2606004265
  • Open Access
  • Article

Multidimensional Identification and Spatiotemporal Evolution Analysis of Land Use Landscape Conflicts in China, 2000–2020

  • Shuhui Lai 1,2,   
  • Daohong Gong 3,4,*,   
  • Haoyuan Wu 5

Received: 30 Jan 2026 | Revised: 23 May 2026 | Accepted: 16 Jun 2026 | Published: 29 Jun 2026

Abstract

With the continuous advancement of urbanization and industrialization, the conflict between the limited availability of land resources and the growing demand for diversified land use has intensified, making land use conflict a critical constraint on regional sustainable development. Based on the multi-source land use and natural-socio-economic data of China during the two periods of 2000 and 2020, this study systematically investigates the spatiotemporal evolution of land use conflicts and quantitatively explores their natural and anthropogenic driving mechanisms. The results indicate that: (1) from 2000 to 2020, China’s land use changes exhibited a concurrent trend of construction land expansion and ecological restoration; (2) land use conflicts displayed a clear “high in the southeast—low in the northwest” spatial pattern, with high-level conflict areas concentrated around urban agglomerations east of the Hu Huanyong Line and in agro-pastoral transition zones, accounting for over 57% of the total area; (3) although high-level conflicts remain dominant, the proportion of extremely severe conflict areas declined slightly from 5.56% in 2000 to 5.37% in 2020; (4) vegetation cover and elevation are the primary determinants of conflict spatial distribution, and interactions between any two factors exhibited enhancement effects, indicating that the coupling of natural conditions and human activities is the key mechanism driving high-intensity conflicts. These findings suggest that land use conflicts in China are driven jointly by natural constraints and anthropogenic disturbances. Future land management should adopt differentiated strategies to prevent new conflicts arising from intensive development.

References 

  • 1.

    Foley, J.A.; DeFries, R.; Asner, G.P.; et al. Global Consequences of Land-Use. Science 2005, 309, 570–574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772.

  • 2.

    Lambin, E.F.; Meyfroidt, P. Global Land-Use Change, Economic Globalization, and the Looming Land Scarcity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3465–3472. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100480108.

  • 3.

    Seto, K.C.; Güneralp, B.; Hutyra, L.R. Global Forecasts of Urban Expansion to 2030 and Direct Impacts on Biodiversity and Carbon Pools. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 16083–16088. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109.

  • 4.

    Wang, D.Y.; Wang, M.S.; Zhang, W.; et al. A Multi-Level Spatial Assessment Framework for Identifying Land-Use Conflict Zones. Land-Use Policy 2025, 148, 107382. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2024.107382.

  • 5.

    Moore, S.A. Testing a Mature Hypothesis: Reflection on “Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities: Urban Planning and the Contradiction of Sustainable Development”. J. Am. Plan. Assoc. 2016, 82, 385–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2016.1213655.

  • 6.

    Zhang, L.L.; Liu, Y.S.; Wang, J.Y.; et al. Land-Use Conflict Identification and Sustainable Development Scenario Simulation on China’s Southeast Coast. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 238, 117899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117899.

  • 7.

    Bai, X.M.; Shi, P.J.; Liu, Y.S. Society: Realizing China’s Urban Dream. Nature 2014, 509, 158–160.

  • 8.

    Chen, M.; Liu, W.; Lu, D. Challenges and the Way Forward in China’s New-Type Urbanization. Land-Use Policy 2016, 55, 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.025.

  • 9.

    He, C.Y.; Liu, Z.F.; Tian, J.; et al. Urban Expansion Dynamics and Natural Habitat Loss in China: A Multiscale Landscape Perspective. Global Change Biol. 2014, 20, 2886–2902. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12553.

  • 10.

    Liu, Y.S.; Zhou, Y. Territory Spatial Planning and National Governance System in China. Land-Use Policy 2021, 102, 105288. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105288.

  • 11.

    Bai, Y.; Wong, C.P.; Jiang, B.; et al. Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy Using Ecosystem Services Assessments for Land-Use Planning. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3034. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05306-1.

  • 12.

    Long, H.L.; Qu, Y. Land-Use Transitions and Land Management: A Mutual Feedback Perspective. Land-Use Policy 2018, 74, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.021.

  • 13.

    Zhou, D.; Xu, J.; Lin, Z. Conflict or Coordination? Assessing Land-Use Multi-Functionalization Using Production-Living-Ecology Analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 577, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.143.

  • 14.

    Song, J.; Meng, J.; Zhu, L.K.; et al. Spatial-Temporal Pattern of Land-Use Conflict in China and Its Multilevel Driving Mechanisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 801, 149697. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.149697.

  • 15.

    Dong, G.L.; Guo, Y.B.; Jiang, H.W.; et al. Land-Use Multi-Suitability, Land Resource Scarcity and Diversity of Human Needs: A New Framework for Land-Use Conflict Identification. Land 2021, 10, 1003. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND10101003.

  • 16.

    Iojă, C.I.; Niţă, M.R.; Vânău, G.O.; et al. Using Multi-Criteria Analysis for the Identification of Spatial Land-Use Conflicts in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 42, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.029.

  • 17.

    Wang, J.-F.; Li, X.-H.; Christakos, G.; et al. Geographical Detectors-Based Health Risk Assessment and Its Application in the Neural Tube Defects Study of the Heshun Region, China. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2010, 24, 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810802443457.

  • 18.

    Ning, J.; Liu, J.Y.; Kuang, W.H.; et al. Spatiotemporal Patterns and Characteristics of Land-Use Change in China during 2010–2015. J. Geogr. Sci. 2018, 28, 547–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1490-0.

  • 19.

    Liu, J.Y.; Liu, M.L.; Tian, H.Q.; et al. Spatial and Temporal Patterns of China’s Cropland during 1990–2000: An Analysis Based on Landsat TM Data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2005, 98, 442–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.012.

  • 20.

    Pontius, R.G.; Shusas, E.; McEachern, M. Detecting Important Categorical Land Changes While Accounting for Persistence. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2003, 101, 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.008.

  • 21.

    Wang, X.M.; Zhang, Y.J.; Liu, X.Y.; et al. An Analysis of Land-Use Conflicts and Strategies in the Harbin–Changchun Urban Agglomeration Based on the Production–Ecological–Living Space Theory and Patch-Generating Land-Use Simulation. Land 2025, 14, 111. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND14010111.

  • 22.

    Gao, J.; Zhao, R.R.; Guo, Z.R.; et al. Transformation of Cultivated Land for Enhanced Quality in Northeast China: Theoretical Interpretation and Practical Evaluation. J. Rural Stud. 2026, 122, 103969. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2025.103969.

  • 23.

    Zhang, J.X.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, J.Q.; et al. Spatiotemporal Patterns and Enhancement Potential of Global Water Retention: Insights from a Water Balance-Geographical Detector Framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2026, 540, 147487. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2026.147487.

  • 24.

    Pan, Z.H.; Li, X.Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Spatiotemporal Variation in Carbon Sequestration in the Forest Ecosystem of Hainan Island over a 30-Year Period and Its Driving Factors. Ecol. Indic. 2026, 182, 114587. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2025.114587.

  • 25.

    Lin, B.; Yang, K.; Yang, W.S.; et al. Soil Erosion Changes in Liangshan Prefecture Based on Geographic Detector. J. Resour. Ecol. 2025, 16, 1851–1860. https://doi.org/10.5814/J.ISSN.1674-764X.2025.06.023.

  • 26.

    Li, X.R.; Che Rus, R.A.; Ahmad, A. GIS-Based Analysis of Retail Spatial Distribution and Driving Mechanisms in a Resource-Based Transition City: Evidence from POI Data in Taiyuan, China. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2025, 14, 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJGI14120483.

  • 27.

    Huang, Y.H.; Jiang, W.Q.; Wang, J.; et al. Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Factors of Vegetation Gross Primary Productivity in a Typical Coastal City: A Case Study of Zhanjiang, China. Remote Sens. 2025, 18, 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS18010089.

  • 28.

    He, L.; Chen, S.Z.; Wang, D.Q. Urbanization Patterns of China’s Cities in 1990-2010. Int. Rev. Spat. Plan. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 3, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.3.4_5.

  • 29.

    Bryan, B.A.; Gao, L.; Ye, Y.Q.; et al. China’s Response to a National Land-System Sustainability Emergency. Nature 2018, 559, 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0280-2.

  • 30.

    Ouyang, Z.Y.; Zheng, H.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Improvements in Ecosystem Services from Investments in Natural Capital. Science 2016, 352, 1455–1459. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2295.

  • 31.

    Sun, P.; Mo, J.; Li, N.; et al. Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Driving Mechanism of Territorial Space Conflicts in Rapid Urbanization Areas from the Perspective of Suitability: An Empirical Study of Jinan City, China. Land 2026, 15, 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15010191.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Lai, S.; Gong, D.; Wu, H. Multidimensional Identification and Spatiotemporal Evolution Analysis of Land Use Landscape Conflicts in China, 2000–2020. Regional Ecology and Management 2026, 1 (1), 8. https://doi.org/10.53941/rem.2026.100008.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.