Scilight Press

Author Information

Received: 25 Feb 2026 | Revised: 30 Mar 2026 | Accepted: 03 Apr 2026 | Published: 27 Apr 2026

Abstract

Keywords

Chinese Religiosity Behaviour Scale (CRBS) | Eastern countries’ worshipers | exploratory study | new multi-dimensional scale of religiosity | pro-environmental behaviour

References 

• 1.

  Niloy, A.C.; Sultana, J.; Alam, J.B.; et al. What Triggers You to Buy Green Products? Explaining through an Extended TPB Model. Asia-Pac. J. Manag. Res. Innov. 2023, 19, 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X231171195.

• 2.

  Haq, M.M. Green Hotel Research Evaluation: A Bibliometric Analysis. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2025, 13, 1234–1247. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/20485.

• 3.

  Ray, A.; Sachdeva, I.; Rana, N.P.; et al. Is the Information on Green Hotel Websites Aligned with the Drivers Affecting Customers’ Intention to Visit Green Hotels? A Mixed‑Methods Approach. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2024, 33, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2023.2235335.

• 4.

  Kumar, G.A. Framing a Model for Green Buying Behavior of Indian Consumers: From the Lenses of the Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 295, 126487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126487.

• 5.

  D’Souza, C.; Apaolaza, V.; Hartmann, P.; et al. Marketing for Sustainability: Travellers’ Intentions to Stay in Green Hotels. J. Vacat. Mark. 2020, 27, 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766720975063.

• 6.

  Liu, M.T.; Liu, Y.; Mo, Z. Moral Norm Is the Key: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) on Chinese Consumers’ Green Purchase Intention. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2020, 32, 1823–1841. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2019-0285.

• 7.

  Sheraz, N.; Saleem, S.; Sultan, S. The Consumer’s Pro Environmental Attitude and Its Impact on Green Purchase Behavior. J. Contemp. Issues Bus. Gov. 2021, 27, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.47750/cibg.2021.27.05.015.

• 8.

  Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Ye, M.-J.; et al. Green Hotels Visit Intention among Young Adults: Integrating the Familiarity, Novelty, Trust, Perceived Risk, and Theory of Planned Behaviour. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 1390. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03935-0.

• 9.

  Shehawy, Y.M. In Green Consumption, Why Consumers Do Not Walk Their Talk: A Cross Cultural Examination from Saudi Arabia and UK. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 75, 103499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103499.

• 10.

  Wang, L.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Merging the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Value-Belief-Norm Theory to Predict Green Hotel Visit Intention among Chinese University Students: The Case from Xuzhou, China. Acta Psychol. 2024, 251, 104627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104627.

• 11.

  Wang, L.; Wang, Z.-X.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Consumers’ Intention to Visit Green Hotels—A Goal‑Framing Theory Perspective. J. Sustain. Tour. 2022, 30, 1837–1857. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1977937.

• 12.

  Akehurst, G.; Afonso, C.; Gonçalves, H.M. Re-Examining Green Purchase Behaviour and the Green Consumer Profile: New Evidences. Manag. Decis. 2012, 50, 972–988. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211227726.

• 13.

  Albayrak, T.; Caber, M.; Moutinho, L.; et al. The Influence of Skepticism on Green Purchase Behavior. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2011, 2, 189–197.

• 14.

  Wang, L.; Wong, P.P.W.; Elangkovan, N.A. The Demographic Impact of Consumer Green Purchase Intention toward Green Hotel Selection in China. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2020, 20, 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358419848129.

• 15.

  Wang, L. Intention to Choose Green Hotels in China: A Conceptual Piece. Int. J. Tour. Hotel Bus. Manag. 2020, 2, 402–404.

• 16.

  Fisher, C.; Bashyal, S.; Bachman, B. Demographic Impacts on Environmentally Friendly Purchase Behaviors. J. Target. Meas. Anal. Mark. 2012, 20, 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2012.13.

• 17.

  Albayrak, T.; Aksoy, Ş.; Caber, M. The Effect of Environmental Concern and Scepticism on Green Purchase Behaviour. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2013, 31, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501311292902.

• 18.

  Anuar, M.M.; Omar, K.; Ahmed, Z.U.; et al. Drivers of Green Consumption Behaviour and Their Implications for Management. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2020, 21, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2020.21.1.06.

• 19.

  Wang, Z.-X.; Jiang, Z.; Jantan, A.H.B.; et al. The Impact of Perceived Interactivity of Virtual Brand Communities on Consumer Purchases of Domestic Electric Vehicles in China. Sage Open 2024, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241307759.

• 20.

  Sadiq, M.; Adil, M.; Paul, J. Eco-Friendly Hotel Stay and Environmental Attitude: A Value-Attitude-Behaviour Perspective. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 100, 103094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103094.

• 21.

  Kim, M.J.; Hall, C.M. Do Perceived Risk and Intervention Affect Crowdfunder Behavior for the Sustainable Development Goals? A Model of Goal-Directed Behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 311, 127614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127614.

• 22.

  Rahman, I.; Reynolds, D. The Influence of Values and Attitudes on Green Consumer Behavior: A Conceptual Model of Green Hotel Patronage. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2019, 20, 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15256480.2017.1359729.

• 23.

  Eid, R.; Agag, G.; Shehawy, Y.M. Understanding Guests’ Intention to Visit Green Hotels. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2021, 45, 494–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020947800.

• 24.

  Sutikno, V.; Indarini, I.; Margaretha, S. Young Consumer’s Purchase Intention toward Environmentally Friendly Products in Indonesia: Expanding the Theory of Planned Behavior. Adv. Econ. Bus. Manag. Res. 2020, 115, 36–40. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200127.008.

• 25.

  Wang, L.; Wong, P.P.W.; Elangkovan, N.A.; et al. Green Hotel Selection of Chinese Consumers: A Planned Behavior Perspective. J. China Tour. Res. 2019, 15, 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2018.1553743.

• 26.

  Nimri, R.; Patiar, A.; Jin, X. The Determinants of Consumers’ Intention of Purchasing Green Hotel Accommodation: Extending the Theory of Planned Behaviour. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 45, 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.10.013.

• 27.

  Ulker-Demirel, E.; Ciftci, G. A Systematic Literature Review of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management Research. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 43, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.04.003.

• 28.

  Gong, Y.; Guo, Y.-P.; Zhai, S.-S.; et al. Factors Influencing Tourists’ Intention to Adopt Classified Garbage Cans in Tourism Destination. Environ. Soc. Psychol. 2024, 9, 1860. https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1860.

• 29.

  Zhang, Q.; Wong, P.P.W.; Wang, L. The Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour and Value-Belief-Norm Theory for Predicting Young Chinese Intention to Choose Green Hotels. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 14332. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99447-1.

• 30.

  Khraim, H. Measuring Religiosity in Consumer Research from an Islamic Perspective. J. Econ. Adm. Sci. 2010, 26, 52–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/10264116201000003.

• 31.

  Mokhlis, S. Relevancy and Measurement of Religiosity in Consumer Behavior Research. Int. Bus. Res. 2009, 2, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v2n3p75.

• 32.

  Mokhlis, S. Religious Contrasts in Consumer Shopping Styles: A Factor Analytic Comparison. J. Bus. Stud. Q. 2010, 2, 52–64.

• 33.

  Abd Aziz, E.Z.; Jusoh, M.S.; Amlus, M.H. The Moderating Effect of Product Quality on Religiosity, Price Sensitivity, Personnel Responsiveness and Purchase Intention: An Exploratory Study. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2015, 9, 218–224.

• 34.

  Asih, D.; Setini, M.; Dharmmesta, B.S.; et al. Religiosity and Spirituality: Conceptualization, Measurement and Its Effect on Frugality. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2020, 10, 4023–4032. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.07.007.

• 35.

  Wang, L.; Wong, P.P.W. Marketing of Environmentally Friendly Hotels in China through Religious Segmentation: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Approach. Tour. Rev. 2021, 76, 1164–1180. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-08-2019-0327.

• 36.

  Borzooei, M.; Asgari, M. The Effect of Religious Commitment on Halal Brand Relationship and Purchase Intention. Int. J. Res. J. Econ. Bus. Stud. 2014, 3, 14–19.

• 37.

  Madni, A.R.; Hamid, N.A.; Rashid, S.M. An Association between Religiosity and Consumer Behavior: A Conceptual Piece. J. Commer. 2016, 8, 58.

• 38.

  Worthington, E.L., Jr.; Wade, N.G.; Hight, T.L.; et al. The Religious Commitment Inventory-10: Development, Refinement, and Validation of a Brief Scale for Research and Counseling. J. Couns. Psychol. 2003, 50, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.1.84.

• 39.

  Allport, G.W.; Ross, J.M. Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1967, 5, 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.5.4.432.

• 40.

  Abdurrahman, A.A. Development of a Muslim Religiosity Scale. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA, 1997.

• 41.

  Dali, N.R.S.M.; Yousafzai, S.; Abdul Hamid, H. Religiosity Scale Development. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 10, 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-11-2016-0087.

• 42.

  Wang, L. The Influence of Religiosity on Ecologically Conscious Consumer Behaviour and Consumer Loyalty towards Green Hotel Selection in Xi’an, China. Ph.D. Thesis, Taylor’s University, Selangor, Malaysia, 2019.

• 43.

  Wang, L.; Wong, P.P.W.; Elangkovan, N.A. The Influence of Religiosity on Consumer’s Green Purchase Intention towards Green Hotel Selection in China. J. China Tour. Res. 2020, 16, 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388160.2019.1637318.

• 44.

  State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. China’s Policies and Practices on Protecting Freedom of Religious Belief; State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2018.

• 45.

  State Bureau of Religious Affairs of People’s Republic of China. China’s Religious Situation; State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2022.

• 46.

  Templeton Research Center. Pew-Templeton Global Religious Futures Project; Templeton Research Center: Hong Kong, China, 2020.

• 47.

  Yang, F. Globalplus: Religion in China. The Other Chinese Miracle: Great Awakening Shifts Growth of Global Christianity to the East. Available online: https://theiarj.org/news/globalplus-religion-china/#:~:text=The%202007%20Chinese%20Spiritual%20Life,18%20percent%20identified%20as%20Buddhists (accessed on 25 February 2026).

• 48.

  Li, Y.; Xu, X. Does Religious Culture Matter for Corporate Risk‑Taking? Evidence from China. Asia-Pac. J. Account. Econ. 2019, 28, 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2019.1566869.

• 49.

  Liu, E.Y.; Koenig, H.G. Measuring Intrinsic Religiosity: Scales for Use in Mental Health Studies in China—A Research Report. Ment. Health Relig. Cult. 2013, 16, 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2012.672404.

• 50.

  Du, X. Does Religion Matter to Owner‑Manager Agency Costs? Evidence from China. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 118, 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1569-y.

• 51.

  Shukor, S.A.; Jamal, A. Developing Scales for Measuring Religiosity in the Context of Consumer Research. Middle-East J. Sci. Res. 2013, 13, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.13.1884.

• 52.

  Choi, Y. Religion, Religiosity, and South Korean Consumer Switching Behaviors. J. Consum. Behav. 2010, 9, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.292.

• 53.

  Bhuian, S.N.; Sharma, S.K.; Butt, I.; et al. Antecedents and Pro‑Environmental Consumer Behavior (PECB): The Moderating Role of Religiosity. J. Consum. Mark. 2018, 35, 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2017-2076.

• 54.

  Minton, E.A.; Kahle, L.R.; Kim, C.-H. Religion and Motives for Sustainable Behaviors: A Cross‑Cultural Comparison and Contrast. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1937–1944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.003.

• 55.

  Wang, S.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; et al. How and When Does Religiosity Contribute to Tourists’ Intention to Behave Pro‑Environmentally in Hotels? J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 1120–1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1724122.

• 56.

  Memon, Y.J.; Azhar, S.M.; Haque, R.; et al. Religiosity as a Moderator between Theory of Planned Behavior and Halal Purchase Intention. J. Islam. Mark. 2020, 11, 1821–1836. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2019-0006.

• 57.

  Chau, A.Y. Modalities of Doing Religion and Ritual Polytropy: Evaluating the Religious Market Model from the Perspective of Chinese Religious History. Religion 2011, 41, 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2011.624691.

• 58.

  Jiang, F.; Jiang, Z.; Kim, K.A.; et al. Family‑Firm Risk‑Taking: Does Religion Matter? J. Corp. Finance 2015, 33, 260–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.007.

• 59.

  Miller, A.S. Going to Hell in Asia: The Relationship between Risk and Religion in a Cross Cultural Setting. Rev. Relig. Res. 2000, 42, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/3512141.

• 60.

  Ngah, A.H.; Gabarre, S.; Han, H.; et al. Intention to Purchase Halal Cosmetics: Do Males and Females Differ? A Multigroup Analysis. Cosmetics 2021, 8, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics8010019.

• 61.

  Mukhtar, A.; Butt, M.M. Intention to Choose Halal Products: The Role of Religiosity. J. Islam. Mark. 2012, 3, 108–120. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831211232519.

• 62.

  Bergan, A.; McConatha, J.T. Religiosity and Life Satisfaction. Act. Adapt. Aging 2001, 24, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1300/J016v24n03_02.

• 63.

  Muhamad, N.; Mizerski, D. The Constructs Mediating Religions’ Influence on Buyers and Consumers. J. Islam. Mark. 2010, 1, 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831011055860.

• 64.

  Alam, S.S.; Mohd, R.; Hisham, B. Is Religiosity an Important Determinant on Muslim Consumer Behaviour in Malaysia? J. Islam. Mark. 2011, 2, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831111115268.

• 65.

  Essoo, N.; Dibb, S. Religious Influences on Shopping Behaviour: An Exploratory Study. J. Mark. Manag. 2004, 20, 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257041838728.

• 66.

  Mokhlis, S. Consumer Religiosity and the Importance of Store Attributes. J. Hum. Resour. Adult Learn. 2008, 4, 122–133.

• 67.

  Ahmad, A.N.; Abd Rahman, A.; Ab Rahman, S. Assessing Knowledge and Religiosity on Consumer Behavior towards Halal Food and Cosmetic Products. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2015, 5, 10–14. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2015.V5.413.

• 68.

  Shin, J.; Park, M.; Moon, M.; et al. Does Religiosity Affect on Consumer’s Socialization Agent and Shopping Orientation? J. Manag. Educ. 2013, 28, 69–83.

• 69.

  Patel, M. Influence of Religion on Shopping Behavior of Consumers‑An Exploratory Study. Abhinav Natl. Mon. Refereed J. Res. Commer. Manag. 2012, 1, 68–78.

• 70.

  Hogg, M.A.; Adelman, J.R.; Blagg, R.D. Religion in the Face of Uncertainty: An Uncertainty‑Identity Theory Account of Religiousness. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2010, 14, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309349692.

• 71.

  Barnett, T.; Bass, K.; Brown, G. Religiosity, Ethical Ideology, and Intentions to Report a Peer’s Wrongdoing. J. Bus. Ethics 1996, 15, 1161–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00412815.

• 72.

  Ateeq‑ur‑Rehman; Shabbir, M.S. The Relationship between Religiosity and New Product Adoption. J. Islam. Mark. 2010, 1, 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831011026231.

• 73.

  Glock, C.Y.; Stark, R. Religion and Society in Tension; Rand McNally: Chicago, IL, USA, 1965.

• 74.

  Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

• 75.

  Riswandi, W.N.; Sudarsono, H.; Rahmi, A.N.; et al. The Intention of the Young Muslim Generation to Purchase Halal Cosmetics: Do Religiosity and Halal Knowledge Matter? Asian J. Islam. Manag. 2023, 4, 150–162. https://doi.org/10.20885/AJIM.vol4.iss2.art6.

• 76.

  Lisa, A.; Ma’ruf. Pengaruh Islamic Religiosity dan Halal Knowledge terhadap Purchase Intention Kosmetik Halal Dimediasi oleh Attitude terhadap Produk Halal di Indonesia. Al Muzara’Ah 2020, 8, 57–72. https://doi.org/10.29244/jam.8.1.57-72.

• 77.

  Agag, G.; Colmekcioglu, N. Understanding Guests’ Behavior to Visit Green Hotels: The Role of Ethical Ideology and Religiosity. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 91, 102679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102679.

• 78.

  Karimi, S.; Mohammadimehr, S. Socio‑Psychological Antecedents of Pro‑Environmental Intentions and Behaviors among Iranian Rural Women: An Integrative Framework. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022, 10, 979728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.979728.

• 79.

  Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.-X. Collectivism or Individualism: The Challenge to Predict Green Hotel Selection in a Developing Country. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2026, 13, 377. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06742-x.

• 80.

  Stets, J.E.; Burke, P.J. Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory. Soc. Psychol. Q. 2000, 63, 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870.

• 81.

  Bailey, J.M.; Sood, J. The Effects of Religious Affiliation on Consumer Behavior: A Preliminary Investigation. J. Manag. Issues 1993, 5, 328–352.

• 82.

  Jing, X.J. Religiosity of Nonbelievers in China. Psychol. Rep. 2014, 115, 618–626.

• 83.

  Arli, D.; Tjiptono, F. Does Corporate Social Responsibility Matter to Consumers in Indonesia? Soc. Responsib. J. 2014, 10, 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-01-2013-0007.

• 84.

  Koenig, H.G.; Meador, K.G.; Parkerson, G. Religion Index for Psychiatric Research. Am. J. Psychiatry 1997, 154, 885–886. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.6.885b.

• 85.

  Koenig, H.G.; Smiley, M.; Gonzales, J.A.P. Religion, Health, and Aging: A Review and Theoretical Integration; Greenwood: Westport, CT, USA, 1988; p. 240.

• 86.

  Fetzer Institute. Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research: A Report of the Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group; Fetzer Institute: Kalamazoo, MI, USA, 1999; p. 103.

• 87.

  Hill, P.C.; Hood, R.W., Jr. Measures of Religiosity; Religious Education Press: Birmingham, AL, USA, 1999.

• 88.

  Koenig, H.G.; Al Zaben, F.; Khalifa, D.A.; et al. Measures of Religiosity. In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs; Boyle, G.J., Saklofske, D.H., Matthews, G., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 530–561.

• 89.

  Raggiotto, F.; Mason, M.C.; Moretti, A. Religiosity, Materialism, Consumer Environmental Predisposition. Some Insights on Vegan Purchasing Intentions in Italy. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2018, 42, 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12478.

• 90.

  Genia, V. A Psychometric Evaluation of the Allport‑Ross I/E Scales in a Religiously Heterogeneous Sample. J. Sci. Study Relig. 1993, 32, 284–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386667.

• 91.

  Mokhlis, S. The Influence of Religion on Retail Patronage Behaviour in Malaysia. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK, 2006.

• 92.

  Jaume, L.; Simkin, H.; Etchezahar, E. Religious as Quest and Its Relationship with Intrinsic and Extrinsic Orientation. Int. J. Psychol. Res. 2013, 6, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.688.

• 93.

  Batson, C.D.; Schoenrade, P.; Ventis, W.L. Religion and the Individual: A Social‑Psychological Perspective; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993; p. 440.

• 94.

  Batson, C.D.; Schoenrade, P.A. Measuring Religion as Quest: 2) Reliability Concerns. J. Sci. Study Relig. 1991, 30, 430–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387278.

• 95.

  Islam, T.; Chandrasekaran, U. Religiosity and Ecologically Conscious Consumption Behaviour. Asian J. Bus. Res. 2015, 5, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.150014.

• 96.

  Kang, J.; Park‑Poaps, H. Social Shopping for Fashion: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Scale. Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J. 2011, 39, 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02074.x.

• 97.

  Quazi, A.; Amran, A.; Nejati, M. Conceptualizing and Measuring Consumer Social Responsibility: A Neglected Aspect of Consumer Research. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2016, 40, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12211.

• 98.

  Khan, G.; Khan, F. Ascertaining the “Halalness” of Restaurants—Scale Development and Validation. J. Islam. Mark. 2019, 10, 426–439. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-04-2018-0067.

• 99.

  Leong, F.T.L.; Zachar, P. An Evaluation of Allport’s Religious Orientation Scale across One Australian and Two United States Samples. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1990, 50, 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164490502014.

• 100.

  Feagin, J.R. Prejudice and Relegious Types: A Focused Study of Southern Fundamentalists. J. Sci. Study Relig. 1964, 4, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1385200.

• 101.

  Tiliopoulos, N.; Bikker, A.P.; Coxon, A.P.M.; et al. The Means and Ends of Religiosity: A Fresh Look at Gordon Allport’s Religious Orientation Dimensions. Pers. Individ. Differ. 2007, 42, 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.034.

• 102.

  Darvyri, P.; Galanakis, M.; Avgoustidis, A.G.; et al. The Revised Intrinsic/Extrinsic Religious Orientation Scale in a Sample of Attica’s Inhabitants. Psychology 2014, 5, 1557–1567. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.513166.

• 103.

  Gorsuch, R.L.; McPherson, S.E. Intrinsic/Extrinsic Measurement: I/E‑Revised and Single‑Item Scales. J. Sci. Study Relig. 1989, 28, 348–354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1386745.

• 104.

  Baazeem, R.M. The Role of Religiosity in Technology Acceptance: The Case of Privacy in Saudi Arabia. In Psychological and Behavioral Examinations in Cyber Security; McAlaney, J., Frumkin, L.A., Benson, V., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2018; pp. 172–193.

• 105.

  Albehairi, A.; Demerdash, A. Religious Orientation Scale, 2nd ed.; Egyptian Renascence Bookstore: Cairo, Egypt, 1988.

• 106.

  Alsanie, S.I. Relationship between Level of Religiosity and Criminal Behavior. Ph.D. Thesis, Imam Ibn Suad Islamic University, Saudi Arabia, 1989.

• 107.

  Ju, C.; Zhang, B.; You, X.; et al. Religiousness, Social Support and Subjective Well‑Being: An Exploratory Study among Adolescents in an Asian Atheist Country. Int. J. Psychol. 2018, 53, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12270.

• 108.

  Thanissaro, P.N. Validity and Reliability of a Revised Scale of Attitude towards Buddhism (TSAB‑R). Religions 2016, 7, 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel7050044.

• 109.

  Nguyen, H.T.; Ackert, M.; Flückiger, C.; et al. Centrality of Buddhist Religiosity Scale: Adaptation and Validation of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale in a Buddhist Sample in Vietnam. Religions 2021, 12, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12020079.

• 110.

  Huber, S.; Ackert, M.; Scheiblich, H. Religiosität in Unterschiedlichen Religionskulturen—Vergleiche auf der Basis der Centrality of Religiosity Scale. Cult. Psyché 2020, 1, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43638-020-00007-3.

• 111.

  Krauss, S.E.; Hamzah, A.; Idris, F. Adaptation of a Muslim Religiosity Scale for Use with Four Different Faith Communities in Malaysia. Rev. Relig. Res. 2007, 49, 147–164.

• 112.

  Holdcroft, B. What Is Religiosity. Cathol. Educ. J. Inq. Pract. 2006, 10, 89–103.

• 113.

  Wang, K. The “One Mind, Two Aspects” Model of the Self: The Self Model and Self‑Cultivation Theory of Chinese Buddhism. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 652465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652465.

• 114.

  Pargament, K.I. The Psychology of Religion & Coping: Theory, Research, Practice; The Guilford Press: London, UK, 1997.

• 115.

  Saunders, M.; Lewis, P.; Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students, 8th ed.; Pearson International: Harlow, UK, 2019; p. 872.

• 116.

  Hair, J.F., Jr.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; et al. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson International: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2013.

• 117.

  Norris, M.; Lecavalier, L. Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Developmental Disability Psychological Research. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2010, 40, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0816-2.

• 118.

  Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 5th ed.; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023.

• 119.

  Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151335.

• 120.

  Diamantopoulos, A.; Siguaw, J.A. Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated; Sage: London, UK, 2000.

• 121.

  Meyers, L.S.; Gamst, G.; Guarino, A.J. Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation, 3rd ed.; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2016.

• 122.

  Martin, W.C.; Bateman, C.R. Consumer Religious Commitment’s Influence on Ecocentric Attitudes and Behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.006.

• 123.

  Mas’od, A.; Chin, T.A. Determining Socio‑Demographic, Psychographic and Religiosity of Green Hotel Consumer in Malaysia. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 130, 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.056.

• 124.

  Wang, L.; Zhang, Q. The Role of Extrinsic Religiosity on Consumer Green Hotel Selection in China. Int. J. Tour. Hotel Bus. Manag. 2021, 3, 405–425.

• 125.

  Chan, R.Y.K. Determinants of Chinese Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior. Psychol. Mark. 2001, 18, 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1013.

• 126.

  Yeow, P.H.P.; Loo, W.H. Antecedents of Green Computer Purchase Behavior among Malaysian Consumers from the Perspective of Rational Choice and Moral Norm Factors. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 32, 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.05.015.

• 127.

  Robson, C.; McCartan, K. Real World Research; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016.