• Open Access
  • Article

Diatoms: A Nutritional Potential for Sustainable Applications: From Biochemical Composition to Bioeconomy and Climate Resilience

  • Simoni Singhal 1,   
  • Hirak Parikh 2,   
  • Archana Tiwari 3 and 
  • Jyoti Verma 1, *

Received: 20 July 2026 | Revised: 04 September 2026 | Accepted: 23 October 2026 | Published: 28 October 2026

Abstract

Diatoms are ecologically important microalgae with considerable potential for sustainable applications owing to their diverse biochemical composition and environmental adaptability. This review examines their nutritional composition, including proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, pigments and other bioactive compounds, and evaluates their applications in aquaculture, nutraceuticals, functional foods and emerging biotechnological systems. Particular attention is given to species-specific variation in biochemical composition and the influence of cultivation conditions, nutrient availability, light, temperature and growth phase on biomass productivity and metabolite accumulation. Protein abundance is considered separately from nutritional quality, while fatty acid profiles are discussed in relation to the quantitative evidence available for individual taxa. The review further explores diatom-based biorefinery approaches and their contribution to a circular bioeconomy through the recovery of multiple value-added products from biomass. Climate resilience is addressed by examining how environmental change and cultivation stressors may alter diatom growth, biochemical composition and the reliability of biomass production. Despite their potential, broader application remains constrained by strain-dependent variability, incomplete nutritional characterization, analytical inconsistencies, downstream processing costs and challenges in scaling cultivation systems. Standardization of analytical methods, systematic strain selection, improved cultivation strategies and scalable production systems are therefore essential for reliable product characterization and commercial translation. Integrating nutritional evidence with environmental sustainability and techno-economic considerations may strengthen the role of diatoms in sustainable food and feed systems and the emerging bioeconomy.

References 

  • 1.

    Armbrust, E.V. The life of diatoms in the world's oceans. Nature 2009, 459, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08057.

  • 2.

    Falkowski, P.G.; Barber, R.T.; Smetacek, V. Biogeochemical Controls and Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Production. Science 1998, 281, 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5374.200.

  • 3.

    Field, C.B.; Behrenfeld, M.J.; Randerson, J.T.; et al. Primary Production of the Biosphere: Integrating Terrestrial and Oceanic Components. Science 1998, 281, 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5374.237.

  • 4.

    Pulz, O.; Gross, W. Valuable products from biotechnology of microalgae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 65, 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1647-x.

  • 5.

    Borowitzka, M.A. Biology of Microalgae. In Microalgae in Health and Disease Prevention; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 23–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-811405-6.00003-7.

  • 6.

    Roy, S.S.; Pal, R. Microalgae in Aquaculture: A Review with Special References to Nutritional Value and Fish Dietetics. Proc. Zool. Soc. 2015, 68, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-013-0089-9.

  • 7.

    Guedes, A.C.; Amaro, H.M.; Malcata, F.X. Microalgae as sources of high added‐value compounds—A brief review of recent work. Biotechnol. Prog. 2011, 27, 597–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.575.

  • 8.

    Nieri, P.; Carpi, S.; Esposito, R.; et al. Bioactive Molecules from Marine Diatoms and Their Value for the Nutraceutical Industry. Nutrients 2023, 15, 464. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15020464.

  • 9.

    Patil, V.; Källqvist, T.; Olsen, E.; et al. Fatty acid composition of 12 microalgae for possible use in aquaculture feed. Aquac. Int. 2007, 15, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-006-9060-3.

  • 10.

    Remize, M.; Brunel, Y.; Silva, J.L.; et al. Microalgae n-3 PUFAs Production and Use in Food and Feed Industries. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020113.

  • 11.

    Calder, P.C. Marine omega-3 fatty acids and inflammatory processes: Effects, mechanisms and clinical relevance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2015, 1851, 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.08.010.

  • 12.

    Steinrücken, P.; Mjøs, S.A.; Prestegard, S.K.; et al. Enhancing EPA Content in an Arctic Diatom: A Factorial Design Study to Evaluate Interactive Effects of Growth Factors. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00491.

  • 13.

    Safi, C.; Zebib, B.; Merah, O.; et al. Morphology, composition, production, processing and applications of Chlorella vulgaris: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 35, 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.007.

  • 14.

    Lu, X.; Yang, S.; He, Y.; et al. Nutritional Value and Productivity Potential of the Marine Microalgae Nitzschia laevis, Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Isochrysis galbana. Mar. Drugs 2024, 22, 386. https://doi.org/10.3390/md22090386.

  • 15.

    Chen, J.; Yang, J.; Du, H.; et al. Laminarin, a Major Polysaccharide in Stramenopiles. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 576. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19100576.

  • 16.

    Mishra, A.; Medhi, K.; Malaviya, P.; et al. Omics approaches for microalgal applications: Prospects and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 291, 121890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121890.

  • 17.

    Banskota, A.H.; Hui, J.P.M.; Blatt-Janmaat, K.; et al. Biochemical Characterization of Lipids, Proteins, and Polysaccharides from the Marine Diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum Cultivated in Pilot-Scale Photobioreactors. Molecules 2026, 31, 1017. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31061017.

  • 18.

    Rebolloso-Fuentes, M.M.; Navarro-Pérez, A.; Ramos-Miras, J.J.; et al. Biomass nutrient profiles of the microalga Phaeodactylum tricornutum. J. Food Biochem. 2001, 25, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.2001.tb00724.x.

  • 19.

    Levitan, O.; Dinamarca, J.; Zelzion, E.; et al. Remodeling of intermediate metabolism in the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum under nitrogen stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 412–417. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419818112.

  • 20.

    Courchesne, N.M.D.; Parisien, A.; Wang, B.; et al. Enhancement of lipid production using biochemical, genetic and transcription factor engineering approaches. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 141, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.02.018.

  • 21.

    Brown, M.R.; Jeffrey, S.W.; Volkman, J.K.; et al. Nutritional properties of microalgae for mariculture. Aquaculture 1997, 151, 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0044-8486(96)01501-3.

  • 22.

    Wen, Z.Y.; Chen, F. Heterotrophic production of eicosapentaenoic acid by microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2003, 21, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-9750(03)00051-x.

  • 23.

    Hemaiswarya, S.; Raja, R.; Ravi Kumar, R.; et al. Microalgae: A sustainable feed source for aquaculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 1737–1746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0632-z.

  • 24.

    Whyte, J.N.C. Biochemical composition and energy content of six species of phytoplankton used in mariculture of bivalves. Aquaculture 1987, 60, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(87)90290-0.

  • 25.

    Allen, A.E.; Dupont, C.L.; Oborník, M.; et al. Evolution and metabolic significance of the urea cycle in photosynthetic diatoms. Nature 2011, 473, 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10074.

  • 26.

    Onn, S.M.; Koh, G.J.; Yap, W.H.; et al. Recent advances in genetic engineering of microalgae: Bioengineering strategies, regulatory challenges and future perspectives. J. Appl. Phycol. 2025, 37, 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-024-03367-y.

  • 27.

    Tyagi, R.; Singh, P.K.; Saxena, A.; et al. Exploring the nutraceutical potential of high-altitude freshwater diatom Nitzschia sp. in batch culture. Syst. Microbiol. Biomanuf. 2024, 4, 1262–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43393-024-00299-z.

  • 28.

    Bastos, C.R.V.; Maia, I.B.; Pereira, H.; et al. Optimisation of Biomass Production and Nutritional Value of Two Marine Diatoms (Bacillariophyceae), Skeletonema costatum and Chaetoceros calcitrans. Biology 2022, 11, 594. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11040594.

  • 29.

    Hernández-Sandoval, F.; Del Ángel-Rodríguez, J.; Núñez-Vázquez, E.; et al. Effects on Cell Growth, Lipid and Biochemical Composition of Thalassiosira weissflogii (Bacillariophyceae) Cultured under Two Nitrogen Sources. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 961. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12030961.

  • 30.

    Brown, M.R.; Dunstan, G.A.; Norwood, S.J.; et al. Effects of harvest stage and light on the biochemical composition of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana. J. Phycol. 1996, 32, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1996.00064.x.

  • 31.

    Vásquez Suárez, A.; Guevara, M.; González, M.; et al. Crecimiento y composición bioquímica de Thalassiosira pseudonana (Thalassiosirales: Thalassiosiraceae) bajo cultivo semi-continuo en diferentes medios y niveles de irradiancias. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2013, 61, 1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v61i3.11776.

  • 32.

    Richmond, A.; Hu, Q. Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Applied Phycology and Biotechnology, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118567166.

  • 33.

    Affan, A.; Karawita, R.; Jeon, Y.J.; et al. Growth characteristics and antioxidant properties of the benthic diatom Navicula incerta (Bacillariophyceae) from Jeju Island, Korea. J. Phycol. 2007, 43, 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00367.x.

  • 34.

    Kang, K.H.; Qian, Z.J.; Ryu, B.; et al. Characterization of growth and protein contents from microalgae Navicula incerta with the investigation of antioxidant activity of enzymatic hydrolysates. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2011, 20, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-011-0025-6.

  • 35.

    Coombs, J.; Darley, W.M.; Holm-Hansen, O.; et al. Studies on the Biochemistry and Fine Structure of Silica Shell Formation in Diatoms. Chemical Composition of Navicula pelliculosa during Silicon-Starvation Synchrony. Plant Physiol. 1967, 42, 1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.42.11.1601.

  • 36.

    Pahl, S.L.; Lewis, D.M.; Chen, F.; et al. Growth dynamics and the proximate biochemical composition and fatty acid profile of the heterotrophically grown diatom Cyclotella cryptica. J. Appl. Phycol. 2010, 22, 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-009-9436-7.

  • 37.

    Guillard, R.R.L.; Ryther, J.H. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Can. J. Microbiol. 1962, 8, 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1139/m62-029.

  • 38.

    Tiwari, A.; Saini, G.K.; Parikh, H.; et al. Diatom-Derived Biochemicals: An In-Depth Analysis of Polysaccharides, Extraction Methodologies, and Diverse Applications. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2026, 198, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-025-05414-x.

  • 39.

    Singh, P.K.; Bhattacharjya, R.; Lakshmi, N.J.; et al. Evaluation of the antioxidative response of diatoms grown on emerging steroidal contaminants. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11336-0.

  • 40.

    Imamoglu, E. Artificial Intelligence and/or Machine Learning Algorithms in Microalgae Bioprocesses. Bioengineering 2024, 11, 1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11111143.

  • 41.

    Verma, J.; Mishra, M.; Rai, J.; et al. First Record of the Centric Diatom Pleurosira laevis (Ehrenberg) Compère, 1982 from the Ganga River at Prayagraj, India: Implications of Mass Gathering Events. PhytoTalks 2026, 3, 903–914. https://doi.org/10.21276/pt.2026.v3.i2.9.

  • 42.

    Yaakob, M.A.; Mohamed, R.M.S.R.; Al-Gheethi, A.; et al. Influence of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on Microalgal Growth, Biomass, Lipid, and Fatty Acid Production: An Overview. Cells 2021, 10, 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10020393.

  • 43.

    Armin, G.; Inomura, K. Modeling the elemental stoichiometry and silicon accumulation in diatoms. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2022, 3, 100164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2022.100164.

  • 44.

    Shang, X.; Li, X.; Sun, J. Transcriptomic insights into cell-cycle arrest and metabolic adaptation of Skeletonema dohrnii under silicon starvation. Algal Res. 2026, 93, 104452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2025.104452.

  • 45.

    Lapointe, A.; Kocademir, M.; Bergman, P.; et al. Characterization of polyphosphate dynamics in the widespread freshwater diatom Achnanthidium minutissimum under varying phosphorus supplies. J. Phycol. 2024, 60, 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpy.13423.

  • 46.

    Lovio-Fragoso, J.P.; de Jesús-Campos, D.; López-Elías, J.A.; et al. Biochemical and Molecular Aspects of Phosphorus Limitation in Diatoms and Their Relationship with Biomolecule Accumulation. Biology 2021, 10, 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology10070565.

  • 47.

    Gu, W.; Kavanagh, J.M.; McClure, D.D. A scalable model for EPA and fatty acid production by Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1011570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1011570.

  • 48.

    Calderini, M.L.; Pääkkönen, S.; Salmi, P.; et al. Temperature, phosphorus and species composition will all influence phytoplankton production and content of polyunsaturated fatty acids. J. Plankton Res. 2023, 45, 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbad026.

  • 49.

    Truong, T.Q.; Park, Y.J.; Koo, S.Y.; et al. Interdependence of fucoxanthin biosynthesis and fucoxanthin-chlorophyll a/c binding proteins in Phaeodactylum tricornutum under different light intensities. J. Appl. Phycol. 2023, 35, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-022-02856-2.

  • 50.

    Ebbing, T.; Kopp, L.; Frick, K.; et al. Exploring Phaeodactylum tricornutum for Nutraceuticals: Cultivation Techniques and Neurotoxin Risk Assessment. Mar. Drugs 2025, 23, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23020058.

  • 51.

    Bhattacharjya, R.; Marella, T.K.; Kumar, M.; et al. Diatom‐assisted aquaculture: Paving the way towards sustainable economy. Rev. Aquac. 2024, 16, 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12848.

  • 52.

    Martin‐Jézéquel, V.; Hildebrand, M.; Brzezinski, M.A. Silicon metabolism in diatoms: Implications for growth. J. Phycol. 2000, 36, 821–840. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.2000.00019.x.

  • 53.

    Spilling, K.; Seppälä, J.; Schwenk, D.; et al. Variation in the fatty acid profiles of two cold water diatoms grown under different temperature, light, and nutrient regimes. J. Appl. Phycol. 2021, 33, 1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-021-02380-9.

  • 54.

    Round, F.E.; Crawford, R.M.; Mann, D.G. Diatoms: Biology and Morphology of the Genera; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990.

  • 55.

    Pandey, L.K.; Bergey, E.A.; Lyu, J.; et al. The use of diatoms in ecotoxicology and bioassessment: Insights, advances and challenges. Water Res. 2017, 118, 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.01.062.

  • 56.

    Sarker, N.K.; Kaparaju, P. Microalgal Bioeconomy: A Green Economy Approach Towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability 2024, 16, 11218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162411218.

  • 57.

    Boyd, P.W.; Claustre, H.; Levy, M.; et al. Multi-faceted particle pumps drive carbon sequestration in the ocean. Nature 2019, 568, 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1098-2.

  • 58.

    Tréguer, P.; Bowler, C.; Moriceau, B.; et al. Influence of diatom diversity on the ocean biological carbon pump. Nat. Geosci. 2018, 11, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-017-0028-x.

  • 59.

    Syed, T.; Krujatz, F.; Ihadjadene, Y.; et al. A review on machine learning approaches for microalgae cultivation systems. Comput. Biol. Med. 2024, 172, 108248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108248.

  • 60.

    Ding, W.; Ye, Y.; Yu, L.; et al. Physiochemical and molecular responses of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum to illumination transitions. Biotechnol. Biofuels Bioprod. 2023, 16, 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-023-02352-w.

  • 61.

    Butler, T.; Kapoore, R.V.; Vaidyanathan, S. Phaeodactylum tricornutum: A Diatom Cell Factory. Trends Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 606–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.12.023.

  • 62.

    Smol, J.P.; Stoermer, E.F. The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010.

  • 63.

    Singhal, S.; Srivastava, P.; Verma, J. Diatom-Based Multifunctional Biogenic Nanostructures in Water Purification: From Mechanistic Understanding to Innovative Applications. PhytoTalks 2025, 2, 496–522. https://doi.org/10.21276/pt.2025.v2.i3.8.

  • 64.

    Jeffryes, C.; Agathos, S.N.; Rorrer, G. Biogenic nanomaterials from photosynthetic microorganisms. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2014.10.005.

  • 65.

    Uduman, N.; Qi, Y.; Danquah, M.K.; et al. Dewatering of microalgal cultures: A major bottleneck to algae-based fuels. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2010, 2, 012701. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3294480.

  • 66.

    Khan, M.I.; Shin, J.H.; Kim, J.D. The promising future of microalgae: Current status, challenges, and optimization of a sustainable and renewable industry for biofuels, feed, and other products. Microb. Cell Fact. 2018, 17, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-0879-x.

  • 67.

    Quinn, J.C.; Davis, R. The potentials and challenges of algae based biofuels: A review of the techno-economic, life cycle, and resource assessment modeling. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 184, 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.075.

  • 68.

    Rawat, I.; Ranjith Kumar, R.; Mutanda, T.; et al. Dual role of microalgae: Phycoremediation of domestic wastewater and biomass production for sustainable biofuels production. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 3411–3424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.025.

  • 69.

    Hixson, S.M.; Arts, M.T. Climate warming is predicted to reduce omega‐3, long‐chain, polyunsaturated fatty acid production in phytoplankton. Glob. Change Biol. 2016, 22, 2744–2755. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13295.

  • 70.

    Patwardhan, S.B.; Pandit, S.; Ghosh, D.; et al. A concise review on the cultivation of microalgal biofilms for biofuel feedstock production. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024, 14, 7219–7236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02783-9. Correction in Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2024, 14, 7237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02881-8.

  • 71.

    Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Huang, Y.; et al. Temperature-controlled microalgal biofilm detachment and harvesting assisted by ultrasonic from 3D porous substrates grafted with thermosensitive gels. Environ. Res. 2024, 256, 119245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.119245.

  • 72.

    Wang, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, T. Biofilm based attached cultivation technology for microalgal biorefineries—A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 244, 1245–1253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.136.

  • 73.

    Jebali, A.; Sanchez, M.R.; Hanschen, E.R.; et al. Trait drift in microalgae and applications for strain improvement. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 60, 108034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108034.

  • 74.

    Slade, R.; Bauen, A. Micro-algae cultivation for biofuels: Cost, energy balance, environmental impacts and future prospects. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 53, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.019.

  • 75.

    Hu, Q.; Sommerfeld, M.; Jarvis, E.; et al. Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: Perspectives and advances. Plant J. 2008, 54, 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03492.x.

  • 76.

    Jain, R.; Dhali, S.; Malik, A.; et al. Sustainable biorefining: Hydrothermal liquefaction of diatom biomass for bio-crude and nano-biosilica recovery. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 187, 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2024.05.025.

  • 77.

    Falciatore, A.; Bowler, C. Revealing the molecular secrets of marine diatoms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091701.153921.

  • 78.

    Wali, Z.; Parikh, H.; Tyagi, R.; et al. Diatoms for sustainable aquaculture: Nutritional potential, cultivation strategies, and circular bioeconomy applications. Phycol. J. 2026, 2, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44377-026-00014-0.

  • 79.

    Al Saoud, H.A.; Sprynskyy, M.; Pashaei, R.; et al. Diatom Biosilica: Source, Physical-Chemical Characterization, Modification, and Application. J. Sep. Sci. 2022, 45, 3362–3376. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202100981.

  • 80.

    Adarchenko, I.; Kurbatova, A.; Porotnikova, N.; et al. Advanced Technologies for Bioeconomy: The Case of Microalgae Production. Foresight STI Gov. 2024, 18, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2024.2.69.83.

  • 81.

    Singhal, S.; Srivastava, A.; Srivastava, P.; et al. Deciphering urban freshwater health through integrated assessment of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage and physicochemical dynamics in artificial ponds of Prayagraj, India. Discov. Ecol. 2026, 2, 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-025-00020-x.

  • 82.

    Parikh, H.; Dave, G.; Verma, J.; et al. Artificial intelligence in diatom science: Methods, progress and applications. Aquat. Sci. 2026, 88, 117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-026-01349-5.

  • 83.

    Srivastava, A.; Singhal, S.; Yadav, A.; et al. Harnessing RStudio Package for Ecological Insights: Monitoring Diatoms with DiaThor. Comput. Ecol. Softw. 2026, 16, 1–34.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Singhal, S.; Parikh, H.; Tiwari, A.; Verma, J. Diatoms: A Nutritional Potential for Sustainable Applications: From Biochemical Composition to Bioeconomy and Climate Resilience. Algae and Environment 2026, 2 (1), 3. https://doi.org/10.53941/algaeenviron.2026.100003.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
Article Metrics
53
Article Views
0
Citations