2609005213
  • Open Access
  • Article

Ternary Co-Pyrolysis of Arecanut Husk–Sewage Sludge–Red Mud in a Fixed-Bed Reactor: Product Yields, Biochar Characterization, Heavy Metal Immobilization and N/S Pollutant Suppression

  • K. H. Arunkumar

Received: 20 May 2026 | Revised: 10 Aug 2026 | Accepted: 17 Sep 2026 | Published: 22 Oct 2026

Abstract

Pyrolysis-based valorization of sewage sludge (SS) is limited by the low surface area and elevated ecological risk of the resulting biochar. This study investigated ternary co-pyrolysis of arecanut husk (ANH), municipal SS, and red mud (RM) in a fixed-bed reactor under N2 and CO2 atmospheres at 500–600 °C, to increase biochar surface area, lower heavy-metal ecological risk, and enhance hydrogen production. ANH supplied a lignocellulosic meso-channel template and high volatile matter (65.8 wt%), while RM (Fe2O3 ≥ 62 wt%) catalyzed pore development and helped immobilize heavy metals originating from SS. At the optimum condition (15% RM, N2, 500 °C), biochar surface area reached 184.6 m2/g, 2.71 times greater than the pure-SS baseline (68.2 m2/g); CO2 activation at 600 °C increased this further to 224.8 m2/g. The Hakanson Ecological Risk Index fell from 495.4 (pure SS) to 98.6 at 15% RM, meeting the EU Biochar Certificate threshold (RI < 150) for unrestricted agricultural use. Under CO2 at 500 °C, hydrogen yield reached 10.42 mmol/g, while NH3 and SO2 emissions fell by 61.3% and 54.8%, respectively, relative to the pure-SS baseline. Multi-response desirability optimization identified 15% RM, N2, 500 °C as the overall optimum among the conditions tested (D = 0.847). To the authors’ knowledge, few studies have examined ternary co-pyrolysis systems combining agricultural, municipal, and industrial waste streams under both inert and CO2-assisted atmospheres; these findings show that red mud addition can simultaneously improve biochar porosity, reduce ecotoxicological risk, and enhance hydrogen co-production from a ternary waste-derived feedstock.

References 

  • 1.

    Chen, X.; Wu, R.; Sun, Y.; et al. Synergistic Effects on the Co-pyrolysis of Agricultural Wastes and Sewage Sludge at Various Ratios. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 1264–1272. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c05884.

  • 2.

    Wang, C.; Bi, H.; Lin, Q.; et al. Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and rice husk by TG–FTIR–MS: Pyrolysis behavior, kinetics, and condensable/non-condensable gases characteristics. Renew. Energy 2020, 160, 1048–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.046.

  • 3.

    Hoang, S.A.; Bolan, N.; Madhubashani, A.M.P.; et al. Treatment processes to eliminate potential environmental hazards and restore agronomic value of sewage sludge: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 293, 118564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118564.

  • 4.

    Huang, H.J.; Yang, T.; Lai, F.Y.; et al. Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and sawdust/rice straw for the production of biochar. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2017, 125, 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2017.04.018.

  • 5.

    Zhang, C.; Yang, X.; Tan, X.; et al. Sewage sludge treatment technology under the requirement of carbon neutrality: Recent progress and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 362, 127853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127853.

  • 6.

    Ye, Y.; Hao Ngo, H.; Guo, W.; et al. A critical review on utilization of sewage sludge as environmental functional materials. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 363, 127984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127984.

  • 7.

    Cao, J.; Jiang, Y.; Tan, X.; et al. Sludge-based biochar preparation: Pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis methods, improvements, and environmental applications. Fuel 2024, 373, 132265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132265.

  • 8.

    Chen, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; et al. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics and heavy metal adsorptive performance of biochar derived from municipal sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 164, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.048.

  • 9.

    Li, B.; Ding, S.; Fan, H.; et al. Experimental Investigation into the Effect of Pyrolysis on Chemical Forms of Heavy Metals in Sewage Sludge Biochar (SSB), with Brief Ecological Risk Assessment. Materials 2021, 14, 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020447.

  • 10.

    Yuan, H.; Lu, T.; Huang, H.; et al. Influence of pyrolysis temperature on physical and chemical properties of biochar made from sewage sludge. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2015, 112, 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2015.01.010.

  • 11.

    Sunny, G.; Rajan, T.P. Review on Areca Nut Fiber and its Implementation in Sustainable Products Development. J. Nat. Fibers 2022, 19, 4747–4760. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2020.1870623.

  • 12.

    Süfer, Ö.; Tonay, A.N.; Çelebi, Y.; et al. Areca nut husk lignocellulosic fibers: A sustainable alternative to synthetic textiles. Eur. Polym. J. 2024, 221, 113531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113531.

  • 13.

    Yalçın, N.; Sevinç, V. Utilization of bauxite waste in ceramic glazes. Ceram. Int. 2000, 26, 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-8842(99)00083-8.

  • 14.

    Yang, J.; Xu, X.; Liang, S.; et al. Enhanced hydrogen production in catalytic pyrolysis of sewage sludge by red mud: Thermogravimetric kinetic analysis and pyrolysis characteristics. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 7795–7807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.018.

  • 15.

    Gao, N.; Kamran, K.; Quan, C.; et al. Thermochemical conversion of sewage sludge: A critical review. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2020, 79, 100843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100843.

  • 16.

    Oktaviana, A.A.; Hermana, J.; Syafei, A.D.; et al. Effect of pyrolysis temperature of domestic sewage sludge biochar on CO2 adsorption. Results Eng. 2025, 26, 105136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105136.

  • 17.

    Deng, W.; Hu, M.; Xu, S.; et al. Pyrolysis of sludge briquettes for the preparation of cylindrical-shaped biochar and comparison between CO2 and steam activation. Fuel 2023, 338, 127317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127317.

  • 18.

    Flynn, J.H.; Wall, L.A. A quick, direct method for the determination of activation energy from thermogravimetric data. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Lett. 1966, 4, 323–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1966.110040504.

  • 19.

    Ozawa, T. A New Method of Analyzing Thermogravimetric Data. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1965, 38, 1881–1886. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.38.1881.

  • 20.

    Kissinger, H.E. Reaction Kinetics in Differential Thermal Analysis. Anal. Chem. 1957, 29, 1702–1706. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60131a045.

  • 21.

    Akahira, T.; Sunose, T. Method of determining activation deterioration constant of electrical insulating materials. Res. Rep. Chiba Inst. Technol. 1971, 16, 22–31.

  • 22.

    Starink, M.J. The determination of activation energy from linear heating rate experiments: A comparison of the accuracy of isoconversion methods. Thermochim. Acta 2003, 404, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0040-6031(03)00144-8.

  • 23.

    Rauret, G.; López-Sánchez, J.F.; Sahuquillo, A.; et al. Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. J. Environ. Monit. 1999, 1, 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1039/a807854h.

  • 24.

    Hakanson, L. An ecological risk index for aquatic pollution control. A sedimentological approach. Water Res. 1980, 14, 975–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90143-8.

  • 25.

    Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2014-1117.

  • 26.

    Ouadi, M.; Brammer, J.G.; Yang, Y.; et al. The intermediate pyrolysis of de-inking sludge to produce a sustainable liquid fuel. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2013, 102, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2013.04.007.

  • 27.

    Oladejo, J.; Shi, K.; Luo, X.; et al. A Review of Sludge-to-Energy Recovery Methods. Energies 2019, 12, 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12010060.

  • 28.

    van Krevelen, D.W. Graphical-statistical method for the study of structure and reaction processes of coal. Fuel 1950, 29, 269–284.

  • 29.

    Stefanelli, E.; Vitolo, S.; Di Fidio, N.; et al. Tailoring the porosity of chemically activated carbons derived from the HTC treatment of sewage sludge for the removal of pollutants from gaseous and aqueous phases. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 345, 118887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118887.

  • 30.

    EBC (European Biochar Certificate). European Biochar Certificate—Guidelines for a Sustainable Production of Biochar. Available online: https://www.european-biochar.org/media/doc/2/version_en_10_1.pdf (accessed on 5 February 2025).

  • 31.

    Monsalvo, V.M.; Mohedano, A.F.; Rodriguez, J.J. Activated carbons from sewage sludge: Application to aqueous-phase adsorption of 4-chlorophenol. Desalination 2011, 277, 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.059.

  • 32.

    Zhang, J.; Shao, J.; Jin, Q.; et al. Sludge-based biochar activation to enhance Pb(II) adsorption. Fuel 2019, 252, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.096.

  • 33.

    Zhang, J.; Jin, J.; Wang, M.; et al. Co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and rice husk/bamboo sawdust for biochar with high aromaticity and low metal mobility. Environ. Res. 2020, 191, 110034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110034.

  • 34.

    Lee, G.B.; Jeong, W.G.; Tsang, Y.F.; et al. Stability assessment of heavy metals in sewage sludge pyrolysis biochar based on the chemical-enhanced primary treatment (CEPT) process. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2026, 206, 108338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2025.108338.

  • 35.

    da Silva, F.G.; Fonteles, J.L.V.; Costa, R.G.; et al. Biochar from Co-pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge Improves Plant Eco-physiology in Degraded Soils? J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2026, 26, 4773–4789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-026-03155-2.

  • 36.

    Martínez-Alvarenga, H.; Gutiérrez, M.C.; Gómez-Cámer, J.L.; et al. Integral evaluation of effective conversion of sewage sludge from WWTP into highly porous activated carbon. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 351, 119822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119822.

  • 37.

    Choudhary, R.; Verma, A.; Sharma, A.; et al. Characterization of the sewage sludge derived biochar and evaluation of its effect on growth of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. & Coss.]. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2025, 191, 107164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2025.107164.

Share this article:
How to Cite
Arunkumar, K. H. Ternary Co-Pyrolysis of Arecanut Husk–Sewage Sludge–Red Mud in a Fixed-Bed Reactor: Product Yields, Biochar Characterization, Heavy Metal Immobilization and N/S Pollutant Suppression. Thermal Science and Applications 2026, 1 (4), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.53941/tsa.2026.100021.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
Article Metrics
33
Article Views
0
Citations