HM/
Articles/
2607004749
  • Open Access
  • Review

Resolving GPCR Activation and Signaling Dynamics by Solution NMR Spectroscopy

  • Ruibo Zhai 1,   
  • Changwen Jin 2,*,   
  • Yunfei Hu 1,*

Received: 11 May 2026 | Revised: 03 Jul 2026 | Accepted: 28 Jul 2026 | Published: 21 Oct 2026

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are inherently dynamic transmembrane receptors that recognize various extracellular stimuli and mediate diverse signaling events. NMR spectroscopy is an important method to resolve the complex conformational energy landscapes of GPCRs and to probe the dynamic receptor-ligand/receptor-transducer interactions, which are critical in modulating functional diversity but are generally lacking in the static structures obtained by cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography studies. This review summarizes current advances in applying solution NMR to study GPCR structural dynamics during activation and signaling. We cover recent progress in sample preparation and isotopic labeling strategies, as well as critical NMR experimental methodologies that help illuminate transient interactions and functional intermediates. We then highlight representative studies that utilize the power of NMR to provide unique insights into GPCR signaling mechanisms that are difficult to access by other methods.

References 

  • 1.

    Hauser, A.S.; Attwood, M.M.; Rask-Andersen, M.; Schiöth, H.B.; Gloriam, D.E. Trends in GPCR drug discovery: New agents, targets and indications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017, 16, 829–842. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2017.178.

  • 2.

    Lorente, J.S.; Sokolov, A.V.; Ferguson, G.; Schioth, H.B.; Hauser, A.S.; Gloriam, D.E. GPCR drug discovery: New agents, targets and indications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2025, 24, 458–479. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-025-01139-y.

  • 3.

    Latorraca, N.R.; Venkatakrishnan, A.J.; Dror, R.O. GPCR dynamics: Structures in motion. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00177.

  • 4.

    Conflitti, P.; Lyman, E.; Sansom, M.S.P.; Hildebrand, P.W.; Gutierrez-de-Teran, H.; Carloni, P.; Ansell, T.B.; Yuan, S.; Barth, P.; Robinson, A.S.; et al. Functional dynamics of G protein-coupled receptors reveal new routes for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2025, 24, 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-024-01083-3.

  • 5.

    Gardner, K.H.; Kay, L.E. The use of 2H, 13C, 15N multidimensional NMR to study the structure and dynamics of proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1998, 27, 357–406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.357.

  • 6.

    Ohki, S.Y.; Kainosho, M. Stable isotope labeling methods for protein NMR spectroscopy. Prog. Nucl. Mag. Res. Sp. 2008, 53, 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2008.01.003.

  • 7.

    Wu, F.J.; Williams, L.M.; Abdul-Ridha, A.; Gunatilaka, A.; Vaid, T.M.; Kocan, M.; Whitehead, A.R.; Griffin, M.D.W.; Bathgate, R.A.D.; Scott, D.J.; et al. Probing the correlation between ligand efficacy and conformational diversity at the α1A-adrenoreceptor reveals allosteric coupling of its microswitches. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 7404–7417. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.012842.

  • 8.

    Bumbak, F.; Pons, M.; Inoue, A.; Paniagua, J.C.; Yan, F.; Wu, H.; Robson, S.A.; Bathgate, R.A.D.; Scott, D.J.; Gooley, P.R.; et al. Ligands selectively tune the local and global motions of neurotensin receptor 1 (NTS1). Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112015.

  • 9.

    Bumbak, F.; Bower, J.B.; Zemmer, S.C.; Inoue, A.; Pons, M.; Paniagua, J.C.; Yan, F.; Ford, J.; Wu, H.; Robson, S.A.; et al. Stabilization of pre-existing neurotensin receptor conformational states by β-arrestin-1 and the biased allosteric modulator ML314. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38894-8.

  • 10.

    Asadollahi, K.; Rajput, S.; de Zhang, L.A.; Ang, C.S.; Nie, S.; Williamson, N.A.; Griffin, M.D.W.; Bathgate, R.A.D.; Scott, D.J.; Weikl, T.R.; et al. Unravelling the mechanism of neurotensin recognition by neurotensin receptor 1. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 8155. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44010-7.

  • 11.

    Bumbak, F.; Keen, A.C.; Gunn, N.J.; Gooley, P.R.; Bathgate, R.A.D.; Scott, D.J. Optimization and 13CH3 methionine labeling of a signaling competent neurotensin receptor 1 variant for NMR studies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2018, 1860, 1372–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.03.020.

  • 12.

    Schuster, M.; Deluigi, M.; Pantić, M.; Vacca, S.; Baumann, C.; Scott, D.J.; Plückthun, A.; Zerbe, O. Optimizing the α1B-adrenergic receptor for solution NMR studies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2020, 1862, 183354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2020.183354.

  • 13.

    Scott, D.J.; Plückthun, A. Direct molecular evolution of detergent-stable G protein-coupled receptors using polymer encapsulated cells. J. Mol. Biol. 2013, 425, 662–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2012.11.015.

  • 14.

    Clark, L.D.; Dikiy, I.; Chapman, K.; Rodstrom, K.E.; Aramini, J.; LeVine, M.V.; Khelashvili, G.; Rasmussen, S.G.; Gardner, K.H.; Rosenbaum, D.M. Ligand modulation of sidechain dynamics in a wild-type human GPCR. eLife 2017, 6, e28505. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28505.

  • 15.

    Eddy, M.T.; Lee, M.Y.; Gao, Z.G.; White, K.L.; Didenko, T.; Horst, R.; Audet, M.; Stanczak, P.; McClary, K.M.; Han, G.W.; et al. Allosteric coupling of drug binding and intracellular signaling in the A2A adenosine receptor. Cell 2018, 172, 68–80.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.004.

  • 16.

    Mizumura, T.; Kondo, K.; Kurita, M.; Kofuku, Y.; Natsume, M.; Imai, S.; Shiraishi, Y.; Ueda, T.; Shimada, I. Activation of adenosine A2A receptor by lipids from docosahexaenoic acid revealed by NMR. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaay8544. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay8544.

  • 17.

    Werner, K.; Richter, C.; Klein-Seetharaman, J.; Schwalbe, H. Isotope labeling of mammalian GPCRs in HEK293 cells and characterization of the C-terminus of bovine rhodopsin by high resolution liquid NMR spectroscopy. J. Biomol. NMR 2008, 40, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-007-9205-3.

  • 18.

    Klein-Seetharaman, J.; Reeves, P.J.; Loewen, M.C.; Getmanova, E.V.; Chung, J.; Schwalbe, H.; Wright, P.E.; Khorana, H.G. Solution NMR spectroscopy of [α-15N]lysine-labeled rhodopsin: The single peak observed in both conventional and TROSY-type HSQC spectra is ascribed to Lys-339 in the carboxyl-terminal peptide sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 3452–3457. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.052713999.

  • 19.

    Stehle, J.; Silvers, R.; Werner, K.; Chatterjee, D.; Gande, S.; Scholz, F.; Dutta, A.; Wachtveitl, J.; Klein-Seetharaman, J.; Schwalbe, H. Characterization of the simultaneous decay kinetics of metarhodopsin states II and III in rhodopsin by solution-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 2078–2084. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201309581.

  • 20.

    Franke, B.; Opitz, C.; Isogai, S.; Grahl, A.; Delgado, L.; Gossert, A.D.; Grzesiek, S. Production of isotope-labeled proteins in insect cells for NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 2018, 71, 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-018-0172-7.

  • 21.

    Gossert, A.D.; Hinniger, A.; Gutmann, S.; Jahnke, W.; Strauss, A.; Fernández, C. A simple protocol for amino acid type selective isotope labeling in insect cells with improved yields and high reproducibility. J. Biomol. NMR 2011, 51, 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-011-9570-9.

  • 22.

    Strauss, A.; Bitsch, F.; Cutting, B.; Fendrich, G.; Graff, P.; Liebetanz, J.; Zurini, M.; Jahnke, W. Amino-acid-type selective isotope labeling of proteins expressed in Baculovirus-infected insect cells useful for NMR studies. J. Biomol. NMR 2003, 26, 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024013111478.

  • 23.

    Isogai, S.; Deupi, X.; Opitz, C.; Heydenreich, F.M.; Tsai, C.J.; Brueckner, F.; Schertler, G.F.; Veprintsev, D.B.; Grzesiek, S. Backbone NMR reveals allosteric signal transduction networks in the β1-adrenergic receptor. Nature 2016, 530, 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16577.

  • 24.

    Grahl, A.; Abiko, L.A.; Isogai, S.; Sharpe, T.; Grzesiek, S. A high-resolution description of β1-adrenergic receptor functional dynamics and allosteric coupling from backbone NMR. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15864-y.

  • 25.

    Abiko, L.A.; Dias Teixeira, R.; Engilberge, S.; Grahl, A.; Muhlethaler, T.; Sharpe, T.; Grzesiek, S. Filling of a water-free void explains the allosteric regulation of the β1-adrenergic receptor by cholesterol. Nat. Chem. 2022, 14, 1133–1141. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01009-9.

  • 26.

    Wu, F.J.; Rieder, P.S.; Abiko, L.A.; Grahl, A.; Haussinger, D.; Grzesiek, S. Activation dynamics traced through a G protein-coupled receptor by 81 1H-15N NMR probes. Science 2025, 388, eadq9106. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adq9106.

  • 27.

    Tugarinov, V.; Kay, L.E. Methyl groups as probes of structure and dynamics in NMR studies of high-molecular-weight proteins. Chembiochem 2005, 6, 1567–1577. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200500110.

  • 28.

    Kofuku, Y.; Ueda, T.; Okude, J.; Shiraishi, Y.; Kondo, K.; Maeda, M.; Tsujishita, H.; Shimada, I. Efficacy of the β2-adrenergic receptor is determined by conformational equilibrium in the transmembrane region. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1045. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2046.

  • 29.

    Nygaard, R.; Zou, Y.; Dror, R.O.; Mildorf, T.J.; Arlow, D.H.; Manglik, A.; Pan, A.C.; Liu, C.W.; Fung, J.J.; Bokoch, M.P.; et al. The dynamic process of β2-adrenergic receptor activation. Cell 2013, 152, 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.008.

  • 30.

    Solt, A.S.; Bostock, M.J.; Shrestha, B.; Kumar, P.; Warne, T.; Tate, C.G.; Nietlispach, D. Insight into partial agonism by observing multiple equilibria for ligand-bound and Gs-mimetic nanobody-bound β1-adrenergic receptor. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1795. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02008-y.

  • 31.

    Xu, J.; Hu, Y.; Kaindl, J.; Risel, P.; Hubner, H.; Maeda, S.; Niu, X.; Li, H.; Gmeiner, P.; Jin, C.; et al. Conformational complexity and dynamics in a muscarinic receptor revealed by NMR spectroscopy. Mol. Cell 2019, 75, 53–65.e57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.028.

  • 32.

    Kleist, A.B.; Jenjak, S.; Sente, A.; Laskowski, L.J.; Szpakowska, M.; Calkins, M.M.; Anderson, E.I.; McNally, L.M.; Heukers, R.; Bobkov, V.; et al. Conformational selection guides β-arrestin recruitment at a biased G protein-coupled receptor. Science 2022, 377, 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj4922.

  • 33.

    Okude, J.; Ueda, T.; Kofuku, Y.; Sato, M.; Nobuyama, N.; Kondo, K.; Shiraishi, Y.; Mizumura, T.; Onishi, K.; Natsume, M.; et al. Identification of a conformational equilibrium that determines the efficacy and functional selectivity of the μ-opioid receptor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2015, 54, 15771–15776. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201508794.

  • 34.

    Cong, X.; Maurel, D.; Demene, H.; Vasiliauskaite-Brooks, I.; Hagelberger, J.; Peysson, F.; Saint-Paul, J.; Golebiowski, J.; Granier, S.; Sounier, R. Molecular insights into the biased signaling mechanism of the μ-opioid receptor. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 4165–4175.e4166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2021.07.033.

  • 35.

    Kofuku, Y.; Yokomizo, T.; Imai, S.; Shiraishi, Y.; Natsume, M.; Itoh, H.; Inoue, M.; Nakata, K.; Igarashi, S.; Yamaguchi, H.; et al. Deuteration and selective labeling of alanine methyl groups of β2-adrenergic receptor expressed in a baculovirus-insect cell expression system. J. Biomol. NMR 2018, 71, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-018-0174-5.

  • 36.

    Kofuku, Y.; Ueda, T.; Okude, J.; Shiraishi, Y.; Kondo, K.; Mizumura, T.; Suzuki, S.; Shimada, I. Functional dynamics of deuterated β2-adrenergic receptor in lipid bilayers revealed by NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 13376–13379. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201406603.

  • 37.

    Imai, S.; Yokomizo, T.; Kofuku, Y.; Shiraishi, Y.; Ueda, T.; Shimada, I. Structural equilibrium underlying ligand-dependent activation of β2-adrenoreceptor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020, 16, 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-019-0457-5.

  • 38.

    Kaneko, S.; Imai, S.; Asao, N.; Kofuku, Y.; Ueda, T.; Shimada, I. Activation mechanism of the μ-opioid receptor by an allosteric modulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2121918119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2121918119.

  • 39.

    Kaneko, S.; Imai, S.; Uchikubo-Kamo, T.; Hisano, T.; Asao, N.; Shirouzu, M.; Shimada, I. Structural and dynamic insights into the activation of the μ-opioid receptor by an allosteric modulator. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 3544. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47792-6.

  • 40.

    Opitz, C.; Isogai, S.; Grzesiek, S. An economic approach to efficient isotope labeling in insect cells using homemade 15N-, 13C- and 2H-labeled yeast extracts. J. Biomol. NMR 2015, 62, 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-015-9954-3.

  • 41.

    Eddy, M.T.; Martin, B.T.; Wuthrich, K. A2A adenosine receptor partial agonism related to structural rearrangements in an activation microswitch. Structure 2021, 29, 170–176.e173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2020.11.005.

  • 42.

    Jones, A.J.Y.; Harman, T.H.; Harris, M.; Lewis, O.E.; Ladds, G.; Nietlispach, D. Binding kinetics drive G protein subtype selectivity at the β1-adrenergic receptor. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1334. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-45680-7.

  • 43.

    Wang, X.; Liu, D.; Shen, L.; Li, F.; Li, Y.; Yang, L.; Xu, T.; Tao, H.; Yao, D.; Wu, L.; et al. A genetically encoded 19F NMR probe reveals the allosteric modulation mechanism of cannabinoid receptor 1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 16320–16325. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c06847.

  • 44.

    Larda, S.T.; Bokoch, M.P.; Evanics, F.; Prosser, R.S. Lysine methylation strategies for characterizing protein conformations by NMR. J. Biomol. NMR 2012, 54, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-012-9664-z.

  • 45.

    Bokoch, M.P.; Zou, Y.; Rasmussen, S.G.; Liu, C.W.; Nygaard, R.; Rosenbaum, D.M.; Fung, J.J.; Choi, H.J.; Thian, F.S.; Kobilka, T.S.; et al. Ligand-specific regulation of the extracellular surface of a G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature 2010, 463, 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08650.

  • 46.

    Ma, X.; Hu, Y.; Batebi, H.; Heng, J.; Xu, J.; Liu, X.; Niu, X.; Li, H.; Hildebrand, P.W.; Jin, C.; et al. Analysis of β2AR-Gs and β2AR-Gi complex formation by NMR spectroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 23096–23105. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2009786117.

  • 47.

    Sounier, R.; Mas, C.; Steyaert, J.; Laeremans, T.; Manglik, A.; Huang, W.; Kobilka, B.K.; Demene, H.; Granier, S. Propagation of conformational changes during μ-opioid receptor activation. Nature 2015, 524, 375–378. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14680.

  • 48.

    Didenko, T.; Liu, J.J.; Horst, R.; Stevens, R.C.; Wuthrich, K. Fluorine-19 NMR of integral membrane proteins illustrated with studies of GPCRs. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2013, 23, 740–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2013.07.011.

  • 49.

    Prosser, R.S.; Alonzi, N.A. Discerning conformational dynamics and binding kinetics of GPCRs by 19F NMR. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2023, 72, 102377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2023.102377.

  • 50.

    Liu, J.J.; Horst, R.; Katritch, V.; Stevens, R.C.; Wuthrich, K. Biased signaling pathways in β2-adrenergic receptor characterized by 19F NMR. Science 2012, 335, 1106–1110. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1215802.

  • 51.

    Kim, T.H.; Chung, K.Y.; Manglik, A.; Hansen, A.L.; Dror, R.O.; Mildorf, T.J.; Shaw, D.E.; Kobilka, B.K.; Prosser, R.S. The role of ligands on the equilibria between functional states of a G protein-coupled receptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 9465–9474. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja404305k.

  • 52.

    Manglik, A.; Kim, T.H.; Masureel, M.; Altenbach, C.; Yang, Z.; Hilger, D.; Lerch, M.T.; Kobilka, T.S.; Thian, F.S.; Hubbell, W.L.; et al. Structural insights into the dynamic process of β2-adrenergic receptor signaling. Cell 2015, 161, 1101–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.043.

  • 53.

    Frei, J.N.; Broadhurst, R.W.; Bostock, M.J.; Solt, A.; Jones, A.J.Y.; Gabriel, F.; Tandale, A.; Shrestha, B.; Nietlispach, D. Conformational plasticity of ligand-bound and ternary GPCR complexes studied by 19F NMR of the β1-adrenergic receptor. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 669. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14526-3.

  • 54.

    Ye, L.; Van Eps, N.; Zimmer, M.; Ernst, O.P.; Prosser, R.S. Activation of the A2A adenosine G-protein-coupled receptor by conformational selection. Nature 2016, 533, 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17668.

  • 55.

    Susac, L.; Eddy, M.T.; Didenko, T.; Stevens, R.C.; Wuthrich, K. A2A adenosine receptor functional states characterized by 19F NMR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 12733–12738. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813649115.

  • 56.

    Chai, Z.; Wu, Q.; Cheng, K.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Zhou, X.; Liu, M.; Li, C. Visualizing proteins in human cells at near-physiological concentrations with sensitive 19F NMR chemical tags. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2023, 62, e202300318. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202300318.

  • 57.

    Huang, Y.; Reddy, K.D.; Bracken, C.; Qiu, B.; Zhan, W.; Eliezer, D.; Boudker, O. Environmentally ultrasensitive fluorine probe to resolve protein conformational ensembles by 19F NMR and cryo-EM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 8583–8592. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c01003.

  • 58.

    Frere, G.A.; Hasabnis, A.; Francisco, C.B.; Suleiman, M.; Alimowska, O.; Rahmatullah, R.; Gould, J.; Su, C.Y.; Voznyy, O.; Gunning, P.T.; et al. Next-generation tags for fluorine nuclear magnetic resonance: Designing amplification of chemical shift sensitivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 3052–3064. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c09730.

  • 59.

    Boeszoermenyi, A.; Chhabra, S.; Dubey, A.; Radeva, D.L.; Burdzhiev, N.T.; Chanev, C.D.; Petrov, O.I.; Gelev, V.M.; Zhang, M.; Anklin, C.; et al. Aromatic 19F-13C TROSY: A background-free approach to probe biomolecular structure, function, and dynamics. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0334-x.

  • 60.

    Susac, L.; O’Connor, C.; Stevens, R.C.; Wuthrich, K. In-membrane chemical modification (IMCM) for site-specific chromophore labeling of GPCRs. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2015, 54, 15246–15249. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201508506.

  • 61.

    Liu, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, Z.; Jin, C.; Hu, Y. An improved cysteine-based labeling strategy for GPCR structural dynamics studies. Chem. Eur. J. 2025, 32, e01656. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202501656.

  • 62.

    Horst, R.; Liu, J.J.; Stevens, R.C.; Wuthrich, K. β2-adrenergic receptor activation by agonists studied with 19F NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2013, 52, 10762–10765. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201305286.

  • 63.

    Huang, S.K.; Pandey, A.; Tran, D.P.; Villanueva, N.L.; Kitao, A.; Sunahara, R.K.; Sljoka, A.; Prosser, R.S. Delineating the conformational landscape of the adenosine A2A receptor during G protein coupling. Cell 2021, 184, 1884–1894.e1814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.041.

  • 64.

    Huang, S.K.; Almurad, O.; Pejana, R.J.; Morrison, Z.A.; Pandey, A.; Picard, L.P.; Nitz, M.; Sljoka, A.; Prosser, R.S. Allosteric modulation of the adenosine A2A receptor by cholesterol. eLife 2022, 11, e73901. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.73901.

  • 65.

    Thakur, N.; Ray, A.P.; Sharp, L.; Jin, B.; Duong, A.; Pour, N.G.; Obeng, S.; Wijesekara, A.V.; Gao, Z.G.; McCurdy, C.R.; et al. Anionic phospholipids control mechanisms of GPCR-G protein recognition. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 794. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36425-z.

  • 66.

    Picard, L.P.; Orazietti, A.; Tran, D.P.; Tucs, A.; Hagimoto, S.; Qi, Z.; Huang, S.K.; Tsuda, K.; Kitao, A.; Sljoka, A.; et al. Balancing G protein selectivity and efficacy in the adenosine A2A receptor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2025, 21, 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01682-6.

  • 67.

    Shiraishi, Y.; Natsume, M.; Kofuku, Y.; Imai, S.; Nakata, K.; Mizukoshi, T.; Ueda, T.; Iwai, H.; Shimada, I. Phosphorylation-induced conformation of β2-adrenoceptor related to arrestin recruitment revealed by NMR. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 194. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02632-8.

  • 68.

    Heng, J.; Hu, Y.; Perez-Hernandez, G.; Inoue, A.; Zhao, J.; Ma, X.; Sun, X.; Kawakami, K.; Ikuta, T.; Ding, J.; et al. Function and dynamics of the intrinsically disordered carboxyl terminus of β2 adrenergic receptor. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37233-1.

  • 69.

    Chung, K.Y.; Kim, T.H.; Manglik, A.; Alvares, R.; Kobilka, B.K.; Prosser, R.S. Role of detergents in conformational exchange of a G protein-coupled receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 36305–36311. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.406371.

  • 70.

    Lavington, S.; Watts, A. Lipid nanoparticle technologies for the study of G protein-coupled receptors in lipid environments. Biophys. Rev. 2020, 12, 1287–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-020-00775-5.

  • 71.

    Hagn, F.; Nasr, M.L.; Wagner, G. Assembly of phospholipid nanodiscs of controlled size for structural studies of membrane proteins by NMR. Nat. Protoc. 2018, 13, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2017.094.

  • 72.

    Guo, C.; Yang, L.; Liu, Z.; Liu, D.; Wuthrich, K. Two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy of the G protein-coupled receptor A2AAR in lipid nanodiscs. Molecules 2023, 28, 5419, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28145419.

  • 73.

    Staus, D.P.; Wingler, L.M.; Pichugin, D.; Prosser, R.S.; Lefkowitz, R.J. Detergent- and phospholipid-based reconstitution systems have differential effects on constitutive activity of G-protein-coupled receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 13218–13223. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.AC119.009848.

  • 74.

    Thakur, N.; Ray, A.P.; Jin, B.; Afsharian, N.P.; Lyman, E.; Gao, Z.G.; Jacobson, K.A.; Eddy, M.T. Membrane mimetic-dependence of GPCR energy landscapes. Structure 2024, 32, 523–535.e525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2024.01.013.

  • 75.

    Mendoza-Hoffmann, F.; Guo, C.; Song, Y.; Feng, D.; Yang, L.; Wuthrich, K. 19F NMR studies of the impact of different detergents and nanodiscs on the A2A adenosine receptor. J. Biomol. NMR 2024, 78, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-023-00430-7.

  • 76.

    Wu, F.J.; Rieder, P.S.; Abiko, L.A.; Rossler, P.; Gossert, A.D.; Haussinger, D.; Grzesiek, S. Nanobody GPS by PCS: An efficient new NMR analysis method for G protein coupled receptors and other large proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 21728–21740. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c09692.

  • 77.

    Palmer, A.G., 3rd. NMR characterization of the dynamics of biomacromolecules. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3623–3640. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030413t.

  • 78.

    Sun, H.; Kay, L.E.; Tugarinov, V. An optimized relaxation-based coherence transfer NMR experiment for the measurement of side-chain order in methyl-protonated, highly deuterated proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 14878–14884. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp209049k.

  • 79.

    Mittermaier, A.; Kay, L.E. New tools provide new insights in NMR studies of protein dynamics. Science 2006, 312, 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124964.

  • 80.

    Vallurupalli, P.; Sekhar, A.; Yuwen, T.; Kay, L.E. Probing conformational dynamics in biomolecules via chemical exchange saturation transfer: A primer. J. Biomol. NMR 2017, 67, 243–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10858-017-0099-4.

  • 81.

    Pan, B.; Liu, D.; Yang, L.; Wuthrich, K. GPCR large-amplitude dynamics by 19F NMR of aprepitant bound to the neurokinin 1 receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2122682119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2122682119.

  • 82.

    Gong, Z.; Zhang, X.; Liu, M.; Jin, C.; Hu, Y. Visualizing agonist-induced M2 receptor activation regulated by aromatic ring dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2025, 122, e2418559122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2418559122.

  • 83.

    Huang, S.K.; Picard, L.P.; Rahmatullah, R.S.M.; Pandey, A.; Van Eps, N.; Sunahara, R.K.; Ernst, O.P.; Sljoka, A.; Prosser, R.S. Mapping the conformational landscape of the stimulatory heterotrimeric G protein. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2023, 30, 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-023-00957‑1.

  • 84.

    Zhai, R.; Wang, Z.; Chai, Z.; Niu, X.; Li, C.; Jin, C.; Hu, Y. Distinct activation mechanisms of β-arrestin-1 revealed by 19F NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7865. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43694-1.

  • 85.

    Shiraishi, Y.; Kofuku, Y.; Ueda, T.; Pandey, S.; Dwivedi-Agnihotri, H.; Shukla, A.K.; Shimada, I. Biphasic activation of β-arrestin 1 upon interaction with a GPCR revealed by methyl-TROSY NMR. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7158. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27482-3.

  • 86.

    Yang, F.; Yu, X.; Liu, C.; Qu, C.X.; Gong, Z.; Liu, H.D.; Li, F.H.; Wang, H.M.; He, D.F.; Yi, F.; et al. Phospho-selective mechanisms of arrestin conformations and functions revealed by unnatural amino acid incorporation and 19F NMR. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8202. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9202.

  • 87.

    Yang, F.; Xiao, P.; Qu, C.X.; Liu, Q.; Wang, L.Y.; Liu, Z.X.; He, Q.T.; Liu, C.; Xu, J.Y.; Li, R.R.; et al. Allosteric mechanisms underlie GPCR signaling to SH3-domain proteins through arrestin. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018, 14, 876–886. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-018-0115-3.

  • 88.

    Liu, Q.; He, Q.T.; Lyu, X.; Yang, F.; Zhu, Z.L.; Xiao, P.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, F.; Yang, Z.Y.; Wang, X.Y.; et al. DeSiphering receptor core-induced and ligand-dependent conformational changes in arrestin via genetic encoded trimethylsilyl 1H NMR probe. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18433-5.

  • 89.

    He, Q.T.; Xiao, P.; Huang, S.M.; Jia, Y.L.; Zhu, Z.L.; Lin, J.Y.; Yang, F.; Tao, X.N.; Zhao, R.J.; Gao, F.Y.; et al. Structural studies of phosphorylation-dependent interactions between the V2R receptor and arrestin-2. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22731-x.

Share this article:
Download PDF
DOI
10.53941/hm.2026.100024
Issue
Volume 3, Issue 4
How to Cite
Zhai, R.; Jin, C.; Hu, Y. Resolving GPCR Activation and Signaling Dynamics by Solution NMR Spectroscopy. Health and Metabolism 2026, 3 (4), 2. https://doi.org/10.53941/hm.2026.100024.
RIS
BibTex
Copyright & License
article copyright Image
Copyright (c) 2026 by the authors.
Article Metrics
44
Article Views
0
Citations