Accelerating Decarbonization in Public Institutions: A Scalable Model for LED Lighting Retrofits

Wei Gao; Raymond Chong Ong Tang; Hwai Chyuan Ong

doi:10.53941/gefr.2026.100008

Abstract

Public and educational institutions represent a significant share of global electricity consumption and play a critical role in achieving national decarbonization targets. This study addresses this challenge by conducting a comprehensive lighting retrofit assessment for a university engineering building in Malaysia, with the objective of evaluating the energy, economic and environmental impact of replacing conventional fluorescent lighting with light-emitting diode (LED) technology. A methodology was adopted, comprising a detailed on-site lighting audit, development of LED replacement scenarios, energy consumption modelling based on operating profiles, life-cycle cost (LCC) and payback period analyses, emission reduction assessment using national grid emission factors and sensitivity analysis to test economic robustness under varying assumptions. A total of 1831 luminaires were audited, establishing a baseline annual lighting consumption of 158,410 kWh. Retrofit simulations indicate that replacing existing fluorescent and CFL lamps with LED alternatives reduces daily lighting energy use from 434 kWh to 240 kWh, corresponding to annual energy savings of 70,810 kWh or 44.7%. Financial analysis demonstrates strong economic viability, with payback periods of 2.21 years (20W_LED), 2.14 years (10W_LED) and 1.90 years (9W_LED). Over a 10-year assessment horizon, cumulative cost savings exceed RN225000, driven by reduced electricity consumption and lower maintenance requirements resulting from LED lifespans of up to 50,000 h. Environmentally, the retrofit yields cumulative emission reductions of approximately 130,285 kg CO₂, 408 kg SO₂, 275 kg NO_x and 106 kg CO over 10 years, supporting national objectives to reduce greenhouse gas intensity and improve urban air quality. Overall, the study provides a structured, scalable and evidence-based framework for LED lighting retrofits in educational buildings, demonstrating that lighting upgrades can deliver rapid economic returns while contributing meaningfully to long term decarbonization goals

References

1.
Yousaf Raza, M.; Hasan, M.M.; Chen, Y. Role of economic growth, urbanization and energy consumption on climate change in Bangladesh. Energy Strategy Rev. 2023, 47, 101088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2023.101088.
2.
Dodoo, A.; Gustavsson, L.; Le Truong, N. Primary energy benefits of cost-effective energy renovation of a district heated multi-family building under different energy supply systems. Energy 2018, 143, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.113.
3.
Agency, I.E. Targeting 100% LED Lighting Sales by 2025; IEA: Paris, France, 2022.
4.
Pompei, L.; Blaso, L.; Fumagalli, S.; et al. The impact of key parameters on the energy requirements for artificial lighting in Italian buildings based on standard EN 15193-1:2017. Energy Build. 2022, 263, 112025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112025.
5.
Mahlia, T.M.I.; Razak, H.A.; Nursahida, M.A. Life cycle cost analysis and payback period of lighting retrofit at the University of Malaya. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1125–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.10.014.
6.
Department of Standards Malaysia. Malaysian Standards Online (MySOL). Available online: https://mysol.jsm.gov.my/new#publish (accessed on 1 July 2024).
7.
Kim, H.-J.; Yang, i.-H. An Economic analysis of the Luminaire-Level control of LED lighting in small office. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 2022, 21, 2155–2171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2097244.
8.
De Bakker, C.; Van de Voort, T.; Rosemann, A. The Energy Saving Potential of Occupancy-Based Lighting Control Strategies in Open-Plan Offices: The Influence of Occupancy Patterns. Energies 2018, 11, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11010002.
9.
Von Neida, B.; Maniccia, D.; Tweed, A. An Analysis of the Energy and Cost Savings Potential of Occupancy Sensors for Commercial Lighting Systems. J. Illum. Eng. Soc. 2001, 30, 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00994480.2001.10748357.
10.
Williams, A.; Atkinson, B.; Garbesi, K.; et al. A Meta-Analysis of Energy Savings from Lighting Controls in Commercial Buildings; Energy Analysis Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley,CA, USA, 2011.
11.
Roisin, B.; Bodart, M.; Deneyer, A.; et al. Lighting energy savings in offices using different control systems and their real consumption. Energy Build. 2008, 40, 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.04.006.
12.
Fernandes, L.L.; Lee, E.S.; DiBartolomeo, D.L.; et al. Monitored lighting energy savings from dimmable lighting controls in The New York Times Headquarters Building. Energy Build. 2014, 68, 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.10.009.
13.
Xu, L.; Pan, Y.; Yao, Y.; et al. Lighting energy efficiency in offices under different control strategies. Energy Build. 2017, 138, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.006.
14.
Antoniou, F.; Mageiropoulos, T. Ranking the Barriers to the Energy Upgrading of Buildings Using the Best-Worst Method. Sustainability 2024, 16, 10143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162210143.
15.
Karakosta, C.; Vryzidis, I. Cost-Effective Energy Retrofit Pathways for Buildings: A Case Study in Greece. Energies 2025, 18, 4014. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154014.
16.
Olajiga, O.; Ani, E.; Sikhakane, Z.; et al. A comprehensive review of energy-efficient lighting technologies and trends. Eng. Sci. Technol. J. 2024, 5, 1097–1111. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i3.973.
17.
Ganandran, G.S.; Mahlia, T.M.; Ong, H.C.; et al. Cost-benefit analysis and emission reduction of energy efficient lighting at the Universiti Tenaga Nasional. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 745894. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/745894.
18.
Trifunovic, J.; Mikulovic, J.; Djurisic, Z.; et al. Reductions in electricity consumption and power demand in case of the mass use of compact fluorescent lamps. Energy 2009, 34, 1355–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.05.014.
19.
Radakovic, Z.; Topalis, F.V.; Kostic, M. The voltage distortion in low-voltage networks caused by compact fluorescent lamps with electronic gear. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2005, 73, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2004.06.008.
20.
Zamarreño-Suárez, M.; Alcala-Gonzalez, D.; Alfonso-Corcuera, D.; et al. Measuring the Lighting Quality in Academic Institutions: The UPM Faculty of Aerospace Engineering (Spain). Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8345. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238345.
21.
Guevarra, D.; Fernandez, J.; Alfonso, M.; et al. Illumination Infrastructure of the Electrical Engineering Building in Dhvsu Main Campus toward Institutional Policy on Lighting Management. Asian J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2025, 09, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.38177/ajast.2025.9213.
22.
Hegde, A.L.; Tyne, I.A.; Adi, M.N. Visual and non-visual classroom lighting in a large university–A case study. Build. Environ. 2025, 285, 113531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113531.
23.
Katabaro, J.M.; Yan, Y. Effects of Lighting Quality on Working Efficiency of Workers in Office Building in Tanzania. J. Environ. Public Health 2019, 2019, 3476490. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3476490.
24.
Krames, M.R.; Shchekin, O.B.; Mueller-Mach, R.; et al. Status and Future of High-Power Light-Emitting Diodes for Solid-State Lighting. J. Disp. Technol. 2007, 3, 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1109/JDT.2007.895339.
25.
Uddin, S.; Shareef, H.; Mohamed, A.; et al. LEDs as energy efficient lighting systems: A detail review. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development, Cyberjaya, Malaysia, 19–20 December 2011; pp. 468–472.
26.
Albu, H.; Beu, D.; Rus, T.; et al. Life cycle assessment of LED luminaire and impact on lighting installation—A case study. Alex. Eng. J. 2023, 80, 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.068.
27.
Chen, N.; Chung, H.S.-H. A driving technology for retrofit LED lamp for fluorescent lighting fixtures with electronic ballasts. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2011, 26, 588–601.
28.
Vahl, F.P.; Campos, L.M.S.; Casarotto Filho, N. Sustainability constraints in techno-economic analysis of general lighting retrofits. Energy Build. 2013, 67, 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.039.
29.
Ryckaert, W.R.; Smet, K.A.G.; Roelandts, I.A.A.; et al. Linear LED tubes versus fluorescent lamps: An evaluation. Energy Build. 2012, 49, 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.02.042.
30.
Dunn, P.J.; Oyegoke, A.S.; Ajayi, S.; et al. Challenges and benefits of LED retrofit projects: A case of SALIX financed secondary school in the UK. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2021, 21, 1883–1900. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-08-2021-0424.
31.
Luo, S.; Yuan, P.F.; Zhao, M.; et al. Developing a framework for sustainable retrofit of residential buildings based on ensemble learning algorithm: A case study of Shanghai. Build. Environ. 2025, 282, 113311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113311.
32.
Seraj, H.; Abbaspour, A.; Bahadori-Jahromi, A. Towards a hybrid retrofit planning framework: A data-driven tool for energy retrofit in residential buildings. Energy Built Environ. 2025, in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2025.05.013.
33.
Papangelopoulou, M.D.; Alexakis, K.; Askounis, D. Assessment Methods for Building Energy Retrofits with Emphasis on Financial Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review. Buildings 2025, 15, 2562. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15142562.
34.
U.S. Department of Energy. Solid-State Lighting Technology Fact Sheet: LED Luminaire Efficacy; U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
35.
International Energy Agency. Lighting efficacy by technology in the Net Zero Scenario, 2010–2030; IEA: Paris, France, 2023.
36.
Sharbaf, S.A.; Schneider-Marin, P. Cost-benefit analysis of sustainable upgrades in existing buildings: A critical review. Energy Build. 2025, 328, 115142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115142.
37.
Belany, P.; Hrabovsky, P.; Kolkova, Z. Combination of lighting retrofit and life cycle cost analysis for energy efficiency improvement in buildings. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 2470–2483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.04.044.
38.
Kneifel, J.; Webb, D.; Laboratory, P.M. Life Cycle Costing Manual for the Federal Energy Management Program; U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2022.
39.
Harbick, K. Comparison of Life-cycle Cost Analysis and Simple Payback Methods for Evaluating Cost-effectiveness of Greenhouse Supplemental Lighting Systems. HortTechnology 2025, 35, 363–365. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05607-25.
40.
Bertolini, M.; Duttilo, P.; Lisi, F. Accounting carbon emissions from electricity generation: A review and comparison of emission factor-based methods. Appl. Energy 2025, 392, 125992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125992.
41.
Wen, Y.-J.; Kehmeier, E.; Kisch, T.; et al. Energy Savings from Networked Lighting Control (NLC) Systems with and without LLLC; Energy Solutions: Oakland, CA, USA, 2020.
42.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. Trends in Commercial Whole-Building Sensors and Controls; U.S. Energy Information Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
43.
United States Environmenal Protection Agency. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/greenhouse-gas-emissions-typical-passenger-vehicle?utm_source=chatgpt.com (accessed on 20 July 2024)
44.
Kwan, S.C.; Zakaria, S.b.; Ibrahim, M.F.; et al. Health impacts from TRAPs and carbon emissions in the projected electric vehicle growth and energy generation mix scenarios in Malaysia. Environ. Res. 2023, 216, 114524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114524.
45.
Tajudin, M.; Khan, M.F.; Mahiyuddin, W.R.W.; et al. Risk of concentrations of major air pollutants on the prevalence of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases in urbanized area of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 171, 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.057.

Scilight Press

Author Information

Abstract

Keywords

References

About Scilight

Journals

Publishing Policies

Contact Us