The Effect of Fermentation, Malting, and Cooking on Protein Content and Fractions of Sorghum Cultivars

Wedad H. Abdelhaleem; ALmujtaba H. M. Abdallh; Abdullahi H. El Tinay; Elfadil E. Babiker

doi:10.53941/fsp.2026.100007

Abstract

This study examined the effects of fermentation, malt addition, and cooking on the protein content and protein fractions of low- (Mugud) and high-tannin (Karamaka) sorghum cultivars. The flour of the seeds of both cultivars was mixed with 5% malt. Then, the flour, with or without malt, was fermented for 16 h. Samples were taken every 4 h during fermentation to monitor changes in pH, titratable acidity, protein content, and protein fractions. Additionally, the fermented flour, with or without malt, was cooked to analyze changes in the protein fractions of the cultivars. The fermentation of flour, regardless of malt addition, elevated crude protein content and titratable acidity while reducing pH in both cultivars. A significant (p < 0.05) increase in the (globulin + albumin) percentage was noted during the fermentation of both cultivars’ flour, while other fractions exhibited variability. Cooking the fermented dough significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the fractions of both cultivars, except for G3-glutelin and insoluble proteins, which were increased significantly (p < 0.05). Malting followed by fermentation had a slight effect on the fractions, except for G3-glutelin and insoluble proteins, which were significantly (p < 0.05) reduced for both cultivars. The results revealed that adding malt to sorghum flour and fermenting it is a valuable method for improving the nutritional quality even after cooking.

References

1.
Girard, A.L.; Awika, J.M. Sorghum polyphenols and other bioactive components as functional and health promoting food ingredients. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 84, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2018.10.009.
2.
FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/?#data/QCL (accessed on 20 October 2024).
3.
de Morais Cardoso, L.; Pinheiro, S.S.; Martino, H.S.D. et al. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.): Nutrients, bioactive compounds, and potential impact on human health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2014.887057.
4.
Hegde, S.R.; Thangalakshmi, S.; Singh, R. A review of gluten and sorghum as a gluten free substitute. Trends Hortic. 2023, 6, 2840. https://doi.org/10.24294/th.v6i2.2840.
5.
Zarei, M.; Amirkolaei, A.K.; Trushenski, J.T.; et al. Sorghum as a potential valuable aquafeed ingredient: Nutritional quality and digestibility. Agriculture 2022, 12, 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050669.
6.
Maharajan, T.; Krishna, T.A.; Kiriyanthan, R.M.; et al. Improving abiotic stress tolerance in sorghum: Focus on the nutrient transporters and marker-assisted breeding. Planta 2021, 254, 90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-021-03739-5.
7.
Gupta, N.; Morya, S. Bioactive and pharmacological characterization of Chenopodium quinoa, Sorghum bicolor and Linum usitassimum: A review. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2022, 14, 1067–1084. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v14i3.3796.
8.
Singh, P.; Singh, R.; Bhadauria, V.; et al. The functionality and extraction of protein from sorghum, finger millet, and Kodo millet: A review. Inter. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 59, 512–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16747.
9.
Can Karaca, A.; Nickerson, M.; Caggia, C.; et al. Nutritional and Functional Properties of Novel Protein Sources. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 6045–6077. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2022.2067174.
10.
Bean, S.R.; Zhu, L.; Smith, B.M.; et al. Starch and protein chemistry and functional properties. In Sorghum and Millets, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2019; pp. 131–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811527-5.00006-X.
11.
Tamilselvan, T.; Kushwaha, A. Effect of traditional processing methods on the nutritional composition of sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L. Moench) flour. Eur. J. Nutr. Food Saf. 2020, 12, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.9734/EJNFS/2020/v12i730252.
12.
Bunkar, D.S.; Goyal, S.K.; Meena, K.K. et al. Nutritional, functional role of kodo millet and its processing: A review. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2021, 10, 1972–1985. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1001.229.
13.
Feyera, M. Overview of malting and fermentation role in sorghum flour, primarily for antinutrient reduction. J. Human Nutr. Food Sci. 2021, 9, 1138. https://doi.org/10.47739/2333-6706/1138.
14.
Bhise, V.J.; Chavan, J.K.; Kadam, S.S. Effects of malting on proximate composition and in vitro protein and starch digestibilities of grain sorghum. J. Food Sci. Technol. (Mysore) 1988, 25, 327–329.
15.
Ibrahim, F.S.; Babiker, E.E.; Yousif, N.E.; et al. Effect of fermentation on biochemical and sensory characteristics of sorghum flour supplemented with whey protein. Food Chem. 2005, 92, 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.07.024.
16.
AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International; AOAC: Rockville, MD, USA, 2005.
17.
Landry, J.; Moureaux, T. Heterogeneity of the glutelins of grain of corn: Selective extraction and composition in amino acid of the three isolated fractions. Bull. Société Chim. Biol. 1970, 52, 1021–1037.
18.
Knez, E.; Kadac-Czapska, K.; Grembecka, M. Effect of fermentation on the nutritional quality of the selected vegetables and legumes and their health effects. Life, 2023, 13, 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13030655.
19.
Fischer, E.; Cayot, N.; Cachon, R. Potential of Microorganisms to Decrease the “Beany” Off-Flavor: A Review. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 4493–4508. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.1c07505.
20.
Harlé, O.; Falentin, H.; Niay, J.; et al. Diversity of the metabolic profiles of a broad range of lactic acid bacteria in soy juice fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2020, 89, 103410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2019.103410.
21.
Okpalanma, E.F.; Ukpong, E.S.; Chude, C.O.; et al. Determination of malting conditions, proximate and biochemical properties of sorghum/millet grains and malts. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 6, 51–58.
22.
Canale, M.; Gugino, I.M.; Sanfilippo, R.; et al. Utilization of wheat malts as a replacement for improvers to enhance physicochemical, technological, nutritional, and sensory characteristics of bread. LWT Food Sci. Tech. 2025, 219, 117535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2025.117535.
23.
Forsido, S.F.; Hordofa, A.A.; Ayelign, A.; et al. Effects of fermentation and malt addition on the physicochemical properties of cereal based complementary foods in Ethiopia. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04606.
24.
Alhaag, H.; Yuan, X.; Mala, A.; et al. Fermentation characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus species isolated from sweet sorghum silage and their application as silage inoculants. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1247. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061247.
25.
Nkhata, S.G.; Ayua, E.; Kamau, E.H.; et al. Fermentation and germination improve nutritional value of cereals and legumes through activation of endogenous enzymes. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 2446–2458. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.846.
26.
Bello, A.A.; Gernah, D.I.; Ariahu, C.C.; et al. Physico-chemical and sensory properties of complementary foods from blends of malted and non-malted sorghum, soybean and Moringa Oleifera seed flours. Am. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 8, 1–13.
27.
Hailegiorgis, D.; Mekonnen, F.; Hailu, F.; et al. Composition and Molecular Weight Distribution of Albumin and Globulin Protein Isolates from Durum Wheat Genotypes. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2020.112011.
28.
Li, C.C.; Lu, Q.Y.; Liu, Z.P.; et al. Effects of the addition of gluten with different disulfide bonds and sulfhydryl concentrations on Chinese white noodle quality. Czech J. Food Sci. 2018, 36, 246–254. https://doi.org/10.17221/326/2017-CJFS.
29.
Shah, U.; Dwivedi, D.; Hackett, M.; et al. Physicochemical characterisation of kafirins extracted from sorghum grain and dried distillers grain with solubles related to their biomaterial functionality. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15204. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94718-z.
30.
Bhattarai, R.R.; Jayasree, T.; Joshi, T.; et al. Effects of extrusion cooking on nutritional and health attributes of sorghum and millets: Special reference to protein and starch digestibility. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2025, 60, vvae093. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijfood/vvae093.
31.
Liu, K.; Zheng, J.; Chen, F. Effect of domestic cooking on rice protein digestibility. Food Sci. Nutr. 2019, 7, 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.884.
32.
Kaur, R.; Prasad, K. Effect of malting and roasting of chickpea on functional and nutritional qualities of its protein fractions. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2022, 57, 3990–4000. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.15769.
33.
Chusova, A.E.; Zelenkova, A.V.; Novikova, I.V.; et al. Bio-processing of oats to make malt. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1052, 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1052/1/012005.
34.
Khalid, W.; Arshad, M.S.; Aslam, N.; et al. Food applications of sorghum derived kafirins potentially valuable in celiac disease. Int. J. Food Prop. 2022, 25, 2348–2363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2022.2135532.
35.
Yousefi, N.; Abbasi, S. Food proteins: Solubility & thermal stability improvement techniques. Food Chem. Adv. 2022, 1, 100090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2022.100090.

Scilight Press

Author Information

Abstract

Keywords

References

About Scilight

Journals

Publishing Policies

Contact Us