UBS/
Articles/
2510001687
  • Open Access
  • Article

Identifying the Design Indicators of Sustainable Urban Parks: Applying to Urban Parks in Tehran and Tabriz, Iran

  • Davood Vafadari Komarolya 1,   
  • Kojiro Sho 2, *

Received: 02 Aug 2025 | Revised: 19 Aug 2025 | Accepted: 13 Oct 2025 | Published: 17 Oct 2025

Abstract

Sustainable urban parks (SUPs) are crucial for achieving sustainable urban communities. This research aimed to identify SUP design indicators through a literature review and semi-structured interviews with 31 experts. 17 key indicators were identified, encompassing the use of native plants, increasing vegetation, providing waste separation bins, involving the public in planning, considering local conditions, and incorporating local patterns. Less significant indicators included tree trunk protection for birds and open amphitheater design. Applying this framework to the case studies revealed a divergence in sustainability performance. The average number of indicators present in Tehran’s parks was 28 out of a total of 50, exceeding the defined sustainability benchmark. Conversely, the average for Tabriz’s parks was 24 out of 50, falling below the established threshold. This research helps address gaps in SUP design indicators and highlights the significance of involving specialists and city managers in planning and implementation to enhance sustainability.

References 

  • 1.

    Chen, S.; Shao, C.; Yu, H.; et al. Navigating urban human settlement sustainability: A multi-indicator assessment based on sustainable development goal 11. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 472, 143509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143509.

  • 2.

    Liu, Y.; Dong, K.; Wang, K.; et al. Moving towards sustainable city: Can China’s green finance policy lead to sustainable development of cities? Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 102, 105242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105242.

  • 3.

    Li, D.; Yang, Y.; Xia, F.; et al. Exploring the influences of different processes of habitat fragmentation on ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2022, 227, 104544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104544.

  • 4.

    Rafael, S.; Rodrigues, V.; Fernandes, A.P.; et al. Evaluation of urban surface parameterizations in WRF model using energy fluxes measurements in Portugal. Urban Clim. 2019, 28, 100465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2019.100465.

  • 5.

    Han, D.; An, H.; Cai, H.; et al. How do 2D/3D urban landscapes impact diurnal land surface temperature: Insights from block scale and machine learning algorithms. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2023, 99, 104933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104933.

  • 6.

    McKinney, M.L. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience 2002, 52, 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2.

  • 7.

    McKinney, M.L. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 127, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005.

  • 8.

    Dadashpoor, H.; Azizi, P.; Moghadasi, M. Land use change, urbanization, and change in landscape pattern in a metropolitan area. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 655, 707–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.267.

  • 9.

    He, B.J.; Wang, J.; Zhu, J.; et al. Beating the urban heat: Situation, background, impacts and the way forward in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112350.

  • 10.

    Ettinger, A.K.; Buhle, E.R.; Feist, B.E.; et al. Prioritizing conservation actions in urbanizing landscapes. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79258-2.

  • 11.

    U.N. Environmental Program I. The Weight of Cities–Resource Requirements of Future Urbanization; International Resource Panel Secretariat: Paris, France, 2018.

  • 12.

    Orchi, H.; Diallo, A.B.; Elbiaze, H.; et al. A contemporary survey on multisource information fusion for smart sustainable cities: Emerging trends and persistent challenges. Inf. Fusion 2025, 114, 102667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102667.

  • 13.

    Liu, J.; Cheng, Z.; Yi, P.; et al. Predictive evaluation of city sustainability based on benchmarking method–A case study of 34 cities in northeastern China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 112, 105627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105627.

  • 14.

    Garcia, C.; López-Jiménez, P.A.; Pérez-Sánchez, M.; et al. Methodology for assessing progress in sustainable development goals indicators in urban water systems. How far are we from the 2030 targets? Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 112, 105616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105616.

  • 15.

    Engström, G.; Gren, A. Capturing the value of green space in urban parks in a sustainable urban planning and design context: Pros and cons of hedonic pricing. Ecol. Soc. 2017, 22, 21. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09365-220221.

  • 16.

    Hosseinpour, N.; Kazemi, F.; Mahdizadeh, H. A cost-benefit analysis of applying urban agriculture in sustainable park design. Land Use Policy 2022, 112, 105834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105834.

  • 17.

    Moubarak, L.M.; Nour El-Dine, A.; Morghany, E.A.M. Sustainable international parks in Egypt: Suggested criteria for design. J. Urban Res. 2022, 44, 82–102. https://doi.org/10.21608/jur.2022.77038.1066.

  • 18.

    Kim, S.; Kwon, H. Urban sustainability through public architecture. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041249.

  • 19.

    Sarhan, A.A.; Farghaly, Y.; Elsayed, R. Measures and attributes for sustainability of parks. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2016, 34, 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.04.040.

  • 20.

    Kazemi, F.; Mahdizadeh, H. Sustainable low-input urban park design based on some decision-making methods. Land Use Policy 2022, 117, 106092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106092.

  • 21.

    Vafadari Komarolya, D.; Kafi, M.; Khansefid, M. Investigating the Preventive Factors of People in the Society from Attending Urban Parks during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Hortic. Sci. 2023, 37, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.22067/jhs.2022.75378.1143.

  • 22.

    Vafadari Komarolya, D.; Kafi, M.; Khansefid, M.; et al. Criteria for Designing Urban Parks in a Pandemic of Infectious Diseases: A survey based on experts’ opinions. Int. J. Archit. Eng. Urban Plan. 2024, 34, 41–51.

  • 23.

    Jim, C.Y.; Chen, W.Y. External effects of neighbourhood parks and landscape elements on high-rise residential value. Land Use Policy 2010, 27, 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.027.

  • 24.

    Cranz, G.; Boland, M. Defining the sustainable park: A fifth model for urban parks. Landsc. J. 2004, 23, 102–120. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.23.2.102.

  • 25.

    Anderson, J.; Benton, J.S.; Ye, J.; et al. Large walking and wellbeing behaviour benefits of co-designed sustainable park improvements: A natural experimental study in a UK deprived urban area. Environ. Int. 2024, 187, 108669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108669.

  • 26.

    Bressane, A.; Galvão, A.L.S.; Loureiro, A.I.S.; et al. Valuing urban green spaces for enhanced public health and sustainability: A study on public willingness-to-pay in an emerging economy. Urban For. Urban Green. 2024, 98, 128386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128386.

  • 27.

    Opoku, A.; Duff, A.; Wasim Yahia, M.; et al. Utilisation of green urban space for food sufficiency and the realisation of the sustainable development goals–UK stakeholders perspective. Geogr. Sustain. 2024, 5, 13–18.

  • 28.

    Lu, W.; Jiang, W.; Qiao, D.; et al. Embracing green spaces: Exploring spatiotemporal changes in urban green space accessibility and its equity in Guangzhou, China for sustainable urban greening. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2023, 19, 100290.

  • 29.

    Wey, Y.E.; Sarma, V.; Lechner, A.M.; et al. Malaysians’ perception on the contribution of urban green spaces to the UN sustainable development goals. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 78, 127792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127792.

  • 30.

    Wang, Y.; Su, T. The Impacts of Friendly Designs on the Long-Term Sustainability of Modern Urban Parks. Sustainability 2025, 17, 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030830.

  • 31.

    He, B.; Wang, S.; Xiong, Q.; et al. Urban Park Planning for Sustainability: Resident Insights from China’s Major Cities. Land 2025, 14, 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010128.

  • 32.

    Faragallah, R.N. The impact of productive open spaces on urban sustainability: The case of el Mansheya Square–Alexandria, Alexandria. Alex. Eng. J. 2018, 57, 3969–3976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2018.02.008.

  • 33.

    Badiu, D.L.; Iojă, C.I.; Pătroescu, M.; et al. Is urban green space per capita a valuable target to achieve cities’ sustainability goals? Romania as a case study. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 70, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.044.

  • 34.

    Lalbakhsh, E. The impact of recycling urban space in sustainable development in developing countries. APCBEE Procedia 2012, 1, 331–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2012.03.054.

  • 35.

    Couto, E.; Gregorio, L.; Valle‏, G. SITIUS method: A new approach for sustainable urban development indexes based on the ISO 37120 standard‏. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2025, 27, 1619–1642.

  • 36.

    Ma‏, F. Evaluating the implementation of the Sustainable Sites Initiative (SITES) and its adaptation potential in China‏. Environ. Sustain. Indic. 2024, 24, 100532.

  • 37.

    Hamdy‏, A. Quality of life: Quantitative analysis in New Urbanism and LEED-ND certified neighbourhoods‏. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Urban Des. Plan. 2024, 177, 195–231.

  • 38.

    Zhao, Q.; Zhang, L.; Hou, J. Developing a cultural sustainability assessment framework for environmental facilities in urban communities‏. NPJ Herit. Sci. 2025, 13, 107.

  • 39.

    Kim, G.; Coseo, P. Urban park systems to support sustainability: The role of urban park systems in hot arid urban climates. Forests 2018, 9, 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9070439.

  • 40.

    Seymour, M. Just sustainability in urban parks‏. Local Environ. 2012, 17, 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.646968.

  • 41.

    Aly, D.; Dimitrijevic, B. Systems approach to the sustainable management of urban public parks. Urban For. Urban Green. 2022, 68, 127482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127482.

  • 42.

    Kreutz, A. Student and senior views on sustainable park design and intergenerational connection: A case study of an urban nature park. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2024, 241, 104290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104920.

  • 43.

    Ibrahim, R.; Clayden, A.; Cameron, R. Tropical urban parks in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Challenging the attitudes of park management teams towards a more environmentally sustainable approach. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 49, 126605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126605.

  • 44.

    Megyesi, B.; Gholipour, A.; Cuomo, F.; et al. Perceptions of stakeholders on nature-based solutions in urban planning: A thematic analysis in six European cities. Urban For. Urban Green. 2024, 96, 128344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128344.

  • 45.

    Zhong, W.; Schröder, T.; Bekkering, J. Implementing biophilic design in architecture through three-dimensional green spaces: Guidelines for building technologies, plant selection, and maintenance. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 92, 109648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109648.

  • 46.

    Ruslin, R.; Mashuri, S.; Sarib, M.; et al. Semi-structured interview: A methodological reflection on the development of a qualitative research instrument in educational studies. J. Res. Method Educ. 2022, 12, 22–29. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1201052229.

  • 47.

    Vafadari Komarolya, D.; Nazmfar, H.; Hami, A.; et al. Identifying indicators for planning and designing lively urban landscape. Landsc. Archit. Sustain. 2025, 1, 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.las.2025.100002.

  • 48.

    Vafadari Komarolya, D.; Yousefpour Dokhaniyeh, A.; Heidari, A.; et al. Future research of factors affecting the acceptability of urban parks with an emphasis on women’s parks. Geogr. Eng. Territ. 2024. https://doi.org/10.22034/jget.2024.459213.1559.

  • 49.

    Vafadari Komarolya, D.; Nazmfar, H.; Hami, A.; et al. Analyzing and Identifying the indicators of planning and designing a happy urban landscape. J. Sustain. Urban Reg. Dev. Stud. 2024, 5, 69–86.

  • 50.

    Vafadari Komarolya, D.; Nazmfar, H.; Hami, A.; et al. Analyzing and Recognition indicators of 24-h urban landscape planning and design. Geogr. Hum. Relatsh. 2024. https://doi.org/10.22034/gahr.2024.453164.2100.

  • 51.

    Yousefpour Dokhaniyeh, A.; Vafadari Komarolya, D. Analysis and recognition of design indicators for planting ornamental plants in urban green spaces. J. Nat. Environ. 2024, 77, 537–549. https://doi.org/10.22059/jne.2024.379080.2693.

  • 52.

    McIntosh, M.; Morse, J. Situating and Constructing Diversity in Semi-Structured Interviews. Glob. Qual. Nurs. Res. 2015, 2, 2333393615597674. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393615597674.

  • 53.

    Waters, J. Snowball sampling: A cautionary tale involving a study of older drug users. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2015, 18, 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.953316.

  • 54.

    Kubiciel-Lodzińska, S. Snowball sampling vs. respondent driven sampling in regional research. Comparing the use of the methods to study migrants working in elderly care. Stud. Migr. Przegląd Pol. 2021, 47, 149–180. https://doi.org/10.4467/25444972SMPP.21.007.13319.

  • 55.

    Zarie, H.; Sepehri, B.; Anvar Adibhesami, M.; et al. A strategy for giving urban public green spaces a third dimension: A case study of Qasrodasht, Shiraz. Nature-Based Solutions. 2024, 5, 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2023.100102.

  • 56.

    Sajedi, S.; Vafadari Komarolya, D. Investigating factors affecting the role of historical buildings in urban tourism with a future research approach. J. Sustain. Urban Reg. Dev. Stud. 2025, 6, 219–235.

  • 57.

    Vafadari Komarolya, D.; Nazmfar, H.; Hami, A.; et al. Identifying of the aesthetic indicators of the urban landscape. Geography 2024, 22, 149–164. https://doi.org/10.22034/iga.2024.2036141.1318.

  • 58.

    Maguire, M.; Delahunt, B. Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Irel. J. High. Educ. 2017, 9, 3. https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335.

  • 59.

    Kamjou, E.; Scott, M.; Lennon, M. A bottom-up perspective on green infrastructure in informal settlements: Understanding nature’s benefits through lived experiences. Urban For. Urban Green. 2024, 94, 128231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128231.

  • 60.

    Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

  • 61.

    Darmastuti, L.; Rustiadi, E.; Fauzi, A.; et al. Stakeholder Analysis of Sustainable Wastewater Management: A Case Study of Bogor, Indonesia. Sustainability 2023, 15, 11826. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511826.

  • 62.

    Rees, G.H.; MacDonell, S. Data gathering for actor analyses: A research note on the collection and aggregation of individual respondent data for MACTOR. Future Stud. Res. J. Trends Strateg. 2017, 9, 115–137. https://doi.org/10.24023/FutureJournal/2175-5825/2017.v9i1.256.

  • 63.

    Elmsalmi, M.; Hachicha, W. Risk mitigation strategies according to the supply actors’ objectives through MACTOR method. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT), Hammamet, Tunisia, 1–3 May 2014; pp. 362–367. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAdLT.2014.6866339.

  • 64.

    Vivanco-Aranda, M.; Mojica, F.J.; Martínez-Cordero, F.J. Foresight analysis of tilapia supply chains (Sistema Producto) in four states in Mexico: Scenarios and strategies for 2018. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78, 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.05.005.

  • 65.

    Lafourcade, B.; Chapuy, P. Scenarios and actors’ strategies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2000, 65, 67–80.

  • 66.

    Elmsalmi, M.; Khlifi, H.; Hachicha, W. Elaboration of Risk Mitigation Strategies based on Sustainable Development Practices. In Proceedings of the 2017 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT), Bali, Indonesia, 24–27 July 2017; pp. 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAdLT.2017.8547014.

  • 67.

    Lakner, Z. Main actors and their strategies in Hungarian higher education. Acta Oeconomica 2013, 63, 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1556/aoecon.63.2013.2.4.

  • 68.

    Lo, C.C.; Wang, C.H.; Huang, C.C. The national innovation system in the Taiwanese photovoltaic industry: A multiple stakeholder perspective. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 893–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.016.

  • 69.

    Bettencourt, R. Strategic prospective for the implementation of employment policies in the Azores. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77, 1566–1574.

  • 70.

    Mangifera, L.; Isa, M. Development model of creative industries: An application of MACTOR. KnE Soc. Sci. 2019, 3, 360. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i14.4322.

  • 71.

    Heger, T.; Rohrbeck, R. Strategic foresight for collaborative exploration of new business fields. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79, 819–831.

  • 72.

    Made-Sutrisna, I.B.; Nyoman-Saskara, I.A.; Suyana-Utama, M.; et al. Prospective analysis of sustainable tourism development in penglipuran village as a tourist village role model in Bali. Tech. Soc. Sci. J. 2020, 13, 184–198.

  • 73.

    Cerezo-Narváez, A.; Pastor-Fernández, A.; Otero-Mateo, M.; et al. The relationship between building agents in the context of integrated project management: A prospective analysis. Buildings 2021, 11, 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11050184.

  • 74.

    Yousefpour Dokhaniyeh, A.; Vafadari Komarolya, D. Analyzing and Identifying the Effects of Using Native Plants in Urban Green Spaces. Environ. Interdiscip. Dev. 2024, 9, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.22034/envj.2024.455518.1373.

  • 75.

    Vafadari Komarolya, D.; Pourbeirami Hir, Y.; Vafadari Komarolya, M. Futuristic Design of Urban Parks with the Biophilic Urban Approach. Environ. Interdiscip. Dev. 2024, 9, 65–87.

  • 76.

    Makmun, M.; Fahmid, I.; Ali, M.; et al. Power relations among actors in laying hen business in Indonesia: A MACTOR analysis. Open Agric. 2024, 9, 20220334. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0334.

  • 77.

    Kaviani Rad, A.; Razmi, S.O.; Nematollahi, M.J.; et al. Machine learning models for predicting interactions between air pollutants in Tehran Megacity, Iran. Alex. Eng. J. 2024, 104, 464–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.08.023.

  • 78.

    Behboudi, D.; Mohamadzade, P.; Feizizadeh, B.; et al. Multi-criteria based readiness assessment for developing spatial data infrastructures in East Azerbaijan Province, Iran. GI_Forum 2018, 1, 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2018_02_s322.

  • 79.

    Feizizadeh, B.; Blaschke, T. Land suitability analysis for Tabriz County, Iran: A multi-criteria evaluation approach using GIS. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2013, 56, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.646964.

  • 80.

    Feizizadeh, B.; Omarzadeh, D.; Ronagh, Z.; et al. A scenario-based approach for urban water management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and a case study for the Tabriz metropolitan area, Iran. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 790, 148272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148272.

  • 81.

    Saemian, P.; Elmi, O.; Vishwakarma, B.D.; et al. Analyzing the Lake Urmia restoration progress using ground-based and spaceborne observations. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 739, 139857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139857.

  • 82.

    Lemes de Oliveira, F. Nature in nature-based solutions in urban planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2025, 256, 105282.

  • 83.

    Combary, Y.E.F.; Atchrimi, B.T.; Zemo‏, M.A.T. Graph-Based Approaches Modeling to Assess Ecological Connectivity, Create Natural Habitats and Strengthen Ecological Networks in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. ‏Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 2025, 20, 1971–1981.

  • 84.

    Chan, C.S.; Si, F.H.; Marafa, L.M. Indicator development for sustainable urban park management in Hong Kong. Urban For. Urban Green. 2018, 31, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.025.

  • 85.

    Firmansyah Soeriaatmadja, A.R.; Wulanningsih, R. A Set of Sustainable Urban Landscape Indicators and Parameters to Evaluate Urban Green Open Space in Bandung City. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 179, 012016.

Share this article:
Download PDF
Supplementary Materials
DOI
10.53941/ubs.2025.100007
Issue
Volume 1, Issue 1
How to Cite
Komarolya, D. V.; Sho, K. Identifying the Design Indicators of Sustainable Urban Parks: Applying to Urban Parks in Tehran and Tabriz, Iran. Urban and Building Science 2025, 1 (1), 7. https://doi.org/10.53941/ubs.2025.100007.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2025 by the authors.