ALE/
Articles/
2609005194
  • Open Access
  • Article

Phytoplankton Dynamics in Contrasting Coastal Embayments of South Australia: Implications for Bivalve Aquaculture

  • Shaun Henderson 1,   
  • Maziidah A. Rahman 1,   
  • Paul D. van Ruth 2,3,   
  • Xiaoxu Li 2,   
  • Yan Li 1,*

Received: 05 Jul 2026 | Revised: 06 Sep 2026 | Accepted: 16 Sep 2026 | Published: 29 Sep 2026

Abstract

This study investigated seasonal phytoplankton communities in two contrasting oyster-growing embayments, Coffin Bay and Franklin Harbour (Eyre Peninsula, South Australia), to assess how environmental conditions influence food availability across the full phytoplankton size spectrum. In both embayments, nutrient availability was a major driver of phytoplankton dynamics during summer, while seasonal changes in physical conditions coincided with a shift in the phytoplankton community from oligotrophic to mesotrophic assemblages. In Coffin Bay, the community was dominated by picoplankton (<2 µm), accounting for more than 50% of total biomass for over 8 months of the year. In contrast, Franklin Harbour was dominated by larger phytoplankton (>20 µm). Productivity in outer Coffin Bay was primarily supported by inflowing shelf waters, which sustained peak picoeukaryote biomass (44.27 µg C L−1), and was further enhanced by a late-summer upwelling event in the eastern Great Australian Bight. However, productivity in Franklin Harbour was primarily generated internally, with the highest picoeukaryote biomass (68.15 µg C L−1) in the southern end. This study provides new insights into phytoplankton dynamics across the full spectrum in two contrasting embayments. The findings demonstrate how variations across the phytoplankton size spectrum can inform assessments of coastal productivity and carrying capacity, with implications for the sustainable management of bivalve aquaculture in temperate coastal regions.

References 

  • 1.

    FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2016; p. 204. https://doi.org/10.18356/8e4e0ebf-en.

  • 2.

    Cresson, P.; Ruitton, S.; Harmelin-Vivien, M. Feeding Strategies of Co-Occurring Suspension Feeders in an Oligotrophic Environment. Food Webs 2016, 6, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fooweb.2015.12.002.

  • 3.

    Cloern, J.E. Phytoplankton Bloom Dynamics in Coastal Ecosystems: A Review with Some General Lessons from Sustained Investigation of San Francisco Bay, California. Rev. Geophys. 1996, 34, 127–168. https://doi.org/10.1029/96rg00986.

  • 4.

    McKindsey, C.W.; Thetmeyer, H.; Landry, T.; et al. Review of Recent Carrying Capacity Models for Bivalve Culture and Recommendations for Research and Management. Aquaculture 2006, 261, 451–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.06.044.

  • 5.

    Byron, C.; Link, J.; Costa-Pierce, B.; et al. Modeling Ecological Carrying Capacity of Shellfish Aquaculture in Highly Flushed Temperate Lagoons. Aquaculture 2011, 314, 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.02.019.

  • 6.

    Carver, C.E.A.; Mallet, A.L. Estimating the Carrying Capacity of a Coastal Inlet for Mussel Culture. Aquaculture 1990, 88, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(90)90317-g.

  • 7.

    Graeme, J.I.; Barbara, J.H.; Alex, H.R. An Overview of Factors Affecting the Carrying Capacity of Coastal Embayments for Mussel Culture; Ministry for the Environment, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2000; p. 38.

  • 8.

    Kreeger, D.; Langdon, C.; Newell, R. Utilization of Refractory Cellulosic Carbon Derived from Spartina alterniflora by the Ribbed Mussel Geukensia demissa. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1988, 42, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps042171.

  • 9.

    Crosby, M.P.; Gale, L.D. A Review and Evaluation of Bivalve Condition Index Methodologies with a Suggested Standard Method. J. Shellfish Res. 1990, 9, 233–237.

  • 10.

    Li, Y.; Qin, J.G.; Li, X.; et al. Monthly Variation of Condition Index, Energy Reserves and Antibacterial Activity in Pacific Oysters, Crassostrea gigas, in Stansbury (South Australia). Aquaculture 2009, 286, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.09.004.

  • 11.

    Qin, J.; Ma, Z.; Li, Y. Review and Outlook for Research and Development in Aquatic Life and Ecosystems. Aquat. Life Ecosyst. 2025, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.53941/ale.2025.100002.

  • 12.

    Shumway, S.E.; Cucci, T.L.; Newell, R.C.; et al. Particle Selection, Ingestion, and Absorption in Filter-Feeding Bivalves. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1985, 91, 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(85)90222-9.

  • 13.

    Ward, J.E.; Sanford, L.P.; Newell, R.I.E.; et al. A New Explanation of Particle Capture in Suspension-Feeding Bivalve Molluscs. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1998, 43, 741–752. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1998.43.5.0741.

  • 14.

    Webb, J.L.; Vandenbor, J.; Pirie, B.; et al. Effects of Temperature, Diet, and Bivalve Size on the Ingestion of Sea Lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) Larvae by Various Filter-Feeding Shellfish. Aquaculture 2013, 406–407, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.04.010.

  • 15.

    Ward, J.E.; Shumway, S.E. Separating the Grain from the Chaff: Particle Selection in Suspension- and Deposit-Feeding Bivalves. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2004, 300, 83–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2004.03.002.

  • 16.

    Ezgeta-Balić, D.; Najdek, M.; Peharda, M.; et al. Seasonal Fatty Acid Profile Analysis to Trace Origin of Food Sources of Four Commercially Important Bivalves. Aquaculture 2012, 334–337, 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.12.041.

  • 17.

    Dupuy, C.; Vaquer, A.; Lam-Höai, T.; et al. Feeding Rate of the Oyster Crassostrea gigas in a Natural Planktonic Community of the Mediterranean Thau Lagoon. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2000, 205, 171–184. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps205171.

  • 18.

    Kasim, M.R.; Mukai, H. Contribution of Benthic and Epiphytic Diatoms to Clam and Oyster Production in the Akkeshi-Ko Estuary. J. Oceanogr. 2006, 62, 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-006-0051-9.

  • 19.

    Langdon, C.; Newell, R. Utilization of Detritus and Bacteria as Food Sources by Two Bivalve Suspension-Feeders, the Oyster Crassostrea virginica and the Mussel Geukensia demissa. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1989, 58, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps058299.

  • 20.

    Rubio, A.Z. The Dynamic and Distribution of Food Supplies for the Sydney Rock Oyster in Southern NSW Estuaries. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10779/uow.27844404 (accessed on 7 May 2026).

  • 21.

    Rahman, M.A.; Henderson, S.; Miller-Ezzy, P.A.; et al. Analysis of the Seasonal Impact of Three Marine Bivalves on Seston Particles in Water Column. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2020, 522, 151251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2019.151251.

  • 22.

    Fantasia, R.L.; Bricelj, V.M.; Ren, L. Phytoplankton Community Structure Based on Photopigment Markers in a Mid-Atlantic U.S. Coastal Lagoon: Significance for Hard-Clam Production. J. Coast. Res. 2017, 78, 106–126. https://doi.org/10.2112/si78-010.1.

  • 23.

    Pulina, S.; Satta, C.T.; Padedda, B.M.; et al. Picophytoplankton Seasonal Dynamics and Interactions with Environmental Variables in Three Mediterranean Coastal Lagoons. Estuaries Coasts 2017, 40, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0154-5.

  • 24.

    Purcell-Meyerink, D.; Fortune, J.; Butler, E.C.V. Productivity Dominated by Picoplankton in a Macro-Tidal Tropical Estuary, Darwin Harbour. N. Z. J. Bot. 2017, 55, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825x.2016.1231125.

  • 25.

    Balzano, S.; Ellis, A.V.; Le Lan, C.; et al. Seasonal Changes in Phytoplankton on the North-Eastern Shelf of Kangaroo Island (South Australia) in 2012 and 2013. Oceanologia 2015, 57, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceano.2015.04.003.

  • 26.

    Messer, L.; Doubell, M.; Jeffries, T.; et al. Prokaryotic and Diazotrophic Population Dynamics within a Large Oligotrophic Inverse Estuary. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 74, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01726.

  • 27.

    Partensky, F.; Blanchot, J.; Vaulot, D. Differential Distribution and Ecology of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus in Oceanic Waters: A Review. In Marine Cyanobacteria; Musée Océanographique: Monaco, 1999; pp. 457–476.

  • 28.

    Patten, N.L.; van Ruth, P.D.; Rodriguez, A.R. Spatial Variability in Picophytoplankton, Bacteria and Viruses in Waters of the Great Australian Bight (Southern Australia). Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2018, 157–158, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2018.04.009.

  • 29.

    Gasol, J.M.; del Giorgio, P.A.; Duarte, C.M. Biomass Distribution in Marine Planktonic Communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1997, 42, 1353–1363. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1997.42.6.1353.

  • 30.

    Fukuda, R.; Ogawa, H.; Nagata, T.; et al. Direct Determination of Carbon and Nitrogen Contents of Natural Bacterial Assemblages in Marine Environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3352–3358. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.9.3352-3358.1998.

  • 31.

    Turley, C.; Bianchi, M.; Christaki, U.; et al. Relationship between Primary Producers and Bacteria in an Oligotrophic Sea—The Mediterranean and Biogeochemical Implications. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2000, 193, 11–18. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps193011.

  • 32.

    Unrein, F.; Gasol, J.M.; Not, F.; et al. Mixotrophic Haptophytes Are Key Bacterial Grazers in Oligotrophic Coastal Waters. ISME J. 2014, 8, 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.132.

  • 33.

    Saxby, S.A. A Review of Food Availability, Sea Water Characteristics and Bivalve Growth Performance at Coastal Culture Sites in Temperate and Warm Temperate Regions of the World. Available online: https://library.dpird.wa.gov.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1159&context=fr_rr (accessed on 6 May 2026).

  • 34.

    Middleton, J.F.; Bye, J.A.T. A Review of the Shelf-Slope Circulation along Australia’s Southern Shelves: Cape Leeuwin to Portland. Prog. Oceanogr. 2007, 75, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2007.07.001.

  • 35.

    Doubell, M.J.; Spencer, D.; van Ruth, P.D.; et al. Observations of Vertical Turbulent Nitrate Flux during Summer in the Great Australian Bight. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2018, 157–158, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2018.08.007.

  • 36.

    van Ruth, P.D.; Patten, N.L. Environmental Monitoring for Improved Understanding of Oyster Performance; South Australian Research and Development Institute: West Beach, SA, Australia, 2018.

  • 37.

    Kämpf, J.; Doubell, M.; Griffin, D.; et al. Evidence of a Large Seasonal Coastal Upwelling System along the Southern Shelf of Australia. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2004, 31, L019221. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003gl019221.

  • 38.

    Kämpf, J.; Payne, N.; Malthouse, P. Marine Connectivity in a Large Inverse Estuary. J. Coast. Res. 2010, 26, 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.2112/jcoastres-d-10-00043.1.

  • 39.

    Middleton, J.; Doubell, M.; James, C.; et al. PIRSA Initiative II: Carrying Capacity of Spencer Gulf: Hydrodynamic and Biogeochemical Measurement Modelling and Performance Monitoring: Final Report for the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation; South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences): West Beach, SA, Australia, 2013.

  • 40.

    Leterme, S.C.; Jendyk, J.G.; Ellis, A.V.; et al. Annual Phytoplankton Dynamics in the Gulf Saint Vincent, South Australia, in 2011. Oceanologia 2014, 56, 757–778. https://doi.org/10.5697/oc.56-4.757.

  • 41.

    Kämpf, J.; Ellis, H. Hydrodynamics and Flushing of Coffin Bay, South Australia: A Small Tidal Inverse Estuary of Interconnected Bays. J. Coast. Res. 2015, 31, 447–456. https://doi.org/10.2112/jcoastres-d-14-00046.1.

  • 42.

    Tanner, J.; Bailleul, F.; Bryars, S.; et al. Potential Social, Economic and Ecological Indicators for Integrated Ecosystem Assessment of Spencer Gulf. Available online: https://goyderinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/goyder_trs_19-32_spencer_gulf_indicators_ecosystem_assessment.pdf (accessed on 5 April 2026).

  • 43.

    van Dongen-Vogels, V.; Seymour, J.R.; Middleton, J.F.; et al. Influence of Local Physical Events on Picophytoplankton Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in South Australian Continental Shelf Waters. J. Plankton Res. 2011, 33, 1825–1841. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbr077.

  • 44.

    van Dongen-Vogels, V.; Seymour, J.R.; Middleton, J.F.; et al. Shifts in Picophytoplankton Community Structure Influenced by Changing Upwelling Conditions. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 109, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.05.026.

  • 45.

    van Ruth, P.D.; Patten, N.L.; Doubell, M.J.; et al. Seasonal- and Event-Scale Variations in Upwelling, Enrichment and Primary Productivity in the Eastern Great Australian Bight. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2018, 157–158, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2018.09.008.

  • 46.

    Strutton, P.G.; Bye, J.A.T.; Mitchell, J.G. Determining Coastal Inlet Flushing Times: A Practical Expression for Use in Aquaculture and Pollution Management. Aquac. Res. 1996, 27, 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.1996.tb01279.x.

  • 47.

    Jayaswal, Z. A Study of the Dynamics of Franklin Harbour, South Australia. Bachelor Thesis, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia, 1997; p. 34.

  • 48.

    South Australian Shellfish Quality Assurance Program (SASQAP). Available online: https://pir.sa.gov.au/fishing-and-aquaculture/seafood-quality-and-safety/shellfish-sasqap/_nocache (accessed on 6 May 2025).

  • 49.

    Kämpf, J. South Australia’s Large Inverse Estuaries: On the Road to Ruin. In Estuaries of the World; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7019-5_9.

  • 50.

    Van Heukelem, L.; Thomas, C.S. Computer-Assisted High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Method Development with Applications to the Isolation and Analysis of Phytoplankton Pigments. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 910, 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4347(00)00603-4.

  • 51.

    Thompson, P.A.; Bonham, P.; Waite, A.M.; et al. Contrasting Oceanographic Conditions and Phytoplankton Communities on the East and West Coasts of Australia. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2011, 58, 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.003.

  • 52.

    Brussaard, C.P.D. Optimization of Procedures for Counting Viruses by Flow Cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 1506–1513. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.70.3.1506-1513.2004.

  • 53.

    Patten, N.L.; Wyatt, A.S.J.; Lowe, R.J.; et al. Uptake of Picophytoplankton, Bacterioplankton and Virioplankton by a Fringing Coral Reef Community (Ningaloo Reef, Australia). Coral Reefs 2011, 30, 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0777-8.

  • 54.

    Worden, A.Z.; Nolan, J.K.; Palenik, B. Assessing the Dynamics and Ecology of Marine Picophytoplankton: The Importance of the Eukaryotic Component. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2004, 49, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.1.0168.

  • 55.

    Suttle, C.A. Viruses in the Sea. Nature 2005, 437, 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04160.

  • 56.

    Kämpf, J.; Kavi, A. On the “Hidden” Phytoplankton Blooms on Australia’s Southern Shelves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2017, 44, 1466–1473. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl072096.

  • 57.

    Ning, X.; Cloern, J.E.; Cole, B.E. Spatial and Temporal Variability of Picocyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. in San Francisco Bay. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2000, 45, 695–702. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2000.45.3.0695.

  • 58.

    Bec, B.; Husseini-Ratrema, J.; Collos, Y.; et al. Phytoplankton Seasonal Dynamics in a Mediterranean Coastal Lagoon: Emphasis on the Picoeukaryote Community. J. Plankton Res. 2005, 27, 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbi061.

  • 59.

    Estrada, M.; Henriksen, P.; Gasol, J.M.; et al. Diversity of Planktonic Photoautotrophic Microorganisms along a Salinity Gradient as Depicted by Microscopy, Flow Cytometry, Pigment Analysis and DNA-Based Methods. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2004, 49, 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.04.002.

  • 60.

    Schapira, M.; Buscot, M.J.; Pollet, T.; et al. Distribution of Picophytoplankton Communities from Brackish to Hypersaline Waters in a South Australian Coastal Lagoon. Saline Syst. 2010, 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1448-6-2.

  • 61.

    Bunse, C.; Pinhassi, J. Marine Bacterioplankton Seasonal Succession Dynamics. Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.013.

  • 62.

    Polat, S.; Akiz, A.; Olgunoglu, M. Daily Variations of Coastal Phytoplankton Assemblages in Summer Conditions of the Northeastern Mediterranean (Bay of İskenderun). Pak. J. Bot. 2005, 37, 715–724.

  • 63.

    Pearman, J.K.; Ellis, J.; Irigoien, X.; et al. Microbial Planktonic Communities in the Red Sea: High Levels of Spatial and Temporal Variability Shaped by Nutrient Availability and Turbulence. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 6611. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06928-z.

  • 64.

    Geldenhuys, C.; Cotiyane, P.; Rajkaran, A. Understanding the Creek Dynamics and Environmental Characteristics That Determine the Distribution of Mangrove and Salt Marsh Communities at Nahoon Estuary. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 107, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.04.013.

  • 65.

    Lee, T.C.; Fong, F.L.; Ho, K.C.; et al. The Mechanism of Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning Toxin Production in Prorocentrum spp.: Physiological and Molecular Perspectives. Toxins 2016, 8, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins8100272.

  • 66.

    Jiang, T.; Chen, F.; Yu, Z.; et al. Size-Dependent Depletion and Community Disturbance of Phytoplankton under Intensive Oyster Mariculture Based on HPLC Pigment Analysis in Daya Bay, South China Sea. Environ. Pollut. 2016, 219, 804–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.058.

  • 67.

    Rosa, M.; Ward, J.E.; Shumway, S.E. Selective Capture and Ingestion of Particles by Suspension-Feeding Bivalve Molluscs: A Review. J. Shellfish Res. 2018, 37, 727–746. https://doi.org/10.2983/035.037.0405.

  • 68.

    Cranford, P.; Kamermans, P.; Krause, G.; et al. An Ecosystem-Based Approach and Management Framework for the Integrated Evaluation of Bivalve Aquaculture Impacts. Aquacult. Environ. Interact. 2012, 2, 193–213. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00040.

Share this article:
Download PDF
DOI
10.53941/ale.2026.100013
Issue
Volume 2, Issue 3
How to Cite
Henderson, S.; Rahman, M. A.; van Ruth, P. D.; Li, X.; Li, Y. Phytoplankton Dynamics in Contrasting Coastal Embayments of South Australia: Implications for Bivalve Aquaculture. Aquatic Life and Ecosystems 2026, 2 (3), 13. https://doi.org/10.53941/ale.2026.100013.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
Article Metrics
63
Article Views
0
Citations