The systematic comparison of pre-modern literary traditions demands a methodology capable of balancing historical specificity with analytical rigor. This study constructs an integrative framework that bridges deep hermeneutic traditions and computational literary analysis. Focusing on the peony in Tang-dynasty China (618–907 CE) and the rose in Renaissance England (ca. 1500–1660 CE), we situate these emblematic flowers within Janet Abu-Lughod’s paradigm of the pre-modern Afro-Eurasian “world system”, establishing their comparability as distinct yet interconnected cultural formations. To move beyond impressionistic analogy, we introduce a computational transposition of the logic of cultural dimensions research—the translation of abstract values into measurable axes of variation—from sociological surveys to poetic language. Treating the peony and the rose as Ernst Cassirer’s symbolic forms, we employ a multi-method computational triangulation—multilingual BERT embeddings for semantic resonance, LDA topic modeling for thematic structure, and transformer-based emotion analysis for affective tonality—to model their symbolic architectures across a bilingual corpus of 49 Tang peony poems and 45 Renaissance rose sonnets after quality control and alignment constraints. Results reveal a shared preoccupation with beauty and transience as a universal axis of meaning. Yet a significant negative correlation (r = −0.128, p < 0.05) between semantic and thematic alignment suggests a pattern of structural complementarity rather than direct similarity: Tang and Renaissance poetics converge in emotional and aesthetic concerns while diverging in symbolic framing. The study thus proposes both a substantive insight into cross-civilizational poetics and a transferable methodological paradigm—one that complements close reading with empirical scalability and structural clarity in the comparative study of the world literature.
- Open Access
- Article
The Measure of Resonance: A Computational Cross-Cultural Analysis of Floral Poetics in Tang and Renaissance Verse
- Tiange Zhou 1,*,†,
- Marco Bidin 2,†
Author Information
Received: 19 Sep 2025 | Revised: 20 Oct 2025 | Accepted: 06 Nov 2025 | Published: 12 Dec 2025
Abstract
Keywords
digital humanities | computational poetics | cross-cultural analysis | symbolic forms | tang poetry | renaissance sonnets | world-systems
References
- 1.
Abu-Lughod, J.L. Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D. 1250–1350; Oxford University Press: New York,
NY, USA, 1989. - 2.
Hofstede, G.; Hofstede, G.J.; Minkov, M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New
York, NY, USA, 2010. - 3.
Minkov, M.; Hofstede, G. Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension: New Evidence from the World Values Survey. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol.
2012, 43, 3–14. - 4.
Cassirer, E. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT,
USA, 1944. - 5.
Devlin, J.; Chang, M.-W.; Lee, K.; et al. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding.
In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics:
Human Language Technologies; Association for Computational Linguistics: Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2019; pp. 4171–4186. - 6.
Blei, D.M.; Ng, A.Y.; Jordan, M.I. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 3, 993–1022.
- 7.
Dobson, J.E. Critical Digital Humanities: The Search for a Methodology; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 2019.
- 8.
Moretti, F. Distant Reading; Verso Books: London, UK, 2013.
- 9.
Jockers, M.L. Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History; University of Illinois Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 2013.
- 10.
Piper, A. Think Small: On Literary Modeling. PMLA 2017, 132, 651–658.
- 11.
Mosteller, F.; Wallace, D.L. Inference in an Authorship Problem: A Comparative Study of Discrimination Methods Applied
to the Authorship of the Disputed Federalist Papers. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 58, 275–309. - 12.
Bender, T.K. Computation into Criticism: A Study of Jane Austen’s Novels and an Experiment in Method. J. Engl. Ger.
Philol. 1989, 88, 111–114. - 13.
Bamman, D.; Popat, S.; Shen, S. An Annotated Dataset of Literary Entities. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the
North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long
and Short Papers), Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2–7 June 2019; Association for Computational Linguistics: Minneapolis, MN,
USA, 2019; pp 2138–2144. - 14.
Mihalcea, R.; Nastase, V. Word Epoch Disambiguation: Finding How Words Change over Time. In Proceedings of the 50th
Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers); Association for Computational
Linguistics: Jeju Island, Republic of Korea, 2012; pp. 259–263. - 15.
Underwood, T. Distant Horizons: Digital Evidence and Literary Change; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2019.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Suite 4002 Level 4, 447 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
General Inquiries: info@sciltp.com