2607004483
  • Open Access
  • Article

An Integrated Theoretical Framework for Deep Learning in Chinese Characters: Insights from Multimedia, Taxonomy, and Cognitive Semantics

  • Yu-Lu Jin 1,   
  • Bao-Wen Shao 1,2,   
  • Nik Muhammad Hanis Bin Nek Rakami 1,*,   
  • Md. Nasir Masran 1,   
  • Qun-Fang Zeng 3

Received: 31 Oct 2025 | Revised: 28 Feb 2026 | Accepted: 10 Apr 2026 | Published: 30 Jun 2026

Abstract

This study proposes an integrated theoretical framework to support deep learning in Chinese character instruction by synthesizing three major theoretical perspectives: the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (CTML), Bloom’s Taxonomy, and Cognitive Semantics. While Chinese character learning presents significant challenges due to its complex visual forms and semantic depth, multimedia technology offers promising but underutilized potential to support meaningful learning. Drawing on critical analysis of prior empirical and theoretical studies, the framework aligns CTML’s design principles with Bloom’s hierarchical cognitive objectives and the meaning construction mechanisms of Cognitive Semantics. The result is a comprehensive conceptual model designed to guide the development of multimedia-assisted modules that foster deep learning. This framework offers theoretical contributions to language learning and practical implications for instructional design, particularly in ideographic languages. Future empirical validation of this framework is recommended.

References 

  • 1.

    Aidi, X. (2009, November 21–22). Cognitive overload and its countermeasures from the angle of information processing [Conference session]. 2009 Third International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application (Vol. 1, pp. 391–394), Nanchang, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/IITA.2009.278.

  • 2.

    American Institutes for Research (AIR). (2016). Does deeper learning improve student outcomes? AIR. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/Deeper-Learning-Summary-Updated-August-2016.pdf.

  • 3.

    Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

  • 4.

    Angeles, R. N., Dolovich, L., Kaczorowski, J., & Thabane, L. (2014). Developing a theoretical framework for complex community-based interventions. Health Promotion Practice, 15(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839913483469.

  • 5.

    Armstrong, P. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching, 12(05), 2023. https://health.ucdavis.edu/mdprogram/curriculum/pdfs/blooms-taxonomy-vanderbilt.pdf.

  • 6.

    Athanassiou, N., McNett, J. M., & Harvey, C. (2003). Critical thinking in the management classroom: Bloom’s taxonomy as a learning tool. Journal of Management Education, 27(5), 533–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562903252515.

  • 7.

    Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David McKay Company.

  • 8.

    Chen, Y. (2023). Teaching Chinese characters to non-native speakers: A scoping review. SHS Web of Conferences, 174, 01029. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317401029.

  • 9.

    Chen, Y. (2025). Transforming English language education with AI-driven deep learning models for scalable adaptive and inclusive assessment. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 26(12), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICT.2025.146163.

  • 10.

    Cheng, T. S., Lu, Y. C., & Yang, C. S. (2015). Using the multi-display teaching system to lower cognitive load. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 128–140. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.18.4.128.

  • 11.

    Dai, Z.H., & Yang, J. (2022). A multimedia learning for Chinese character image recognition via human-computer interaction network. Advances in Multimedia, 2022, 4427091. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4427091.

  • 12.

    Delgado-Crespo, V., Gil, V., Mur-Dueñas, P., & Pellicer-Ortín, S. (2020). Developing communication and thinking skills in English as a Foreign Language Education undergraduate students: A proposal for a syllabus model. Onomázein, 104–125. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.ne6.06.

  • 13.

    Fu, F.Y. (2018). Study on Multimedia Assisted Instruction of Elementary Chinese Comprehensive Courses for Thai Students (Master’s Thesis, Yunnan University). https://kns-cnki-net-443.webvpn.wzu.edu.cn/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbname=CMFD202001&filename=1018248984.nh.

  • 14.

    Guo, M & Guo, W. (2021). Optimizing the teaching path of literacy and writing in elementary school under the perspective of deep learning. Modern Primary and Secondary Education (08), 35–38. https://doi.org/10.16165/j.cnki.22-1096/g4.2021.08.009.

  • 15.

    Han, S. J., Kelly, P., Winters, J., & Kemp, C. (2022). Simplification Is Not Dominant in the Evolution of Chinese Characters. Open Mind: Discoveries in Cognitive Science, 6, 264–279. https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00064.

  • 16.

    Hermida, J. (2014). Facilitating deep learning: Pathways to success for university and college teachers. CRC Press.

  • 17.

    Hu, B., Xiao, S., & Chen, H. (2023). Online teaching strategies of idioms for international Chinese teachers under the digital Bloom’s theory. Journal of Technology and Chinese Language Teaching, 14(2), 44–61. http://www.tclt.us/journal/2023v14n2/huxiaochen.pdf.

  • 18.

    Jiang, D., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). Evaluating ELT multimedia courseware from the perspective of cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 726–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1359187.

  • 19.

    Jiang, S. (2017). The semantics of Chinese classifiers and linguistic relativity. Routledge.

  • 20.

    Kövecses, Z. (2012). Emotion concepts. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • 21.

    Lan, Z. (2022). Scenario-Based Teaching Design of International Trade Practice Based on Deep Learning. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 6927596. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6927596.

  • 22.

    Li, J.H. (2010). Introduction to Taxonomy of New Educational Goals. Shanghai Education Press.

  • 23.

    Li, Q. (2019). Cognitive Semantics and Its Application on Lexicography: A Case Study of Idioms with xīn in Modern Chinese Dictionary. In Workshop on Chinese Lexical Semantics (pp. 834–839). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38189-9_83.

  • 24.

    Li, W., & Mohamad, M. (2023). An efficient probabilistic deep learning model for the oral proficiency assessment of student speech recognition and classification. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11(6), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i6.7734.

  • 25.

    Lin, Y. S., Lim, J. N., & Wu, Y. S. (2022). Developing and applying a Chinese character learning game app to enhance primary school students’ abilities in identifying and using characters. Education Sciences, 12(3), 189. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030189.

  • 26.

    Liu, Y., Jang, B. G., & Roy-Campbell, Z. (2018). Optimum input mode in the modality and redundancy principles for university ESL students’ multimedia learning. Computers & Education, 127, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.025.

  • 27.

    Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: 1. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x.

  • 28.

    Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press.

  • 29.

    Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014a). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 43–72). Cambridge University Press.

  • 30.

    Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2014b). Introduction to multimedia learning. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.003.

  • 31.

    Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). Compulsory Education Chinese Curriculum Standards. Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.

  • 32.

    Mthethwa-Kunene, K., Rugube, T., & Maphosa, C. (2022). Rethinking pedagogy: Interrogating ways of promoting deeper learning in higher education. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 3(1), e02204. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/11439.

  • 33.

    National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press. http://fsba.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Education-for-life-and-work.pdf.

  • 34.

    Nguyen, P. T., & Dinh, V. T. (2024). Design and practice of human-machine cooperative international Chinese character teaching in ChatGPT application. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(9), 6269. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.6269.

  • 35.

    Nurmatova, S., & Altun, M. (2023). A comprehensive review of Bloom’s taxonomy integration to enhancing novice EFL educators’ pedagogical impact. Arab World English Journals, 14(3), 380–388. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4593934.

  • 36.

    Prismana, R. D. E., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Analysis of difficulties in mathematics problem solving based on revised Bloom’s Taxonomy viewed from high self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1008(1), 012063.

  • 37.

    Putra, J. A., Nurdin, E. A., & Fathimah, N. S. (2024). Design and Develop Interactive Multimedia Applying Problem-Based Learning to Enhance Problem-Solving Skills: Rancang Bangun Multimedia Interaktif Dengan Menerapkan Model Problem-Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Problem-Solving. Bit-Tech, 6(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v6i3.1207.

  • 38.

    Qiu, Q., Watanabe, S., & Omura, K. (2021). Emotional responses to Chinese characters: Exploration for simplified, traditional Chinese and Japanese Typefaces. International Journal of Affective Engineering, 20(2), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.5057/ijae.IJAE-D-20-00018.

  • 39.

    Ravichandran, K., & Virgin, A. B. (2024). Bloom’s taxonomy categories in the economy of literature teaching-learning process. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 5(3), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2024.v05i03.0827.

  • 40.

    Rudolph, M. (2017). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Online Higher Education, 1(2), 1–10. https://www.studocu.com/ph/document/labas-senior-high-school/bs-math/rudolph-2017-cognitive-theory-of-multimedia-learning/62690585.

  • 41.

    Scheiter, K., Fillisch, B., Krebs, M. C., Leber, J., Ploetzner, R., Renkl, A., Schmidt, H., Schüler, A., & Zimmermann, G. (2017). How to design adaptive information environments to support self-regulated learning with multimedia. In Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 203–223). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64274-1_9.

  • 42.

    She, J. H., Wang, H., Chen, L., & Chen, S. (2009a). Improvement of redundancy principle for multimedia technical foreign-language learning. International journal of computer applications in technology, 34(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCAT.2009.024078.

  • 43.

    She, J. H., Wu, C., Wang, H., & Chen, S. (2009b). Design of an e-learning system for technical Chinese courses using cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Electronics and Communications in Japan, 92(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecj.10204.

  • 44.

    Takashima, A., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). Radical repetition effects in beginning learners of Chinese as a foreign language reading. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.03.001.

  • 45.

    Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. The MIT Press.

  • 46.

    Tin, T. G., Atan, N. A., Said, M. N. H. B. M., Ali, M. F., Mohd, S., & Abd Hamid, M. Z. (2018). Integrating Animations in Chinese Character Writing Based on Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning to Promote Students’ Writing Skills. International journal of interactive mobile technologies, 12(7), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i7.9671.

  • 47.

    Tong, X., Tong, X., & McBride, C. (2017). Radical sensitivity is the key to understanding Chinese character acquisition in children. Reading and Writing, 30(6), 1251–1265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9722-8.

  • 48.

    Wang, L., Lou, Y., Li, X., Xiang, Y., Jiang, T., Che, Y., & Ye, C. (2024). GlyphGenius: Unleashing the potential of AIGC in Chinese character learning. IEEE Access, 12, 136420–136434. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3464562.

  • 49.

    Winje, Ø., & Løndal, K. (2020). Bringing deep learning to the surface: A systematic mapping review of 48 years of research in primary and secondary education. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 4(2), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.3798.

  • 50.

    Wu, S. L., Huang, L., & Polley, C. (2024). Cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition of Chinese: Theories and applications. Cambridge University Press.

  • 51.

    Xi, X., Chow, K. K., & Xia, N. (2023). The relationship between Chinese characters and artefacts: A semantics mapping analysis. The Design Journal, 26(2), 329–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022.2121071.

  • 52.

    Xie, X. (2019). Optimized Application of Multimedia Technology in Chinese Reading Teaching in Primary Schools. Learning Weekly, (20), 121–122. https://doi.org/10.16657/j.cnki.issn1673-9132.2019.20.110.

  • 53.

    Yang, C. (2025, July 25–26). Online Learning Platform of Modern Chinese Course Based on Multimodal Emotion-Aware Adaptive Learning [Conference session]. 2025 3rd International Conference on Data Science and Network Security (ICDSNS) (pp. 1–6), Tiptur, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSNS65743.2025.11168669.

  • 54.

    Yang, J. (2022). Teenage beginners’ perceptions of learning Chinese characters: A case study. Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, 6(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/25138502221050960.

  • 55.

    Yulu, J., & bin Masran, M. N. (2023). The Effect of Multimedia Technology on Deep Learning of Chinese Characters Among Primary School Students. Journal of Higher Education Theory & Practice, 23(15), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i15.6411.

  • 56.

    Zaidi, N. L. B., Grob, K. L., Monrad, S. M., Kurtz, J. B., Tai, A., Ahmed, A. Z., Gruppen, L. D., & Santen, S. A. (2018). Pushing critical thinking skills with multiple-choice questions: Does bloom’s taxonomy work? Academic Medicine, 93(6), 856–859. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002087.

  • 57.

    Zhang, J. (2024). Developing L2 Chinese Learners’ Conceptual Understanding of the Polysemous Verb Compound Verb-dao. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 46, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.46.14.

  • 58.

    Zhang, S. (2016). A blended Chinese-as-a-foreign-language short course: Design and perceptions. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 6(2), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.2016040103.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Jin, Y.-L.; Shao, B.-W.; Rakami, N. M. H. B. N.; Masran, Md. N.; Zeng, Q.-F. An Integrated Theoretical Framework for Deep Learning in Chinese Characters: Insights from Multimedia, Taxonomy, and Cognitive Semantics. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation 2026, 8 (2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.61414/32c39251.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.