2609005231
  • Open Access
  • Review

Galactic Dark-Matter Halo Profiles

  • Sergei V. Bolokhov

Received: 27 Aug 2026 | Revised: 22 Sep 2026 | Accepted: 24 Sep 2026 | Published: 28 Sep 2026

Abstract

Spherically averaged density profiles are indispensable compressed descriptions of galactic dark-matter halos, but profiles with superficially similar rotation curves need not have the same physical status. The Navarro–Frenk–White (NFW), Moore, and Einasto forms summarize collisionless cosmological simulations; Burkert and pseudo-isothermal laws are economical cored fits to galaxy kinematics; the generalized NFW/Zhao and Dehnen families interpolate between asymptotic slopes; and Hernquist and Jaffe models were devised primarily for stellar systems but provide useful finite-mass analytic potentials. Perfect-fluid dark matter (PFDM), scalar-field halos, and wave-dark-matter solitons instead introduce assumptions about the stressenergy or microscopic dynamics, and therefore cannot be interpreted as merely another choice of fitting function. Here we derive the principal density, mass, circular-speed, and slope relations; compare central and outer asymptotics; explain which fitted parameters carry physical information; and discuss the observational degeneracies that limit cusp–core inference. In a short final part, we address central black holes and emphasize that a galactic density law plus a Newtonian rotation curve does not uniquely determine a relativistic spacetime: the pressure components, equation of state, near-horizon response, and boundary conditions must also satisfy the Einstein equations. Our purpose is astrophysical model selection rather than an exhaustive review of black-hole phenomenology.

References 

  • 1.

    Rubin, V.C.; Ford, W.K., Jr. Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions. Astrophys. J. 1970, 159, 379. https://doi.org/10.1086/150317.

  • 2.

    Rubin, V.C.; Ford, W.K., Jr.; Thonnard, N. Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R = 4 kpc) to UGC 2885 (R = 122 kpc). Astrophys. J. 1980, 238, 471–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/158003.

  • 3.

    Sofue, Y.; Rubin, V. Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2001, 39, 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.137.

  • 4.

    Bertone, G.; Hooper, D. History of Dark Matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018, 90, 045002. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002.

  • 5.

    de Blok, W.J.G. The Core-Cusp Problem. Adv. Astron. 2010, 2010, 789293. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/789293.

  • 6.

    Oh, S.H.; Hunter, D.A.; Brinks, E.; et al. High-Resolution Mass Models of Dwarf Galaxies from LITTLE THINGS. Astron. J. 2015, 149, 180. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/180.

  • 7.

    Lelli, F.; McGaugh, S.S.; Schombert, J.M. SPARC: Mass Models for 175 Disk Galaxies with Spitzer Photometry and Accurate Rotation Curves. Astron. J. 2016, 152, 157. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/157.

  • 8.

    Navarro, J.F.; Frenk, C.S.; White, S.D.M. The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos. Astrophys. J. 1996, 462, 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/177173.

  • 9.

    Navarro, J.F.; Frenk, C.S.; White, S.D.M. A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering. Astrophys. J. 1997, 490, 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1086/304888.

  • 10.

    Navarro, J.F.; Hayashi, E.; Power, C. The Inner Structure of ΛCDM Haloes. III. Universality and Asymptotic Slopes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2004, 349, 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07586.x.

  • 11.

    Blumenthal, G.R.; Faber, S.M.; Flores, R.; et al. Contraction of Dark Matter Galactic Halos Due to Baryonic Infall. Astrophys. J. 1986, 301, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/163867.

  • 12.

    Gnedin, O.Y.; Kravtsov, A.V.; Klypin, A.A.; et al. Response of Dark Matter Halos to Condensation of Baryons: Cosmological Simulations and Improved Adiabatic Contraction Model. Astrophys. J. 2004, 616, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/424914.

  • 13.

    Pontzen, A.; Governato, F. How Supernova Feedback Turns Dark Matter Cusps into Cores. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 421, 3464–3471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20571.x.

  • 14.

    Spergel, D.N.; Steinhardt, P.J. Observational Evidence for Self-Interacting Cold Dark Matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 3760–3763. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.84.3760.

  • 15.

    Rocha, M.; Peter, A.H.G.; Bullock, J.S.; et al. Cosmological simulations with self-interacting dark matter—I. Constantdensity cores and substructure. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 430, 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts514.

  • 16.

    Schive, H.Y.; Chiueh, T.; Broadhurst, T. Cosmic Structure as the Quantum Interference of a Coherent Dark Wave. Nat. Phys. 2014, 10, 496–499. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2996.

  • 17.

    Hui, L.; Ostriker, J.P.; Tremaine, S.; et al. Ultralight Scalars as Cosmological Dark Matter. Phys. Rev. D 2017, 95, 043541. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.95.043541.

  • 18.

    Cardoso, V.; Destounis, K.; Duque, F.; et al. Black Holes in Galaxies: Environmental Impact on Gravitational-Wave Generation and Propagation. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, L061501. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.105.1061501.

  • 19.

    Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. Solutions of the Einstein Equations for a Black Hole Surrounded by a Galactic Halo. Astrophys. J. 2022, 933, 166. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac76bc.

  • 20.

    Sadeghian, L.; Ferrer, F.; Will, C.M. Dark-Matter Distributions around Massive Black Holes: A General Relativistic Analysis. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 88, 063522. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.88.063522.

  • 21.

    Bolokhov, S.V. Revisiting Black Holes in Dark-Matter Halos: On Consistent Solutions to the Einstein Equations. Eur. Phys. J. C 2026, 86, 576. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15831-9.

  • 22.

    Ludlow, A.D.; Navarro, J.F.; Boylan-Kolchin, M.; et al. The Mass Profile and Accretion History of Cold Dark Matter Haloes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2013, 432, 1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt526.

  • 23.

    Dutton, A.A.; Maccio, A.V. Cold Dark Matter Haloes in the Planck Era: Evolution of Structural Parameters for Einasto and NFW Profiles. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 441, 3359–3374. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu742.

  • 24.

    Power, C.; Navarro, J.F.; Jenkins, A.; et al. The inner structure of ΛCDM haloes–I. A numerical convergence study. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2003, 338, 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.05925.x.

  • 25.

    Moore, B.; Quinn, T.; Governato, F.; et al. Cold Collapse and the Core Catastrophe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1999, 310, 1147–1152. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.03039.x.

  • 26.

    Navarro, J.F.; Ludlow, A.; Springel, V.; et al. The diversity and similarity of simulated cold dark matter haloes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010, 402, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15878.x.

  • 27.

    Einasto, J. On the Construction of a Composite Model for the Galaxy and on the Determination of the System of Galactic Parameters. Tr. Astrofiz. Instituta Alma-Ata 1965, 5, 87–100.

  • 28.

    Retana-Montenegro, E.; Van Hese, E.; Gentile, G.; et al. Analytical Properties of Einasto Dark Matter Haloes. Astron. Astrophys. 2012, 540, A70. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118543.

  • 29.

    Merritt, D.; Graham, A.W.; Moore, B.; et al. Empirical Models for Dark Matter Halos. I. Nonparametric Construction of Density Profiles and Comparison with Parametric Models. Astron. J. 2006, 132, 2685–2700. https://doi.org/10.1086/508988.

  • 30.

    Gao, L.; Navarro, J.F.; Cole, S.; et al. The redshift dependence of the structure of massive Λ cold dark matter haloes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2008, 387, 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13277.x.

  • 31.

    Zhao, H. Analytical Models for Galactic Nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1996, 278, 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/278.2.488.

  • 32.

    Dehnen, W. A Family of Potential-Density Pairs for Spherical Galaxies and Bulges. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1993, 265, 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/265.1.250.

  • 33.

    Tremaine, S.; Richstone, D.O.; Byun, Y.I. A Family of Models for Spherical Stellar Systems. Astron. J. 1994, 107, 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1086/116883.

  • 34.

    Hernquist, L. An Analytical Model for Spherical Galaxies and Bulges. Astrophys. J. 1990, 356, 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1086/168845.

  • 35.

    Jaffe, W. A Simple Model for the Distribution of Light in Spherical Galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1983, 202, 995–999. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/202.4.995.

  • 36.

    Begeman, K.G.; Broeils, A.H.; Sanders, R.H. Extended Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies: Dark Haloes and Modified Dynamics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1991, 249, 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/249.3.523.

  • 37.

    Burkert, A. The Structure of Dark Matter Halos in Dwarf Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 1995, 447, L25–L28. https://doi.org/10.1086/309560.

  • 38.

    Salucci, P.; Burkert, A. Dark Matter Scaling Relations. Astrophys. J. 2000, 537, L9–L12. https://doi.org/10.1086/312747.

  • 39.

    Donato, F.; Gentile, G.; Salucci, P.; et al. A Constant Dark Matter Halo Surface Density in Galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009, 397, 1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15004.x.

  • 40.

    Rahaman, F.; Nandi, K.K.; Bhadra, A.; et al. Perfect Fluid Dark Matter. Phys. Lett. B 2010, 694, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010.09.038.

  • 41.

    Potapov, A.A.; Garipova, G.M.; Nandi, K.K. Revisiting Perfect Fluid Dark Matter: Observational Constraints from Our Galaxy. Phys. Lett. B 2016, 753, 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.057.

  • 42.

    Kuncewicz, J. Perfect Fluid Dark Matter: A Viability Test with Galaxy Rotation Curves. Eur. Phys. J. C 2025, 85, 979. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14705-w.

  • 43.

    Xu, Z.; Hou, X.; Wang, J. Kerr–anti-de Sitter/de Sitter black hole in perfect fluid dark matter background. Class. Quantum Gravity 2018, 35, 115003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aabcb6.

  • 44.

    Marsh, D.J.E. Axion Cosmology. Phys. Rep. 2016, 643, 1–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.005.

  • 45.

    Matos, T.; Guzman, F.S.; Nunez, D. Spherical Scalar Field Halo in Galaxies. Phys. Rev. D 2000, 62, 061301. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.62.061301.

  • 46.

    Robles, V.H.; Matos, T. Flat Central Density Profile and Constant Dark Matter Surface Density in Galaxies from Scalar Field Dark Matter. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 422, 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20603.x.

  • 47.

    Gentile, G.; Salucci, P.; Klein, U.; et al. The Cored Distribution of Dark Matter in Spiral Galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2004, 351, 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07836.x.

  • 48.

    Di Cintio, A.; Brook, C.B.; Dutton, A.A.; et al. A Mass-dependent Density Profile for Dark Matter Haloes Including the Influence of Galaxy Formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 441, 2986–2995. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu729.

  • 49.

    Walker, M.G.; Mateo, M.; Olszewski, E.W.; et al. A Universal Mass Profile for Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies? Astrophys. J. 2009, 704, 1274–1287. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/704/2/1274.

  • 50.

    Wolf, J.; Martinez, G.D.; Bullock, J.S.; et al. Accurate Masses for Dispersion-Supported Galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010, 406, 1220–1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16753.x.

  • 51.

    Kormendy, J.; Ho, L.C. Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 51, 511–653. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811.

  • 52.

    Gondolo, P.; Silk, J. Dark Matter Annihilation at the Galactic Center. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 1719–1722. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.83.1719.

  • 53.

    Merritt, D.; Milosavljevic, M.; Verde, L.; et al. Dark Matter Spikes and Annihilation Radiation from the Galactic Center. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 191301. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.88.191301.

  • 54.

    Xu, Z.; Hou, X.; Gong, X.; et al. Black Hole Space-Time in Dark Matter Halo. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 2018, 038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/038.

  • 55.

    Figueiredo, E.; Maselli, A.; Cardoso, V. Black Holes Surrounded by Generic Dark Matter Profiles: Appearance and Gravitational-Wave Emission. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 104033. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.107.104033.

  • 56.

    Shen, Z.; Wang, A.; Gong, Y.; et al. Analytical Models of Supermassive Black Holes in Galaxies Surrounded by Dark Matter Halos. Phys. Lett. B 2024, 855, 138797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138797.

  • 57.

    Konoplya, R.A. Black Holes in Galactic Centers: Quasinormal Ringing, Grey-Body Factors and Unruh Temperature. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 823, 136734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136734.

  • 58.

    Konoplya, R.A.; Zhidenko, A. Dark Matter Halo as a Source of Regular Black-Hole Geometries. Phys. Rev. D 2026, 113, 043011. https://doi.org/10.1103/7ptp-9j1t.

  • 59.

    Xavier, S.V.M.C.B.; Lima Junior, H.C.D.; Crispino, L.C.B. Shadows of Black Holes with Dark Matter Halo. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 064040. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.107.064040.

  • 60.

    Pezzella, L.; Destounis, K.; Maselli, A.; et al. Quasinormal Modes of Black Holes Embedded in Halos of Matter. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 111, 064026. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.064026.

  • 61.

    Chakraborty, S.; Compere, G.; Machet, L. Tidal Love numbers and quasinormal modes of the Schwarzschild-Hernquist black hole. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 112, 024015. https://doi.org/10.1103/4p2c-rwdh.

  • 62.

    Shen, Z.; Wang, A.; Yin, S. Inner Radius and Energy Conditions of Dark Matter Halos Surrounding Schwarzschild Black Holes. Phys. Lett. B 2025, 862, 139300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2025.139300.

  • 63.

    Fonseca, D.S.; Macedo, C.F.B.; Correa, M.M.; et al. Matter Environments around Black Holes: Geodesics, Light Rings, and Ultracompact Configurations. Phys. Rev. D 2026, 113, 124039. https://doi.org/10.1103/x95d-ry14.

  • 64.

    Kottler, F. Uber die physikalischen Grundlagen der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie. Ann. Phys. 1918, 361, 401–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19183611402.

  • 65.

    McVittie, G.C. The Mass-Particle in an Expanding Universe. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1933, 93, 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/93.5.325.

  • 66.

    Einstein, A.; Straus, E.G. The Influence of the Expansion of Space on the Gravitation Fields Surrounding the Individual Stars. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1945, 17, 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.17.120.

  • 67.

    Kiselev, V.V. Quintessence and Black Holes. Class. Quantum Gravity 2003, 20, 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/20/6/310.

  • 68.

    Visser, M. The Kiselev Black Hole Is Neither Perfect Fluid, nor Is It Quintessence. Class. Quantum Gravity 2020, 37, 045001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab60b8.

  • 69.

    Jusufi, K. Black Holes Surrounded by Einstein Clusters as Models of Dark Matter Fluid. Eur. Phys. J. C 2023, 83, 103. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11264-w.

  • 70.

    Ferrer, F.; Medeiros da Rosa, A.; Will, C.M. Dark Matter Spikes in the Vicinity of Kerr Black Holes. Phys. Rev. D 2017, 96, 083014. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.96.083014.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Bolokhov, S. V. Galactic Dark-Matter Halo Profiles. International Journal of Gravitation and Theoretical Physics 2026, 2 (3), 5. https://doi.org/10.53941/ijgtp.2026.100019.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
Article Metrics
14
Article Views
0
Citations