As a vital global protein source, the commercial poultry industry relies on high-density breeding systems, which significantly heightens the risk of infectious disease. Broilers are particularly vulnerable at 2 to 3 weeks post-hatch due to a critical ‘immune vacuum’ caused by the waning of maternal antibodies before endogenous immunity fully matures. To address this gap, non-invasive and in-feed immunostimulants offer a cost-effective and stress-free strategy to rapidly enhance early innate defenses. This study evaluated the temporal immunological effects of a newly formulated immunostimulant administered ad libitum to 14-day-old broilers. By analyzing mRNA expression levels in the bursa of Fabricius at 3 and 7 days post-administration (dpa), we aimed to determine whether this formulation successfully bridges innate and adaptive immunity. Notably, our findings revealed a distinct sequential immune cascade: a significant early induction of antiviral genes such as interferon γ (IFNγ) and interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) at 3 dpa, followed by the robust upregulation of specific antiviral 2′-5′-oligoadenylate synthetase-like (OASL) gene and adaptive immunoglobulin Y (IgY) gene effectors at 7 dpa. Ultimately, these results suggest that this in-feed immunostimulant could be a practical strategy for enhancing broad-spectrum disease resistance in poultry farms.
- Open Access
- Article
In-Feed Immunostimulant for Broiler Chickens: Upregulation of Antiviral Genes and Immunoglobulin Y (IgY)
Author Information
Received: 01 May 2026 | Revised: 06 Aug 2026 | Accepted: 21 Sep 2026 | Published: 09 Oct 2026
Abstract
Keywords
in-feed immunostimulant | broiler chicken | antiviral gene | IFNγ | adaptive immunity
References
- 1.
Gržinić, G.; Piotrowicz-Cieślak, A.; Klimkowicz-Pawlas, A.; et al. Intensive poultry farming: A review of the impact on the environment and human health. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 160014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160014.
- 2.
OECD; FAO. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2024–2033; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1787/4c5d2cfb-en.
- 3.
Mottet, A.; Tempio, G. Global poultry production: Current state and future outlook and challenges. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2017, 73, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043933917000071.
- 4.
Swelum, A.A.; Elbestawy, A.R.; El-Saadony, M.T.; et al. Ways to minimize bacterial infections, with special reference to Escherichia coli, to cope with the first-week mortality in chicks: An updated overview. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101039.
- 5.
Bayraktar, E.; Aydin, O.; Tali, H.E.; et al. Predominance of reassortant infectious bursal disease viruses in Turkish poultry flocks. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2025.105974.
- 6.
Agnihotri, A.A.; Awandkar, S.P.; Kulkarni, M.B.; et al. Molecular phylodynamics of infectious bursal disease viruses. Virus Genes 2022, 58, 350–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-022-01905-9.
- 7.
Mosad, S.M.; Elsayed, M.M.; Hammad, E.M.; et al. Genotype classification and pathogenicity of infectious bursal disease virus circulating in vaccinated broiler chicken farms. Vet. Res. Commun. 2024, 48, 3089–3104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-024-10468-z.
- 8.
Thai, T.N.; Yoo, D.S.; Jang, I.; et al. Dynamics of the Emerging Genogroup of Infectious Bursal Disease Virus Infection in Broiler Farms in South Korea: A Nationwide Study. Viruses 2022, 14, 1604. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081604.
- 9.
Lee, K.W. Recent development on controlling necrotic enteritis in poultry. Anim. Ind. Technol. 2024, 11, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.5187/ait.2024.11.1.31.
- 10.
Valdez, G.; Shyur, L.F.; Wang, S.Y.; et al. Phytogenics in Ginger, Origanum vulgare, and Syzygium aromaticum and Their Potential as a Feed Additive against Clostridium perfringens in Broiler Production. Animals 2023, 13, 3643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13233643.
- 11.
Charlebois, A.; Parent, E.; Letourneau-Montminy, M.P.; et al. Persistence of a Clostridium perfringens Strain in a Broiler Chicken Farm over a Three-Year Period. Avian Dis. 2020, 64, 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-d-19-00112.
- 12.
Pietruska, A.; Bortoluzzi, C.; Hauck, R. A meta-analysis of the effect of Eimeria spp. and/or Clostridium perfringens infection on the microbiota of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102652.
- 13.
Husta, M.; Tretiak, S.; Ducatelle, R.; et al. Clostridium perfringens strains proliferate to high counts in the broiler small intestinal tract, in accordance with necrotic lesion severity, and sporulate in the distal intestine. Vet. Microbiol. 2023, 280, 109705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2023.109705.
- 14.
Mwangi, S.; Timmons, J.; Fitz-Coy, S.; et al. Characterization of Clostridium perfringens recovered from broiler chicken affected by necrotic enteritis. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey332.
- 15.
Rafique, S.; Jabeen, Z.; Pervaiz, T.; et al. Avian infectious bronchitis virus (AIBV) review by continent. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1325346. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1325346.
- 16.
Simancas-Racines, A.; Cadena-Ullauri, S.; Guevara-Ramírez, P.; et al. Avian Influenza: Strategies to Manage an Outbreak. Pathogens 2023, 12, 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12040610.
- 17.
Kanaujia, R.; Bora, I.; Ratho, R.K.; et al. Avian influenza revisited: Concerns and constraints. Virusdisease 2022, 33, 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-022-00800-z.
- 18.
Gadde, U.; Kim, W.H.; Oh, S.T.; et al. Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: A review. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2017, 18, 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1466252316000207.
- 19.
Abdelaziz, K.; Helmy, Y.A.; Yitbarek, A.; et al. Advances in Poultry Vaccines: Leveraging Biotechnology for Improving Vaccine Development, Stability, and Delivery. Vaccines 2024, 12, 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12020134.
- 20.
Dey, P.; Ahuja, A.; Panwar, J.; et al. Immune Control of Avian Influenza Virus Infection and Its Vaccine Development. Vaccines 2023, 11, 593. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11030593.
- 21.
Broom, L.J.; Kogut, M.H. The role of the gut microbiome in shaping the immune system of chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2018, 204, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2018.10.002.
- 22.
Awad, W.A.; Ghareeb, K.; Abdel-Raheem, S.; et al. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2009, 88, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244.
- 23.
Abdel-Latif, M.A.; El-Hamid, H.S.A.; Emam, M.; et al. Dietary lysozyme and avilamycin modulate gut health, immunity, and growth rate in broilers. BMC Vet. Res. 2024, 20, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-023-03871-2.
- 24.
Gharaibeh, S.; Mahmoud, K. Decay of maternal antibodies in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 2333–2336. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03249.
- 25.
Kaspers, B.; Schat, K.A.; Göbel, T.; et al. Avian Immunology, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021.
- 26.
Goossens, K.E.; Ward, A.C.; Lowenthal, J.W.; et al. Chicken interferons, their receptors and interferon-stimulated genes. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2013, 41, 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dci.2013.05.020.
- 27.
Schoggins, J.W. Interferon-Stimulated Genes: What Do They All Do? Annu. Rev. Virol. 2019, 6, 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-virology-092818-015756.
- 28.
Yang, W.; Liu, X.; Wang, X. The immune system of chicken and its response to H9N2 avian influenza virus. Vet. Q. 2023, 43, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2023.2228360.
- 29.
St. Paul, M.; Brisbin, J.T.; Abdul-Careem, M.F.; et al. Immunostimulatory properties of Toll-like receptor ligands in chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2013, 152, 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.10.013.
- 30.
Savan, R.; Ravichandran, S.; Collins, J.R.; et al. Structural conservation of interferon gamma among vertebrates. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2009, 20, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.02.006.
- 31.
Sekimoto, T.; Nakajima, K.; Tachibana, T.; et al. Interferon-γ-dependent Nuclear Import of Stat1 Is Mediated by the GTPase Activity of Ran/TC4. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 31017–31020. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.271.49.31017.
- 32.
Shah, M.A.A.; Song, X.; Xu, L.; et al. The DNA-induced protective immunity with chicken interferon gamma against poultry coccidiosis. Parasitol. Res. 2010, 107, 747–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1940-9.
- 33.
Xiang, C.; Yang, Z.; Xiong, T.; et al. Avian IRF1 and IRF7 Play Overlapping and Distinct Roles in Regulating IFN-Dependent and -Independent Antiviral Responses to Duck Tembusu Virus Infection. Viruses 2022, 14, 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14071506.
- 34.
Lin, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, N.; et al. Functional characterization of goose IRF1 in IFN induction and anti-NDV infection. Vet. Res. 2022, 53, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-022-01046-9.
- 35.
Liu, S.Y.; Huang, M.; Fung, T.S.; et al. Characterization of the induction kinetics and antiviral functions of IRF1, ISG15 and ISG20 in cells infected with gammacoronavirus avian infectious bronchitis virus. Virology 2023, 582, 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2023.03.017.
- 36.
Tag-El-Din-Hassan, H.T.; Sasaki, N.; Torigoe, D.; et al. Analysis of the Relationship Between Enzymatic and Antiviral Activities of the Chicken Oligoadenylate Synthetase-Like. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 2017, 37, 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.2016.0012.
- 37.
Wang, S.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; et al. OASL suppresses infectious bursal disease virus replication by targeting VP2 for degrading through the autophagy pathway. J. Virol. 2024, 98, e00181-24. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00181-24.
- 38.
Del Vesco, A.P.; Jang, H.J.; Monson, M.S.; et al. Role of the chicken oligoadenylate synthase-like gene during in vitro Newcastle disease virus infection. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101067.
- 39.
Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089.
- 40.
Pestka, S. The interferons: 50 years after their discovery, there is much more to learn. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 20047–20051. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.r700004200.
- 41.
Sheikh, E.; Tran, T.T.; Vranić, S.; et al. Role and significance of c-KIT receptor tyrosine kinase in cancer: A review. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2022, 22, 683–698. https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2021.7399.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Suite 4002 Level 4, 447 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
General Inquiries: info@sciltp.com