Metal additive manufacturing (MAM) has evolved into a strategic manufacturing route for producing, repairing, and remanufacturing high-value components; however, process selection and optimization remain challenging because manufacturing conditions, alloy behaviour, defect formation, microstructural evolution, and final properties are strongly interdependent. This review provides a critical and comparative assessment of four representative MAM technologies—Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF), Laser Metal Deposition (LMD), a laser-based variant of Directed Energy Deposition (DED), Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM), and Metal Binder Jetting (MBJ)—with particular emphasis on their interactions with titanium alloys, nickel-based superalloys, steels, and aluminium alloys. Rather than comparing these technologies solely in terms of productivity, cost, or geometrical capability, the review examines the physical and metallurgical mechanisms governing thermal history, solidification or densification, phase evolution, defect formation, microstructure, and resulting component performance. Particular attention is given to porosity, lack of fusion, cracking, residual stresses, distortion, anisotropy, and surface integrity, together with process-specific mitigation and post-processing strategies. Based on the relationships identified across the literature, an integrated Process–Material–Defect–Property (PMDP) framework is proposed to connect manufacturing conditions and alloy-specific responses with defect and microstructural evolution, resulting properties, and in-service performance. A complementary PMDP-based decision pathway is introduced to support performance-driven alloy–process selection, risk identification, thermal and parameter optimization, post-processing definition, and final performance validation. The analysis demonstrates that no universally optimal MAM technology exists; instead, process suitability depends on the compatibility between material behaviour, manufacturing physics, component requirements, and the targeted material state. Future progress is expected to rely on transferable process–material maps, additive manufacturing (AM)-specific alloy design, mechanism-informed in-situ monitoring, physics-informed data-driven modelling, and adaptive closed-loop control. The proposed framework therefore provides a structured pathway towards material- and performance-driven, state-controlled, and ultimately performance-certified metal additive manufacturing.
- Open Access
- Review
Metal Additive Manufacturing of Engineering Alloys: Process–Material Interactions, Defect Formation, Property Optimization and a Decision-Making Framework
- Joel Rocha 1,
- Naiara P. V. Sebbe 1,2,*,
- André F. V. Pedroso 1,2,
- Rúben Costa 2,3,
- Marta Barbosa 2 and
- Vitor Sousa 2,3
Author Information
Received: 18 August 2026 | Revised: 17 October 2026 | Accepted: 20 October 2026 | Published: 03 November 2026
Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Keywords
metal additive manufacturing | Process–Material–Defect–Property (PMDP) framework | L-PBF | LMD | WAAM | Metal Binder Jetting | defect mitigation | microstructure | process optimization | performance-driven manufacturing
References
- 1.
Kokare, S.; Oliveira, J.P.; Godina, R. Life Cycle Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Processes: A Review. J. Manuf. Syst. 2023, 68, 536–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.05.007.
- 2.
Ford, S.; Despeisse, M. Additive Manufacturing and Sustainability: An Exploratory Study of the Advantages and Challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 1573–1587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150.
- 3.
Ferreira, B.T.; de Campos, A.A.; Casati, R.; et al. Technological Capabilities and Sustainability Aspects of Metal Additive Manufacturing. Prog. Addit. Manuf. 2024, 9, 1737–1773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-023-00534-4.
- 4.
Cunningham, C.R.; Flynn, J.M.; Shokrani, A.; et al. Invited Review: Wire Plus Arc Additive Manufacturing of Metals. Mater. Des. 2018, 156, 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.020.
- 5.
Pinkerton, A.J. Lasers in Additive Manufacturing. Opt. Laser Technol. 2016, 78, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2015.09.025.
- 6.
Gibson, I.; Rosen, D.; Stucker, B.; et al. Binder Jetting. In Additive Manufacturing Technologies; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56127-7_8.
- 7.
Ziaee, M.; Crane, N.B. Binder Jetting: A Review of Process, Materials, and Methods. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 28, 781–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.031.
- 8.
Williams, S.W.; Martina, F.; Addison, A.C.; et al. Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 641–647. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743284715y.0000000073.
- 9.
Ding, D.; Pan, Z.; Cuiuri, D.; et al. Wire-Feed Additive Manufacturing of Metal Components: Technologies, Developments and Future Interests. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2015, 81, 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7077-3.
- 10.
Rahmani, R.; Bashiri, B.; Lopes, S.I.; et al. Sustainable Additive Manufacturing: An Overview on Life Cycle Impacts and Cost Efficiency of Laser Powder Bed Fusion. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2025, 9, 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9010018.
- 11.
Pazoki, D.; Dowling, D.; Ghadimi, P. A Control System Design for Selective Laser Melting Process: Toward Sustainable Additive Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 2025, 135, 881–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.12.082.
- 12.
Zapata, A.; Bernauer, C.; Celba, M.; et al. Studies on the Use of Laser Directed Energy Deposition for the Additive Manufacturing of Lightweight Parts. Lasers Manuf. Mater. Process. 2024, 11, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40516-023-00233-6.
- 13.
Saboori, A.; Aversa, A.; Marchese, G.; et al. Application of Directed Energy Deposition-Based Additive Manufacturing in Repair. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3316. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163316.
- 14.
Li, M.; Du, W.; Elwany, A.; et al. Metal Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing: A Literature Review. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2020, 142, 090801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047430.
- 15.
Lores, A.; Azurmendi, N.; Agote, I.; et al. A Review on Recent Developments in Binder Jetting Metal Additive Manufacturing: Materials and Process Characteristics. Powder Metall. 2019, 62, 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325899.2019.1669299.
- 16.
Mostafaei, A.; Elliott, A.M.; Barnes, J.E.; et al. Binder Jet 3D Printing—Process Parameters, Materials, Properties, Modeling, and Challenges. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021, 119, 100707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100707.
- 17.
Liu, S.; Shin, Y.C. Additive Manufacturing of Ti6Al4V Alloy: A Review. Mater. Des. 2019, 164, 107552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552.
- 18.
DebRoy, T.; Wei, H.L.; Zuback, J.S.; et al. Additive Manufacturing of Metallic Components—Process, Structure and Properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 92, 112–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001.
- 19.
Galib, G.; Silva, F.J.G.; Pedroso, A.F.V.; et al. A Comprehensive Review of Additive Manufacturing Technologies for Composite Materials. J. Mech. Eng. Manuf. 2025, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.53941/jmem.2025.100002.
- 20.
Bermingham, M.J.; Nicastro, L.; Kent, D.; et al. Optimising the Mechanical Properties of Ti-6Al-4V Components Produced by Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing with Post-Process Heat Treatments. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 753, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.158.
- 21.
Thompson, S.M.; Bian, L.; Shamsaei, N.; et al. An Overview of Direct Laser Deposition for Additive Manufacturing; Part I: Transport Phenomena, Modeling and Diagnostics. Addit. Manuf. 2015, 8, 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.07.001.
- 22.
Wolff, S.; Lin, S.; Faierson, E.J.; et al. A Framework to Link Localized Process Parameters to Final Part Properties in Additively Manufactured Metallic Parts. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2019, 25, 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.027.
- 23.
Flynn, J.M.; Shokrani, A.; Newman, S.T.; et al. Hybrid Additive and Subtractive Machine Tools—Research and Industrial Developments. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2016, 101, 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.11.007.
- 24.
Cristino, V.A.M.; Pragana, J.P.M.; Bragança, I.M.F.; et al. Hybrid Manufacturing of Stiffening Grooves in Additive Deposited Thin Parts. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2021, 5, 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp5040140.
- 25.
Mattera, G.; Caggiano, A.; Nele, L. Energy Efficiency Optimisation in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of Invar 36 Alloy via Intelligent Data-Driven Techniques. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2025, 12, 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-025-00705-4.
- 26.
Smythe, S.A.; Thomas, B.M.; Jackson, M. Recycling of Titanium Alloy Powders and Swarf through Continuous Extrusion (ConformTM) into Affordable Wire for Additive Manufacturing. Metals 2020, 10, 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10060843.
- 27.
Bekker, A.C.M.; Verlinden, J.C. Life Cycle Assessment of Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing Compared to Green Sand Casting and CNC Milling in Stainless Steel. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 177, 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.148.
- 28.
Colorado, H.A.; Velásquez, E.I.G.; Monteiro, S.N. Sustainability of Additive Manufacturing: The Circular Economy of Materials and Environmental Perspectives. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 8221–8234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.04.062.
- 29.
Peng, T.; Kellens, K.; Tang, R.; et al. Sustainability of Additive Manufacturing: An Overview on Its Energy Demand and Environmental Impact. Addit. Manuf. 2018, 21, 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.04.022.
- 30.
Van Sice, C.; Faludi, J. Comparing Environmental Impacts of Metal Additive Manufacturing to Conventional Manufacturing. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED21), Gothenburg, Sweden, 16–20 August 2021; pp. 671–680.
- 31.
Kokare, S.; Shen, J.; Fonseca, P.P.; et al. Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of a High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel Part: Environmental Impacts, Costs, and Mechanical Properties. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 134, 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-14144-z.
- 32.
Arrizubieta, J.I.; Murua, O.; Urresti, A.; et al. Energy and Mass Assessment of the Laser Directed Energy Deposition Process (DED-LB) for Reduced Environmental Impact. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2024, 17, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2024.2316125.
- 33.
Xu, X.; Meteyer, S.; Perry, N.; et al. Energy Consumption Model of Binder-Jetting Additive Manufacturing Processes. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2015, 53, 7005–7015. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.937013.
- 34.
Huang, T.; Sitt Thu, K.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Assessing the Impact of Top-up Powder Reuse Strategy on MS1 Powder Characteristics and L-PBF Printed Part Properties. Metals 2025, 15, 181. https://doi.org/10.3390/met15020181.
- 35.
Mechali, A.; Hlinka, J.; Kresta, M.; et al. Effect of Powder Recycling on the Surface and Selected Technological Properties of M300 Maraging Steel Produced via the SLM Method. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2024, 8, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8060267.
- 36.
Amicarelli, M.; Trovato, M.; Ferrara, D.; et al. Recycled Powders: An Eco-Design Approach for Laser-Powder Bed Fusion. Procedia CIRP 2025, 136, 677–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.08.116.
- 37.
Lanzutti, A.; Marin, E. The Challenges and Advances in Recycling/Re-Using Powder for Metal 3D Printing: A Comprehensive Review. Metals 2024, 14, 886. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14080886.
- 38.
Ahmad, A.; Xirouchakis, P.; Pearson, A.; et al. Development of Laser AM Process to Repair Damaged Super Duplex Stainless Steel Components. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17125438.
- 39.
Lu, F.; Ma, Q.; Liu, E.; et al. Advancements in Understanding the Microstructure and Properties of Additive Manufacturing Ti-6Al-4V Alloy: A Comprehensive Review. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1027, 180543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.180543.
- 40.
Spreafico, C.; Kokare, S.; Godina, R. Prospective Life Cycle Assessment of Future Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing Deposition Process for Large-Scale Steel Parts. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2026, 116, 108111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108111.
- 41.
Alves, A.S.F.; Kokare, S.; Oliveira, J.P.; et al. Environmental Comparison of Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing and CNC Milling on Steel Produced Parts. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2025, 253, 3025–3036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.027.
- 42.
Meteyer, S.; Xu, X.; Perry, N.; et al. Energy and Material Flow Analysis of Binder-Jetting Additive Manufacturing Processes. Procedia CIRP 2014, 15, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.030.
- 43.
Bidare, P.; Abdullah, R.; Jiménez, A.; et al. Powder Reusability in Metal Binder Jetting. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part E J. Process Mech. Eng. 2024, 238, 1554–1560. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089221147778.
- 44.
Ghezri, A.; Nelis, T.; Burger, J.; et al. Surface Finishing of Additive Manufactured Titanium Alloy by Plasma Electrolytic Polishing without Pretreatments. Materials 2025, 18, 4719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204719.
- 45.
Chicos, L.A.; Rodríguez, J.; Cañadas, I.; et al. Application of Concentrated Solar Energy in Postprocessing of Selective Laser Melted Ti6Al4V Alloy through Simultaneously Gas Nitriding and Heat Treatment. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 28193. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13552-9.
- 46.
Kishor, G.; Mugada, K.K.; Mahto, R.P.; et al. Assessment of Microstructure Development, Defect Formation, Innovations, and Challenges in Wire Arc Based Metal Additive Manufacturing. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 2025, 239, 1956–1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207241302262.
- 47.
Gautam, P.; Nag, A.; Hajnyš, J.; et al. Investigating the Impact of Post-Processing Techniques on Surface Morphology and Wettability of Inconel 718 Components Fabricated via Selective Laser Melting. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2025, 68, 102105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102105.
- 48.
Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Fang, T.; et al. Sustainable Additive Manufacturing of IN718 Blades: Powder Recycling Strategies for Reduced Carbon Footprint. Materials 2025, 18, 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18061344.
- 49.
Wilson, J.M.; Piya, C.; Shin, Y.C.; et al. Remanufacturing of Turbine Blades by Laser Direct Deposition with Its Energy and Environmental Impact Analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 80, 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.084.
- 50.
Rahman, K.M.; Miyanaji, H.; Williams, C.B. Effects of Binder Droplet Size and Powder Particle Size on Binder Jetting Part Properties. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2023, 29, 1715–1729. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-10-2022-0358.
- 51.
Mostafaei, A.; Elliott, A.M.; Barnes, J.E.; et al. Binder Jet 3D Printing—Process Parameters, Materials, Properties, Modeling, and Challenges. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021, 119, 100707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100707.
- 52.
Villa, R.; Liu, Y.; Siddique, Z. Review of Defects and Their Sources in as-Built Ti6Al4V Manufactured via Powder Bed Fusion. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 132, 4105–4134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13611-x.
- 53.
Shahwaz, M.; Nath, P.; Sen, I. Recent Advances in Additive Manufacturing Technologies for Ni-Based Inconel Superalloys—A Comprehensive Review. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1010, 177654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.177654.
- 54.
Yadav, P.; Rigo, O.; Arvieu, C.; et al. In Situ Monitoring Systems of the SLM Process: On the Need to Develop Machine Learning Models for Data Processing. Crystals 2020, 10, 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst10060524.
- 55.
Kisielewicz, A.; Thalavai Pandian, K.; Sthen, D.; et al. Hot-Wire Laser-Directed Energy Deposition: Process Characteristics and Benefits of Resistive Pre-Heating of the Feedstock Wire. Metals 2021, 11, 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11040634.
- 56.
Haribaskar, R.; Kumar, T.S. Defects in Metal Additive Manufacturing: Formation, Process Parameters, Postprocessing, Challenges, Economic Aspects, and Future Research Directions. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2024, 11, e1629–e1655. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2022.0344.
- 57.
Mani, M.; Feng, S.; Brandon, L.; et al. Measurement Science Needs for Real-Time Control of Additive Manufacturing Powder Bed Fusion Processes. In Additive Manufacturing Handbook; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 629–652.
- 58.
Dareh Baghi, A.; Nafisi, S.; Ebendorff-Heidepriem, H.; et al. Microstructural Development of Ti-6Al-4V Alloy via Powder Metallurgy and Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Metals 2022, 12, 1462. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12091462.
- 59.
Fayed, E.M.; Shahriari, D.; Saadati, M.; et al. Influence of Homogenization and Solution Treatments Time on the Microstructure and Hardness of Inconel 718 Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process. Materials 2020, 13, 2574. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13112574.
- 60.
Li, W.; Meng, L.; Niu, X.; et al. Microstructure, Mechanical Properties, and Deformation Behaviour of LPBF 316L via Post-Heat Treatment. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2024, 19, e2405623. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2024.2405623.
- 61.
Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, W.; et al. Towards Understanding Formation Mechanism of Cellular Structures in Laser Powder Bed Fused AlSi10Mg. Materials 2024, 17, 2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092121.
- 62.
Attar, H.; Bermingham, M.J.; Ehtemam-Haghighi, S.; et al. Evaluation of the Mechanical and Wear Properties of Titanium Produced by Three Different Additive Manufacturing Methods for Biomedical Application. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2019, 760, 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.06.024.
- 63.
Sebbe, N.P.V.; Silva, F.J.G.; Pinto, A.; et al. Exploring Post-Processing Operations of Ti Alloys Using Hybrid Manufacturing Systems. J. Mech. Eng. Manuf. 2026, 2, 9. https://doi.org/10.53941/jmem.2026.100009.
- 64.
Gradl, P.; Tinker, D.C.; Park, A.; et al. Robust Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Selection and Development for Aerospace Components. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2022, 31, 6013–6044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-06850-0.
- 65.
Li, Z.; Affolter, C. High-Cycle Fatigue Performance of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Ti-6Al-4V Alloy with Inherent Internal Defects: A Critical Literature Review. Metals 2024, 14, 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/met14090972.
- 66.
Ekengwu, I.; Jude, D.; Ilechukwu, A.; et al. Machine Learning for Process Optimization and Defect Detection in Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Critical Review of Algorithms, in-Situ Monitoring Strategies, and Quality Assurance Frameworks. J. Mech. Eng. Manuf. 2026, 2, 22. https://doi.org/10.53941/jmem.2026.100022.
- 67.
Sun, X.; Huang, L.; Xiao, B.G.; et al. X-Ray Computed Tomography in Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review on Prevention, Diagnostic, and Prediction of Failure. Thin-Walled Struct. 2025, 207, 112736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2024.112736.
- 68.
Adapa, V.S.K.; Kalidindi, S.R.; Saldana, C.J. Rapid Development of Metal Additive Manufacturing Using Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning and High-Throughput Material Testing. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2025, 55, 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-080423-121436.
- 69.
Hu, Z.; Yan, W. Data-Driven Modeling of Process-Structure-Property Relationships in Metal Additive Manufacturing. npj Adv. Manuf. 2024, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44334-024-00003-y.
- 70.
Ahsan, M.M.; Liu, Y.; Raman, S.; et al. Digital Twins in Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review. Internet Things 2025, 33, 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2025.101692.
- 71.
Sebbe, N.P.V.; Fernandes, F.; Sousa, V.F.C.; et al. Hybrid Manufacturing Processes Used in the Production of Complex Parts: A Comprehensive Review. Metals 2022, 12, 1874. https://doi.org/10.3390/met12111874.
- 72.
Lv, J.; Liang, Y.; Xu, X.; et al. Performance-Control-Orientated Hybrid Metal Additive Manufacturing Technologies: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Trends. Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 2024, 6, 032009. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ad3315.
- 73.
Pacheco, F.; Sebbe, N.P.V.; Silva, F.J.G.; et al. Challenges and Frontiers in the Circularity of Polymer Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review of Recycling Pathways and Material Degradation. J. Mech. Eng. Manuf. 2026, 2, 19. https://doi.org/10.53941/jmem.2026.100019.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
