2509001205
  • Open Access
  • Article

Co-Benefits and Synergies between Food Security and Eight Positive Peace Pillars

  • Tong Zou 1,   
  • Ali Cheshmehzangi 2, 3, *

Received: 14 Apr 2025 | Revised: 15 Jun 2025 | Accepted: 01 Sep 2025 | Published: 04 Sep 2025

Abstract

Nowadays, food insecurity (FI) remains one of the most challenging issues due to the complexity of food systems and its structural and underlying causes including governance, economic and production issues, demographical and social issues, and climate/environment, aligning with the four dimensions of sustainable development (economic, social, environmental, and institutional). Regarding to this, when constructing any potential solutions, it is important to identify the fundamental needs, key actors, and major priorities. In speaking of peace, impacts of conflicts (CF) are major drivers of food insecurity, including agricultural damage, food system & production disruptions, crops and livestock plundering, and assets and income loss. Conversely, food insecurity can undermine peace and trigger conflicts with various factors fueled by rapid increase in food prices, limited accesses to food, food supply chain disruption, etc. To understand this nexus better, this study conducts a systematic bibliometric analysis of the literature on food security and the eight pillars of Positive Peace. We searched the Web of Science database, applying stringent inclusion criteria focused on articles detailing interactions between specific food security dimensions (availability, accessibility, utilizaiton, stability) and the eight pillars of Positive Peace (functional government, equitable resources, free information flow, neighborly relations, human capital, rights acceptance, low corruption, sound business environment.). From an initial pool of 123 records, 27 articles met the criteria for full analysis. Findings highlight strongest interactions: (1) Availability-Positive Peace/Conflict (e.g., GM crops); (2) Accessibility-Equitable Distribution of Resources (water/land access) & Food Accessibility/Food Insecurity-Positive Peace/Conflict (e.g., COVID lockdowns); (3) Availability-Governance/Equitable Distribution of Resources (e.g., food aid) & Food Insecurity-Governance (e.g., effective institutions). This analysis provides evidence-based pathways for designing integrated solutions that simultaneously strengthen food security and foster durable peace. 

References 

  • 1.
    UN. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed on 23 May 2024).
  • 2.
    Institute for Economics & Peace. Positive Peace Report 2020: Analysing the Factors That Sustain Peace; Institute for Economics & Peace: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2020.
  • 3.
    Amadei, B. Revisiting positive peace using systems tools. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 158, 120149.
  • 4.
    Besa, S.T. The Nexus between USAID-Funded Food Security Programs and Positive Peace: A Case of Ensure Program, Buhera. Unpublished Thesis (Bachelor’s Thesis), Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe, 2017.
  • 5.
    Bora, S.; Ceccacci, I.; Delgado, C.; et al. Food Security and Conflict; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
  • 6.
    Matemilola, S.; Alabi, H. A. Food security. In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 1–5.
  • 7.
    Moffat, T.; Mohammed, C.; Newbold, K.B. Cultural dimensions of food insecurity among immigrants and refugees. Hum. Organ. 2017, 76, 15–27.
  • 8.
    Food Security: Pillars, Determinants and Factors Affecting It—Public Health Notes. Available online: https://www.publichealthnotes.com/food-security-determinants-and-urbanization/ (accessed on 30 June 2022).
  • 9.
    Institute for Economics & Peace. Positive Peace Report 2022: Analysing the Factors That Build, Predict and Sustain Peace; Institute for Economics & Peace: Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2022.
  • 10.
    Galtung, J. Cultural violence. J. Peace Res. 1990, 27, 291–305.
  • 11.
    Ali, H.E.; Lin, E.S. Wars, Foodcost and Countervailing Policies: A Panel Data Approach. Food Policy 2010, 35, 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.foodpol.2010.05.004.
  • 12.
    Bellinger, N.; Kattelman, K.T. Domestic Terrorism in the Developing World: Role of Food Security. J. Int. Relat. Dev. 2021, 24, 306–332. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00191-y.
  • 13.
    Bowles, D.C.; Butler, C.D.; Morisetti, N. Climate Change, Conflict and Health. J. R. Soc. Med. 2015, 108, 390–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076815603234.
  • 14.
    Castro-Nunez, A. Responding to Climate Change in Tropical Countries Emerging from Armed Conflicts: Harnessing Climate Finance, Peacebuilding, and Sustainable Food. Forests 2018, 9, 621. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9100621.
  • 15.
    Fielding, D.; Shortland, A. “An Eye for an Eye, a Tooth for a Tooth”: Political Violence and Counter-Insurgency in Egypt. J. Peace Res. 2010, 47, 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343309360897.
  • 16.
    Greent, J.C.; Boakye, E.A.; Barnidge, E.K.; et al. Armed Conflict in Central America and Immigrant Food Insecurity in the United States. J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2018, 8, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.2991/j.jegh.2018.02.005.
  • 17.
    Jenicek, V.; Grofova, S. Least Developed Countries—Characteristics. Agric. Econ. 2014, 60, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.17221/67/2013-AGRICECON.
  • 18.
    Jenicek, V.; Grofova, S. The Least Developed Countries—The Case of the Congo DR. Agric. Econ. 2015, 61, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.17221/49/2014-AGRICECON.
  • 19.
    Jones, B.T.; Mattiacci, E.; Braumoeller, B.F. Food Scarcity and State Vulnerability: Unpacking the Link between Climate Variability and Violent Unrest. J. Peace Res. 2017, 54, 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316684662.
  • 20.
    Jun, T. Temperature, Maize Yield, and Civil Conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa. Clim. Chang. 2017, 142, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1941-0.
  • 21.
    Justino, P.; Hagerman, K.; Jackson, J.; et al. Pathways to Achieving Food Security, Sustainable Peace and Gender Equality: Evidence from Three FAO Interventions. Dev. Policy Rev. 2020, 38, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12413.
  • 22.
    Keen, D.; Lee, V. Conflict, Trade and the Medium-Term Future of Food Security in Sudan. Disasters 2007, 31, S9–S24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.00346.x.
  • 23.
    Koren, O.; Bagozzi, B.E. Living off the Land: The Connection between Cropland, Food Security, and Violence against Civilians. J. Peace Res. 2017, 54, 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316684543.
  • 24.
    Lander, B.; Richards, R.V. Addressing Hunger and Starvation in Situations of Armed Conflict—Laying the Foundations for Peace. J. Int. Crim. Justice 2019, 17, 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqz055.
  • 25.
    Macrae, J.; Zwi, A.B. Food as an instrument of war in contemporary african famines—A review of the evidence. Disasters 1992, 16, 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.1992.tb00412.x.
  • 26.
    Mary, S.; Mishra, A.K. Humanitarian Food Aid and Civil Conflict. World Dev. 2020, 126, 104713. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2019.104713.
  • 27.
    Matus, J. The Future of Food Security in the Three Areas of Sudan. Disasters 2007, 31, S91–S103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2007.00351.x.
  • 28.
    Messer, E.; Cohen, M.J. Breaking the Links Between Conflict and Hunger Redux. World Med. Health Policy 2015, 7, 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.147.
  • 29.
    Nunn, N.; Qian, N. US Food Aid and Civil Conflict. Am. Econ. Rev. 2014, 104, 1630–1666. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.6.1630.
  • 30.
    Pingali, P.; Alinovi, L.; Sutton, J. Food Security in Complex Emergencies: Enhancing Food System Resilience. Disasters 2005, 29, S5–S24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0361-3666.2005.00282.x.
  • 31.
    Pomeroy, R.; Parks, J.; Pollnac, R.; et al. Fish Wars: Conflict and Collaboration in Fisheries Management in Southeast Asia. Mar. Policy 2007, 31, 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.03.012.
  • 32.
    Sassi, M. Coping Strategies of Food Insecure Households in Conflict Areas: The Case of South Sudan. sustainability 2021, 13, 8615. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158615.
  • 33.
    Schellens, M.K.; Belyazid, S. Revisiting the Contested Role of Natural Resources in Violent Conflict Risk through Machine Learning. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166574.
  • 34.
    Sithole, P.M. Nhimbe Practice in Zimbabwe Revisited: Not Only a Method of Socio-Economic Assistance but Also a Communal Mechanism for Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding. Afr. J. Confl. Resolut. 2020, 20, 115–134.
  • 35.
    Szenkovics, D.; Tonk, M.; Balog, A. Can Genetically Modified (GM) Crops Act as Possible Alternatives to Mitigate World Political Conflicts for Food? Food Energy Secur. 2021, 10, e268. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.268.
  • 36.
    Vallet, M.E.; Frankenberger, T.R.; Presnall, C.; et al. Where Are the Development Actors in Protracted Crises? Refugee Livelihood and Food Security Outcomes in South Sudan Demonstrate the Potential for Fragile Settings. World Dev. Perspect. 2021, 24, 100366. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WDP.2021.100366.
  • 37.
    Van Vliet, N.; Schulte-Herbruggen, B.; Muhindo, J.; et al. Trends in Bushmeat Trade in a Postconflict Forest Town: Implications for Food Security. Ecol. Soc. 2017, 22, 35. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09780-220435.
  • 38.
    Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. VOSviewer Manual. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.6.pdf (accessed on 21 June 2022).
  • 39.
    Sharifi, A. Co-Benefits and Synergies between Urban Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Measures: A Literature Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 750, 141642.
Share this article:
How to Cite
Zou, T.; Cheshmehzangi, A. Co-Benefits and Synergies between Food Security and Eight Positive Peace Pillars. Urban and Building Science 2025, 1 (1), 6. https://doi.org/10.53941/ubs.2025.100006.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.