
7.
Chao, C.; Deng, Y.; Dewil, R.; et al. Post-combustion carbon capture. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110490.
8.
Guastaferro, M.; Marchetti, L.; Baglioni, F.; et al. Efficient syngas generation from heterogeneous waste for low-carbon methanol synthesis. Fuel 2026, 420, 138952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.138952.
9.
Deng, Y.; Margot, V.E.; Liu, H.; et al. Techno-economic feasibility and kinetic optimization of dry reforming of methane. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2026, 14, 121021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.121021.
10.
Alamdari, A.; Azarhoosh, M.J.; Aghaeinejad-Meybodi, A. Thermodynamic assessment of tri-reforming of methane with optimization of operating conditions to achieve suitable syngas for methanol production. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 14257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44472-x.
11.
Olazar, L.; Pawelczyk, E.; Gębicki, J.; et al. Evaluation of continuous pyrolysis and in-line catalytic dry reforming of commodity plastics for syngas production. Fuel 2026, 426, 139476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.139476.
12.
Sudalyandi, K.; Jeyakumar, R. Biofuel Production Using Anaerobic Digestion, 1st ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3743-9.
13.
Deng, Y.; Li, S.; Liu, H.; et al. Recent Research in Solar-Driven Hydrogen Production. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072883.
14.
Ramli, S.; Baki, A.M.; Ayub, M.A.; et al. Renewable Energy from Biogas Generated by Sewage Sludge—Relationship between Sludge Volume and Power Generated. Sci. Res. J. 2008, 5, 1–9.
15.
The Biogas—Biogas Composition. Available online: https://www.biogas-renewable-energy.info/biogas_composition.html (accessed on 26 May 2026).
16.
IEA Bioenergy. A Perspective on the State of the Biogas Industry from Selected Member Countries; IEA Bioenergy: Paris, France, 2022.
17.
Hanum, F.; Yuan, L.; Kamahara, H.; et al. Treatment of Sewage Sludge Using Anaerobic Digestion in Malaysia: Current State and Challenges. Front. Energy Res. 2019, 7, 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2019.00019.
18.
Xu, A.; Wu, Y.H.; Chen, Z.; et al. Towards the new era of wastewater treatment of China: Development history, current status, and future directions. Water Cycle 2020, 1, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watcyc.2020.06.004.
19.
Chaubey, R.; Sahu, S.; James, O.O.; et al. A review on development of industrial processes and emerging techniques for production of hydrogen from renewable and sustainable sources. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 23, 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.019.
20.
Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; et al. Hydrogen production by catalytic methane decomposition: Carbon materials as catalysts or catalyst supports. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 19755–19775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.197.
21.
Usman, M.; Daud, W.M.A.W.; Abbas, H.F. Dry reforming of methane: Influence of process parameters—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 45, 710–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.026.
22.
Wittich, K.; Krämer, M.; Bottke, N.; et al. Catalytic Dry Reforming of Methane: Insights from Model Systems. Chemcatchem 2020, 12, 2130–2147. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201902142.
23.
Office of Fossil Energy, United States Department of Energy. Hydrogen Production: Natural Gas Reforming; Office of Fossil Energy, United States Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
24.
Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Dalai, A.K. Development of stable bimetallic catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. J. Catal. 2007, 249, 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2007.05.004.
25.
Hao, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Jiang, Z.; et al. Characterization of aerogel Ni/Al₂O₃ catalysts and investigation on their stability for CH₄-CO₂ reforming in a fluidized bed. Fuel Process. Technol. 2009, 90, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.08.004.
26.
Hao, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Jiang, Z.; et al. Fluidization characteristics of aerogel Co/Al₂O₃ catalyst in a magnetic fluidized bed and its application to CH₄–CO₂ reforming. Powder Technol. 2008, 183, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2007.11.015.
27.
Hua, W.; Jin, L.; He, X.; et al. Preparation of Ni/MgO catalyst for CO₂ reforming of methane by dielectric-barrier discharge plasma. Catal. Commun. 2010, 11, 968–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2010.04.007.
28.
Barroso-Quiroga, M.M.; Castro-Luna, A.E. Catalytic activity and effect of modifiers on Ni-based catalysts for the dry reforming of methane. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 6052–6056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.12.073.
29.
Effendi, A.; Hellgardt, K.; Zhang, Z.G.; et al. Characterisation of carbon deposits on Ni/SiO₂ in the reforming of CH₄–CO₂ using fixed- and fluidised-bed reactors. Catal. Commun. 2003, 4, 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-7367(03)00034-7.
30.
Huang, J.; Ma, R.; Huang, T.; et al. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over Ni/Mo/SBA-15-La₂O₃ catalyst: Its characterization and catalytic performance. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2011, 20, 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-9953(10)60226-5.
31.
Zhu, J.; Peng, X.; Yao, L.; et al. Synthesis gas production from CO₂ reforming of methane over Ni–Ce/SiO₂ catalyst: The effect of calcination ambience. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.136.
32.
Yang, M.; Gao, W.; Zhang, H.; et al. Catalytic methane decomposition on an Fe-catalyst, coated on a novel fleece reactor. Energy 2025, 335, 138340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138340.
33.
The Clean Hydrogen Ladder. Available online: https://www.liebreich.com/the-clean-hydrogen-ladder-now-updated-to-v4-1/ (accessed on 26 May 2026).
34.
IEA. The Role of E-Fuels in Decarbonising Transport; IEA: Paris, France, 2023.
35.
Hamedi, H.; Brinkmann, T.; Shishatskiy, S. Membrane-Assisted Methanol Synthesis Processes and the Required Permselectivity. Membranes 2021, 11, 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11080596.
36.
Ye, J.; Dimitratos, N.; Rossi, L.M.; et al. Hydrogenation of CO₂ for sustainable fuel and chemical production. Science 2025, 387, 9388. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn9388.
37.
Dang, S.; Li, M.; Gao, C.; et al. Size-dependent evolution of active-sites on Co₃O₄-modified In₂O₃ catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2026, 395, 126899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2026.126899.
38.
Guzman-Urbina, A.; Kitagawa, N.; Richards, D.; et al. Advancing e-methanol systems via direct air carbon capture, CO₂ hydrogenation, and hydrothermal co-electrolysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 528, 146699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146699.
39.
Beck, A.; Zabilskiy, M.; Newton, M.A.; et al. Following the structure of copper-zinc-alumina across the pressure gap in carbon dioxide hydrogenation. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-021-00625-x.
40.
Jiang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; et al. Green Methanol by Catalytic Multi-stage Fixed-bed Conversion of Biogas-based Syngas (CO, H₂). SSRN 2026. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6670547.
41.
Everaert, K.; Baeyens, J. Catalytic combustion of volatile organic compounds. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 109, 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.03.019.
42.
Hayes, R.; Kolaczkowski, S. Introduction to Catalytic Combustion; Routledge: London, UK, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203750186.
43.
Behrens, M.; Studt, F.; Kasatkin, I.; et al. The Active Site of Methanol Synthesis over Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ Industrial Catalysts. Science 2012, 336, 893–897. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219831.
44.
Bennekom, J.; Winkelman, J.; Venderbosch, R.; et al. Modeling and Experimental Studies on Phase and Chemical Equilibria in High-Pressure Methanol Synthesis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 12233–12243. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie3017362.
45.
Slotboom, Y.; Bos, M.; Pieper, J.; et al. Critical assessment of steady-state kinetic models for the synthesis of methanol over an industrial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 389, 124181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124181.
46.
Schagen, T.N.; Keestra, H.; Brilman, D.W.F. Improved kinetic model for methanol synthesis with Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalysts based on an extensive state-of-the-art dataset. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 507, 159953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.159953.
47.
Graaf, G.H.; Scholtens, H.; Stamhuis, E.J.; et al. Intra-particle diffusion limitations in low-pressure methanol synthesis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1990, 45, 773–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(90)85001-T.
48.
UNIFAC Consortium at the Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg (Develops the PSRK Model Since 2005). Available online: https://unifac.ddbst.com/unifac_.html (accessed on 26 May 2026).
49.
Parameters of the Original UNIFAC Model. Available online: https://www.ddbst.com/published-parameters-unifac.html (accessed on 26 May 2026).
50.
Parameters of the Modified UNIFAC (Dortmund) Model. Available online: https://www.ddbst.com/PublishedParametersUNIFACDO.html (accessed on 26 May 2026).
51.
Published Parameters of the PSRK Model. Available online: https://www.ddbst.com/psrk.html (accessed on 26 May 2026).
52.
Horstmann, S.; Jabłoniec, A.; Krafczyk, J.; et al. PSRK group contribution equation of state: Comprehensive revision and extension IV, including critical constants and α-function parameters for 1000 components. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2005, 227, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2004.11.002.
53.
Renon, H.; Prausnitz, J.M. Local compositions in thermodynamic excess functions for liquid mixtures. AIChE J. 1968, 14, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690140124.
54.
McDermott, C.; Ashton, N. Note on the definition of local composition. Fluid. Phase Equilibria 1977, 1, 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(77)80024-1.

Scilight Press

Author Information

Abstract

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

References

About Scilight

Journals

Publishing Policies

Contact Us