Loco-regional hyperthermia is one of the oldest concepts in oncology, yet its modern adoption has been constrained by two persistent problems: the inability to confine heat selectively to malignant tissue and the risk that indiscriminate warming increases tumor perfusion and promotes dissemination. Modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT), delivered as a capacitively coupled, amplitude-modulated 13.56 MHz radiofrequency current, was developed specifically to resolve these problems by exploiting the biophysical differences between cancer cells and their healthy hosts rather than relying on bulk temperature elevation. This narrative review organizes the available preclinical and clinical evidence around a single explanatory scaffold: a one-to-one correspondence between four fundamental, widely recognized challenges of contemporary oncotherapy and the specific mechanisms by which mEHT addresses each. The four challenges are poor tumor selectivity, the capacity of tumors to adapt and evade immune surveillance, the insufficiency of local control when survival depends on systemic disease, and the toxicity that erodes quality of life. We argue that mEHT addresses these, respectively, through biophysical self-focusing on the malignant membrane; multi-pathway apoptosis that overwhelms chaperone buffering and exposes damage-associated molecular patterns; immunogenic cell death that primes a systemic, abscopal antitumor response; and a benign adverse-event profile that preserves quality of life. We then trace the translational arc from in silico and in vitro mechanisms, through in vivo validation, to controlled clinical studies, including a phase III randomized trial in locally advanced cervical cancer and a meta-analysis in glioblastoma, and conclude with the limitations and the trial agenda needed to consolidate mEHT’s role as an adjuvant modality. Underlying the whole account is a set of conceptual reorientations: away from attacking the tumor’s strongest capability and toward its vulnerabilities; away from static hallmarks and toward biological processes; away from the tumor as target and toward the patient who bears it; away from a temperature-and-heat dogma and toward an alliance with the immune system and homeostasis; and away from temperature and toward an energy-based dose. We propose that mEHT is best understood as an expression of these reorientations, and that tumor shrinkage, while welcome, is not the goal; survival time and quality of life are.




